<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div class="header reader-header reader-show-element"> <font
          size="-2"><a class="domain reader-domain"
href="https://theintercept.com/2019/03/20/rodrigo-duterte-ibm-surveillance/">https://theintercept.com/2019/03/20/rodrigo-duterte-ibm-surveillance/</a></font>
        <h1 class="Post-title" data-reactid="162">Inside the Video
          Surveillance Program IBM Built for Philippine Strongman
          Rodrigo Duterte</h1>
        <div class="credits reader-credits">George Joseph - March 20,
          2019</div>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div class="moz-reader-content line-height4 reader-show-element">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div>
              <p><u>Jaypee Larosa was</u> standing in front of an
                internet cafe in Davao City, a metropolitan hub on the
                Philippine island of Mindanao, when three men in dark
                jackets pulled up on a motorcycle and opened fire. That
                summer evening, Larosa, 20, was killed. After the
                shooting, <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">according
                  to witnesses</a>, one of the men reportedly removed
                Larosa’s baseball cap and said, “Son of a bitch. This is
                not the one.” Then they drove off.</p>
              <p>Larosa’s murder, on July 17, 2008, was one of <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">hundreds</a> of
                extrajudicial killings carried out in Davao City, now a
                city of 1.6 million, while Rodrigo Duterte, now
                president of the Philippines, was mayor there. Years
                before launching his notorious, <a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/19/dutertes-philippines-drug-war-death-toll-rises-above-5000">bloody</a> “<a
href="https://www.philstar.com/pilipino-star-ngayon/bansa/2016/10/12/1632667/ejk-inamin-ni-digong">drug
                  war</a>” across the country, Duterte presided over
                similar tactics at the local level. During his tenure as
                mayor, according to a <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/philippines0409webwcover_0.pdf">2009
                  investigation</a> by Human Rights Watch, death squads
                assassinated street children, drug dealers, and petty
                criminals; in some cases, researchers found evidence of
                the complicity or direct involvement of government
                officials and police.</p>
              <p>Duterte has consistently denied any connection to this
                campaign of killings, but at times, his <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/297514/what-went-before-the-davao-death-squad">support
                  for</a> the violence was barely concealed. As mayor,
                Duterte would publicly announce the names or locations
                of “criminals,” and some of them <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">would
                  later</a> be killed, according to human rights groups
                and <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/735457/davao-drug-suspect-dead-after-duterte-ultimatum">local
                  newspapers</a>. Although it stopped short of accusing
                Duterte himself of misconduct or direct involvement, the
                Philippines’ Office of the Ombudsman <a
href="https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/137446-davao-death-squad-rodrigo-duterte-chr-resolution">partially
                  acknowledged</a> in <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/169081/21-pnp-officers-fined-for-2005-2008-spate-of-killings-in-davao-city">2012</a> the
                police’s role in tolerating the killings, finding that
                21 Davao City police officials and officers were “remiss
                in their duty” for failing to solve them.</p>
              <p>But this potential complicity in human rights
                violations did not stop IBM from agreeing to provide
                surveillance technology to law enforcement in Davao
                City. On <a
                  href="https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/38152.wss">June
                  27, 2012</a>, three years after the devastating Human
                Rights Watch report, IBM issued a short news release
                announcing an agreement with Davao to upgrade its police
                command center in order to “further enhance public
                safety operations in the city.” IBM’s installation,
                known as the Intelligent Operations Center, <a
                  href="https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/38152.wss">promised</a> to
                enhance authorities’ ability to monitor residents in
                real time with cutting-edge video analytics,
                multichannel communications technology, and GPS-enabled
                patrol vehicles. Less than two months later, the
                Philippine Commission on Human Rights <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/08/16/philippines-prosecute-officials-death-squad-killings">published</a> a
                resolution condemning Davao authorities for fostering a
                “climate of impunity” with regard to the killings,
                recommending that the National Bureau of Investigation
                undertake an impartial investigation into potential
                obstruction of justice by local police officials.
