<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<h2><i><small><small>To be read in the context of the supreme court's
decisions on affirmative action and voting rights</small></small> - <small><small>ed</small></small></i><br>
</h2>
<h2><a
href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/whiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege/"
rel="bookmark"
title="Whiteness, NSA Spying and the Irony of Racial Privilege">Whiteness,
NSA Spying and the Irony of Racial Privilege</a></h2>
<div id="wp_fb_like_button"
style="margin: 5px 0pt; float: none; height: 45px;"> Posted on June
19, 2013<br>
<small><small><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/whiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege/">http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/whiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege/</a></small></small><fb:like
class="fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget"
fb-xfbml-state="rendered"
href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/whiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timwise.org%2F2013%2F06%2Fwhiteness-nsa-spying-and-the-irony-of-racial-privilege%2F"
send="true" layout="standard" width="400" show_faces="false"
font="arial" action="like" colorscheme="light"><span
style="height: 24px; width: 400px;"></span></fb:like></div>
<p>It’s not that I’m not angry.</p>
<p>It’s not that I’m not disturbed, even horrified by the fact that my
government thinks it appropriate to spy on people, monitoring their
phone calls — to whom we speak and when — among other tactics, all in
the supposed service of the national interest.</p>
<p>That any government thinks it legitimate to so closely monitor its
people is indicative of the inherent sickness of nation-states, made
worse in the modern era, where the power to intrude into the most
private aspects of our lives is more possible than ever, thanks to the
data-gathering techniques made feasible by technological advance.</p>
<p>That said, I also must admit to a certain nonchalance in the face of
the recent revelations about the National Security Agency’s snooping
into phone records, and the dust-up over the leaking of the NSA’s
program by Ed Snowden. And as I tried to figure out why I wasn’t more
animated upon hearing the revelations — and, likewise, why so many
others <em>were</em> — it struck me. Those who are especially chapped
about the program, about the very concept of their government keeping
tabs on them — in effect profiling them as potential criminals, as
terrorists — are almost entirely those for whom shit like this is new:
people who have never before been presumed criminal, up to no good, or
worthy of suspicion.</p>
<p>In short, they are mostly white. And male. And middle-class or
above. And most assuredly not Muslim.</p>
<p><span id="more-2984"></span>And although I too am those things,
perhaps because I work mostly on issues of racism, white privilege and
racial inequity — and because my mentors and teachers have principally
been people of color, for whom things like this are distressingly
familiar — the latest confirmation that the U.S. is far from the nation
we were sold as children is hardly Earth-shattering. After all, it is
only those who have had the relative luxury of remaining in a
child-like, innocent state with regard to the empire in which they
reside who can be driven to such distraction by something that,
compared to what lots of folks deal with every day, seems pretty weak
tea.</p>
<p>As Yasuragi, a blogger over at Daily Kos <a
href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/14/1215645/-Alliances-Coalitions-and-the-Naivete-of-Privilege">reminded
us last week</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>(This is) the nation that killed protesters at Jackson and Kent
State Universities…The nation that executed Fred Hampton in his bed,
without so much as a warrant. The nation that still, still, still holds
Leonard Peltier in prison. The nation that supported Noriega, the Shah,
Trujillo, and dozens of other fascist monsters who did nothing but fuck
over their own people and their neighbors. The nation of Joseph
McCarthy and his current-day descendants. The nation that allows
stop-and-frisk.</p>
<p>Before all that: The nation that enforced Jim Crow laws. Before
that, the nation that built itself on slavery and the slave trade. And
before all of that, the nation that nearly succeeded in the genocide of
this continent’s indigenous peoples.</p>
<p>So why are you so surprised that our government is gathering
yottabytes of data on our phone calls?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let’s be clear, it’s not that the NSA misdeeds, carried out by the
last two administrations, are no big deal. They’re completely
indefensible, no matter the efforts of the apologists for empire — from
the corporate media to President Obama to Dick Cheney — to legitimize
them. A free people should not stand for it.</p>
<p>Problem is, we are not a free people and never have been, and
therein lies the rub.</p>
