[News] Covert Crusade: Washington's $600m digital war on Iran
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Feb 21 15:13:18 EST 2025
Covert Crusade: Washington's $600m digital war on Iran
For over a decade, the US State Department’s NERD fund has covertly
funneled hundreds of millions into regime-change efforts in Iran,
disguising digital warfare and opposition funding as ‘democracy
promotion’ – but a sudden funding freeze has thrown these operations
into chaos.
Kit Klarenberg <https://thecradle.co/authors/kit-klarenberg>
FEB 21, 2025
-https://thecradle.co/articles/covert-crusade-washingtons-600m-digital-war-on-iran
Photo Credit: The Cradle
Earlier this month, /The Cradle /exposed how
<https://thecradle.co/articles/leaked-documents-expose-us-interference-projects-in-iran>in
2023, the US State Department’s shadowy Near East Regional Democracy
(NERD) fund earmarked $55 million to stoke unrest in Iran during the
following year’s elections.
This was part of a wider US campaign of interference designed to disrupt
and destabilize the Islamic Republic. As that investigation noted,
details on where this money goes – and who benefits – are strictly
confidential as a matter of policy. Still, there are clues in the public
domain pointing to at least some recipients.
*Regime change by another name *
As a US Congressional Research Service report records
<https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mideast/R46344.pdf>, due to hostile US–Iran
relations, and Tehran’s well-founded view of NERD “as a means of
financing regime change,” its programs rely on “third-country training”
as well as “online training and media content.”
The report further confirms that despite NERD being Washington’s primary
“foreign assistance channel” for projects targeting Iran, “activities,
grantees, [and] beneficiaries” are not advertised “due to the security
risks posed by the Iranian government.” It continues:
“NERD was created in 2009 as a ‘line item for Iran democracy’ but
was not (and is still not) technically Iran-specific … For 2024, the
Biden Administration requested $65 million for NERD … to ‘foster a
vibrant civil society, increase the free flow of information, and
promote the exercise of human rights,’ including at least $16.75
million for internet freedom.”
What was unstated in the report is that NERD represents a simple
rebranding of the Iran Democracy Fund, created
<https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/after-crackdown-iran-democracy-fund>by
former president George W. Bush in 2006 with the explicit goal of
toppling the Islamic Republic.
The initiative was ostensibly shut down under Barack Obama three years
later, eliciting bitter condemnation
<https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704500604574481341183751038>from
much of the western media, neoconservative pundits, and lawmakers.
However, as the BBC acknowledged
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8315120.stm>at the time, the
move was in fact “welcomed by Iranian human rights and pro-democracy
activists”:
“These US funds are going to people who have very little to do with the
real struggle for democracy in Iran and our civil society activists
never received such funds,” a Tehran-based human rights lawyer told the
British state broadcaster. “The end to this program will have no impact
on our activities whatsoever.”
*Internet interference *
In reality, the program never ended – it was merely repackaged. White
House officials maintained the fiction that NERD was focused on
democratization rather than regime change, a claim undermined by a June
2011 <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/world/12internet.html>/New York
Times/exposé.
That investigation revealed the Obama administration’s so-called
“Internet Freedom
<https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/rm/2011/168475.htm>” initiative
aimed to “deploy ‘shadow’ internet and mobile phone systems dissidents
can use to communicate outside the reach of governments in countries
like Iran, Syria, and Libya.”
In other words, Washington sought to build a covert legion of regime
change operatives in Tehran, and provide them with the technology to
coordinate in secret. It is clear from the Congressional report’s marked
reference to “internet freedom” that these machinations continue today.
Moreover, as a 2020 report
<https://mideastdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/POMED_FY21BudgetReport.pdf>by
the DC-based <https://mideastdc.org/>Project on Middle East Democracy
noted, organizations genuinely committed to advancing Iranian rights
still steer well clear of NERD. An anonymous NGO worker described its
“style” as “aggressive.” Another implied NERD is engaged in deeply dirty
work:
“We choose not to apply for NERD grants because we do not want to
get pulled into [anything] crazy.”
*‘Non-Iranian’*
The same year, the /Financial Times /(FT)//reported how
<https://www.ft.com/content/740a385a-3924-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4>NERD
efforts had become turbocharged under US President Donald Trump's
administration, explicitly to facilitate and encourage “anti-Tehran
protests.”
This included “providing apps, servers, and other technology to help
people communicate, visit banned websites, install anti-tracking
software,” and more in the Islamic Republic, in order to offer “Iranians
more options on how they communicate with each other and the outside
world.”
Curiously, while portraying Iran as a digital prison, the FT admitted
that major western social networks remain accessible in the country, and
Iranians can easily view western media. As usual, recipients of NERD
funds remained unnamed – except for Psiphon
<https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/beware-psiphon-cia-tool-fueling-global>,
a VPN provider long-associated with discredited exiled Iranian
<https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/12/16995882/asl-19-ali-karimzadeh-bangi-alleged-assault>opposition
figures and, by then, controlled by the Open Technology Fund (OTF). The
FT estimated that just three million Iranians used Psiphon, less than
four percent of the population.
