<html>
<body>
<font size=4><b>Khalid Amayreh interviewed by Silvia Cattori<br><br>
</b></font><font size=3>
<a href="http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/03/10/khalid-amayreh-interviewed-by-silvia-cattori/" eudora="autourl">
http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/03/10/khalid-amayreh-interviewed-by-silvia-cattori/<br>
<br>
</a>Khalid Amayreh is a journalist who lives in Hebron, a city
brutalized<br>
and bloodied daily by armed Jewish settlers who are driving the<br>
authentic inhabitants by force. He is what might be called a true<br>
Palestinian; a man of integrity who was never seduced by financial<br>
rewards and prestige; a man standing who has remained with his<br>
martyred people in order to witness every day the atrocities he<br>
suffers at the hands of the Israeli army, but also, and this is the<br>
most painful, at the hands of the authorities of Ramallah. He
himself<br>
has been imprisoned, savagely beaten without knowing why, by this<br>
Palestinian police to the training of which Bernard Kouchner is so<br>
pleased to have participated.<br><br>
His articles, to which he devotes all his energies and time, by love<br>
for his country that Israel has turned into a nightmare, reflect
daily<br>
the torture, the arrests, the abductions, the humiliations, the<br>
massacres that the Israeli army imposes constantly to his destitute<br>
people, abandoned by the world. He calls a spade a spade when he<br>
documents the racist remarks of the Jewish religious and political<br>
leaders advocating the mass murder of Palestinians. He compares the<br>
Israeli military to the Nazis when they behave as such. He describes<br>
the Israeli anti-Muslim racism, which resembles in many respects the<br>
“anti-Jewish propaganda of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”. He challenges<br>
the colonization presented as a "return to their original
homeland”.<br>
He deserves our full consideration. It is appalling that witnesses
of<br>
his calibre are ignored by the mainstream media. He responds here to<br>
the questions of Silvia Cattori.<br><br>
________________________________<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: You have written countless articles explaining in<br>
detail what is happening in Palestine. When you see that the crimes
of<br>
Israel, you are documenting in your articles which are translated
in<br>
many languages, and well reported in the Arab medias and in the new<br>
medias remain largely ignored in the mainstream western medias,<br>
aren’t you sometimes discouraged?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: No, not at all, the evilness of the Israeli regime<br>
instils in us a greater determination to keep up the struggle. With<br>
every murderous crime committed by the Zionists, whom I often call
the<br>
“Nazis of our time”, we acquire new evidence that the evil regime’s<br>
end is inevitable. Evil can’t be sustained for ever. Eventually it<br>
will destroy itself along with the evil doers. This often happens
due<br>
to purely internal factors, but it could be also as a result of a<br>
combination of internal and external factors. The fact that Israel
is<br>
trying to censor the messages and punish the messengers (e.g.<br>
international observers and human rights activists operating in<br>
occupied Palestine) shows that Israel has much to hide from the eyes<br>
of the world. Nonetheless, Israel is fighting a losing battle as
many<br>
Israelis are finding out that Zionist criminality can’t be sustained<br>
for ever. In a world where everything can be denied, there are
forces<br>
undeniable. And on earth, where nothing is sure, we have our<br>
certainties. As an oppressed people our certainty is to be free.
True,<br>
our freedom is not around the corner, but, nonetheless it is a<br>
certainty.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Deceit is everywhere. While large international<br>
solidarity associations with the Palestinian cause immediately
publish<br>
all the writings of Israeli militants and journalists like Michel<br>
Warschawski, Uri Avnery, Amira Hass, or Gideon Levy, few of your<br>
articles pass the censorship. This shows well that the discourse in<br>
the solidarity movement is biased, truncated at will; of course they<br>
condemn the occupation but they do not question the legitimacy of<br>
Israel, the dispossession of Palestine in 48, etc. Better to be<br>
Israeli Jewish to report on Israel Palestine?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: Your observations are unfortunately correct.
