<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="container content-width3" style="--font-size:20px;">
      <div class="header reader-header reader-show-element"> <font
          size="-2"><a class="domain reader-domain"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/opinion/sunday/kashmir-siege-modi.html?fbclid=IwAR0uK36dBOZ78mZCcSJ-SB5tLN65TRYj5ElETz-gp3Bnnaqcgbo0PgLF4yM">https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/opinion/sunday/kashmir-siege-modi.html?fbclid=IwAR0uK36dBOZ78mZCcSJ-SB5tLN65TRYj5ElETz-gp3Bnnaqcgbo0PgLF4yM</a></font>
        <h1 class="reader-title">The Silence Is the Loudest Sound</h1>
        <p><font size="+1"><b>The Indian government has confined about
              seven million Kashmiris to their homes and imposed a
              complete communications blackout</b></font></p>
        <div class="meta-data">
          <div class="reader-estimated-time">Arundhati Roy - August 15,
            2019<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div class="moz-reader-content line-height4 reader-show-element">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <article id="story"><span itemprop="hasPart" itemscope=""
                itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPageElement"></span>
              <section name="articleBody" itemprop="articleBody">
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>NEW DELHI — As India celebrates her 73rd year of
                      independence from British rule, ragged children
                      thread their way through traffic in Delhi, selling
                      outsized national flags and souvenirs that say,
                      “Mera Bharat Mahan.” My India is Great. Quite
                      honestly, it’s hard to feel that way right now,
                      because it looks very much as though our
                      government has gone rogue.</p>
                    <p>Last week it <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/opinion/modis-majoritarian-march-to-kashmir.html?module=inline"
                        title="">unilaterally breached </a>the
                      fundamental conditions of the Instrument of
                      Accession, by which the former Princely State of
                      Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India in 1947. In
                      preparation for this, at midnight on Aug. 4, it
                      turned all of <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/10/world/asia/kashmir-india-pakistan.html?module=inline"
                        title="">Kashmir into a giant prison camp</a>.
                      Seven million Kashmiris were barricaded in their
                      homes, internet connections were cut and their
                      phones went dead.</p>
                    <p>On Aug. 5, India’s home minister proposed in
                      Parliament that <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/world/asia/india-pakistan-crisis.html?module=inline"
                        title="">Article 370 of the Indian Constitution</a>
                      (the article that <a
href="https://thewire.in/law/murder-of-insaniyat-and-of-indias-solemn-commitment-to-kashmir"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">outlines the legal obligations </a>that
                      arise from the Instrument of Accession) be
                      overturned. The opposition parties rolled over. By
                      the next evening the Jammu and Kashmir
                      Reorganization Act, 2019 had been passed by the
                      upper as well as the lower house.</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>The act strips the State of Jammu and Kashmir of
                    its special status — which includes its right to
                    have its own constitution and its own flag. It also
                    strips it of statehood and partitions it into two
                    Union territories. The first, Jammu and Kashmir,
                    will be administered directly by the central
                    government in New Delhi, although it will continue
                    to have a locally elected legislative assembly but
                    one with drastically reduced powers. The second,
                    Ladakh, will be <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/opinion/modis-majoritarian-march-to-kashmir.html?module=inline"
                      title="">administered directly from New Delhi</a>
                    and will not have a legislative assembly. </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>The passing of the act was welcomed in Parliament
                      by the very British tradition of desk-thumping.
