<html>
<body>
<font size=4><b>Ecuador’s Economy Under Rafael Correa: Twenty-First
Century Socialism or the New-Extractivism? – An Inteview with Alberto
Acosta <br><br>
</b></font><font size=1>
<a href="http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/2586-ecuadors-economy-under-rafael-correa-twenty-first-century-socialism-or-the-new-extractivism--an-inteview-with-alberto-acosta" eudora="autourl">
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/ecuador-archives-49/2586-ecuadors-economy-under-rafael-correa-twenty-first-century-socialism-or-the-new-extractivism--an-inteview-with-alberto-acosta<br>
</a></font><font size=3>Written by Jeffery R. Webber
<br>
Monday, 12 July 2010 09:54 <br><br>
<br>
<i>I spoke with Alberto Acosta, ex-Minister of Energy and Mines, and
ex-President of the Constituent Assembly, in his Quito office on July 8,
2010.<br><br>
</i><b>Jeffery R. Webber:</b> In a few words, can you describe your
political formation and political trajectory?<br><br>
<b>Alberto Acosta:</b> I’m an economist. I’ve worked as an international
consultant and as a university professor. I’ve been an advisor to social
movements, to the indigenous movement. I’ve been involved in various
struggles in the last few years which are trying to build a country based
in equality, liberty, and justice. In the early part of the Rafael Correa
government, I was the Minister of Energy and Mines and the President of
the Constituent Assembly. <br><br>
<b>JW:</b> As a former Minister of Energy and Mines, can you talk about
the strengths and weaknesses of the economic model being advanced by the
Correa government in the current conjuncture?<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> We can’t talk about the economic development model of only
this government. Stretching way back, Ecuador has had a model of
accumulation based on the extraction of natural resources. Ecuador has
been a country based in the production of bananas, flowers, shrimp, and
oil, and there are people who now believe that it can be a country based
in mining production. <br><br>
In reality, we’ve been living off the rent of nature. In the last few
decades, since the 1970s, Ecuador has had as its principal source of
revenue the exploitation of oil – the extraction of crude oil and the
export of oil into the international market. This is a fundamental
characteristic of the Ecuadorean economy. And this has not changed
substantively under the government of Correa.<br><br>
It’s true that he’s sought greater participation of the state in
generating the oil rent. There’s been a certain increase of state control
over oil activities. There’s been an attempt to increase the efficiency
and to strengthen the state oil company. And the state’s greater take of
the oil rent has allowed for improvements in education, health, and
social welfare. <br><br>
But at the root of things, the fact that Ecuador has an economy dependent
on natural resources has not been altered, and we remain highly dependent
on our insertion into the world market. <br><br>
<b>JW:</b> You were also President of the Constituent Assembly. Can you
talk about this process, and the advances and setbacks related to the new
Constitution.<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> The new constitution opened the door for a series of profound
changes. Its statutes guarantee the construction of a plurinational
state. This means the incorporation for the first time of marginalized
groups, like indigenous peoples and nationalities, and Afro-Ecuadoreans.
The constitution mandates respect for their unique ways of life and
community organizing, and a new way of structuring the state in general.
<br><br>
The Constitution also commits the country to “living well,” or sumak
kawsay, in Quichua, which is an entirely distinct way of understanding
development. It’s another form of development. It’s an alternative to
development, an alternative not within development, but an entirely
different concept to development. Along these lines, the Constitution
guarantees the rights of nature. Nature is a subject with rights in the
Constitution. Ecuador’s Constitution is the only one in the world with
this characteristic. <br><br>
The Constitution also notes that water is a fundamental human right, not
just access to water, but water itself. Water is a strategic patrimony.
Water is part of biodiversity. It is central to nature. <br><br>
<b>JW:</b> How do you explain the contrast between, on the one hand, the
rhetoric of the Correa government – “citizens’ revolution,” “twenty-first
century socialism” – and, on the other, the tense relations, often open
clashes, between this government and prominent social movements?<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> These phrases, citizens’ revolution and twenty-first century
socialism, have to be understood in their full context. Socialism of the
twenty-first century has absolutely no meaning. It has no meaning. We
need to rescue socialism from the errors of the last century, but we
can’t do this by promoting some kind of “new age” socialism. For me,
twenty-first century socialism has no meaning, it is pure rhetoric.