                (Duterte has recently <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/01/18/philippines-dutertes-drug-war-claims-12000-lives">condemned</a> the
                commission, questioning its motives and suggesting that
                it should be abolished.)</p>
              <p>The 2012 IBM deal was signed by Rodrigo Duterte’s
                daughter, Sara Duterte, who was Davao City’s <a
                  href="https://www.ft.com/content/9d6225dc-e805-11e6-967b-c88452263daf">nominal</a> mayor
                at the time, while her <a
                  href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Rodrigo-Duterte">term-limited</a> father
                served as vice mayor; under Sara Duterte, the <a
                  href="http://www.cbcpnews.com/cbcpnews/?p=76531">killings
                  continued</a>. The system, according to local news
                reports, was <a
href="https://durianburgdavao.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/duterte-credits-inday-sara-for-davao-citys-james-bond-gadgets/">deployed
                  in June 2013</a>, just as Rodrigo Duterte was about to
                return to the mayoral seat he had already held for
                nearly two decades. The police command center, Sara
                Duterte told the Durian Post, “is now infused with IBM’s
                IOC technology,” allowing police to “shift from
                responding to critical events to anticipating and
                preventing them.”</p>
              <p>While The Intercept and Type Investigations were unable
                to locate any reference to Davao’s death squads in IBM’s
                public corporate documents about the program, <a
href="https://www.scribd.com/document/251701696/IBM-Smarter-Cities-Overview-Cities-must-become-smarter">a
                  2014 company overview</a> of the installation made
                clear that IBM knew “illegal drugs,” predictive
                policing, and crime suppression were among Davao City
                security forces’ “priority areas.” From 2013 through
                late 2016, when one Davao security official estimated
                the IBM program stopped being in active use, Filipino
                human rights activists who worked closely with the
                Commission on Human Rights claimed to have <a
                  href="http://www.cbcpnews.com/cbcpnews/?p=76531">documented</a> at
                least 213 extrajudicial killings carried out by Davao
                death squads.</p>
              <p>Davao City officials did not respond to queries related
                to IBM’s video surveillance system or its potential role
                in extrajudicial killing operations during its run. But
                three police and city security officials interviewed in
                Davao City last year said the program had strengthened
                police video monitoring capabilities, which they said
                had proved useful in Davao’s controversial war on
                so-called <a
                  href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDwOGX5F4Mw">drug
                  syndicates</a>. That war, <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">human
                  rights reports</a> and former <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/882306/lascanas-drug-lords-go-to-davao-to-lie-low">death
                  squad participants</a> have shown, often targeted
                low-level drug users and peddlers, rather than major
                traffickers.</p>
              <p>Amado Picardal, a former spokesperson of the Coalition
                Against Summary Executions, a Davao-based human rights
                group, called IBM’s work “unethical,” given that some of
                the killings had been linked to Duterte’s police in the
                years before its deal with Davao City.</p>
              <p>IBM declined to respond to queries about its human
                rights record in Davao City. IBM spokesperson Edward
                Barbini briefly noted that the company “no longer
                supplies technology to the Intelligent Operations Center
                in Davao, and has not done so since 2012,” though he
                declined to clarify whether IBM serviced the technology
                after that point, and IBM’s public filings mention the
                program as ongoing after that date. “The Philippines
                city of Davao’s 1.5 million citizens will be the first
                in Asia to benefit from an Intelligent Operations
                Center,” an April 3, 2013, IBM disclosure reads. “A new
                early warning system will monitor key risk indicators so
                agencies can take quick action before situations
                escalate.”</p>
              <p>In the years since the IBM program was phased out,
                Philippine police interest in cutting-edge surveillance
                infrastructure has hardly waned. National authorities
                are now looking to deploy real-time facial recognition
                across the country, in a project called “Safe
                Philippines,” and have considered technology from a
                variety of international vendors, including the Chinese
                telecom Huawei.</p>
              <p>In December, a local newspaper <a
href="https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/12/13/1876639/dilg-chinese-firm-install-p20-billion-cctv-network">reported</a> that
                the Philippines had secured a 20 billion-peso loan for
                the installation of thousands of surveillance cameras
                across Davao City and metro Manila in collaboration with
                a Chinese firm, an installation that would reportedly
                include a national command center and feature facial and
                vehicle recognition software. In a January interview on
                Filipino television, Epimaco Densing III, undersecretary
