<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div id="container" class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div id="reader-header" class="header" style="display: block;"> <font
          size="-2"><a id="reader-domain" class="domain"
href="https://www.theindigenousamericans.com/2017/10/17/victory-standing-rock-sioux-tribe-court-finds-approval-dakota-access-pipeline-violated-law-2/">https://www.theindigenousamericans.com/2017/10/17/victory-standing-rock-sioux-tribe-court-finds-approval-dakota-access-pipeline-violated-law-2/</a></font>
        <h1 id="reader-title">In Victory for Standing Rock Sioux Tribe,
          Court Finds That Approval of Dakota Access Pipeline Violated
          the Law</h1>
        <div id="reader-credits" class="credits">By
          theindigenousamericans_6i2sru - October 17, 2017<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div id="moz-reader-content" class="line-height4"
          style="display: block;">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div class="entry-content">
              <p>The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe won a significant victory
                today in its fight to protect the Tribe’s drinking water
                and ancestral lands from the Dakota Access pipeline.</p>
              <p>A federal judge ruled that the federal permits
                authorizing the pipeline to cross the Missouri River
                just upstream of the Standing Rock reservation, which
                were hastily issued by the Trump administration just
                days after the inauguration, violated the law in certain
                critical respects.</p>
              <p>In a 91-page decision, Judge James Boasberg wrote, “the
                Court agrees that [the Corps] did not adequately
                consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights,
                hunting rights, or environmental justice, or the degree
                to which the pipeline’s effects are likely to be highly
                controversial.”</p>
              <p>The Court did not determine whether pipeline operations
                should be shut off and has requested additional briefing
                on the subject and a status conference next week.</p>
              <p>“This is a major victory for the Tribe and we commend
                the courts for upholding the law and doing the right
                thing,” <strong>said Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave
                  Archambault II in a recent statement.</strong> “The
                previous administration painstakingly considered the
                impacts of this pipeline, and President Trump hastily
                dismissed these careful environmental considerations in
                favor of political and personal interests.</p>
              <p>We applaud the courts for protecting our laws and
                regulations from undue political influence and will ask
                the Court to shut down pipeline operations immediately.”</p>
              <p>The Tribe’s inspiring and courageous fight has
                attracted international attention and drawn the support
                of hundreds of tribes around the nation.</p>
              <p>The Tribe is represented by the nonprofit environmental
                law firm Earthjustice, which filed a lawsuit challenging
                the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for issuing a permit
                for the pipeline construction in violation of several
                environmental laws.</p>
              <p>“This decision marks an important turning point. Until
                now, the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe have
                been disregarded by the builders of the Dakota Access
                Pipeline and the Trump administration—prompting a
                well-deserved global outcry,”<strong> said Earthjustice
                  attorney Jan Hasselman</strong>. “The federal courts
                have stepped in where our political systems have failed
                to protect the rights of Native communities.”</p>
              <p>The Court ruled against the Tribe on several other
                issues, finding that the reversal allowing the pipeline
                complied with the law in some respects.</p>
              <p>The $3.8 billion pipeline project, also known as Bakken
                Oil Pipeline, extends 1,168 miles across North Dakota,
                South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois, crossing through
                communities, farms, tribal land, sensitive natural areas
                and wildlife habitat. The pipeline would carry up to
                570,000 barrels a day of crude oil from the Bakken oil
                fields in North Dakota to Illinois where it links with
                another pipeline that will transport the oil to
                terminals and refineries along the Gulf of Mexico.</p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>