However,<br>
it is always better to view the half-full part of the proverbial<br>
glass. That these people don’t publish my articles is unfortunate,<br>
however, the fact that they have brought themselves to realizing
that<br>
Israel is committing crimes and violating the basic human rights of<br>
the Palestinian people is a laudable act in itself.<br><br>
What is more important is that a revolutionary act can’t occur
outside<br>
its natural historical and political milieu. We just can’t expect<br>
people who were breast-fed with the holocaust religion all their
life<br>
to suddenly convert to anti-Zionism. In France, as in the United<br>
States and much of the West, turning one’s back completely to Israel<br>
and Zionism means losing a certain part of one’s identity. Hence,
many<br>
people are just not ready to undergo the desired transformation. My<br>
personal impression is that the final transformation will ultimately<br>
occur as the universal resistance to Zionism becomes deeper and<br>
irreversible as the futility of the so-called peace process become<br>
clearer, which is happening now.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: The murder of a Hamas military executive, Mahmoud<br>
al-Mabhouh, has been largely commented. Never has been Israel’s
image<br>
so degraded. But should we not see that no Western State condemns
the<br>
Israeli policy of targeted killings of Palestinians fighters?
Doesn’t<br>
this demonstrate that Western politicians do not want to see the
ugly<br>
and brutal policy of the current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and<br>
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman [1]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: You see, international politics is very much like a<br>
house of ill-repute. Principles, including so-called moral
principles,<br>
mean nothing as opposed to statecraft. In western countries, leaders<br>
and politicians would go to a great extent asserting the ideals of<br>
freedom, human rights and democracy. However, when these principles<br>
collide with expediency or pass through a real test (e.g. Hamas’s<br>
election victory in 2006), they are let down in the name of realism<br>
and pragmatism.<br><br>
The same thing applies to Israeli behaviour. Israel has always been
a<br>
criminal entity. And the West went along with that. Hence, it would
be<br>
naïve to expect the West to undergo a sudden awakening of its<br>
conscience just because Israel has murdered a Palestinian leader.<br>
Israel has always committed such crimes, and the West has always
lived<br>
with this. So there is absolutely nothing extraordinary here.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: When Benjamin Netanyahu reiterates that Israel will<br>
never withdraw from East Jerusalem, nor return to 1967 borders, nor<br>
allow Palestinian refugees to return to what is now Israel, which<br>
means do you have to voice your anger?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: I tend to believe him, which really convinces me of<br>
the futility of seeking peace with Israel. Unfortunately, it is too<br>
late for peace with Israel. Now it is either open-ended conflict, or
a<br>
single democratic state in all of mandatory Palestine from the River<br>
Jordan to the Mediterranean where all inhabitants are viewed as<br>
citizens, irrespective of religion and ethnicity. Needless to say,
the<br>
later concept is anathema for Israel, since it would lead to the
loss<br>
of Israel’s Jewish identity.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: After calling to dismember Iraq, after destroying<br>
Lebanon and Palestine, Israeli regime wants now to attack Iran and<br>
encourage his allies to enter in his war propaganda. President
Nicolas<br>
Sarkozy’s government is openly the most eager to support Israel<br>
against Iran. But is it really Iran that threatens the Middle
East?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: No, Iran in no way represents a threat to the Middle<br>
East. Iran is still very much a Third World country that lacks the<br>
ability (and the inclination) to pose such a threat. Besides, Iran,<br>
unlike Israel, has not waged wars of aggression in modern times.<br><br>
In my opinion, the driving motive behind the Israeli-western
hysteria<br>
against Iran is to ensure that Israel remains the sole, undisputed,<br>
and unchallenged superpower in the Middle East as it is now. Hence,<br>
the largely phobic talk about the possible destruction of Israel by<br>
Iran is more than rubbish. It really insults people’s intelligence
and<br>
should never be entertained by serious peoples.<br><br>
Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear heads and bombs, along with
their<br>
delivery systems, which means that it would be utterly foolish to<br>
threaten Israel. Some would claim that the Iranian leadership can be<br>
“foolish” but this is nonsense. A country that has been able to<br>
navigate itself through the treacherous terrains of international<br>
politics can’t really be foolish.<br><br>
In the final analysis, we are talking about a potential challenge to<br>
Israeli supremacy in the region, not existence, a condition that has<br>
persisted since the aftermath of the Second World War. This is what<br>
irks Israel and the West.<br><br>
As to Sarkozy, he obviously lacks the rectitude of an honest leader.<br>
He is very much a European copy of George Bush, but lacking the<br>
enormity of means that were at the latter’s disposal.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: How France totally aligned with Israel as it is
from<br>
2007 could it help the Palestinians people to regain their rights?<br>
Did it not already lose all its credit and influence in the region?