                of the Department of the Interior and Local Government, <a
href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/31/19/dilg-safe-philippines-can-help-thwart-another-jolo-attack">said</a> that
                a goal of the project is to detect the faces of
                terrorist suspects and prevent crimes before they take
                place.</p>
              <p>Filipino activists worry that such capabilities could
                facilitate human rights violations. Over the last three
                years, parts of the country have been under <a
href="https://www.manilatimes.net/house-ready-to-extend-martial-law-if-duterte-wants-it/436220/">temporary
                  declarations</a> of martial law, and Duterte’s “war on
                drugs” has left at least 5,000 and possibly as many as
                27,000 dead (police and human rights groups’ estimates <a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/19/dutertes-philippines-drug-war-death-toll-rises-above-5000">vary
                  widely</a>). Those killed have included <a
href="https://www.amnesty.org.au/philippines-political-human-rights-activists-killed-impunity/">anti-Duterte
                  activists</a>, <a
href="http://time.com/5330071/philippines-mayors-political-assassination-duterte/">elected
                  officials</a>, and <a
href="https://www.rappler.com/nation/205165-catholics-outrage-filipino-priests-killings">outspoken
                  Catholic priests</a>. Currently, Duterte is
                campaigning to modify the constitution, a move that <a
href="https://www.cfr.org/blog/implications-dutertes-proposed-constitutional-changes">could</a> <a
href="https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/2154392/draft-constitution-proposes-giving-philippine-president">afford
                  powers</a> to the executive to further the suppression
                of political opponents.</p>
              <h3>Surveillance Capabilities in Davao</h3>
              <p>In June 2012, Mayor Sara Duterte <a
href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/city-of-davao-and-ibm-collaborate-to-build-a-smarter-city-160480725.html">announced</a> a
                128 million-peso deal, worth just over $3 million at the
                time, with IBM to improve its real-time monitoring
                capabilities. The announcement promised to “scale up”
                Davao’s Public Safety and Security Command Center, or
                PSSCC, with improved communications and surveillance
                technology.</p>
              <p>Sayaji Shinde, a former IBM sales leader who says he
                was part of the team that secured the command center
                deal, recalls that his team was eager to partner with
                the Duterte administration. “If you look at the Dutertes
                as such, they focus a lot on public-sector security,”
                said Shinde. “And I think that is one of the drivers,
                for even us, to go and spend our time and advise them
                because we saw that they are really keen to ensure that
                the city become more safer.”</p>
              <p>To seal the deal, Shinde said, IBM pointed to the
                international recognition that such a project would
                bring Davao. “That is precisely what we sold them: ‘You
                know if you do this, work with us, and it becomes first
                of its kind, then this will be highlighted globally.’”</p>
              <p>In the initial phase of the project, IBM mapped Davao’s
                police cameras onto a geographic information system,
                allowing operators to quickly access camera feeds near
                locations of interest, Shinde said.</p>
              <p>According to Shinde, the rollout also featured a
                multichannel communications system, allowing police,
                traffic, and defense personnel to communicate with one
                another. It also included video analytics technology
                that automatically tagged objects captured on camera,
                like cars and people, by their physical attributes. The
                tags included the objects’ size, speed, color,
                trajectory, and direction, according to a November <a
href="https://www.scribd.com/document/251701696/IBM-Smarter-Cities-Overview-Cities-must-become-smarter">2014
                  IBM presentation</a> to the Asian Development Bank,
                allowing command center operators to comb through camera
                footage in search of suspects by their descriptions.
                (IBM had refined these kinds of surveillance
                capabilities using <a
href="https://theintercept.com/2018/09/06/nypd-surveillance-camera-skin-tone-search/">secret
                  access to New York Police Department camera footage</a>,
                as The Intercept and Type Investigations reported in
                September.)</p>
              <p>“That was probably the first-ever video analytics
                surveillance that was done in Asia,” said Shinde, noting
                that the system could be used in the wake of robberies
                or murders to track a suspect’s car before and after a
                crime. The software was “very user-friendly,” he noted,
                so Davao security officials at the command center could
                easily have become competent in the program’s object
                search capabilities.</p>
              <p>The 2014 IBM presentation on its Davao project also
                mentions a tool known as “Face Capture,” which boxes out
                images of faces in real time and stores them for <a
href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByBx73lqSsgjZGd1cDIySk9fOGM/view?usp=sharing">retroactive
                  analysis</a>. In a recent interview, Emmanuel Jaldon,
                head of Davao City’s 911 Center, claimed that this
                functionality was planned but never formally deployed.
