<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div id="container" class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div id="reader-header" class="header" style="display: block;"> <font
          size="-2"><a id="reader-domain" class="domain"
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Plan-Colombia-Casts-Shadow-on-Indigenous-Rights-as-Peace-Nears--20161012-0001.html">http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Plan-Colombia-Casts-Shadow-on-Indigenous-Rights-as-Peace-Nears--20161012-0001.html</a></font>
        <h1 id="reader-title">Plan Colombia Casts Shadow on Indigenous
          Rights as Peace Nears</h1>
      </div>
      <div class="content">
        <div id="moz-reader-content" class="line-height4"
          style="display: block;">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page"
xml:base="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Plan-Colombia-Casts-Shadow-on-Indigenous-Rights-as-Peace-Nears--20161012-0001.html">
            <div class="txt_newworld" itemprop="articleBody">
              <p>October 12, 2016<br>
              </p>
              <p>Marginalized Indigenous and Afro-descendant communities
                in Colombia have been among the most battered by more
                than five decades of internal armed conflict between the
                military, paramilitaries and armed left-wing rebel
                groups. They are also the communities that <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/analysis/Most-Affected-Colombians-Voted-for-Peace-Who-Voted-No-20161002-0008.html"
                  target="_blank">overwhelmingly voted “Yes” to the
                  groundbreaking peace deal</a> recently defeated at the
                polls and have much at stake in what comes next on the
                road to a post-conflict Colombia. </p>
              <p>With <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Peace-at-Last-FARC-and-Colombia-Govt-to-Announce-Final-Deal-20160823-0034.html"
                  target="_blank">peace on the horizon</a> and some
                US$4.5 billion set to flow into Colombia over the next
                10 years through <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Plan-Colombia-2.0-As-It-Develops-20160204-0030.html"
                  target="_blank">“Plan Colombia 2.0,”</a> the path to a
                post-conflict era is marked by many hurdles. Many of the
                challenges are new ones, including the quest for
                ensuring truth and reconciliation for abuses during the
                52-year war as part of building stable and lasting
                peace. Others — such as ethnic communities’ fights for
                legal land title and respect for Indigenous rights to
                free, prior and informed consent for development
                projects in their ancestral territories — are
                longstanding. </p>
              <p>Despite landmark agreements on victims’ rights and
                rural reform, among others, covered in the <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/FARC-and-Colombian-Government-Announce-Final-Peace-Accord-20160824-0026.html"
                  target="_blank">historic deal</a> between the
                Colombian government and the country’s largest guerrilla
                group, the FARC, Black and Indigenous communities have
                warned that the peace accords could also spur a new
                elite-backed scramble for land and resources in
                Colombia’s countryside — particularly in areas where
                rebel disarmament creates a power vacuum for the first
                time in decades. </p>
              <p>“As the peace accords are implemented, I think it is
                going to generate many more problems that have to do
                with the economic model promoted in the territories,”
                Carlos Rosero, a leader of the network of <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Afro-Colombian-Strike-in-Choco-A-Historical-Reckoning-20160827-0011.html"
                  target="_blank">Afro-Colombian</a> groups known as the
                Process of Black Communities, recently told teleSUR by
                phone from Bogota. “Because it is an extractivist model
                with an enormous cost that ends up affecting the
                economic, social and cultural ways of the communities.”