OTF was an “Internet Freedom” product <https://www.opentech.fund/>– one
of its board members has openly admitted
<http://jilliancyork.com/2015/02/06/there-are-other-funding-options-than-the-usg/>the
Fund’s agenda is “regime change.”
Fast forward to September 2024; as former US president Joe Biden's
administration was seeking increased funds for NERD – mere months after
the $55 million invested the previous year failed to produce desired
mass unrest and upheaval around that year’s elections in Iran – a White
House meeting was convened
<https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-calls-big-tech-help-evade-online-censors-russia-iran-2024-09-05/>with
major tech giants, encouraging them to offer more “digital bandwidth”
for OTF-bankrolled apps and tools.
As fund chief Laura Cunningham explained, a “sizeable chunk” of OTF’s
budget was taken up by the cost of hosting all the network traffic
generated by its vast array of digital destabilization apps, which
included Signal
<https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/signal-facing-collapse-after-cia>and
Tor
<https://libguides.pratt.edu/internet-data-privacy/building-privacy-toolkit>.
While OTF sought to support “additional users” of these products, it
lacked resources to keep up with “surging demand.” What came of this
meeting, which was attended by representatives of Amazon, Cloudflare,
Google, and Microsoft, is not clear.
Yet, if further “digital bandwidth” was granted to OTF, it is clear the
Trump administration’s “pause” in overseas aid funding has thrown all
NERD’s meddling efforts in Iran into total – and potentially permanent
– disarray.
A 27 January report <https://www.iranintl.com/en/202501271390>in the
Saudi-funded, anti-Islamic Republic/Iran International /quoted numerous
anonymous beneficiaries of US financing bemoaning how grantees,
including foreign-run Persian-language media outlets and organizations
documenting purported “abuses” to keep the Islamic Republic
“accountable,” had been abruptly shuttered.
An anonymous “human rights activist” told the outlet Washington’s freeze
on aid spending “(will) impose restrictions on projects that address
human rights violations or investigate governmental and military
corruption which have impacted Iran's economy and social conditions in
favor of foreign terrorist activities and money laundering.”
They said “several /non-Iranian American institutions /[emphasis added]
have been using these funds to investigate corruption and money
laundering.” Now though, “these organizations will be forced to halt
their activities.”
*‘Severe implications’*
US-supplied Virtual Private Network (VPN) services also loomed large
among the malign resources impacted by the aid “pause.” A nameless
“activist” told /Iran International/that 20 million Iranians used such
tools “to bypass Tehran’s internet curbs.”
The outlet further quoted an article published
<https://www.peace-mark.org/en/articles/165-11-2/>by Human Rights
Activists in Iran, a US-funded NGO
<https://www.hra-iran.org/contact/>/not /based in the Islamic Republic,
but Virginia, near the CIA’s Langley headquarters: “In today’s Iran, the
internet has no meaning without VPNs.”
Such dire warnings were echoed by Ahmad Ahmadian, head of
California-based tech firm Holistic Resilience
<https://holisticresilience.us/>, which “aims to advance internet
freedom and privacy by developing and researching censorship
circumvention.”
An Iranian expat and alumni
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/aahmadiyan/details/education/>of Tehran
University, Ahmadian warned major US tech firms “may not be willing or
able to continue their support for providing anti-censorship tools”
without government support. Such remarks highlight how these supposedly
popular resources lack grassroots backing or financing, being wholly
dependent on Washington’s sponsorship to operate:
“The leadership of the US government has been crucial in urging big
tech companies to provide public services. Without the encouragement
of the US government, these companies wouldn't take the initiative
on their own.”
Other unnamed activists further warned /Iran International/, “the
consequences of Trump’s executive order will not remain limited to
internet censorship circumvention tools.” They believe that if NERD’s
activities “do not receive an exemption within the next month” – by the
end of February – “they will either collapse entirely or be deeply
curtailed.”
One declared, “the impact of this freeze might not be immediately
noticeable, but its severe implications will become evident over time.”
Meanwhile, “internet experts” cautioned that “even if US aid starts
again” after the 90-day pause, “the damage is irreversible since many
people … might never fully return to using US-backed secure services.”
As /The Cradle /noted on 11 February, Washington’s forced withdrawal
from meddling in Iran could create fresh opportunities for genuine
diplomatic engagement
<https://apnews.com/article/iran-trump-usaid-nuclear-deal-talks-986793e2e21e2b338546767bba5f2df0>between
the two long-time adversaries. But another possibility looms: after
spending $600 million over a decade with little success, the US may
simply be preparing to test out new, potentially more malign
regime-change strategies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250221/308a1a0a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list