<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <header class="post-header">
      <h1 class="entry-title"> FBI Orders High School Teachers To Report
        Anti-Government Students</h1>
      <p class="meta post-meta">Posted on <span class="updated">March
          5, 2016</span> by <span class="vcard author"><a class="fn"
            href="http://yournewswire.com/author/cyrus/">Sean
            Adl-Tabatabai</a></span> <a
href="http://yournewswire.com/fbi-orders-high-school-teachers-to-report-anti-government-students/#disqus_thread"></a></p>
    </header>
    <p><strong><small><small><small><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://yournewswire.com/fbi-orders-high-school-teachers-to-report-anti-government-students/">http://yournewswire.com/fbi-orders-high-school-teachers-to-report-anti-government-students/</a></small></small></small><br>
      </strong></p>
    <p><strong>The FBI have launched a new program forcing high schools
        across America to report students that display “anti-government”
        or rebellious behavior to authorities. </strong></p>
    <p>The program is an attempt to prevent future terrorists from
      manifesting, in the governments ongoing “war on terror”.</p>
    <p>The FBI are urging school teachers to report any “suspicious
      behavior” to authorities in their new guidelines entitled “<em>Preventing
        Violent Extremism in Schools</em>“.</p>
    <p><a
href="http://sputniknews.com/us/20160305/1035810676/fbi-high-school-profiling.html"
        target="_blank">Sputniknews.com</a> reports:</p>
    <p>“High school students are ideal targets for recruitment
      by violent extremists seeking support for their radical
      ideologies, foreign fighter networks, or conducting acts
      of violence within our borders,” the FBI guidelines read.</p>
    <p>Labeled “Preventing Violent Extremism in Schools,” the guidelines
      instruct educators to look for loosely-defined indicators that a
      student could be a threat. “Talking about traveling to places that
      sound suspicious,” “using code words or unusual language,” “using
      several different cell phones and private messaging apps,” and
      “studying or taking pictures of potential targets (like a
      government building),” are all listed as potential warning signs.</p>
    <p>Educators note that many of these so-called indicators are too
      broad to be effective, as they could be applied to almost any
      teenager. Other indicators seem specifically geared
      toward targeting Muslims.</p>
    <p>“In practice, schools seeking to implement this document will end
      up monitoring Muslim students disproportionately,” Arun Kundnani,
      a professor at New York University, told AlterNet.</p>
    <p>A similar program in the United Kingdom, known as “Preventing
      Violent Extremism,” relies on mass-surveillance of Muslim
      communities and mosques, and has been expanded into the country’s
      public schools. This program has been heavily criticized by rights
      groups.</p>
    <p>“Our case studies show that children are being taken away
      from mandatory school hours to be questioned on matters
      misconstrued as markers of ‘extremism,” Ibrahim Mohamoud,
      communications officer with the Islamic advocacy group CAGE said
      in a statement.</p>
    <p>“By alienating parents, turning teachers into informants, and
      antagonizing students, [UK program] PREVENT is a divisive policy
      that does an injustice to the education system.”</p>
    <p>The expansion of these programs is especially troubling given
      that there is little scientific evidence to suggest that they are
      effective.</p>
    <p>“Drawing on the junk science of radicalization models, the
      document dangerously blurs the distinction between legitimate
      ideological expression and violent criminal actions,” Kundani
      stated.</p>
    <p>Such programs rely on antiquated social theory that has not been
      proven.</p>
    <p>“The whole concept…is based on the conveyor belt theory – the
      idea that ‘extreme ideas’ lead to violence,” Michael German, a
      fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National
      Security Program, told AlterNet.</p>
    <p>“These programs fall back on the older ‘stages of radicalization’
      models, where the identified indicators are the expression
      of political grievances and religious practices.”</p>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.freedomarchives.org">www.freedomarchives.org</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>