[News] Staging for a Strike? US Quietly Moves Bombers as Israel Prepares to Hit Iran

[Anti-Imperialist News]

mintpressnews.com
<https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-deploys-bombers-israel-iran-strike/289846/>
Staging for a Strike? US Quietly Moves Bombers as Israel Prepares to Hit
Iran
Robert Inlakesh
May 22, 2025
------------------------------
[image: dims_edited.jpg]

As threats of an Israeli strike on Iran grow louder, the United States is
making quiet but unmistakable moves of its own. Over the past month,
Washington has quietly repositioned strategic bombers and fighter squadrons
to Diego Garcia, a remote U.S. military outpost in the Indian Ocean,
squarely within striking distance
<https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104482/b-2-spirit/>
of Tehran.

The official rationale is force protection. But the scale and nature of the
deployments have sparked speculation that Washington is laying the
groundwork for potential military involvement in an Israeli-led operation,
or, at the very least, sending a message to Tehran that it won’t stand in
the way.

Roughly a month ago, the U.S. Air Force deployed
<https://militarnyi.com/en/news/united-states-deployed-b-52-bombers-to-an-air-base-in-the-indian-ocean/>
six B-2 Spirit bombers to Diego Garcia, a third of its active fleet of
nuclear-capable stealth aircraft. These bombers, capable of flying directly
from the U.S. to targets across the globe, don’t require forward deployment
to be effective. Which is why their presence on a remote island in the
Indian Ocean is raising eyebrows.

The B-2s have reportedly been used in prior strikes against Ansar Allah
targets in Yemen, though with limited strategic effect. Following the
declared conclusion of U.S. operations in Yemen, at least some of the B-2s
were replaced
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-downgrades-bombers-deployed-in-middle-east-as-tensions-lower-with-houthis-and-iran/>
by four B-52 strategic bombers, another long-range platform associated with
show-of-force
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-downgrades-bombers-deployed-in-middle-east-as-tensions-lower-with-houthis-and-iran/>
missions.

But then, additional firepower arrived. An entire squadron of F-15E Strike
Eagle fighter jets was flown to the base. While these jets have strike
capabilities, open-source intelligence analysts suggest they were likely
deployed for base defense. That assessment, if correct, underscores that
the Pentagon sees Diego Garcia not just as a staging ground, but as a
potential target in a broader escalation.

Meanwhile, intelligence signals point to real movement on the Israeli side.
A CNN report
<https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/20/politics/intelligence-israel-possible-strike-iran-nuclear-facilities>
this Tuesday cited intercepted communications and activity on the ground
indicating that Israel is preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.
U.S. officials reportedly believe the plans are active and serious.

In April, Donald Trump remarked
<https://english.alarabiya.net/News/united-states/2025/04/10/trump-says-israel-will-lead-military-strike-against-iran-if-nuclear-program-persists>
that Israel would “lead” any such operation. That comment was interpreted
by many as a nod of support, if not a green light, from Washington. Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for his part, has repeatedly warned that
his government will not allow Iran to become a nuclear weapons state.

Yet even as diplomatic channels remained open, the introduction
<https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-envoy-witkoff-cites-us-red-line-with-iran-against-uranium-enrichment-2025-05-18/>
of new U.S. “red lines” appears to have derailed progress. U.S. Middle East
envoy Steve Witkoff recently declared that Iran must halt all uranium
enrichment, a demand not included in the original 2015 nuclear agreement,
the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Iranian officials rejected the move outright. Foreign Minister Abbas
Araghchi reiterated
<https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-05-21/iran-insists-it-wont-stop-enriching-uranium-despite-us-demand>
that enrichment is a sovereign right and a non-negotiable issue. Ayatollah
Seyyed Ali Khamenei dismissed
<https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/irans-ayatollah-khamenei-fed-up-with-donald-trumps-nonsense-demands-defers-future-talks-8465040'>
the new U.S. conditions as “nonsense.”

And on May 22, Araghchi issued
<https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-nuclear-talks-israel-hamas-war-tensions-e3a56cb2f47bb065f8b3861297a6ff3e>
a sharper warning: Iran, he said, would take “special measures to defend
its nuclear facilities” if Israeli threats continued. The statement was
deliberately vague, but left little doubt that Tehran is preparing for
contingencies.

In Washington, meanwhile, influential think tanks are ratcheting up
pressure for a hardline approach. The Washington Institute for Near East
Policy (WINEP) has called
<https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/potential-interim-iran-nuclear-deal-sounds-great-it-isnt>
for the complete dismantling of Iran’s enrichment infrastructure. The
Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) has urged
<https://www.fdd.org/analysis/policy_briefs/2025/04/21/maximum-pressure-on-tehran-regime-in-motion-as-trump-builds-negotiating-leverage/>
more sanctions. The Atlantic Council argues
<https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/trump-cant-afford-to-simply-revive-obamas-nuclear-deal/>
the U.S. must avoid “reviving Obama’s Iran deal.”

Simultaneously, Dana Stroul, a former Biden official now at WINEP, has
argued
<https://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/narrow-path-new-middle-east?utm_medium=socialhttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/narrow-path-new-middle-east?utm_medium=social>
that Iran’s current weakness presents an opportunity for military action.
Her view echoes a growing consensus across Washington’s think tank circuit:
that Tehran is vulnerable, and now is the moment to strike.

These are the same voices that helped shape past U.S. interventions in the
region. Their resurgence now, alongside tactical military deployments and
rhetorical escalations, suggests a familiar pattern.

What’s missing from the conversation is any real public debate about the
consequences. Not just for Iran, but for U.S. interests, regional
stability, and the American public. A confrontation with Iran would carry
significant consequences, yet few in Washington have publicly questioned
whether such a conflict serves America’s national interest, save for
outliers
<https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/12/06/congress/massie-zionism-patriotism-house-israel-00130383?utm_source=chatgpt.com>
like Rep. Thomas Massie, who has drawn fire from powerful lobbies simply
for asking whether this is our fight to begin with.

The buildup at Diego Garcia may be interpreted as precaution. But it’s also
a reminder of how quickly precaution becomes policy, and policy becomes
war, especially when shaped by proxies, pressure groups, and allies with
very different interests.

Wars don’t always begin with votes. In fact, they often begin with quiet
deployments far from view, and even farther from the American people they
will ultimately affect.

Feature photo | This satellite image from Planet Labs PBC shows six U.S.
B-2 stealth bombers parked at Camp Thunder Cove in Diego Garcia on April 2,
2025. Though officially deployed for operations in Yemen, the presence of
these nuclear-capable aircraft in striking range of Iran has raised
concerns that the U.S. is quietly preparing to support a potential Israeli
attack. Photo | AP

* Robert Inlakesh is a political analyst, journalist and documentary
filmmaker currently based in London, UK. He has reported from and lived in
the occupied Palestinian territories and hosts the show ‘Palestine Files’.
Director of ‘Steal of the Century: Trump’s Palestine-Israel Catastrophe’.
Follow him on Twitter @falasteen47*

* Republish our stories! * MintPress News is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250524/6ca093b0/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dims_edited.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 783385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250524/6ca093b0/attachment-0001.jpg>