                Barbini also claims that IBM “never supplied facial
                recognition capability for the center.” And Shinde, who
                left IBM in 2014, said that Face Capture was not
                integrated while he was there during the first phase of
                the Davao project. But a February 2015 promotional video
                for the PSSCC, highlighting the command center’s
                monitoring capabilities and ability to “suppress all
                forms of criminalities,” features a clip of IBM’s Face
                Capture interface in action, gathering facial images
                from pedestrians on the streets of Davao City. Footage
                of what appears to be the IBM Davao City dashboard,
                pictured above, shows the software boxing out and
                collecting facial images as people walked past street
                cameras.</p>
              <p>The program also helped authorities monitor “crowd
                behavior” and instances of “loitering” — <a
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-crime/thousands-of-philippine-poor-nabbed-in-dutertes-latest-war-on-loitering-idUSKBN1KE0MT">a
                  crime</a> that Duterte has cracked down on nationally
                as president — according to the <a
href="https://www.scribd.com/document/251701696/IBM-Smarter-Cities-Overview-Cities-must-become-smarter">2014
                  IBM presentation</a>.</p>
              <h3>IBM’s Technology in Duterte’s War on Crime</h3>
              <p>When asked what assurances he was given about how the
                surveillance program would be used, Shinde defended
                IBM’s sale, saying that it was intended for legitimate
                public safety activities, such as responding to fires.
                “That particular implementation was not meant to track
                people,” he said. “It was meant to track the incidents
                and faster responses to those incidences.”</p>
              <p>But in interviews in the command center, the nearby 911
                center, and other locations in Davao City, local law
                enforcement officials familiar with the IBM program told
                The Intercept and Type Investigations that the
                technology had assisted them in carrying out Duterte’s
                controversial anti-crime agenda.</p>
              <p>Manuel Gaerlan, <a
                  href="https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/1757362">a
                  former regional Philippines National Police chief
                  superintendent</a>, said the command center, which IBM
                substantially upgraded, functions as a force multiplier
                in counter-drug operations. “It records events so it’s
                easier to identify the perpetrators, then you can go
                after the member of the syndicates,” he said. “If you
                can see more areas, you can send patrol to respond. It’s
                like putting more men on the ground. And you can put
                more cameras in drug areas.”</p>
              <p>Jaldon, the 911 chief, pointed to IBM’s object tagging
                and search feature as the most useful tool the program
                gave law enforcement in counter-drug operations,
                especially when it came to “backtracking,” or
                investigating incidents after the fact. “After an event,
                the system helps find them quickly, give you awareness,”
                he said. “It helps in investigations to slice and dice
                by time, color, type of physical feature.” Most
                significantly, he said the program’s real-time alerts
                could also increase authorities’ “awareness of suspects’
                presence.”</p>
              <p>Antonio Boquiren, a training and research officer at
                the Davao command center, said the video capabilities
                helped police crack down on low-level quality of life
                violations.</p>
              <p>“Whether it’s criminality, smoking, or jaywalking, any
                violation of ordinance is a crime and a police is sent,”
                he said, laughing. “People who smoke complain, ‘How did
                you catch us before we even lit?’ The police officer
                will point to the CCTV.”</p>
              <p>The targeting of petty criminals, gang members, and
                street children by Davao death squads figures
                prominently in the 2009 Human Rights Watch <a
                  href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2009/07/30/philippine-death-squads">report</a>.
                And a <a
                  href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGZCFc3umCQ">2015
                  promotional</a> video featuring IBM’s technology shows
                authorities aggressively going after low-level crimes.