As<br>
for the strategy of Obama for the Middle East has it not already<br>
failed?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: No, France is not really qualified to carry out a<br>
truly constructive role in helping the Palestinians regain their<br>
rights. France, especially under the present government, is too<br>
reluctant, too inconsistent, too unprincipled and too much seduced
by<br>
Zionist romanticism.<br><br>
Indeed, France has repeatedly demonstrated that its heart and mind<br>
belong to Israel, not to Justice. Moreover, the scandalous French<br>
stand on the genocidal Israeli onslaught against the people of the<br>
Gaza Strip a year ago was really a classical example of political<br>
whoredom. What else can be said of a major international power that<br>
once taught the world the meaning of liberty that stood idle,<br>
passively watching Nazi-Israel rain death on the heads of Gaza’s<br>
helpless children and women while mendaciously claiming to be doing<br>
this in self-defence?<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Have you not been shocked by the call to recognize a<br>
“Palestinian State without borders”, made by Bernard Kouchner on
the<br>
day (21 February) of the arrival of the President of the Palestinian<br>
Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, in Paris? If France wants to recognise a<br>
Palestinian State, why should it be without defining its
borders?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: Yes, I have. And I think many other Palestinians
have<br>
the same feeling. The reason for that is very clear. The French<br>
proposal for recognizing a Palestinian state without borders should
be<br>
viewed as a mere euphemism for the liquidation of the Palestinian<br>
cause.<br><br>
Besides, any temporary arrangements would have be more or less vague<br>
arrangements in order to be accepted by both sides. And from our<br>
experience with the Oslo Accords, vague arrangements are always<br>
interpreted by the powerful side, in this case Israel, in a way that<br>
serves the Israeli designs, while the other party, the Palestinians,<br>
is left indulging in day-dreaming.<br><br>
Didn’t Shimon Peres, the hero of the Qana massacre [Besides, who
would<br>
or could guarantee that Israel wouldn’t treat the “temporary
borders”<br>
as “permanent borders”? The United States? France? The United
Kindom?<br>
Germany (we probably shouldn’t even mention Germany, given her<br>
pornographic embrace of Israeli Nazism!)? Well, these powers can’t<br>
even get Israel to stop demolishing an Arab home in East Jerusalem,<br>
let alone force Israel to withdraw from Palestinian land.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: The day after his call, in an article co-authored
with<br>
Miguel Angel Moratinos [2]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: I think this plan is no plan at all. It is rather a<br>
process of deception very much like the defunct Oslo process.
