<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div id="container" class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div id="reader-header" class="header" style="display: block;"
        dir="ltr"> <font size="-2"><a id="reader-domain" class="domain"
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/lawyer-who-says-palestinians-dont-exist-sues-san-francisco-university">https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/lawyer-who-says-palestinians-dont-exist-sues-san-francisco-university</a></font>
        <h1 id="reader-title">Lawyer who says Palestinians don't exist
          sues San Francisco university</h1>
        <p class="node__submitted">
          <span class="field field-author"><a
              href="https://electronicintifada.net/people/charlotte-silver">Charlotte
              Silver</a></span> <span class="field field-blog">- </span><span
            class="field field-publication-date"><span
              class="date-display-single"
              content="2017-06-23T15:43:57+00:00">23 June 2017</span></span>
        </p>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div id="moz-reader-content" class="line-height4" dir="ltr"
          style="display: block;">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div class="sumud-region-main">
              <article class="node-20856 node node-blog view-mode-full
                node-is-page image-landscape">
                <figure id="file-48431" class="media
                  media-element-container media-figure file file-image
                  file-image-jpeg"><source media="(min-width: 72rem)"><figcaption
                    class="group-caption field-group-html-element"><small
                      class="credit"><span class="field field-publisher"></span></small></figcaption></figure>
                <p>A lawyer who denies that Palestinians exist is suing
                  <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/san-francisco-state-university">San
                    Francisco State University</a>, alleging the
                  administration there fosters a hostile environment for
                  Jewish students.</p>
                <p>But faculty and civil rights lawyers say the lawsuit,
                  filed on behalf of six plaintiffs, is yet another
                  attempt at censorship by conflating criticism of
                  Israel with anti-Semitism.</p>
                <p>The <a
href="http://thelawfareproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/SFSU-Federal-Complaint.pdf">complaint</a>,
                  filed in federal court in Northern California on 19
                  June, was prepared by <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/lawfare-project">The
                    Lawfare Project</a>, a group that <a
                    href="http://thelawfareproject.org/">describes</a>
                  itself as “the legal arm of the pro-Israel community.”</p>
                <p>Last year, the group’s director, <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/brooke-goldstein">Brooke
                    Goldstein</a>, was filmed asking Israel lobby
                  leaders in New York, “Why are we using the word
                  Palestinian?”</p>
                <p>“There’s no such thing as a Palestinian person,”
                  Goldstein asserted:</p>
                <p>In the <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israel-lawfare-group-plans-massive-punishments-activists">same
                    speech</a>, Goldstein also revealed new strategies
                  to undermine the movement for Palestinian rights,
                  including preparing legal challenges against US
                  institutions, among them specifically San Francisco
                  State University.</p>
                <p>“The goal is to make the enemy pay,” Goldstein
                  explained.</p>
                <p>The Lawfare Project <a
                    href="http://thelawfareproject.org/lp-files-lawsuit-sfsu/">says</a>
                  that the lawsuit was filed after the US Department of
                  Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced it would
                  be “scaling back” investigations of alleged
                  discrimination on campuses around the country.</p>
                <p>Claiming that San Francisco State University is
                  “among the worst of the worst” campuses for Jewish
                  students, the plaintiffs, three students and three
                  area residents, say administrators have “fostered,
                  fomented and systematically instilled an anti-Jewish
                  animus” on the campus.</p>
                <h2>Criminalizing criticism of Israel</h2>
                <p>The 73-page complaint lists about a dozen incidents,
                  some dating back to the early 1990s – before many of
                  the university’s current students would have been born
                  – in an attempt to paint of picture of systematic
                  discrimination.</p>
                <p>Nearly all of those incidents involve disputes
                  between pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian communities on
                  campus, including the disruption of an event last year
                  featuring the Israeli mayor of Jerusalem <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/nir-barkat">Nir
                    Barkat</a>.</p>
                <p>Israel’s municipality includes <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/east-jerusalem">occupied
                    East Jerusalem</a>, which no country recognizes as
                  part of Israel.</p>
                <p>“The incidents they are complaining about involve
                  activism for Palestinian rights, which is political
                  speech that is protected by the First Amendment,” <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/dima-khalidi">Dima Khalidi</a>,
                  director of <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/palestine-legal">Palestine
                    Legal</a>, told The Electronic Intifada.</p>
                <p>“The whole premise of their complaint relies on the