                One clip highlights a young man, caught on CCTV,
                stealing a bag from a truck. Later, the narrator notes
                that the technology gives police faster response times
                and cuts to <a
                  href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGZCFc3umCQ">footage</a> of
                police officers chasing after a group of people on the
                street. One then raises his baton as if to hit one of
                them.</p>
              <p>A former Philippine Army security consultant with close
                ties to Philippine intelligence, who requested anonymity
                for fear of reprisal, claimed that IBM’s program
                assisted police not only in monitoring criminal
                activities, but also in gathering intelligence on the
                activities of the political opposition in Davao. Based
                on his dealings with Davao City law enforcement
                officials, he said he couldn’t rule out that the data
                feed was implicated in extrajudicial killings.</p>
              <p>Even if IBM’s program was solely used to assist in
                legitimate police responses to crime and fires, as
                Shinde said it was designed to do, surveillance
                researchers point out that it could well have enabled
                extrajudicial killings, simply by helping police capture
                or monitor everyday criminal suspects. The government
                has long denied the existence of police death squads,
                but in the Dutertes’ Davao, victims of extrajudicial
                killing <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">were
                  sometimes targeted immediately</a> after being
                released from police custody, and police frequently
                killed suspects during planned raids.</p>
              <p>In October 2015, for example, Duterte warned a group of
                drug dealers on a street called Dewey Boulevard that
                they had 48 hours to leave the city or be killed. “If
                you are into drugs, I’m warning you,” he announced,
                according to local press reports. “I’m giving you 48
                hours, 48 hours. If I see you there, I’ll have you
                killed.” Police reportedly <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/735457/davao-drug-suspect-dead-after-duterte-ultimatum">monitored</a> the
                area and relayed that some known dealers had left. But a
                day after the warning, police fatally shot Armanuel
                Atienza, a 38-year-old community leader, <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/735457/davao-drug-suspect-dead-after-duterte-ultimatum">claiming</a> that
                he had resisted arrest during a buy-and-bust operation
                and that they found a handgun and drugs on his person.
                Such claims are suspect. <a
href="https://www.rappler.com/nation/146455-highlights-matobato-testimony-davao-death-squad">According</a> to
                2016 Senate testimony by Edgar Matobato, who allegedly
                served as a death squad member from 1988 to 2013, Davao
                police regularly planted guns and drugs on suspects
                after killing them. (Duterte has asserted that he does
                not know Matobato and has implied that he may have
                committed perjury in this testimony. The Duterte
                administration’s communications office did not respond
                to detailed queries related to the IBM program, or its
                potential role in human rights violations.)</p>
              <p>IBM’s object-tagging capability, for example, could
                have been used to locate a suspect by their physical
                attributes, someone who may then have become a target of
                extrajudicial violence, explains Kade Crockford, a
                technologist with the American Civil Liberties Union of
                Massachusetts, whose research focuses on police
                surveillance. “Maybe the system identifies three to four
                people, then law enforcement are sent to find those
                people,” Crockford said. “Maybe that person isn’t
                executed on the spot by law enforcement, but police
                question him about him and his associates; now he and
                some of the people he named make their way on to a list
                which ends up in the hands of a death squad.”</p>
              <p>Social media posts from a PSSCC department head,
                archived on a local blog, suggest that the center, using
                IBM’s technology, was effective at nabbing suspected
                criminals.</p>
              <p>In August 2014, that official claimed that police <a
href="https://www.coolbuster.net/2014/09/street-kids-steal-davao-multicab-driver-income-video.html">monitored
                  and caught</a> a group of street kids stealing from a
                cab driver “through the coordination” of the PSSCC and
                city police. That December, he claimed that the <a
href="https://www.coolbuster.net/2014/12/police-intercept-gun-toting-suspect-with-real-life-big-brother-cams.html">Intelligent
                  Operations Center</a> was a factor in the police
                surveillance and capture of a man cruising around Davao
                City with a gun.</p>
              <p>IBM’s “Face Capture” feature, if deployed, also could
                have helped authorities locate wanted people in near
                real time — including residents on watchlists, according
                to Crockford. “Imagine a scenario in which someone in
                the police force, who has access to this system and
                works with the local death squad, producing lists of
                people to be killed,” she said. “This technology could
                help the police leader to ID a person on the kill list
                in real time and then have them deploy the death squads
                to go get them.”</p>
              <p>The Davao command center, according to a local news
                report, did have facial recognition capabilities in
                place by 2014, though the technology was not identified
                with IBM. And according to the 2009 Human Rights Watch
                report, Davao’s death squads were known to rely in part
                on photos of targets on their watchlists.</p>
              <p>In August 2016, <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/816030/village-chair-shot-dead-2-others-wounded-in-davao-city">Artemio
                  Jimenez Jr.</a>, a neighborhood political leader and
                vocal supporter of Duterte’s war on drugs, turned
                himself in to Davao City police after apparently
                discovering that he was on a government watchlist of
                suspected drug users, offering to be tested for drugs in
                order to clear his name. Police tested his urine for
                methamphetamine and cannabinol, according to <a
href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/816030/village-chair-shot-dead-2-others-wounded-in-davao-city">The
                  Inquirer</a><em>,</em> tests that came up negative.
