<html>
<body>
<font size=3>
<a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/lamb08182010.html" eudora="autourl">
http://www.counterpunch.org/lamb08182010.html<br><br>
</a></font><font size=2 color="#990000">August 18, 2010<br><br>
</font><h1><font face="Times New Roman, Times" size=4><b>A 15-Minute Sop
for Refugees <br><br>
<br>
</i></font><font face="Times New Roman, Times" size=5 color="#990000">
Chickenfeed for the Soul
</b></font></h1><font face="Times New Roman, Times" size=4>By FRANKLIN
LAMB<br><br>
Beirut.<br><br>
</font><font size=3>At 3:02 p.m. on August 17 Lebanon’s Parliament began
its deliberation on granting basic civil rights to its Palestinian
refugees and within four minutes agreed to alter article 50 of Lebanon’s
1964 labor law to theoretically make it easier for Palestinian refugees
to obtain a work permit and a job. There was no discussion of other draft
bills to grant Palestinian refugees elementary civil rights, and fifteen
minutes later, by 3:17 p.m. Parliament had agreed on the next bill
involving excavating for oil, which may bring millions to some well
placed members. Many MP’s hadn’t studied either bill.<br><br>
Thus did the bell ring on Round One of the fight in Lebanon for
elementary civil rights for Palestinians refugees.<br><br>
The members of Parliament decided to do essentially nothing to meet
Lebanon’s legal, moral, religious, social and political obligations to
her unwanted refugees. Parliaments gesture will likely not improve the
lives of many, if even a handful, of the hundreds of thousands of
refugees, 62 years after their expulsion from their homes and lands in
Palestine.<br><br>
The morning after Parliament amended the Labor law and cancelled the work
permit fee for Palestinian refugees, the mainstream media including CNN,
AP, Reuters, AFP among others appeared to misunderstand what had
occurred. CNN: “In Lebanon, new legislation will give Palestinians full
employment rights. By the CNN Wire Staff.” CNN broadcast: “The body OK'd
legislation giving the refugees full employment rights and social
security and will allow them to work in any job.” <br><br>
Hardly.<br><br>
The NYT is reported that “Lebanon passed a law on Tuesday granting
Palestinian refugees here the same rights to work as other
foreigners.”<br><br>
Not accurate.<br><br>
Some leading politicians also got it wrong. Fares Soueid, the General
Coordinator for the March 14 coalition declared at his news
conference:<br><br>
“We gave to Palestinians the right to work in Lebanon, like all Arabic
workers have the right to work in Lebanon.”<br><br>
A huge overstatement.<br><br>
Unfortunately, Lebanon did not grant its Palestinian refugees meaningful
civil rights on August 17 or even significantly improve their work
prospects. What it did do was cancel the work permit fee ( which was
never a big problem) and allow for the setting up of a private Social
Security Fund (not the Lebanese National Security Fund as misreported in
much of the media.) The Palestinian Private Fund was a compromise.
Hezbollah switched its support from using the State Fund which it had
earlier proposed , to the Private Fund idea, under pressure from
Christian ally Michel Aoun. If the Private Fund is set up it will be paid
for by Palestinian workers themselves and hoped-for private donations.
Insisting on a shadowy, opaque “consensus vote” rather than a more
democratic, simple majority roll call, Parliament decided on the lowest
common denominator by which all the MP’s were essentially given a veto.
What it produced was a weak, emasculated bill unworthily of the label:
Civil rights law.<br><br>
MP Walid Jumblatt, author of his Druze Progressive Socialist Party June
15, 2010 draft bill, which would have actually granted some substantive
civil rights, appeared to throw in the towel without even stepping into
the ring. However to his credit, Jumblatt confessed this morning that he
will do better next Round and told Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper: "The
second, more serious battle is ahead: And it is home ownership rights. I
won't give up, and what has been accomplished today is only the outcome
of consensus among everyone but home ownership rights remains pending,
and it is very important."<br><br>
The excellent Syrian Socialist National Party bill, which meets
international legal standards for treatment of refugees, supported by
many human rights organizations including most NGOs as well as the
Palestine Civil Rights Campaign-Lebanon and the Sabra Shatila Foundation
was not even considered.<br><br>
Within the Palestinian and NGO community there is widespread
disappointment and frustration. Ziad Sayegh, an expert on Palestinian
refugee rights in Lebanon said that the new legislation would have little
effect in changing the overall social and economic situation on the
refugees.<br><br>
According to scholar Suheil al- Natour, Director of a Palestinian Human
Rights Center based in Mar Elias Camp, "They spent a long time on
discussions which emptied the law of any real meaning, and I wish they
had put it off so we could push for a better version…Those who voted
yesterday are suggesting that what they did will alleviate the burdens on
the Palestinian community. This is not true. We will not have the full
right to work, they law will not apply to the more than 30 syndicated
professions, we do not have any rights for property. We do not have free
movement. Our camps are surrounded by the army. We will not reduce this
catastrophic situation by just some changes to Article 50 of the 1964
Labor law which may not even help many Palestinians get jobs.”<br><br>
Among the jobs still prohibited to Palestinians are more than 30
professions including medicine, law, dentistry, engineering, nursing, and
all technical professions in the construction sector and its derivatives
such as tiling, coating, plastering, installation of aluminum, iron, wood
or decoration works and the like; teaching at the elementary,
intermediate and secondary levels with the exception of foreign language
teaching when necessary; hairdressing, ironing and dry-cleaning
upholstery; publishing, printing, engineering work in all specialties,
smithery and upholstery work; all kinds of work in pharmacies, drug
warehouses and medical laboratories. In general all occupations and
professions which can be filled by Lebanese nationals and have guild or
syndicate memberships, money changer, real estate agent, taxi driver or
driver training instructor, registered nurse or assistant nurse, or other