                      There was a distinct whiff of colonialism in the
                      air. The masters were pleased that a recalcitrant
                      colony had finally, formally, been brought under
                      the crown. For its own good. Of course.</p>
                    <p>Indian citizens can now buy land and settle in
                      their new domain. The new territories are open for
                      business. Already India’s richest industrialist,
                      Mukesh Ambani, of Reliance Industries, has
                      promised several “announcements.” What this might
                      mean to <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/01/opinion/himalayas-mountains-dams.html?module=inline"
                        title="">the fragile Himalayan ecology</a> of
                      Ladakh and Kashmir, the land of vast glaciers,
                      high-altitude lakes and five major rivers, barely
                      bears consideration.</p>
                    <p>The dissolution of the legal entity of the state
                      also means the dissolution of Article 35A, which
                      granted residents <a
href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/08/kashmir-special-status-explained-articles-370-35a-190805054643431.html"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">rights and privileges</a> that
                      made them stewards of their own territory. So,
                      “being open for business,” it must be clarified,
                      can also include Israeli-style settlements and
                      Tibet-style population transfers.</p>
                    <p>For Kashmiris, in particular, this has been an
                      old, primal fear. Their recurring nightmare (an
                      inversion of the one being peddled by Donald
                      Trump) of being swept away by a tidal wave of
                      triumphant Indians wanting a little home in their
                      sylvan valley could easily come true.</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>As news of the new act spread, Indian
                      nationalists of all stripes cheered. The
                      mainstream media, for the most part, made a low,
                      sweeping bow. There was dancing in the streets and
                      horrifying misogyny on the internet. Manohar Lal
                      Khattar, chief minister of the state of Haryana,
                      bordering Delhi, while speaking about the
                      improvement he had brought about in the skewed
                      gender ratio in his state<a
                        href="https://twitter.com/manakgupta/status/1160083098253455360"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">, joked</a>: “Our Dhakarji used
                      to say we will bring in girls from Bihar. Now they
                      say Kashmir is open, we can bring girls from
                      there.”</p>
                    <p>Amid these vulgar celebrations the loudest sound,
                      however, is <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/10/world/asia/kashmir-india-pakistan.html?module=inline"
                        title="">the deathly silence from Kashmir’s
                        patrolled, barricaded streets</a> and its
                      approximately seven million caged, humiliated
                      people, stitched down by razor wire, spied on by
                      drones, living under a complete communications
                      blackout. That in this age of information, a
                      government can so easily cut off a whole
                      population from the rest of the world for days at
                      a time, says something serious about the times we
                      are heading toward.</p>
                    <p>Kashmir, they often say, is the unfinished
                      business of the “Partition.” That word suggests
                      that in 1947, when the <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/18/opinion/india-pakistan-partition-imperial-britain.html?module=inline"
                        title="">British drew their famously careless
                        border </a>through the subcontinent, there was
                      a “whole” that was then partitioned. In truth,
                      there was no “whole.” Apart from the territory of
                      British India, there were hundreds of sovereign
                      principalities, each of which individually
                      negotiated the terms on which it would merge with
                      either India or Pakistan. Many that<a
                        href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24159594"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank"> did not wish to merge</a> were
                      forced to.</p>
                    <p>While Partition and the horrifying violence that
                      it caused is a deep, unhealed wound in the memory
                      of the subcontinent, the violence of those times,
                      as well as in the years since, in India and
                      Pakistan, has as much to do with assimilation as
                      it does with partition. In India the project of
                      assimilation, which goes under the banner of
                      nation-building, has meant that there has not been
                      a single year since 1947 when the Indian Army has
                      not been deployed within India’s borders against
                      its “own people.” The list is long — Kashmir,
                      Mizoram, Nagaland, Manipur, Hyderabad, Assam.</p>
                    <p>The business of assimilation has been complicated
                      and painful and has cost tens of thousands of
                      lives. What is unfolding today on both sides of
                      the border of the erstwhile state of Jammu and
                      Kashmir is the unfinished business of
                      assimilation.</p>
                    <p>What happened in the Indian Parliament last week
                      was tantamount to cremating the <a
href="https://thewire.in/history/public-first-time-jammu-kashmirs-instrument-accession-india"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Instrument of Accession</a>. It
                      was a document with a complicated provenance that
                      had been signed by a discredited king, the Dogra
                      Hindu King, Maharaja Hari Singh. His unstable,
                      tattered kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir lay on the
                      fault lines of the new border between India and
                      Pakistan.</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>The rebellions that had broken out against him in
                      1945 had been aggravated and subsumed by the
                      spreading bush fires of Partition. In the western
                      mountain district of Poonch, Muslims, who were the
                      majority, turned on the Maharaja’s forces and on
                      Hindu civilians. In Jammu, to the south, the
                      Maharaja’s forces assisted by troops borrowed from
                      other princely states, massacred Muslims.