                Nonetheless, the next month, “unidentified gunmen” drove
                up to his <a
href="http://mindanaodailymirror.com/barangay-captain-killed-davao-ambush-24697/">car</a> and
                fired repeatedly, killing him and <a
                  href="https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/98687">wounding</a> his
                driver and bodyguard. Police claimed that they were
                investigating, but never announced a suspect or motive
                in the shooting. Nor did they explain how the assassins
                knew Jimenez’s location.</p>
              <h3>IBM’s Public Human Rights Commitments</h3>
              <p>IBM publicly claims to be “committed to high standards
                of corporate responsibility” and to consider the “social
                concerns” of the communities in which it operates.
                IBM’s <a
href="https://www.ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/ibm_humanrightsprinciples.html">Human
                  Rights Statement of Principles</a> cites a number of
                international standards, including the <a
href="https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf">U.N.
                  Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights</a>,
                which calls on corporations to perform due diligence on
                the “human rights context prior to a proposed business
                activity,” identify “who may be affected,” and project
                “how the proposed activity and associated business
                relationships could have adverse human rights impacts on
                those identified.” These standards also call on
                companies to proactively track potential human rights
                abuses related to their business activities and require
                “active engagement” in the remediation of any identified
                abuses.</p>
              <p>IBM’s <a
href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/51143/000110465913026645/a13-9282_1defa14a.htm">Securities
                  and Exchange Commission</a> <a
href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/51143/000110465913015636/a13-6155_18k.htm">documents</a> and <a
href="https://www.ibm.com/annualreport/2012/bin/assets/2012_ibm_annual.pdf">annual
                  reports</a> between 2012 and 2016 contain a few
                scattered mentions of its project in Davao, but no
                discussion of any potential human rights concerns or any
                preventative measures taken by the company. None of
                IBM’s <a
href="https://www.ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/reports/report_downloads.html">corporate
                  social responsibility</a> reports have ever mentioned
                its collaboration with Duterte in Davao.</p>
              <p>Despite reporting by Human Rights Watch and local
                papers, Shinde claimed that the human rights allegations
                against the Duterte regime were “not in the news at all
                during those days.” There was “nothing said like that
                about him at that time,” he continued, pointing out that
                IBM contracted with Sara Duterte, not her father, who,
                he said, “didn’t have such a kind of record.”</p>
              <p>Yet when IBM agreed to work with the Duterte family’s
                administration in 2012, his regime’s support of
                extrajudicial killings in Davao City had been
                well-established; as early as 2009, he had described
                criminals as “<a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">a
                  legitimate target for assassination</a>.” In 2012, the
                year IBM signed the deal with Sara Duterte, local human
                rights activists claimed to have <a
                  href="http://www.cbcpnews.com/cbcpnews/?p=76531">documented</a> 61
                death squad killings.</p>
              <p>According to IBM <a
href="https://www.scribd.com/document/251701696/IBM-Smarter-Cities-Overview-Cities-must-become-smarter">documents</a> and
                law enforcement officials, the Philippine National
                Police also received information from the surveillance
                command center. Before the IBM deal was signed, the
                Philippine National Police <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao">had
                  also been criticized</a> for failing to investigate
                death squad killings, and since Duterte became
                president, it has <a
href="https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/the-philippine-national-police-reenters-the-war-on-drugs/">played
                  a role</a> in the deadly national “war on drugs.”</p>
              <p>“If they had the technology then, I have no doubt that
                they used it and continue to use it to locate the
                targets for elimination,” said Picardal, formerly of the
                Coalition Against Summary Executions. “And not only drug
                users but human rights defenders, activists, and anyone
                they consider as enemies of the state.”</p>
              <p>IBM had to have known about the Dutertes’ track record
                at the time, said a U.S. official who recalled being
                briefed by IBM about its Davao City project. “I can’t
                see how they wouldn’t have known about it. They have
                local people working for them,” said the official, who
