<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div class="header reader-header reader-show-element" dir="ltr"> <font
          size="-2"><a class="domain reader-domain"
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/us-court-throws-out-lawsuit-against-academic-boycott-israel">https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/us-court-throws-out-lawsuit-against-academic-boycott-israel</a></font>
        <h1 class="reader-title">US court throws out lawsuit against
          academic boycott of Israel</h1>
        <p class="node__submitted">
          <span class="field field-author"><a
              href="https://electronicintifada.net/people/ali-abunimah">Ali
              Abunimah</a></span> <span class="field field-blog">-</span>
          <span class="field field-publication-date"><span
              class="date-display-single"
              content="2019-02-05T17:27:18+00:00">5 February 2019</span></span>
        </p>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div class="moz-reader-content line-height4 reader-show-element"
          dir="ltr">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div>
              <article>
                <figure id="file-74426"><source media="(min-width:
                    72rem)"><figcaption><small><span></span></small></figcaption></figure>
                <p>A federal judge in Washington, DC, on Monday
                  dismissed a lawsuit against the <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/american-studies-association">American
                    Studies Association</a> over its decision to support
                  the boycott of Israeli academic institutions.</p>
                <p>The ruling is a significant blow to efforts by Israel
                  lobby groups to use courts to harass, intimidate and
                  silence supporters of Palestinian rights in US
                  universities – a tactic known as <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/lawfare">lawfare</a>.</p>
                <p>In April 2016, several current and former members of
                  the ASA <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/frivolous-lawsuit-aims-reverse-asas-israel-boycott">filed
                    the lawsuit</a> against the group over its 2013 <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/asa-membership-votes-boycott-israel-landslide">resolution
                    backing the academic boycott</a>.</p>
                <p>In his 20-page ruling, US District Judge Rudolph
                  Contreras wrote that the plaintiffs had no standing to
                  file a lawsuit seeking damages on behalf of the ASA,
                  and that their individual damage claims came nowhere
                  near the $75,000 minimum required for them to seek
                  relief in federal court.</p>
                <p>At most, the individual plaintiffs could seek damages
                  of a few hundred dollars to cover membership dues they
                  allege were misappropriated, but they would have to
                  find some other venue to pursue their claims, the
                  judge found.</p>
                <p>“The court basically said, in no uncertain words,
                  that the plaintiffs suing ASA lied when they claimed
                  to have ‘suffered significant economic and
                  reputational damage.’” Radhika Sainath, senior
                  attorney with the civil rights group Palestine Legal,
                  told The Electronic Intifada. “But, as the court
                  explained, ‘nowhere’ in the lawsuit could could the
                  plaintiffs explain what that damage was. It didn’t
                  pass the smell test.”</p>
                <h2>“Desperate lawsuits”</h2>
                <p>“I’m thrilled that this baseless case has been
                  dismissed. It served no purpose other than persecuting
                  those who dare to criticize Israeli policy and seek to
                  end the occupation through peaceful means,” <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/steven-salaita">Steven
                    Salaita</a>, one of the defendants, told The
                  Electronic Intifada.</p>
                <p>“Our victory further illustrates that it’s important
                  to stand firm against attempts to silence those
                  devoted to the cause of justice.”</p>
                <p>In 2014, Salaita was <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/university-illinois-fires-professor-steven-salaita-after-gaza-massacre-tweets">fired</a>
                  by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for
                  social media comments criticizing Israel’s assault on
                  Gaza that year. He sued the university for <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/judge-clears-way-steven-salaita-lawsuit-over-gaza-tweets-firing">breach
                    of contract</a>, alleging administrators <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/steven-salaita-sues-univ-illinois-donors-firing-over-israel-criticism">acted
                    under pressure</a> from pro-Israel donors, later <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/steven-salaita-settles-lawsuit-univ-illinois">settling
                    the case</a>.</p>
                <p>Salaita then found himself targeted by the lawsuit
                  against the American Studies Association.</p>
                <p>Along with Salaita, the lawsuit named as individual