<br><br>
The phrase citizens’ revolution is what popular struggles in Ecuador
proposed and struggled for beginning in 2006 and 2007. Lamentably, it
would appear that the Correa government has its doubts about making a
revolution in reality. The very things this government proposed initially
it is failing to make a reality; it is failing to respect the integral
components of the new Constitution. This is the crucial thing to take
note of. <br><br>
At the moment, the “citizens’ revolution” suffers from a major deficit of
citizens’ involvement.<br><br>
<b>JW:</b> And the contradictions with the social movements, the
indigenous movements, government accusations of “terrorism and
sabotage”?<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> I believe that these types of accusations are tremendously
shameful for the country. They have no basis in justice or a democratic
judicial system. Even during the period of the neoliberal governments,
when social movements and the indigenous movement were massively involved
in protests – there were never accusations of terrorism. This is a
question that is putting the citizens’ revolution itself at risk. It
would appear that there are forces that are configuring themselves in a
type of counter-revolution, without citizenship. <br><br>
<b>JW:</b> For Canadian readers, can you describe some of the conflicts
in the mining sector, and the role of Canadian companies, because they
have a massive presence in this country. <br><br>
<b>AA:</b> Without a doubt. Look, Canadian companies have been very
active in this country for some years. One could say that Canadian
companies were the primary beneficiaries of the new disposition of the
mining laws throughout the early 2000s. These laws were meant to
strengthen the presence of mining companies in Ecuador. This was a
project pushed forward by the World Bank, and which received support from
the governments of that epoch. We’re talking about the neoliberal epoch.
<br><br>
Canadian companies were the ones who took advantage of the new laws with
the greatest enthusiasm, to invest in Ecuador. Canadian companies have
expanded their presence in various regions of the country. In the
Cordillera de Condor, in the Intag Valley, and elsewhere. They’ve managed
to win a huge number of mining concessions. Ecuador gave out over 5,000
concessions in an irresponsible manner, without any controls or criteria.
The great majority of these concessions were concentrated in the hands of
just a few companies, Canadian companies.<br><br>
We can also see how some Canadian companies, such as Ascendant Copper,
have tried to impose their objectives in an authoritarian manner in the
country. They have established schemes of paramilitarism, in order to
divide the communities of Intag, to intimidate these communities, and to
impose mining activities. <br><br>
I was personally a witness to how this company mobilized people to
protest against my presence as Minister of Energy and Mines at the time
because my politics ran against this type of corruption. I remember
receiving threats and having rocks thrown at me during a meeting in the
city of Ibarra, in the province of Imbabura. We saw how they acted, and
how they threatened the communities. Thanks to the struggles of these
very communities, and the actions of the Ministry of Energy and Mines at
the time, we managed to disarm these paramilitaries, and achieved some
justice. But there are still many problems in the region. I believe it’s
important to highlight these events and what they signify.<br><br>
<b>JW:</b> Shifting themes, we’ve seen a shift to the left in Latin
America – full of contradictions, but nonetheless a shift – over the last
decade. What has Ecuador’s role been inside this regional turn to the
Left?<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> There has been a series of very interesting processes in Latin
America – in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. However, none of these new
processes have managed to overcome the economic structures of
extractivism. Bolivia continues to be dependent, even more dependent than
before, on natural gas. Bolivia is making concerted efforts to extend
oil, gas, and mineral extraction. In Ecuador the orientation is toward
ongoing exploitation of oil. Although, one has to highlight the proposals
of Ecuador to leave the oil under the ground in the National Park of
Yasuni, which is positive. But, in general, it’s clear that there is no
coherent position against the extractive model. There is a lot of talk of
transformation and revolution, but it continues to be more of the same.
<br><br>
As I suggested, I don’t think there’s anything to what they’re calling
socialism of the twenty-first century. What we’re witnessing instead is a
neo-extractivism of the twenty-first century. <br><br>
<b>JW:</b> In the long term, what does Ecuador need to change in its
development model?<br><br>
<b>AA:</b> What we need to do in the medium- to long-term is overcome
this model of accumulation. We need another way to organize the economy,
which is not so dependent on the exploitation of natural resources. We
need to move from an extractive economic model, to one based in the
knowledge, and forces, and needs of human beings, individual and
collective. We also need another way of inserting ourselves into the
world market that is more intelligent than simply providing raw
materials. We need to start producing other kinds of products for the
international market. But more than anything, fundamentally, we need to
strengthen the internal market and to strengthen regional integration in
Latin America. Ecuador needs to break with the extreme concentration of
assets and income, and change the pattern. We need to achieve equality if
there is to be justice and freedom. This is what we need. And this
requires a lot of democracy. Always more democracy, and never less.
<br><br>
<i>Jeffery R. Webber teaches politics at the University of Regina. He is
the author of Red October: Left-Indigenous Struggles in Modern Bolivia
(Brill, 2010), and Rebellion to Reform in Bolivia: Class Struggle,
Indigenous Liberation and the Politics of Evo Morales (Haymarket,
2011).<br><br>
<br><br>
</i></font><x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#008000">415 863-9977<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF">
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.Freedomarchives.org</a></font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>