                requested anonymity because he is not authorized to
                speak on U.S. government matters.</p>
              <p>Joshua Franco, head of technology and human rights at
                Amnesty International, noted that Rodrigo Duterte’s
                record as mayor was so well-documented that any company
                engaging with the Davao police at that time would have
                had a responsibility to investigate and avoid potential
                complicity in human rights violations before signing any
                agreements.</p>
              <p>“There is documentation of the killings, by persons
                believed to be linked to the police, that went on in
                Davao City while Duterte was mayor,” he said. “Human
                rights organizations have documented that, during this
                period, as many as 1,000 people were killed, including
                street children, people who used and sold drugs, as well
                as petty criminals. Without implementing a rigorous
                human rights due diligence process, companies supplying
                the local police forces suspected of having been
                involved in the killings with policing equipment and
                technology may have enabled or facilitated the
                commission of human rights violations.”</p>
              <p>Asked about the human rights implications of the
                surveillance program, Philippine law enforcement
                officials familiar with the IBM system made light of
                such concerns.</p>
              <p>“If police do some human rights abuses, who cares?”
                said one official, claiming that such tactics had
                resulted in significant crime reductions.</p>
              <p>Gaerlan, the regional police superintendent, joked
                about the extrajudicial killing of alleged drug lord <a
href="http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2016/08/29/odicta-couple-shot-dead.html">Melvin
                  Odicta Sr</a>., who was shot, according to police, by
                two “unidentified assailants.” Gaerlan’s agency, the
                Philippine National Police, <a
href="http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2016/08/29/odicta-couple-shot-dead.html">officially
                  speculated</a> that he may have been killed by other
                drug dealers. But the commander waved off that version
                of events. “He was shot right off the ship,” he said,
                laughing. “He was trying to evade authorities by not
                coming here on a plane. He never holds drugs. You can’t
                catch him, but he was killed. Not by anyone in uniform!
                It was just some vigilantes, but they weren’t in
                uniform!”</p>
              <p>Legal protections for the accused, such as due process,
                may be good in theory, argued Boquiren, the PSSCC
                officer, but they aren’t practical because of a court
                system he characterized as inefficient and corrupt. “Due
                process is good on the point of lawyers, but if we are
                talking about the criminal justice system, it’s weak.
                Even clear-cut cases of murder take years, witnesses
                die, so something is wrong,” he said.</p>
              <p>“If people don’t have discipline, they don’t obey,” he
                continued. “But if there is fear, they will obey.”</p>
              <h3>Duterte’s Mass Surveillance Plans</h3>
              <p>In November, Jaldon said that IBM’s surveillance
                program was no longer active in Davao. He said that
                authorities switched over to an in-house software system
                in 2016. Still, he and Boquiren said that the urban
                surveillance center model IBM helped build in Davao City
                has served as an inspiration for the Duterte
                administration. “Within the next few years, the
                president will have replicated our system everywhere,”
                Boquiren said last January. “Every time he goes
                somewhere, he keeps telling local leaders, go to Davao
                City and replicate the PSSCC.”</p>
              <p>Duterte’s plan is to expand and unify public safety and
                emergency response centers at a regional and national
                level in the coming years, Jaldon said. “The hard part
                before was the budget costs, but that won’t be a problem
                anymore with the president prioritizing this.”</p>
              <p>Jaldon and Boquiren said national authorities —
                including Duterte himself — are interested in expanding
                surveillance centers across the country and upgrading
                their video capabilities to include real-time facial
                recognition, which could compare the faces of suspects
                to facial images caught on CCTV.</p>
              <p>In <a
href="https://www.manilatimes.net/chinas-declared-purpose-change/381241/">February
                  2018</a>, a local news report cited anonymous sources
                indicating that Duterte was pursuing a partnership with
                Huawei, a Chinese telecom firm, to provide facial
                recognition technology, a development Boquiren confirmed
                at the time.</p>
              <p>Then in December 2018, the <a
href="https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/12/13/1876639/dilg-chinese-firm-install-p20-billion-cctv-network">Philippine