                  conflation of anti-Jewish animus and criticism of
                  Israeli policies,” Khalidi added. “That’s where the
                  complaint is going to fail.”</p>
                <h2>“Unconstitutional and unwise”</h2>
                <p>The lawsuit invokes the <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/state-department-definition-anti-semitism">State
                    Department definition of anti-Semitism</a>, which
                  describes much criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic.</p>
                <p>The definition has no legal force, but Israel lobby
                  groups have been been pressing institutions and
                  governments around the world, <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/michael-f-brown/democrats-advance-palestine-censorship-ahead-trump">including
                    the US Congress</a>, to formally adopt it.</p>
                <p>But even <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/kenneth-stern">Kenneth
                    Stern</a>, the former American Jewish Committee
                  executive who <a
                    href="http://jkrfoundation.org/about/kenneth-s-stern/">authored
                    the definition</a>, has <a
href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion/article/should_a_major_university_system_have_a_particular_definition_of_anti_semit">vigorously
                    opposed</a> its adoption into legislation, warning
                  that it would be used by Israel advocacy groups to
                  police speech.</p>
                <p>Stern <a
href="http://jkrfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Stern-Letter-links-corrected.pdf">told
                    US lawmakers</a> in December that legislating the
                  definition would be “unconstitutional and unwise” and
                  would “actually harm Jewish students and have a toxic
                  effect on the academy.”</p>
                <h2>Dead end</h2>
                <p>In recent years, Israel lobby groups have urged the
                  Department of Education to investigate Palestine
                  advocacy as a potential violation of <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/title-vi-civil-rights-act">Title
                    VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act</a> – landmark
                  legislation that requires administrators to ensure
                  campuses are free from a pervasive atmosphere of bias.</p>
                <p>But in 2013, the strategy hit a dead end as the
                  Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/victory-campus-free-speech-us-dept-education-throws-out-anti-semitism">threw
                    out</a> a slew of Title VI complaints against the
                  University of California campuses at Berkeley, Santa
                  Cruz and Irvine, where there had been active Palestine
                  solidarity campaigns.</p>
                <p>Khalidi says it is revealing that The Lawfare Project
                  is now citing the State Department definition in its
                  lawsuit.</p>
                <p>“This is about an effort to categorize any and all
                  criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic and crush a
                  growing movement that is looking critically at
                  Israel,” she said.</p>
                <h2>Two incidents</h2>
                <p>While painting a lurid broad-brush picture of
                  anti-Jewish hatred on campus, the lawsuit is centered
                  on only two specific incidents: a protest of Israeli
                  government official Nir Barkat’s visit in April 2016,
                  and the exclusion of the campus chapter of the Jewish
                  student organization Hillel from a “Know Your Rights”
                  fair in February 2017.</p>
                <p>Students disrupted the Barkat event with chants,
                  forcing his audience to huddle around to hear his
                  speech. Leslie Wong, SFSU’s president, immediately <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/content/why-are-university-heads-racing-slander-protesters/17061">condemned</a>
                  the protest and announced an investigation.</p>
                <p>That investigation <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/free-speech-triumphs-over-pro-israel-bullies-us-universities">upheld</a>
                  the students’ right to protest and found that campus
                  police and administrators acted in accordance with how
                  they had handled protests in the past.</p>
                <p>The investigative report also affirms that “the
                  protestors did not create a credible threat to public
                  safety” and that they “did not engage in any
                  threatening physical conduct or raise any direct
                  threats that could be interpreted as incitement to
                  imminent lawless action.”</p>
                <p>Yet the lawsuit claims that by not intervening to
                  stop the protest as it happened, the administration
                  violated the audience members’ First Amendment right
                  to hear Barkat.</p>
                <p>This video, posted online by a pro-Israel group,
                  shows Barkat speaking to students gathered around him,
                  while chants of “Free, Free Palestine” can be heard
                  from protesters in the back of the room:</p>
                <p>In the second incident, plaintiffs claim Hillel was
                  barred from a Know Your Rights fair on campus because
                  of its Jewish identity. The university is still
                  investigating the incident.</p>
                <p>Responding to the lawsuit, San Francisco State
                  University affirmed its dedication to free speech,
                  diversity and inclusion.</p>
                <p>But its statement repeats the allegation that the
                  protest of Nir Barkat was anti-Semitic.</p>
                <p>“The disruption of the event featuring Jerusalem