Besides,<br>
it is always ludicrous and vacuous to claim that a viable
Palestinian<br>
state can be built while the Palestinian people are still
languishing<br>
under a cruel foreign military occupation that controls every aspect<br>
of their lives.<br><br>
I sincerely believe that Mr. Fayyad is acting very much like Alice
in<br>
Wonderland. He is a man who was parachuted from North America to<br>
Palestine thanks to a decision by President Bush. I dare say he is
not<br>
really acquainted with the Nazi-like nature of the Israeli regime.<br>
Moreover, he naively thinks that the building of institutions,<br>
probably along with international recognition, could create a
certain<br>
mechanism, or a momentum, that would eventually make the proverbial<br>
viable Palestinian state an achievable task.<br><br>
To this, we Palestinians, who have been through it all, from
creation<br>
to destruction, say a big “No”. We have learned, the hard way, that<br>
the creation of a state before liberation is a dangerous and stupid<br>
act of gambling. This has been proven in a clarion way through the<br>
Oslo process, which gave us annexation instead of liberation and<br>
apartheid instead of statehood.<br><br>
Besides, who would guarantee that Israel wouldn’t move its tanks to<br>
crush all the institutions Mr. Fayyad would like to build in<br>
cooperation with people like Kouchner, [3] especially if
Palestinians<br>
continued to be affronted with the durability of the “temporary<br>
borders” being proposed now?<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Salam Fayyad is a politician that Sarkozy and
Kouchner<br>
would like to seat in power definitely. Luisa Morgantini, the leader<br>
of the solidarity movement in Italy, considers Salam Fayyad as a<br>
militant, a friend of the Palestinian cause. Who is Fayyad really
for<br>
the Palestinians? What did he to improve the daily life of his
people?<br>
Have you seen less check points, less jobless under his regime? Is
it<br>
true that the economic situation improved in the West Bank what does<br>
it mean for the Palestinians on the ground? Do you believe that
Fayyad<br>
could be the right person to solve the Palestinian cause?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: In my opinion, Fayyad is a man who is effectively<br>
striving to carry out the Netanyahu concept of “economic peace”<br>
whereby Palestinians, or a majority of them, would accept trading
off<br>
their national aspirations for jobs and money. In other words, he<br>
wants to us to settle for a deformed “state”, one without dignity,<br>
without freedom, without authority, without anything, for a<br>
little-whore of a state that would be perpetually subject and<br>
subservient to Israel. As to Jerusalem, the right of the refugees,
the<br>
numerous Jewish colonies that continue to expand throughout our
land,<br>
this is none of his concerns. His ultimate concerns is to achieve<br>
“economic prosperity” but at the expense of our legitimate and<br>
inalienable rights, including the right to freedom from Israeli<br>
Nazism.<br><br>
If Fayyad’s vision were to succeed, God forbid, we would be
condemned<br>
to many decades of serfdom and subjugation by Jewish colonialism,
all<br>
in the name of peace.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: The Palestinian people and their cause can only
suffer<br>
from the split between Fatah and Hamas. In 2008 you said that “it is<br>
imperative that member-States of the European Union (EU) either<br>
collectively or individually should initiate a meaningful dialogue<br>
with Hamas as soon as possible. Needless to say, such a dialogue
would<br>
be expedient to all parties involved as well as to the cause of
peace<br>
and stability in the Middle East." [4]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: I am not really optimistic about true reconciliation<br>
between Fatah and Hamas. The reason for that is that Fatah, indeed
the<br>
entire Palestinian Authority, lacks the will to act independently,<br>
given the fact that they both are almost completely dependent for<br>
their financial survival on western and pro-western Arab donors.<br><br>
Indeed, the “raison d’être” of the Palestinian Authority (PA) now,
at<br>
least from the American and Israeli view point, is to combat Hamas
or<br>
at least inhibit its growth.<br><br>
This is not a matter of a transient political strategy. It is much<br>
more than that. Israel, which continues to control the overall<br>
American policy in the Middle East, believes that the inclusion of<br>
Hamas into the main body of Palestinian politics would more or less<br>
raise the ceiling of Palestinian aspirations and expectations. This,<br>
not the issue of terror, is the main reason of Israel’s vehement<br>
hostility to Hamas.<br><br>
Moreover, Israel hopes that a strong Hamas would ensure that Fatah<br>
wouldn’t make serious concessions to Israel with regard to cardinal<br>
final-status issues such Jerusalem and the refugees.<br><br>
This is why it is likely that the dichotomy between the Palestinian<br>
Authority and Hamas will continue for sometime unless the
Palestinian<br>
Authority delivers itself from the shackles of subservience to the<br>
