[News] Political Theater on Gaza: The Trump-Netanyahu Ceasefire Deal

[Anti-Imperialist News]

palestinechronicle.com
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/political-theater-on-gaza-the-trump-netanyahu-ceasefire-deal/>
Political Theater on Gaza: The Trump-Netanyahu Ceasefire DealJuly 14, 2025
------------------------------
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump. (Photo: video
grab)

*By Robert Inlakesh
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/writers/robert-inlakesh>*

Results on the ground are the only thing that can be trusted. What we hear
from the US and Israeli corporate media must be taken with a grain of salt,
while Trump and Netanyahu’s words are all but meaningless.

In the immediate aftermath of the 12-day battle between Israel and Iran, US
President Donald Trump shifted his focus on allegedly pursuing a ceasefire
in Gaza. Despite the benefits for all sides, in the event of a durable
ceasefire, we are yet to see tangible steps taken to bring the genocide to
a close.

At the beginning of July, Donald Trump released a post of “Truth Social”
claiming that Israel had agreed upon a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, adding
that “I hope… that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better –
IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,” in the Republican Party President’s typical style
of social media diplomacy.

Yet, since the beginning of the month, it has become clear that the
Israelis never accepted any ceasefire proposal formally and have continued
to add conditions to the proposal, which are evident non-starters for Hamas.

The Hamas position is very clear: they seek a prisoner exchange but value a
comprehensive agreement to end the war entirely and will not back down from
this position. The Palestinian political party has also repeatedly
expressed its readiness to hand power over to a domestically led governing
body, which would be a precursor to a Palestinian government following free
and fair democratic elections.

Israel, on the other hand, is not even willing to implement a deal that
would replicate the one implemented upon Trump’s inauguration in late
January. It has created the so-called Morag Corridor that bisects southern
Gaza, adding to its scheme of territorial separation inside the besieged
coastal territory.

During the ceasefire negotiations in 2024, the big sticking points were
Israel’s withdrawal from the Netzarim and Philadelphi corridors. At the
time, policy makers in Tel Aviv argued that it would prove difficult to
return to occupying these dividing line positions inside Gaza in the event
of war and made a big deal about how integral these corridors were to
“security”, which it is now also claiming about the newly built Morag
Corridor.

On March 18, Israel unilaterally tore up the Gaza ceasefire, which was met
with American acquiescence. The Israeli military had withdrawn from both
Philadelphi and Netzarim, yet began returning to these positions within
days, debunking their own notions that withdrawal made reoccupying the area
difficult.

In other words, there are no real obstacles on the ground to a ceasefire.
Hamas will cede power; there are ample investors and aid organizations
willing to help, while the Israeli military has no real excuses in terms of
military concessions. Whether we will see a ceasefire is down to whether
Tel Aviv wants it or its allies in Washington force it.
*Will There Be a Ceasefire and Why?*

In order to assess whether a ceasefire is likely, we have to factor in what
could shape such a decision. The first is what the Israelis and Americans
can get out of it and why.

For Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu, a ceasefire could rupture his
ruling coalition and cause a political schism with the most hardline
elements of his right-wing alliance, which could end up translating to a
loss in any future elections.

Thus far, the Israeli prime minister has failed to achieve his stated war
goals after 22 months of inflicting one of the worst atrocities in modern
history upon the people of Gaza. He is currently using an ISIS-linked
militia that is composed of hardened criminal collaborators in Gaza, while
his US allies are helping to run the so-called “Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation” (GHF).

The Trump administration recently injected 30 million dollars in its
people’s tax dollars to finance the scheme that has been condemned by over
160 NGO’s and labelled a “death trap”. Meanwhile, the occupying army is
setting up concentration camps for Gaza’s civilian population and
desperately attempting to find a new method for ethnically cleansing the
territory.

Yet, following the battle with Iran, Netanyahu saw both a rise in support
for his right-wing coalition, in addition to a rise in popular support
amongst Israelis for ending the war in Gaza. Therefore, the personal
political incentive for him would be to close the war on Gaza, return the
captives through a prisoner exchange, and focus on Tehran instead.

Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that Iran’s enriched Uranium stockpile survived
the Israeli-US attacks on the Iranian nuclear facilities, while his Defense
Minister, Israel Katz, has claimed that the strategy on combating Tehran’s
nuclear program is similar to getting rid of cancer, hinting at future
strikes.

Furthermore, the issue of Hezbollah in the north is still clearly a major
priority for the Israelis, and their continued illegal occupation of
southern Syria enables military action in Lebanon that could come from the
Bekaa Valley region on the ground, perhaps even in concert with armed
efforts from forces loyal to Ahmed al-Shara’a.