              </p>
              <p>Rosero and other community leaders fear that the
                “comprehensive rural reform” promoted in the peace deal
                — though aimed at decreasing the vast inequalities
                between rural and urban areas — will open the door for
                national and multinational mining, agribusiness and
                other corporations to bulldoze their human rights and
                chip away at their already <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Afro-Colombians-Indigenous-Fear-New-Pitfalls-in-Peace-Deal-20160925-0011.html"
                  target="_blank">fragile traditional land claims</a>. </p>
              <p>According to official 2015 statistics, the Colombian
                government is sitting on at least 1,000 pending requests
                for legal recognition of Indigenous and Afro-Colombian
                title to their collective lands. Communities are already
                organizing for a new post-conflict struggle after years
                of stagnation on land rights demands in government
                agencies, as well as decades of systematic territorial
                theft and <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Colombia-Abysmal-Conditions-Await-Displaced-Returning-Home-20160324-0031.html"
                  target="_blank">mass displacement</a> that has
                uprooted nearly 7 million people in the country. Another
                220,000 victims have been killed. </p>
              <p>And while peace may pave the way for the expansion of
                neoliberalism and extractivism, the model is far from
                new in Colombia, one of the most loyal corners of
                Washington’s <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Dear-Washington-Post-Latin-America-Doesnt-Need-Intervention-20160414-0006.html"
                  target="_blank">“backyard”</a> in Latin America. As a
                traditionally agricultural economy also rich in natural
                resources, Colombia’s more than quarter century-old free
                market policies, like elsewhere in the region, have
                undermined the viability of local farming by flooding
                the market with cheap imports and streamlined foreign
                resource exploitation. As a result, neoliberalism in
                Colombia has deepened inequality and fueled the
                expansion of illicit coca crops, used in making cocaine,
                as many small producers feel they have no other
                profitable choice. </p>
              <p>The United States has played an pivotal role in the
                process, both through propping up the Colombian
                government's counternarcotics and counterinsurgency
                strategy with <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/telesuragenda/The-U.S.--Plan-Colombia-20160204-0008.html"
                  target="_blank">US$10 billion over 15 years of Plan
                  Colombia</a> and the controversial 2006 U.S.-Colombia
                free trade agreement. Signed by former Presidents Bill
                Clinton and Andres Pastrana and in 2000, Plan Colombia
                dramatically ramped up militarization — while failing to
                address <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Exclusive-Life-in-a-Colombian-Town-Run-by-Paramilitaries-20160406-0037.html"
                  target="_blank">paramilitary violence</a> — with dire
                human rights consequences for social movements and
                marginalized rural communities. </p>
              <p>“Plan Colombia is one of the major reasons that ethnic
                groups are disproportionately victimized by the
                conflict,” Teo Ballve, professor of peace and conflict
                studies at Colgate University, told teleSUR. “U.S.
                military aid helped push the conflict into the heart of
                their territories.” </p>
              <p>Though billed as a counternarcotics program, Plan
                Colombia was unsuccessful in curbing drug trafficking
                and has become widely condemned as a <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/The-Wages-of-Plan-Colombia-Have-Been-Death-20160203-0009.html"
                  target="_blank">failure that ballooned human rights
                  abuses</a>, enabled right-wing death squads, sparked
                land grabs, and ultimately prolonged the conflict.
