[News] Where Egypt’s Gaza Proposal Gets It Right And Wrong

[Anti-Imperialist News]

palestinechronicle.com
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/where-egypts-gaza-proposal-gets-it-right-and-wrong-analysis/>
Where Egypt’s Gaza Proposal Gets It Right And WrongMarch 6, 2025
------------------------------
Arab leaders announced the key points of the Egyptian plan for Gaza at the
Cairo summit. (Photo: via Moroccan Diplomacy X)

*By Robert Inlakesh
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/writers/robert-inlakesh>*

Unfortunately, the Arab leaderships are still caught in their own illusion
that the world will return to the pre-October 7 reality, but it won’t.

Endorsed by Arab rulers at a summit held in Cairo, Egypt’s 112-page draft
proposal for the future of the Gaza Strip was quickly rejected by Israel
and the United States. Meanwhile, Hamas has welcomed the plan. This comes
despite the proposal actually being more favorable to Israel than to them.

Although it took longer than expected to draft, the Egyptian plan is
certainly a serious counter-proposal to US President Donald Trump’s
outlandish rhetoric about ethnically cleansing the Gaza Strip and turning
it into a billionaires’ playground. Striking a balance between Palestinian
and Israeli interests, it reads as a document in line with former Arab
initiatives which uphold the “two-State solution” as the desired long-term
outcome.

Where the proposal shines is its insistence on the Palestinian people not
only leading their own transitional phase government, but also that they be
the ones to preside over reconstruction.

As always, the devil can often be found in the details, yet, premising
reconstruction and future governance on the principle of Palestinian
self-determination is a positive. However, in order to make the
reconstruction phase possible, there must first be an agreement on exactly
who will be allowed to lead the transitional governing coalition that will
be formed in the Gaza Strip.

While pledges to build specific amounts of housing units, an airport, and a
seaport, are all features of Cairo’s proposal and would in theory be great,
there were all these things before, much of which was also included in the
Oslo Agreements. The gaping wipe hole in this proposal has little to do
with Gaza and everything to do with Israel.

To begin with, there is an onus put on Israel for destroying the Gaza
Strip, whether that be a strategy for legally or financially holding Tel
Aviv to account.

The reality is that if the Israelis are never going to be held accountable
and everyone else will simply just pay to reconstruct the occupied
territory – which they are technically responsible for under international
law – then Israel could in theory wait for Gaza to be reconstructed and
then just destroy it again for fun.

The most serious issue that presents itself is what mechanisms are to be
put in place to restrain the Israeli occupation army.

If it is not forced into restraint, what will prevent it from carrying out
random acts of violence against civilians, as they are currently committing
on a daily basis inside southern Lebanon, despite the ceasefire.
Furthermore, what guarantees are there to be put in place that force Israel
to allow sufficient reconstruction materials to enter the Gaza Strip?

In 2014, Israel agreed to allow reconstruction materials into the besieged
coastal enclave, yet never followed up on its pledge, in fact, Gaza was
never fully reconstructed between the 2014 war and October 7, 2023. In
addition to this, we need only go back to the January 19
ceasefire/prisoner-exchange deal to secure all the relevant evidence to
prove that Israel will not respect its side of the ceasefire deal in any
respect.

On all accounts, from murdering Palestinian hostages, refusing to release
hostages on a whim, blocking aid and essential items into Gaza as agreed,
to murdering civilians with airstrikes and sniper fire, Israel violated the
ceasefire.

It not only violated the ceasefire every single day since its
implementation, but Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, openly
vowed from day one that he was not going to uphold the deal he signed and
would cancel it come the second phase of the agreement.

If there are no provisions to hold Israel accountable or to prevent it from
attacking and thwarting reconstruction, the Egyptian plan would be no more
than an exercise in self-vanity on behalf of the Arab rulers.

The other major issue here is whether Palestinians who are professionals in
their fields will be excluded from the future Gaza administration based
solely upon party affiliations or work within the fold of the previous
Hamas-led administration.

The Israel standard of “re-educating Gaza”, “de-radicalizing Gaza” and
“destroying Hamas”, appears to be in line with the disastrous US nation
building policy of “de-Baathification” that was set forth in Baghdad.

As we have learnt from history, disqualifying the most competent
professionals from working in their field simply based on past
affiliations, can prove disastrous, often leading to administrations formed
of unqualified and incompetent opportunists.

If Tel Aviv is going to insist that the competent internally elected
officials cannot govern based upon a claim that they were associated with
Hamas, there cannot be any governing force that will work in Gaza.

Although it is certainly a serious proposal and something that even Hamas
has openly welcomed, despite it clearly spelling the end of their rule in
Gaza, it rests upon two faulty assumptions: The first is that Israel is a
rational actor that will respect an agreement and the second is that we
still live in a two-State solution era.

Israel was never interested in actually giving concessions to the
Palestinian people, yet back in the 1990s and early 2000s, you could argue
it had some national mission of kind and maintained society cohesion
amongst its Jewish population.

In this era, especially after the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023, but
even before that with the rise of Netanyahu’s extremist coalition, Israel
no longer exists as the State it once was.

It is clear that the Israelis are now seeking territorial expansion, “total
victory” in a regional war that aims to redraw borders and crush the
Islamic Republic of Iran along with anyone else who gets in their way,
while redefining what their Zionist mission truly constitutes.

There is no way that Israel, unless it is dealt a decisive military defeat,
will ever agree to concessions with the Palestinian people or any
surrounding nation for that matter. Unfortunately, the Arab leaderships are
still caught in their own illusion that the world will return to the
pre-October 7 reality, but it won’t. Israel sees the “seven front war” that
Netanyahu recently described as an “existential” battle for national
survival.

Even if a short-term proposal for ending the war in Gaza and reconstruction
of the territory would be endorsed by Tel Aviv and Washington, the Arab
rulers have to throw their weight behind a defensive strategy that holds
Israel to account if they violate it. In order to ensure the Israelis don’t
try to collapse the plan, there must be a joint Arab program that will
impose military, economic, political and legal costs on the occupier.

Failure of the Arab leaderships to actually stand up in this moment and to
finally throw their weight around could result in the toppling of many of
these regimes in the foreseeable future. While they may suffer as a result
of the US and Israeli actions that will be taken against them, it could be
the only way to save themselves from being toppled.

We are no longer in the era of the two-State solution being thrown around
as a phrase to make everyone happy, Israel doesn’t even want to hear about
it any more, and neither does the US government. Instead, they want to know
one thing, are you with us as our slaves or are you against us?

*(The Palestine Chronicle)*


*– Robert Inlakesh is a journalist, writer, and documentary filmmaker. He
focuses on the Middle East, specializing in Palestine. He contributed this
article to The Palestine Chronicle. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250306/644c6e5c/attachment-0001.htm>