                  defendants the academics and Palestinian rights
                  advocates <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/lisa-duggan">Lisa
                    Duggan</a>, <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/curtis-marez">Curtis
                    Marez</a>, Avery Gordon, Neferti Tadiar, <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/sunaina-maira">Sunaina
                    Maira</a>, Chandan Reddy, Jasbir Puar, J. Kehaulani
                  Kauanui and John Stephens.</p>
                <p>“These desperate lawsuits brought to silence
                  advocates of Palestinian rights are not only losers –
                  they’re helping to grow the movement by making even
                  clearer who’s on the wrong side of history – who is
                  the aggressor, who is unreasonable and who wants to
                  silence debate,” Maria LaHood, deputy legal director
                  for the Center for Constitutional Rights, told The
                  Electronic Intifada.</p>
                <p>LaHood, who represented Salaita in the ASA lawsuit,
                  added, “Freedom, justice and equality have always been
                  on the right side of history.”</p>
                <p>The <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israel-lobby-group-trying-sue-steven-salaita">complaint
                    alleged</a> that a “cabal of USACBI leaders”
                  surreptitiously took over the ASA and used their
                  positions on its executive committee and national
                  council to foist the boycott resolution on the
                  association’s unsuspecting membership, misspending ASA
                  money in the process.</p>
                <p>As part of the solidarity movement, USACBI, the US
                  Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of
                  Israel, <a
                    href="https://usacbi.org/academic-boycott/">argues</a>
                  that Israeli academic institutions should be boycotted
                  because they are complicit in Israel’s systematic
                  violations of Palestinian rights.</p>
                <h2>Driven by Israel lobby</h2>
                <p>The force behind the lawsuit was the <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/louis-d-brandeis-center-human-rights">Louis
                    D. Brandeis Center</a>, an Israel advocacy
                  organization that has for years worked to smear
                  Palestine solidarity activism as anti-Semitism, and
                  attempts to suppress it with frivolous lawsuits and <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/victory-campus-free-speech-us-dept-education-throws-out-anti-semitism">bogus
                    civil rights complaints</a>.</p>
                <p>Until February last year, the Brandeis Center’s
                  president <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/kenneth-marcus">Kenneth
                    Marcus</a> was an attorney for the plaintiffs.</p>
                <p>Last June, the Senate <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/trumps-civil-rights-enforcer-could-use-law-silence-students">confirmed</a>
                  Marcus as the Trump administration’s top civil rights
                  enforcer at the Department of Education, a position
                  that potentially allows him to pursue his <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/content/trump-official-wants-students-prosecuted-israel-protests/25526">campaign
                    to repress supporters of Palestinian human rights</a>
                  from within the federal government.</p>
                <p>The lawsuit against ASA had previously suffered a
                  major setback.</p>
                <p>In March 2017, the court <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/us-judge-throws-out-key-claim-against-academic-boycott-israel">threw
                    out the plaintiffs’ key claim</a> that the ASA had
                  acted beyond its charter by backing the boycott.</p>
                <p>“The boycott resolution was aimed both at encouraging
                  academic freedom for Palestinians and strengthening
                  relations between American institutions and
                  Palestinians,” Judge Contreras wrote at the time.
                  “Thus, it was not contrary to the ASA’s express
                  purposes.”</p>
                <p>But Contreras allowed other claims to go forward –
                  until he eventually threw the lawsuit out altogether.</p>
                <p>“The Zionists can’t accept the extent of revulsion
                  over Israel’s crimes so they imagine that any group
                  that stands up for justice has been tricked and
                  manipulated into doing so,” Mark Kleiman, the attorney
                  for J. Kehualani Kaunui and Jasbir Puar, told The
                  Electronic Intifada.</p>
                <p>“This blindness partially stems from their own
                  reliance on tricks, bribes and subterfuge to slow down
                  what is rapidly becoming a mass movement,” Kleiman
                  added.</p>
                <p>“In this lawsuit they simply made up accusations and
                  then pretended they had been harmed by the things they
                  imagined people had done.”</p>
                <br>
              </article>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>