                  Mayor Nir Barkat in spring 2016 and bias incidents
                  that were reported this year were ugly reminders that
                  anti-Semitism, like all forms of discrimination, is
                  real and our community has work to do.”</p>
                <p>This new position contradicts the university’s own
                  earlier investigation, which found that the protest
                  targeted Barkat’s politics, not his Jewish identity.</p>
                <p>“In the end, the record demonstrates that the protest
                  was directed towards the Mayor of Jerusalem based on
                  his politics, and not towards any of the audience
                  members,” the investigation concluded.</p>
                <h2>Equating Jews with Israel</h2>
                <p>Barkat oversees the <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/palestinians-face-biggest-expulsion-years-settlers-jerusalem">ongoing
                    forced displacement</a> of Palestinians from their
                  homes in occupied East Jerusalem to make way for
                  Jewish settlers.</p>
                <p>In 2016, Israeli demolitions of Palestinian homes in
                  the occupied West Bank, including Jerusalem, <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/israeli-home-demolitions-break-records-shatter-lives-2016">hit
                    a new record</a>.</p>
                <p>Yet the lawsuit frames the protest against Barkat as
                  an attack on Jewish students on campus, not as
                  political speech against a foreign government’s
                  objectionable behavior.</p>
                <p>The complaint alleges for instance that protesters
                  “had every intention of making the Jews in the room
                  feel intimidated and that they reveled in threatening
                  them.”</p>
                <p>Such assertions manufacture the anti-Semitism the
                  lawsuit claims to expose, by identifying all Jews with
                  Israel and Israel with all Jews. This is absurd on its
                  face, not least because Israeli settlements are <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/us-lets-security-council-pass-resolution-against-israeli-settlements">illegal
                    under international law</a> and are opposed not only
                  by Palestinians and dozens of governments but by also
                  by many Jewish groups and activists, <a
                    href="http://peacenow.org.il/en/about-us/who-are-we">including
                    Israelis</a>.</p>
                <p>The lawsuit also describes the boycott, divestment
                  and sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestinian rights as
                  “inherently anti-Semitic.” It attempts to link BDS
                  activists to “terrorist” organizations.</p>
                <p>It even claims that murdered Palestinian cartoonist <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/naji-al-ali">Naji al-Ali’s</a>
                  iconic character Handala – a child holding a key who
                  represents Palestinian refugees’ desire to return home
                  – is “an established anti-Semitic symbol.”</p>
                <p>The image of a key is often used by Palestinians as a
                  reminder of the houses they left behind in the <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/nakba">Nakba</a>
                  – the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine. But to the
                  plaintiffs, “the key represents the destruction of
                  Israel as a Jewish state.”</p>
                <h2>The spirit of 1968</h2>
                <p>Another target of the lawsuit is San Francisco State
                  University’s <a
                    href="http://www.sfsu.edu/news/2008/fall/8.html">historic</a>
                  College of Ethnic Studies.</p>
                <p>“Unfortunately, part of the legacy that evolved from
                  [the College of Ethnic Studies] has been an extremely
                  disturbing pattern of blatant anti-Jewish animus at
                  SFSU,” the complaint claims.</p>
                <p>The first of its kind, the College of Ethnic Studies
                  was founded in 1969 after the Black Student Union and
                  the Third World Liberation Front waged the longest
                  campus strike in US history, starting the year before.</p>
                <p>It quickly became a model for Black and ethnic
                  studies programs across the country.</p>
                <p>In 2007, in the same spirit, San Francisco State
                  University founded the Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and
                  Diasporas Initiative. Professor <a
                    href="https://electronicintifada.net/tags/rabab-abdulhadi">Rabab
                    Abdulhadi</a>, who teaches in the department, is
                  named as a defendant in the lawsuit, along with the
                  dean of the College of Ethnic Studies.</p>
                <p>The university’s statement responding to the lawsuit
                  does not mention or defend the college.</p>
                <p>Abdulhadi has been the repeated <a
href="https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/racist-group-launches-national-offensive-us-campuses">target</a>
                  of Islamophobic and anti-Palestinian attacks by Israel
                  advocates.</p>
                <p>“These right-wing, pro-Israeli groups are well funded
                  but tiny,” Abdulhadi told The Electronic Intifada.
                  “They don’t represent a consensus of the Jewish
                  community.”</p>
                <p>“They are trying to stop the scholarship and activism
                  on campus,” she added. “They are attacking the spirit
                  of 1968.”</p>
                <br>
              </article>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.freedomarchives.org">www.freedomarchives.org</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>