                Critics argue that Plan Colombia was designed to fight
                left-wing rebel groups, namely the FARC, but also
                targeted rural and ethnic populations in its effort to
                protect elite interests and foreign investment
                opportunities in the face of local community opposition
                and demands for reforms. Plan Colombia’s military budget
                was also accompanied by an economic element aimed at
                further liberalizing the Colombian market and limiting
                public spending in favor of privatization. </p>
              <p>Earlier this year, Presidents Juan Manuel Santos and
                Barack Obama extended the controversial military aid
                package with a <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Plan-Colombia-2.0-As-It-Develops-20160204-0030.html"
                  target="_blank">“Plan Colombia 2.0,” dubbed Paz
                  Colombia</a>. The plan looks to strengthen security
                and continue the “war on drugs” with US$450 million
                annually over the next 10 years in post-conflict
                Colombia. </p>
              <p>“In many ways, (Plan Colombia) 2.0 is trying to attend
                to the human fallout created by the first version of
                Plan Colombia,” Ballve explained. “It's yet another
                example of the U.S. undoing with one hand what it's
                doing with the other.” </p>
              <p>According to Ballve, one of the ways Plan Colombia’s
                strategy directly contradicted itself is revealed in the
                fact that funding earmarked for “alternative
                development” initiatives, particularly for agriculture,
                often ended up in the hands of drug traffickers —
                precisely the powers the aid package claimed to be
                fighting against. “Agriculture and land deals are some
                of drug traffickers’ favorite ways of laundering their
                narco-dollars,” he explained. </p>
              <p>One of the agricultural endeavors promoted by Plan
                Colombia’s “alternative development” measures has been
                palm oil production, an <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/analysis/Palm-Oils-Corporate-Deception-Green-Washing-a-Dirty-Industry--20151201-0020.html"
                  target="_blank">industry notorious for displacing
                  campesinos and ethnic communities</a> and wreaking
                environmental havoc with large-scale, chemical
                intensive, monocultural plantations. In Colombia — the
                largest palm producer in Latin America and fourth
                largest in the world — <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Colombia-to-Intensify-Cultivation-of-Palm-Oil-20160208-0039.html"
                  target="_blank">palm expansion</a> has gone hand in
                hand with violence. In recent years the Colombian
                government, in concert with paramilitaries and big
                agribusiness, has “violently removed” Afro-Colombians,
                Indigenous people, and campesinos to make way for palm
                monocultures, according to the food and development
                policy institute Food First.   </p>
              <p>“If the U.S. does not put into place strict guidelines
                and due diligence,” Ballve continued regarding Plan
                Colombia 2.0, “much of the aid could end up actually
                fueling, rather than abating, Colombia's cycles of
                violence.” </p>
              <p>A new iteration of this kind of institutionalized land
                grab is what vulnerable communities fear as peace
                unfolds and Indigenous and Afro-descendant groups <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Afro-Colombians-Indigenous-Fear-New-Pitfalls-in-Peace-Deal-20160925-0011.html"
                  target="_blank">continue to struggle</a> for legal
                recognition of their collective land rights. </p>
              <p>“The rural development in the peace accords, focused on
                the extractive model, will promote the entrance of new
                economic interests that don’t favor the needs and rights
                of the people and their lands,” Clemencia Herrera, a
                representative of the Organization of Indigenous Peoples
                of the Amazon, recently told teleSUR. “It could create
                more competition for the resources on our lands.” </p>
              <p>According to Omaira Bolaños, Latin America program
                coordinator of the Rights and Resources Initiative,
                along with bloodshed, displacement of Indigenous,
                Afro-Colombian, and campesino communities has been one
                of the most destructive outcomes of the conflict,
                accompanied by economic, social and cultural
                consequences. </p>
              <p>“For a lasting peace to take root,” Bolaños wrote in a
                <a
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2016/10/07/rights-for-indigenous-and-afro-colombian-communities-is-crucial-for-colombias-peace/?utm_term=.8a0a6db1f4e9"
                  target="_blank">recent article</a> published in the
                Washington Post, “the legal recognition of collective
                property rights for indigenous and Afro-Colombian
                communities would be an important step in addressing the
                war’s damages and in continuing a process of
                comprehensive land reform.” </p>
              <p>After years of civil society being hammered with
                militarization and destructive economic policies —
                supported and enshrined in 15 years of Plan Colombia and
                the 2006 U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement — the
                signing of the peace deal between the Colombian
                government and the FARC is mostly symbolic. And the <a
href="http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Colombia-Votes-No-on-Peace-Accord-Countrys-Future-Uncertain-20161002-0007.html"
                  target="_blank">narrow win by the “No” camp in the
                  Oct. 2 plebiscite</a> on the accords makes the future
                even more uncertain. </p>
              <p>Time will tell the true legacy of the peace deal, and
                concrete policies — pushed by grassroots organizing to
                ensure political follow through — and a real reduction
                of poverty, misery, and human rights abuses will be the
                measuring stick. </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.freedomarchives.org">www.freedomarchives.org</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>