<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div style="color: #505050;font-family: Arial;font-size:
      14px;line-height: 110%;text-align: left;">
      <div class="wizard-top-container wizard-nav small-meta fwb
        absolute selfclear" style="color: #505050;font-family:
        Arial;font-size: 14px;line-height: 110%;text-align: left;">
        <div class="wizard-menu float-left" style="color:
          #505050;font-family: Arial;font-size: 14px;line-height:
          110%;text-align: left;">
          <div class="wizard-title" id="wizard-title" style="color:
            #505050;font-family: Arial;font-size: 14px;line-height:
            110%;text-align: left;">
            <div class="wizard-header builder-bar get-started"
              id="builder-header" style="color: #505050;font-family:
              Arial;font-size: 14px;line-height: 110%;text-align: left;">
              <div class="campaign-title" title="Basic - basic"
                style="color: #505050;font-family: Arial;font-size:
                14px;line-height: 110%;text-align: left;"><strong><span
                    style="font-size:11px"><span style="font-size:14px">Reprieve  </span></span><span
                    style="font-size:11px"><span style="font-size:14px">
                      June 30th, 2016  <font size="-2"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.reprieve.org.uk/topic/drones/">http://www.reprieve.org.uk/topic/drones/</a></font><br>
                      <br>
                    </span></span><font size="+2">New report
                    demonstrates previous US Government claims<br>
                    <br>
                    on drones have been false</font></strong><br>
                 <br>
                Ahead of an announcement from the White House on
                civilian casualties from drone strikes, expected <a
href="http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-obama-drone-casualties-20160627-snap-story.html"
                  style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
                  normal;text-decoration: underline;">as early as
                  tomorrow</a> (Friday July 1<sup>st</sup>),
                international human rights organization Reprieve has
                released a <a
href="http://www.reprieve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Obama-Drones-transparency-FINAL.pdf"
                  style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
                  normal;text-decoration: underline;">report</a>
                demonstrating how the Administration’s previous
                statements on the issue have proved to be false.<br>
                 <br>
                >From CIA Director John Brennan’s June 2011 assertion
                that “there hasn’t been a single collateral death” to
                President Obama’s claim that strikes only take place
                when there is “near certainty” that civilians won’t be
                killed, the Administration’s statements, both on record
                and off, have been undermined by Government leaks and
                independent assessments.<br>
                 <br>
                The CIA itself had <a
href="https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2013/04/11/secret-us-documents-show-brennans-no-civilian-drone-deaths-claim-was-false/"
                  style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
                  normal;text-decoration: underline;">recorded a
                  civilian casualty</a> from a Pakistan drone strike
                just two months before Mr Brennan’s claim that there
                hadn’t been any “for nearly a year.”  Meanwhile,
                independent investigation by the Bureau of Investigative
                Journalism (TBIJ) and others identified 45 civilian
                casualties from a strike on a meeting of local elders
                 in March 2011.<br>
                 <br>
                The President’s claims on “near certainty” were
                themselves contradicted by internal CIA documents which,
                <a
href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24747826.html"
                  style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
                  normal;text-decoration: underline;">according to <em>McClatchy</em></a>,
                “show[ed] that drone operators weren’t always certain
                who they were killing despite the administration’s
                guarantees.”<br>
                 <br>
                In addition, his 2013 policy on the 'Use of Force in
                Counterterrorism Operations' has since been undermined
                by revelations that ‘signature strikes,’ which target
                people based on patterns of behavior without knowing
                their identities, have secretly been allowed to continue
                in Pakistan and possibly Yemen.<br>
                 <br>
                According to the report, which is <a
href="http://www.reprieve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Obama-Drones-transparency-FINAL.pdf"
                  style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
                  normal;text-decoration: underline;">available on
                  Reprieve’s website</a>,<br>
                 <br>
                <em>What little the Obama Administration has previously
                  said on the record about the drone program has been
                  shown by the facts on the ground, and even the US
                  Government’s own internal documents, to be false.  Any
                  claim of low numbers of civilian casualties will
                  therefore have to be read against the more rigorous
                  work of organizations such as the Bureau of
                  Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), which estimates a low
                  of 492 civilian casualties across Pakistan, Yemen and
                  Somalia, and a high of potentially 1138. </em><br>
                 <br>
                <em>But more importantly, it has to be asked what bare
                  numbers will mean if they omit even basic details such
                  as the names of those killed and the areas, even the
                  countries, they live in.  Equally, the numbers without
                  the definitions to back up how the Administration is
                  defining its targets is useless, especially given
                  reports the Obama Administration has shifted the
                  goalposts on what counts as a ‘civilian’ to such an
                  extent that any estimate may be far removed from
                  reality. In US drone operations, reports suggest all
                  “military aged males” and potentially even women and
                  children are considered “enemies killed in action”
                  unless they can “posthumously” and “conclusively”
                  prove their innocence.</em><br>
                 <br>
                ENDS<br>
                 </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      Notes to editors</div>
     <br>
    1. Reprieve is an international human rights organization.
    Reprieve’s London office can be contacted on: communications [at]
    reprieve.org.uk / +44 (0) 207 553 8140. Reprieve US, based in New
    York City, can be contacted on Katherine [dot] oshea [at]
    reprieve.org / +1 917 855 8064.<br>
    <br>
    2. The report is available on Reprieve's website, <a
href="http://www.reprieve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Obama-Drones-transparency-FINAL.pdf"
      target="_blank" style="color: #06686B;font-weight:
      normal;text-decoration: underline;">here</a>.
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.freedomarchives.org">www.freedomarchives.org</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>