                      Historians and news reports of the time estimated
                      that somewhere between <a
                        href="https://kashmirlife.net/circa-1947-a-long-story-67652/"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">70,000 and 200,000 were murdered</a>
                      in the streets of the city, and in its neighboring
                      districts.</p>
                    <p>Inflamed by the news of the Jammu massacre,
                      Pakistani “irregulars” swooped down from the
                      mountains of the North Western Frontier Province,
                      burning and pillaging their way across the Kashmir
                      Valley. Hari Singh fled from Kashmir to Jammu from
                      where he appealed to Jawaharlal Nehru, the Indian
                      prime minister, for help. The document that
                      provided legal cover for the Indian Army to enter
                      Kashmir was the <a
href="https://thewire.in/history/public-first-time-jammu-kashmirs-instrument-accession-india"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Instrument of Accession</a>. </p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>The Indian Army, with some help from local
                      people, pushed back the Pakistani “irregulars,”
                      but only as far as the ring of mountains on the
                      edge of the valley. The former Dogra kingdom now
                      lay divided between India and Pakistan. The
                      Instrument of Accession was meant to be <a
                        href="https://undocs.org/S/RES/47(1948)"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">ratified by a referendum</a> to
                      ascertain the will of the people of Jammu and
                      Kashmir. That promised referendum never took
                      place. So was born the subcontinent’s most
                      intractable and dangerous political problem. </p>
                    <p>In the 72 years since then, successive Indian
                      governments have undermined terms of the
                      Instrument of Accession until all that was left of
                      it was the skeletal structure. Now even that has
                      been shot to hell.</p>
                    <p>It would be foolhardy to try to summarize the
                      twists and turns of how things have come to this.
                      Let’s just say that it’s as complicated and as
                      dangerous as the games the United States played
                      with its puppet regimes in South Vietnam all
                      through the 50s and 60s.</p>
                    <p>After a long history of electoral manipulation,
                      the watershed moment came in 1987 when New Delhi
                      flagrantly rigged the state elections. By 1989,
                      the thus far mostly nonviolent demand for
                      self-determination grew into a <a
                        href="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2000/09/21/death-in-kashmir/"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">full-throated freedom struggle</a>.
                      Hundreds of thousands of people poured onto the
                      streets only to be cut down in massacre after
                      massacre. </p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>The Kashmir valley soon thronged with militants,
                    Kashmiri men from both sides of the border, as well
                    as foreign fighters, trained and armed by Pakistan
                    and embraced, for the most part, by the Kashmiri
                    people. Once again, Kashmir was caught up in the
                    political winds that were blowing across the
                    subcontinent — an increasingly radicalized Islam
                    from Pakistan and Afghanistan, quite foreign to
                    Kashmiri culture, and the fanatical Hindu
                    nationalism that was on the rise in India.</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>The first casualty of the uprising was the
                      age-old bond between Kashmir’s Muslims and its
                      tiny minority of Hindus, known locally as Pandits.
                      When the violence began, according to the Kashmiri
                      Pandit Sangharsh Samiti, or the K.P.S.S., an
                      organization run by Kashmiri Pandits, about 400
                      Pandits were targeted and murdered by militants.
                      By the <a
href="https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/why-kashmiris-want-a-fair-probe-into-the-killings-of-pandits-prosecution-of-guilty-4786855/"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">end of 1990</a>, according to a
                      government estimate, 25,000 Pandit families had
                      left the valley.</p>
                    <p>They lost their homes, their homeland and
                      everything they had. Over the years thousands more
                      left — <a
href="https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/kashmirtheforgottenconflict/2011/07/2011724204546645823.html"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">almost the entire population</a>.