<p>The idea that with this NSA program there has been some unique blow
struck against democracy, and that <em>now</em> our liberties are in
jeopardy is the kind of thing one can only believe if one has had the
luxury of thinking they were living in such a place, and were in
possession of such shiny baubles to begin with. And this is, to be
sure, a luxury enjoyed by painfully few folks of color, Muslims in a
post-9/11 America, or poor people of <em>any</em> color. For the
first, they have long known that their freedom was directly constrained
by racial discrimination, in housing, the justice system and the job
market; for the second, profiling and suspicion have circumscribed the
boundaries of their liberties unceasingly for the past twelve years;
and for the latter, freedom and democracy have been mostly an illusion,
limited by economic privation in <a
href="http://www.pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2012/Pursuing_American_Dream.pdf">a
class system</a> that affords <a
href="http://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/publications/files/nv.schoolboards.2011.pdf">less
opportunity for mobility</a> than fifty years ago, and less than most
other nations with which we like to compare ourselves.</p>
<p>In short, when people proclaim a desire to “take back our democracy”
from the national security apparatus, or for that matter the plutocrats
who have ostensibly hijacked it, they begin from a premise that is
entirely untenable; namely, that there was ever a democracy to take
back, and that the hijacking of said utopia has been a recent
phenomenon. But there wasn’t and it hasn’t been.</p>
<p>Reaction to the most recent confirmation of this truth ranks right
along with the way so many were stunned by the September 11 attacks.
The shock in that instance also came from a place of naiveté, wrought
by the luxury of believing that the rest of the world viewed us as we
did: as a paragon of virtue, which had brought only light and happiness
to the world, rather than military occupations, hellfire missiles,
brutal and crippling economic sanctions, and support for dictators so
long as they were serving our presumed interests. But some people — and
again, they were mostly black and brown — were not stunned at all.
Having long had no choice but to see the nation’s warts for what they
were, and having never possessed the benefit of viewing America as most
whites had, peoples of color, while horrified by that day’s events,
were hardly likely to be knocked off stride by them. They had always
known what it was like to be hated. And hunted. And solely because of
who they were.</p>
<p>For myself, I long ago stopped being shocked by anything the empire
did in the service of its continuity. Ever since I was in college, and
it was revealed that the Central American solidarity group of which I
was a member was being actively spied on by the FBI, I’ve taken it as a
matter of faith that such things were probably happening, and that it
would have been silly to the point of idiotic for me to assume such
surveillance were a one-off thing, confined to the inner-workings of
the Reagan Administration.</p>
<p>By 1988, at which point I was still a Democrat — hoping against hope
to turn that party in a truly left direction — the realization that the
government was actively spying on its citizens was fully concretized
for me. It was then that I was disallowed from riding in a campaign
motorcade for Michael Dukakis (despite being the head of the largest
College Democrats chapter in the New Orleans area), because my activism
against U.S. policy in Nicaragua and El Salvador had earned me an FBI
file and caused me to fail a Secret Service background check.</p>
<p>So yeah, the government is spying on you precious. And <em>now</em>
you’re pissed?</p>
<p>This is the irony of privilege: the fact that some have for so long
enjoyed it, in its largely unfettered state, is precisely why some of
those those same persons are now so exorcised at the thought of
potentially being treated like everyone else has been, forever; and it
is also why the state was able to get away with it for such an extended
period. So long as the only possible targets were racial and religious
and class others, shock and outrage could be kept at a minimum. And so
the apparatus of profiling and monitoring and snooping and data
collection and even targeted assassination grew like mushrooms in the
dark. And deep down, most of the same white folks who are now so
unhinged by the mere possibility — and a remote one at that — that they
will be treated like those others, <em>knew</em> what was going on.</p>
<p>And they said little or nothing. White liberals — with some notable
exceptions — mostly clucked their tongues and expressed how unfortunate
it was that certain people were being profiled, but they rarely spoke
out publicly, or challenged those not-so-random searches at the
airport, or dared to challenge cops when they saw them harassing, or
even brutalizing the black and brown. Plenty of other issues were more
pressing. The white conservatives, of course, largely applauded either