United States and European Union, which considers Hamas a terrorist<br>
organization.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: An intelligence officer of the Palestinian
Authority,<br>
Fahmi Shabana al-Tamimi [5]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: No, he hasn’t been heard and is unlikely to be
heard.<br>
The reason is clear. For the Palestinian Authority to truly and<br>
sincerely fight corruption, it would have to demolish the entire<br>
Palestinian Authority apparatus because corruption, in its various<br>
forms, is the other side of the Palestinian Authority regime. In
fact,<br>
there is an umbilical relationship between the Palestinian Authority<br>
and corruption. This might sound as an exaggeration to many,<br>
especially in the west. But this is taken for granted here. In
short,<br>
corruption infests every aspect of the Palestinian Authority so much<br>
so that only a thorough and complete overhaul of the Palestinian<br>
Authority would stem the plague of corruption.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: When Mahmoud Abbas asks Hamas legitimate authorities<br>
(in Gaza) to recognize Israel as a precondition to forming a<br>
government of national unity, does it sound normal?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: No, it doesn’t. And he hasn’t the courage to say so<br>
openly before a Palestinian audience. Besides, he and his
Palestinian<br>
Authority had recognized Israel a long time ago, and look what they<br>
have got in return?<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
recognized<br>
Israel. But is it its honour? What is the usefulness of the PLO? Has<br>
it still reason to be? Do you consider its representatives abroad as<br>
legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people? Mahmoud Abbas<br>
does he not use the PLO to divide the Palestinians?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: The PLO used to be a true representative of the<br>
Palestinian people. But this was when the PLO still retained it<br>
national chastity. Now, in my opinion, the PLO lost much if not all
of<br>
its national honour, if only by indulging in manifestly treasonous<br>
acts such as the so-called security coordination with Israel. Some<br>
Palestinians are already calling the PA, the daughter of the PLO, a<br>
Palestinian “judenrat”.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Your representatives outside do not seem to be<br>
concerned with the abuses of the Palestinian Authorities. Leila<br>
Shahid, Palestinian representative in Brussels continues to refer to<br>
Oslo, to negotiations, and other nonsense. By the way, this PLO<br>
representative is considered, for instance in France, the legitimate<br>
Palestinians’ voice by activists like Dominique Vidal and Michel<br>
Warschawsky, with whom Leila Shahid held conference for years in<br>
France. Did Palestinians expect them to resign in 2006 when Abbas
and<br>
his Fatah movement had lost the power?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: This is really tragic, because these people are<br>
supposed to defend the honour of the Palestinian people, not blindly<br>
support and defend policies that corrode this honour in the service
of<br>
Israel.<br><br>
My impression is that these people are following the old adage “when<br>
money appears, heads bow.” I am sorry that some of our people have<br>
reached this level of depravity.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: When the Palestinian representative in UNESCO Elias<br>
Sambar, or members of the Palestinian Authority, stigmatize Iran
one<br>
of the few countries in the region which denounces Israel without<br>
concessions or blame the Palestinian Muslim resistance to be
“Shiia”<br>
[6]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: I don’t think so. My impression is that they indulge<br>
in this stupid ranting in order to receive a certificate of good<br>
conduct from the U.S. and Israel. Otherwise, one might ask what<br>
interest do Palestinians have in alienating millions of Shiite
Muslims<br>
around the world by calling Hamas “Shia’a”?<br><br>
Besides, didn’t Fatah and the PLO repeatedly beg Hezbollah leader<br>
Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah to include Fatah prisoners in any<br>
prisoner-exchange deal with Israel; hence the hypocrisy on their
part.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Another grim reality: the Fatah collaboration with
the<br>
enemy. Under these conditions when the Palestinians hear Abbas or<br>
Fayyad talk about the “liberation of Palestine”, can they believe<br>
them?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: Yes, I know that too well. This is really beyond<br>
chutzpah [insolence]; it is pornographic hypocrisy bordering on
mental<br>
sickness.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: You wrote that the Popular Front for the Liberation
of<br>
Palestine (PFLP) “is functioning very much like a hanger-on
vis-à-vis<br>
the American backed Palestinian Authority.” [6]<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: The PFLP is not what it used to be. Its effective<br>