                      As the conflict continued, in addition to tens of
                      thousands of Muslims, the K.P.S.S. says 650<a
href="https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/kashmirtheforgottenconflict/2011/07/201176134818984961.html"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank"> Pandits have been killed </a>in
                      the conflict.</p>
                    <p>Since then, great numbers of Pandits have lived
                      in miserable refugee camps in Jammu city. Thirty
                      years have gone by, yet successive governments in
                      New Delhi have not tried to help them return home.
                      They have preferred instead to keep them in limbo,
                      and stir their anger and understandable bitterness
                      into a mephitic brew with which to fuel India’s
                      dangerous and extremely effective nationalistic
                      narrative about Kashmir. In this version, a single
                      aspect of an epic tragedy is cannily and noisily
                      used to draw a curtain across the rest of the
                      horror. </p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>Today Kashmir is one of the most or perhaps <em>the</em>
                    most densely militarized zone in the world. More
                    than a half-million soldiers have been deployed to
                    counter what the army itself admits is now just a
                    handful of “terrorists.” If there were any doubt
                    earlier it should be abundantly clear by now that
                    their real enemy is the Kashmiri people. What India
                    has done in Kashmir over the last 30 years is
                    unforgivable. An estimated 70,000 people, civilians,
                    militants and security forces have been killed in
                    the conflict. <a
href="https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2008/0201/p07s03-wosc.html"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Thousands
                      have been “disappeared,”</a> and tens of thousands
                    have passed through torture chambers that dot the
                    valley like <a
href="http://jkccs.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/TORTURE-Indian-State%E2%80%99s-Instrument-of-Control-in-Indian-administered-Jammu-and-Kashmir.pdf"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">a
                      network of small-scale Abu Ghraibs</a>. </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>Over the last few years, hundreds of <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/asia/pellet-guns-used-in-kashmir-protests-cause-dead-eyes-epidemic.html?module=inline"
                      title="">teenagers have been blinded</a> by the
                    use of pellet-firing shotguns, the security
                    establishment’s new weapon of choice for crowd
                    control. Most militants operating in the valley
                    today are young Kashmiris, armed and trained
                    locally. They do what they do knowing full well that
                    the minute they pick up a gun, their “shelf life” is
                    unlikely to be more than six months. Each time a
                    “terrorist” is killed, Kashmiris turn up in their
                    tens of thousands to bury a young man whom they
                    revere as a <em>shaheed</em>, a martyr.</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>These are only the rough coordinates of a
                      30-year-old military occupation. The most cruel
                      effects of an occupation that has lasted decades
                      are impossible to describe in an account as short
                      as this.</p>
                    <p>In Narendra Modi’s first term as India’s prime
                      minister, his hard-line approach exacerbated the
                      violence in Kashmir. In February, after a <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/02/opinion/sunday/kashmir-india-pakistan.html?module=inline"
                        title="">Kashmiri suicide bomber</a> killed 40
                      Indian security personnel, India launched an
                      airstrike against Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated.
                      They became the first two nuclear powers in
                      history to actually launch airstrikes against each
                      other. Now two months into Narendra Modi’s second
                      term, his government has played its most dangerous
                      card of all. It has tossed a lit match into a
                      powder keg.</p>
                    <p>If that were not bad enough, the cheap, deceitful
                      way in which it did it is disgraceful. In the last
                      week of July, 45,000 extra troops were <a
href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/before-abolishing-article-370-indian-army-identified-possible-trouble-spots-in-kashmir/articleshow/70583869.cms"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">rushed into Kashmir </a>on
                      various pretexts. The one that got the most
                      traction was that there was a Pakistani “terror”
                      threat to the <a
href="https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-india-kashmir-pilgrimage/india-boosts-hindu-pilgrimage-to-holy-cave-in-conflict-torn-kashmir-idUKKCN1UN04Q"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Amarnath Yatra</a> — the annual
                      pilgrimage in which hundreds of thousands of Hindu
                      devotees trek (or are carried by Kashmiri porters)
                      through high mountains to visit the Amarnath cave
                      and pay their respects to a natural ice formation
                      that they believe is an avatar of Shiva.</p>
                    <p>On Aug. 1, some Indian <a
                        href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ta1Dj9LHgM"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">television networks announced</a>
                      that a land mine with Pakistani Army markings on
                      it had been found on the pilgrimage route. On Aug.