Syria is clearly allied with Israel against Iranian-aligned groups –
Hezbollah and the Palestinian resistance – presenting an opening that may
not exist in the future, given the shaky situation for the pro-US
leadership in Damascus.

Israel’s primary concerns are therefore fighting against Hezbollah and
Iran. If Gaza is taken out of the situation, this could potentially negate
the possibility of having to fight a multifront ground war in the north and
south in the future, while also taking Yemen’s Ansarallah out of the
picture at least temporarily.

Although the occupied West Bank could surprise Tel Aviv with a shock
uprising, it appears as if the territory has been successfully pacified
with the help of the Palestinian Authority for the time being. Even a
large-scale annexation of Area C of the West Bank (60% of the territory),
may not translate into any meaningful popular resistance there.

A major challenge to the Israeli occupiers in the West Bank cannot be ruled
out, however, as the October 2015 Knife Intifada demonstrated to be the
case. Quite suddenly and for reasons which can only be understood in
hindsight, there can be an uprising that comes out of nowhere.

This being said, nobody is expecting the West Bank to be a major factor in
the foreseeable future. Therefore, taking the resistance in the Gaza Strip
out of the multi-front war would make perfect strategic sense for the
leadership in Tel Aviv.

>From the US perspective, ending the genocide in Gaza would obviously carry
many benefits. Israel has lost popular support in the United States, so on
a domestic level, the Trump administration would benefit in the court of
public opinion. Also, the US would appear strong over their Israeli allies,
especially as many Americans have begun to question who really controls the
foreign policy positions of their President.

Washington could also then pave the way towards a proper Syria-Israel
normalization agreement, while working on bringing Saudi Arabia into their
so-called “Abraham Accords” alliance. There is no real downside to ending
the Gaza genocide from a purely US perspective at that point, as their
attempt to achieve total regional dominance can be achieved against Iran
and Hezbollah, in theory, not in the Gaza Strip against Hamas.

All of the motivators towards achieving a ceasefire are there. But we have
to understand that the mere fact that it isn’t happening means that the US
and Israel don’t actually want one yet. If Washington and Tel Aviv wanted a
lasting ceasefire, it would be announced within a few days and implemented
soon thereafter. Even if Israel said no, the US could force it with a
single phone call.
*Political Theater*

During the course of the Biden administration’s rule, post October 7, 2023,
we heard time and time again about “imminent” ceasefires and the various
efforts of US negotiations “working around the clock” to end the war. It
would later be revealed through reports published by Israel’s Channel 13
and Drop Site News that the Biden government never asked for Israel to end
the war, long after it became aware that there were no clear war goals in
Gaza.

Donald Trump’s announcements and the reports about “officials” and “leaks”
should also be assumed to be similarly deceptive. These are all part of a
show that is being put on for public consumption.

There is also a precedent for this kind of political theatre during the
Trump administration’s reign in power too. This was exactly what we saw in
the lead-up to Israel’s surprise attack against Iran. The US and Israeli
media were constantly leaking reports that Trump was fighting with
Netanyahu, some Zionist propaganda outlets even produced outlandish claims
that Washington was set to recognize a Palestinian State.

Above and beyond all is the way that Israeli society sees this situation,
which is the primary motivator for the theatre we are seeing. The talk of
imminent agreements over the Gaza war keeps the pressure off of Netanyahu,
while he continues to scheme on how to continue his regime change efforts
against Iran.

There is a significant portion of the Israeli population that desperately
wants to see an end to the war, for two reasons: Because they seek the
return of the captives, and also due to their frustration at the frequent
deaths of soldiers who are being caught in ambushes by the Palestinian
resistance each day.

Israel has already lost the military war in Gaza and has been incapable of
executing the ethnic cleansing program that they have sought since 2023.
The Israeli public does not have the determination to fight and wants easy
solutions that don’t carry consequences.

Benjamin Netanyahu understands his delusional population better than anyone
else and has proven capable of duping the genocidal citizenry. If there is
going to be a ceasefire, the US and Israel will make it happen; otherwise,
everything we are seeing just needs to be viewed as part of a script.

Results on the ground are the only thing that can be trusted. What we hear
from the US and Israeli corporate media must be taken with a grain of salt,
while Trump and Netanyahu’s words are all but meaningless.

*(The Palestine Chronicle)*


*– Robert Inlakesh is a journalist, writer, and documentary filmmaker. He
focuses on the Middle East, specializing in Palestine. He contributed this
article to The Palestine Chronicle. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250714/5284c749/attachment-0001.htm>