or both of those.</p>
<p>And now, because they mostly ignored (or even in some cases cheered)
the violations of Constitutional rights, so long as the violations fell
upon someone other than themselves, they are being freshly confronted
with the surly adolescent version of the infant to which they gave
birth, at least indirectly. And they aren’t too happy with his
insolence.</p>
<p>Yeah, well, tell it to pretty much every Arab American, every
Persian American, every Afghan American, everyone with a so-called
Middle Eastern name walking through an airport in this country for the
past decade or more. Tell them how <em>now</em> you’re outraged by the
idea that the government might consider you a potential terrorist.</p>
<p>Tell it to the hundreds of thousands of black men in New York,
stopped and frisked by the NYPD over the past fifteen years, whose
names and information were entered into police databases, even though
they had committed no crime, but just as a <em>precautionary</em>
measure, in case they ever decided to commit one. Tell them how tight
it makes <em>you</em> to be thought of as a potential criminal,
evidence be damned.</p>
<p>Tell it to brown folks in Arizona, who worry that the mere color of
their skin might provoke a local official, operating on the basis of
state law (or a bigoted little toad of a sheriff), to stop them and
force them to prove they belong in the country. Explain to them how
patently offensive and even hurtful it is to you to be presumed
unlawful in such a way as to provoke official government suspicion.</p>
<p>Tell it to the veterans of the civil rights struggle whose
activities — in the Black Panthers, SNCC, the Young Lords, the Brown
Berets, and the American Indian Movement, among others — were routinely
monitored (and more to the point actively disrupted and ripped apart)
by government intelligence agencies and their operatives. Tell them how
incredibly steamed you are that your government might find out <em>what
websites you surf</em>, or that you placed a phone call last Wednesday
to someone, somewhere. Make sure to explain how such activities are
just a step away from outright tyranny and surely rank up there
alongside the murder and imprisonment to which their members were
subjected. Indeed.</p>
<p>And then maybe, just <em>maybe</em>, consider how privilege — being
on the upside, most of the time, of systems of inequality — can (and
has) let you down, even set you up for a fall. How maybe, just <em>maybe</em>,
all the apoplexy mustered up over the NSAs latest outrage, might have
been conjured a long time ago, and over far greater outrages, the
burdens of which were borne by only certain persons, and not others.</p>
<p>And yes, I know full well that some <em>were</em> speaking out,
loudly and clearly from the start and have never stopped. I am not
speaking to them (to you?), so relax (after all, if what I’m saying
doesn’t apply to you, why so defensive, buttercup?) But so too, there
are those who know (perhaps you?) if they are among those who, like
Rand Paul or Glenn Beck or — for that matter — <em>Edward Snowden</em>
had never before raised too much fuss about those other things, until
it began to potentially affect them and people like them.</p>
<p>Or provide them an opportunity for some publicity. Hero worship.
Perhaps (at least in their own minds) martyrdom?</p>
<p>Maybe it is time to remind ourselves that the only things worse than
what this government and its various law enforcement agencies do in
secret, are the things they’ve been doing <em>blatantly</em>, openly,
but only to <em>some</em> for a long time now.</p>
<p>This nation’s government has killed hundreds of thousands in Iraq
and Afghanistan, openly, in front of the world.</p>
<p>This nation’s sanctions on Iraq in the ’90s contributed to the
deaths of hundreds of thousands more, by the admission of Secretary of
State Albright. All of it, out in the open. No secrets.</p>
<p>This nation stood by and even helped propagate massacre after
massacre — an attempted genocide even — in Guatemala throughout the
1980s; and not only did we not hide that we were doing it, President
Reagan <a href="http://www.alternet.org/noam-chomsky-nuclear">openly
praised the architects</a> of the slaughter while proclaiming they were
committed to social justice.</p>
<p>We incarcerate 2.5 million people — and have roughly 7 million
people under the control of the justice system in all — openly, and
increasingly for non-violent offenses: more than any nation on Earth.</p>
<p>We have the highest child poverty rate in the developed world, and
there is nothing secret about it. Our leaders don’t even care about
covering it up. In fact, an awful lot of them just don’t care. At all.</p>
<p>These are the crimes of empire. These and a lot more. And it didn’t
take Edward Snowden to tell you about them. They’ve been hiding in
plain sight for a long time.</p>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863.9977
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.freedomarchives.org">www.freedomarchives.org</a>
</div>
</body>
</html>