alliance with an American-backed Fatah has more or less undermined
its<br>
erstwhile reputation. For example, the PFLP has not adopted an<br>
uncompromising stance vis-à-vis the issue of security coordination<br>
with Israel. I remember that two years ago, one PLO security
commander<br>
declared that “the Palestinian Authority and Israel have one common<br>
enemy, that is Hamas,” and the PFLP kept silent in the face of this<br>
national apostasy.<br><br>
Moreover, the PFLP was virtually silent and made no reactions to the<br>
serious attacks by the Palestinian Authority on freedom of speech,<br>
human rights and civil liberties in the West Bank. To many<br>
Palestinian, this stand was unforgivable. More to the point, there
is<br>
a widespread impression in occupied Palestine that the PFLP
leadership<br>
has on many occasions allowed the Palestinian Authority leadership
to<br>
utilize the PLO, of which PFLP is a founding member, in the showdown<br>
with Hamas.<br><br>
None the less, most Palestinians, including this writer, still view<br>
with respect and admiration Ahmed Sadat, the imprisoned chief of the<br>
PFLP. We hope that he will be free from Zionist jails soon. [7]<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: The Al-Aqsa Mosque is a place forbidden to many<br>
Palestinians. New restrictions are forbidding Muslims to go on the<br>
site of Haram Al-Sharif. After all the punishments they suffered
from<br>
the Israeli occupiers, is it not the cruellest humiliation for the<br>
Palestinian?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: Yes, it also shows that Israel denies non-Jews
freedom<br>
of religion. How else can one relate to these draconian measures
when<br>
people from Paris to Los Angeles can access the Aqsa Mosque while<br>
Palestinian Muslims and Christian who live only a few hundreds
meters<br>
away are denied the right to visit and pray at their respective holy<br>
places? Even the most fascist states in history didn’t embark on
such<br>
measures.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori: Gaza remains under siege despite protests from many<br>
Muslims and non Muslims in the world. Can the Palestinians of Gaza<br>
continue to survive without outside help?<br><br>
Khalid Amayreh: The Palestinians have no choice but to survive. The<br>
Palestinians have survived in spite of history because they
constantly<br>
and feverishly clung to that choice, if you can call it a choice.
The<br>
other alternative was ultimate demise and national obliteration.<br><br>
None the less, there is no doubt that the enduring Gaza nightmare<br>
represents a stigma of shame at the forefront of the international<br>
community as well as upon humanity’s conscience as a whole.<br><br>
It is more than lamentable that while an entire people is being
raped,<br>
humiliated, starved, and tormented, the nations of the world are
just<br>
looking on passively as if this slow-motion holocaust were taking<br>
place on a different planet or in a different galaxy. I really can’t<br>
find the right word to describe the gigantic crime of apathy toward<br>
Gaza. Now, I understand that why many people were silent when the<br>
Nazis were doing what they were doing Europe in the course of the<br>
Second World War.<br><br>
Silvia Cattori<br><br>
________________________________<br><br>
[1] Benjamin Netanyahu, born in 1949, is the current prime minister<br>
and head of the extreme right-wing Likud party. He was the first to<br>
ever be voted prime minister via direct elections in 1996, and later<br>
served as foreign minister and finance minister under Ariel
Sharon.<br><br>
Avigdor Lieberman, born on 1958 in Kishinev, Moldavia, is the
current<br>
foreign minister and leader of the extreme right-wing Yisrael
Beiteinu<br>
party, which after the 2009 general elections has become Israel’s<br>
third largest party. Lieberman immigrated to Israel in 1978. Shortly<br>
after arriving in the country, he enlisted in the Israel Defence<br>
Forces and served in the Artillery Corps.<br><br>
[2] Qana is a village in Southern Lebanon where many Lebanese<br>
civilians, who had taken refuge in a UN compound to escape the<br>
fighting, were killed by the Israeli artillery on April 18,
1996.<br><br>
[3] An article in the daily Le Monde on February 22, 2010, “À quand<br>
l’État palestinien ?”, by Bernard Kouchner French Minister of
Foreign<br>
Affairs, and Miguel Angel Moratinos, Spanish Minister of Foreign<br>
Affairs and Cooperation.<br><br>
[4] See: “Europe should speak to Hamas now”, by Khalid Amayreh, November
2008.<br><br>
[5] See: “Hedonism in Ramallah”, by Khalid Amayreh, 18 February
2010.<br><br>
[6] See: “The Shi’a Threat in Palestine: between phobias and<br>
propaganda”, by Jean-François Legrain, 1st October 2009.<br><br>
[7] See: “What is wrong with PFLP? ”, by Khalid Amayreh, 16 October
2008.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
</font><x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#008000">415 863-9977<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF">
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.Freedomarchives.org</a></font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>