jobs in the medical field, that have syndicates;licensed health
controller, medical laboratory worker, clinical health industry jobs,
prosthetic devices fitter, certified accountants, dental laboratory,
science technician, jobs relating to nutrition and meals, topography,
physiotherapy, veterinary medicine.<br><br>
Also, a key factor will be if and how the new law is actually
implemented. Changes made in 2005 to the labor law were never implemented
and Lebanon has a long history of passing laws and not ever implementing
them. The role of the international human rights community is now to
monitor and assure that laws regarding refugees in Lebanon are fully
implemented without interminable delays.<br><br>
<b>The winners and the losers</b> <br><br>
The big winners today are: Israel and the US, the Christian right-wing
Kateib (Phalange) party, the Lebanese Forces, the National Party,
Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir, and Hezbollah ally and head of the
Free Patriotic Movement, Michel Aoun, all of whom opposed meaningful
civil rights for Palestinians. Also, the politically fractured pro-Saudi
March 14th coalition and even Syria. The latter will be the likely
beneficiary from any explosions inside the camps as the refugees exist in
the pressure cooker camps and denied the safety value of basic civil
rights. <br><br>
The big losers today are: Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, those under
occupation in Palestine and those in the Diaspora. A meaningful victory
would have given them some hope as their struggles for Justice
continue.<br><br>
Also Lebanon, who will now face mounting international pressure to comply
with her international legal obligations plus efforts to cut off US aid
based on the requirements of the 1961 US Foreign Assistance Act regarding
deprivation of civil rights, and for which purpose a lawsuit in being
prepared in Washington DC. In addition, he UN Human Rights Council may
sanction Lebanon if its long overdue Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of
treatment of Palestinian refugee scheduled to be discussed in Geneva in
December is found wanting. Lebanon plans to tell the UN Human Rights
Council that its record is ok now since it amended its exclusionary labor
law which should now help Palestinians get jobs. One Lebanese official
stated off the record that this was one of the main reasons Parliament
did anything for the Palestinians on August 17. <br><br>
It remains to be seen how the Council views Lebanon’s meager
accomplishment. Lebanon will also face an internal civil rights movement
and calls for BDS as international activists become more aware of the
degradation in Lebanon’s camps and Lebanon refusing its international
obligations. Plans to picket the Lebanese Embassy in Washington DC until
civil rights are granted to Palestinians refugees are underway. Did
Hezbollah doze? Apart from its other current problems, Hezbollah,
normally receiving widespread Palestinian support, is being asked by some
in the camps what became of the role of the Islamic Resistance to the
Zionist occupation of Palestine. One angry resident of Shatila camp
criticized the Resistance this morning and explained:<br><br>
</font>
<dl>
<dd>“In 1982 I saw the Israelis watching us from on top on their military
administrative building west of the camp and 200 meters away from Rue
Sabra, as the slaughter was happening. In 2010 I can see the Resistance
in their administrative building 200 meters to the East of the center of
the camp and they can see us. When the wind shifts from the sea they can
smell the sewage in the camps alleys. Neither in 1982 or 2010 can it be
claimed that observers looking down into the camps did not know about
conditions inside Shatila. What kind of resistance is Hezbollah leading?
Resistance to we Palestinians being allowed some basic civil
rights?”<br><br>
</dl>It was probably appropriate that Lebanese Forces leader MP Samir
Geagea was the first to the microphones to claim victory after Parliament
deliberated for a few minutes to deny Palestinian refugees any meaningful
civil rights. Geagea welcomed the parliament’s approval of his proposed
amendment to Article 50 of the 1964 Labor Code to “ grant work permits to
Palestinian refugees.” The amendment to the 1964 labor law was the least
Parliament could have done and still be able to say it did anything at
all. It will not, as Geagea assured his followers, “resolve the
Palestinian humanitarian issues in Lebanon....” Geagea explained that
there is no possibility of granting Palestinian refugees the right to own
property. “Lebanon cannot solve the Palestinian issue on its own” the
Palestinians nemesis for the past four decades declared. <br><br>
In fact, Geagea spoke the truth without realizing it. Civil rights for
refugees everywhere, including Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, is the
responsibility of the international community which has adopted relevant
international conventions which have been implemented virtually
everywhere but in Lebanon and Israel. The international community, and
the NGOs and activists in the West and elsewhere who claim to support
justice for Palestine must now act to encourage Lebanon to meet its
international obligations by granting meaningful civil rights including
the unfettered right to work and to own a home.<br><br>
The mild gesture Lebanon made on August 17 will not grant Palestinian
refugees here their internationally mandated civil rights. Not by a long
shot. Perhaps the most that can be said in Lebanon’s favor is that it
took a first tentative step. Hopefully, symbolically it will break the
stereotype against Palestinians a bit and show the public that the sky
did not fall in by yesterday’s gesture and will ease the stress
concerning granting some meaningful civil rights. <br><br>
As the Lebanese like to say, “step by step.” For the quarter million
Palestinian refugees stuck in squalor in Lebanon’s 12 camps and the
75,000 in the 42 ‘gatherings’, the cause of civil rights in Lebanon
endures and the dream of returning to Palestine is alive.<br><br>
Franklin Lamb</b> is doing research in Lebanon and can be reached
<a href="mailto:atfplamb@gmail.com">atfplamb@gmail.com</a><br><br>
<br><br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#008000">415 863-9977<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF">
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.Freedomarchives.org</a></font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>