                      2, the government published a notice asking all
                      pilgrims (and even tourists who were miles from
                      the pilgrimage route) to <a
href="https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/leave-kashmir-j-k-administration-issues-security-advisory-for-amarnath-pilgrims-1576494-2019-08-02"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">leave the valley immediately</a>.
                      That set off a panicky exodus. The approximately
                      200,000 Indian migrant day laborers in Kashmir
                      were clearly not a concern to those supervising
                      the evacuation. Too poor to matter, I’m guessing.
                      By Saturday, Aug. 3, tourists and pilgrims had
                      left and the security forces had taken up position
                      across the valley.</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>By midnight Sunday, Kashmiris were barricaded in
                      their homes, and all communication networks went
                      down. The next morning, we learned that, along
                      with several hundred others, three former chief
                      ministers, Farooq Abdullah, his son, Omar Abdullah
                      of the National Conference and <a
href="https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/mehbooba-mufti-omar-abdullah-arrested-after-scrapping-of-article-370-1565015217174.html"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Mehbooba Mufti of the People’s
                        Democratic Party</a>, had been arrested. Those
                      are the mainstream pro-India politicians who have
                      carried India’s water through the years of
                      insurrection.</p>
                    <p>Newspapers report that the Jammu & Kashmir
                      police force <a
href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/disarmed-fall-guys-of-article-370/cid/1696748"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">has been disarmed</a>. More than
                      anybody else, these local police men have put
                      their bodies on the front line, have done the
                      groundwork, provided the apparatus of the
                      occupation with the intelligence that it needs,
                      done the brutal bidding of their masters and, for
                      their pains, earned the contempt of their own
                      people. All to keep the Indian flag flying in
                      Kashmir. And now, when the situation is nothing
                      short of explosive, they are going to be fed to
                      the furious mob like so much cannon fodder.</p>
                    <p>The betrayal and public humiliation of India’s
                      allies by Narendra Modi’s government comes from a
                      kind of hubris and ignorance that has gutted the
                      sly, elaborate structures painstakingly cultivated
                      over decades by cunning, but consummate, Indian
                      statecraft. Now that that’s done — it is down to
                      the Street vs. the Soldier. Apart from what it
                      does to the young Kashmiris on the street, it is
                      also a preposterous thing to do to soldiers.</p>
                    <p>The more militant sections of the Kashmiri
                      population, who have been demanding the right to
                      self-determination or merger with Pakistan, have
                      little regard for India’s laws or constitution.
                      They will no doubt be pleased that those they see
                      as collaborators have been sold down the river and
                      that the game of smoke and mirrors is finally
                      over. It might be too soon for them to rejoice.
                      Because as sure as eggs are eggs and fish are
                      fish, there will be new smoke and new mirrors. And
                      new political parties. And a new game in town.</p>
                    <p>On Aug. 8, four days into the lockdown, <a
                        href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0bNYhPJnxk"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Narendra Modi appeared on
                        television</a> to address an ostensibly
                      celebrating India and an incarcerated Kashmir. He
                      sounded like a changed man. Gone was his customary
                      aggression and his jarring, accusatory tone.
                      Instead he spoke with the tenderness of a young
                      mother. It’s his most chilling avatar to date.</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>His voice quivered and his eyes shone with
                    unspilled tears as he listed the slew of benefits
                    that would rain down on the people of the former
                    State of Jammu and Kashmir, now that it was rid of
                    its old, corrupt leaders, and was going to be ruled
                    directly from New Delhi. He evoked the marvels of
                    Indian modernity as though he were educating a bunch
                    of feudal peasants who had emerged from a time
                    capsule. He spoke of how Bollywood films would once
                    again be shot in their verdant valley.</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>He didn’t explain why Kashmiris needed to be
                      locked down and put under a communications
                      blockade while he delivered his stirring speech.