                  legislature</a> learned that a different Chinese firm,
                the state-owned China International Telecommunications
                and Construction Corp., had loaned the Philippines
                Department of the Interior and Local Government 20
                billion pesos to install 12,000 surveillance cameras
                across Davao City and metro Manila. The “Safe
                Philippines” infrastructure, according to a report in
                the Philippine Star, will include a national command
                center and a backup data center, equipped with facial
                and vehicle recognition software. At a Senate hearing,
                Sen. Ralph Recto raised concerns about China’s
                involvement in the project, and officials from the
                national Department of Information and Communications
                Technology testified that they had not been consulted
                about the deal.</p>
              <p>Several other Chinese firms had originally been
                proposed by the Chinese Embassy for the project,
                including Huawei. But, according to a <a
                  href="http://senate.gov.ph/lisdata/2932525926!.pdf">January
                  2019 Senate resolution</a> introduced by Recto<em>,</em> Huawei
                was slated to become only a major subcontractor as the
                “primary equipment supplier.”</p>
              <p>According to Boquiren, Huawei promised that its facial
                recognition product could capture someone “even with an
                image of the side of their face” and “store up to a
                million faces.” In a November 2018 call, Boquiren
                reiterated that unspecified police authorities were
                looking at Huawei technology, but declined to discuss
                any additional details, citing a lack of technical
                expertise. Jaldon cautioned that while the Chinese firm
                had “a good system,” authorities were still in the
                process of assessing a variety of facial recognition
                vendors as part of the implementation of the “safe city
                project” across the country.</p>
              <p>The Philippines’ potential collaboration with Chinese
                firms, which resulted from an agreement reached during
                the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping last <a
href="https://www.rappler.com/nation/218831-dilg-china-telecom-affiliate-partnership-video-surveillance-system-philippines">November</a>,
                reflects Duterte’s <a
href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-11/duterte-s-pivot-to-china-shows-some-signs-of-economic-payoff">ongoing
                  pivot</a> to China and away from the United States.
                Huawei, in particular, is alleged to have such close
                ties to the Chinese state that it has <a
href="https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/2/17310870/pentagon-ban-huawei-zte-phones-retail-stores-military-bases">been
                  banned</a> from U.S. government contracts and from <a
href="https://www.cnet.com/news/australia-to-ban-huawei-from-5g-rollout-amid-security-concerns/">providing
                  some security products to Australia</a> for fear of
                backdoor intrusions by Chinese intelligence actors.</p>
              <p>The former consultant to the Philippine Army said his
                understanding is that the Safe Philippines installation
                will be modeled after Chinese facial recognition
                infrastructure, uniting CCTV installations and
                intelligence databases from security agencies across the
                country into one unified system. “The project aims to
                establish new CCTV networks and cascade them with all
                existing CCTV installations,” he said. “Patterned after
                the Chinese police state, the system is intended to tap
                databases from a variety of agencies of the government
                and integrate them with the data streams from the CCTV
                networks.”</p>
              <p>In a more recent interview, the former consultant said
                that, given the scrutiny Huawei has drawn, the
                Department of the Interior and Local Government may opt
                for another technology equipment supplier, a claim that
                Densing, the Department of the Interior official, <a
href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/31/19/dilg-safe-philippines-can-help-thwart-another-jolo-attack">echoed</a> in
                the January television interview.</p>
              <p>Maya Wang, senior researcher on China at Human Rights
                Watch, said the potential adoption of a Chinese-style
                surveillance infrastructure, facilitated by Chinese
                companies, is very concerning given the “context of
                Duterte’s increasing abuses, drug war, and large-scale
                extrajudicial violence.” But Wang cautioned that the
                costs and expertise required for such systems are not
                easily replicable. The Philippine government could
                potentially “replicate one or some of the systems, but
                not all of the overlapping, multitiered mass
                surveillance systems seen in China,” she said.</p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>