                      He didn’t explain why the decision that supposedly
                      benefited them so hugely was taken without
                      consulting them. He didn’t say how the great gifts
                      of Indian democracy could be enjoyed by a people
                      who live under a military occupation. He
                      remembered to greet them in advance for Eid, a few
                      days away. But he didn’t promise that the lockdown
                      would be lifted for the festival. It wasn’t.</p>
                    <p>The next morning, the Indian newspapers and
                      several liberal commentators, including some of
                      Narendra Modi’s most trenchant critics gushed over
                      his moving speech. Like true colonials, many in
                      India who are so alert to infringements of their
                      own rights and liberties, have a completely
                      different standard for Kashmiris.</p>
                    <p>On Thursday, Aug. 15, in his Independence Day
                      speech, Narendra Modi boasted from the ramparts of
                      Delhi’s Red Fort that his government finally had
                      achieved India’s dream of “<a
href="https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-india-independenceday-modi/indias-modi-trumpets-kashmir-muslim-marriage-moves-in-independence-day-speech-idUKKCN1V50K4"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">One Nation, One Constitution,</a>”
                      with his Kashmir move. But just the previous
                      evening, <a
href="https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/kashmir-effect-rebel-groups-ban-independence-day-celebrations-in-northeast-1580947-2019-08-14"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">rebel groups in several troubled
                        states in the north east of India</a>, many of
                      which have Special Status like the erstwhile State
                      of Jammu and Kashmir, announced a boycott of
                      Independence Day. While Narendra Modi’s Red Fort
                      audience cheered, about seven million Kashmiris
                      remained locked down. The communication shutdown,
                      we now hear, could be extended for some time to
                      come.</p>
                    <p>When it ends, as it must, the violence that will
                      spiral out of Kashmir will inevitably spill into
                      India. It will be used to further inflame the <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/opinion/india-muslims-hindus-partition.html?module=inline"
                        title="">hostility against Indian Muslims</a>
                      who are already being demonized, ghettoized,
                      pushed down the economic ladder, and, with
                      terrifying regularity, <a
                        href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFRuKs7ZfEk"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">lynched</a>. The state will use
                      it as an opportunity to close in on others, too —
                      the activists, lawyers, artists, students,
                      intellectuals, journalists — who have protested
                      courageously and openly.</p>
                    <p>The danger will come from many directions. The
                      most powerful organization in India, the far-right
                      Hindu nationalist <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/02/magazine/the-other-face-of-fanaticism.html?module=inline"
                        title="">Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or the
                        R.S.S.</a>, with more than 600,000 members
                      including Narendra Modi and many of his ministers,
                      has a trained “volunteer” militia, inspired by
                      Mussolini’s Black Shirts. With each passing day,
                      the R.S.S. tightens its grip on every institution
                      of the Indian state. In truth, it has reached a
                      point when it more or less <em>is </em>the
                      state. </p>
                    <p>In the benevolent shadow of such a state,
                      numerous smaller <a
href="https://caravanmagazine.in/vantage/the-rss-bhonsala-military-school-dhirendra-k-jha"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Hindu vigilante organizations</a>,
                      the storm troopers of the Hindu Nation, have
                      mushroomed across the country, and are
                      conscientiously going about their deadly business.
                    </p>
                    <p><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/magazine/gauri-lankesh-murder-journalist.html?module=inline"
                        title="">Intellectuals and academics</a> are a
                      major preoccupation. In May, the morning after the
                      Bharatiya Janata Party won the general elections,
                      Ram Madhav, a general secretary of the party and a
                      former spokesman for the R.S.S., wrote that the
                      “remnants” of the “pseudo-secular/liberal cartels
                      that held a disproportionate sway and stranglehold
                      over the intellectual and policy establishment of
                      the country … <a
href="https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/lok-sabha-elections-result-narendra-modi-bjp-government-congress-5745313/"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">need to be discarded </a>from
                      the country’s academic, cultural and intellectual
                      landscape.”</p>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p>On Aug. 1, in preparation for that “discarding,”
                    the <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2010/07/27/back-future/indias-2008-counterterrorism-laws"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">already
                      draconian</a> Unlawful Activities Prevention Act
                    was amended to expand the definition of “terrorist”
                    to include individuals, not just organizations. The
                    amendment allows the government <a
href="https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/uapa-amendment-bill-gets-rajya-sabha-approval/article28796520.ece"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">to
                      designate any individual as a terrorist </a>without
                    following the due process of a First Information
                    Report, charge sheet, trial and conviction. Just who
                    — just what kind of individuals it means — was clear
                    when in Parliament, Amit Shah, our chilling <a
                      href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnd_ELCFhCM"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">home
                      minister, </a>said: “Sir, guns do not give rise
                    to terrorism, the <a
                      href="https://thewire.in/rights/uapa-bjp-terrorist-amit-shah-nia"
                      title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">root
                      of terrorism is the propaganda</a> that is done to
                    spread it … And if all such individuals are
                    designated terrorists, I don’t think any member of
                    Parliament should have any objection.”</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p>Several of us felt his cold eyes staring straight
                      at us. It didn’t help to know that he has done
                      time as the main accused in a series of murders in
                      his home state, Gujarat. His trial judge, Justice
                      <a href="https://caravanmagazine.in/tag/loya"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Brijgopal Harkishen Loya</a>,
                      died mysteriously during the trial and was
                      replaced by another who acquitted him speedily.
                      Emboldened by all this, far-right television
                      anchors on hundreds of India’s news networks, now
                      openly denounce dissidents, make wild allegations
                      about them and call for their arrest, or worse.
                      “Lynched by TV,” is likely to be the new political
                      phenomenon in India.</p>
                    <p>As the world looks on, the architecture of Indian
                      fascism is quickly being put into place.</p>
                    <p>I was booked to fly to Kashmir to see some
                      friends on July 28. The whispers about trouble,
                      and troops being flown in, had already begun. I
                      was of two minds about going. A friend of mine and
                      I were chatting about it at my home. He is a
                      senior doctor at a government hospital who has
                      dedicated his life to public service, and happens
                      to be Muslim. We started talking about the new
                      phenomenon of mobs surrounding people, Muslims in
                      particular, and forcing them to chant “<a
                        href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-48882053"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Jai Shri Ram</a>!” (“Victory to
                      Lord Ram!”)</p>
                    <p>If Kashmir is occupied by security forces, India
                      is occupied by the mob.</p>
                    <p>He said he had been thinking about that, too,
                      because he often drove on the highways out of
                      Delhi to visit his family who live some hours
                      away.</p>
                    <p>“I could easily be stopped,” he said.</p>
                    <p>“You must say it then,” I said. “You must
                      survive.”</p>
                    <p>“I won’t,” he said, “because they’ll kill me
                      either way. That’s what they did to <a
href="https://indianexpress.com/article/india/tabrez-ansari-18th-mob-violence-victim-in-jharkhand-in-three-years-5808122/"
                        title="" rel="noopener noreferrer"
                        target="_blank">Tabrez Ansari</a>.”</p>
                    <p>These are the conversations we are having in
                      India while we wait for Kashmir to speak. And
                      speak it surely will.</p>
                    <p>Arundhati Roy is the author of the novel “The
                      Ministry of Utmost Happiness.” Her most recent
                      book is a collection of essays, “My Seditious
                      Heart.” </p>
                    <p><em>The Times is committed to publishing </em><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html"
                        title=""><em>a diversity of letters</em></a><em>
                        to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think
                        about this or any of our articles. Here are some
                      </em><a
href="https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor"
                        title=""><em>tips</em></a><em>. And here’s our
                        email: </em><a
                        href="mailto:letters@nytimes.com" title=""><em>letters@nytimes.com</em></a><em>.</em></p>
                    <p><em></em><em><br>
                      </em></p>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </section>
            </article>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>