[News] The strategic and tactical gains of Operation People of Might
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu Nov 28 22:36:52 EST 2024
english.almayadeen.net
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/the-strategic-and-tactical-gains-of-operation-people-of-migh>
The strategic and tactical gains of Operation People of Might
Janna Kadri and Tala Alayli
November 28, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article examines the economic and political repercussions for
"Israel", the mounting legal challenges faced by its leadership, and the
broader regional and international implications of this historic
confrontation, following a 13-month battle with the Islamic Resistance
in Lebanon.
87e6e943-b9b5-4c07-9467-f4e463391023.jpg
* The strategic and tactical gains of Operation People of Might (Al
Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Mahdi Rtail)
On the morning of November 27, 2024, the ceasefire agreement between
"Israel" and Hezbollah came into effect, marking the conclusion of a
protracted and devastating war that began in October 2023. This
agreement, brokered by international powers such as the United States
and France but ultimately shaped by the Resistance's uncompromising
demands, underscored a pivotal shift in the trajectory of the war, with
terms decisively favoring Hezbollah's strategic objectives.
The agreement symbolized the West's capitulation to the Resistance,
driven by its inability to sustain the crippling military and economic
toll inflicted on its settler-colonial protégé—an entity whose very
survival hinges on the violent dispossession and systematic
extermination of indigenous Arabs.
In this analysis, we lay bare the multifaceted dimensions of the war,
dissecting Hezbollah's strategic and military triumphs over the
settler-colonial Israeli regime. We further examine the economic and
political repercussions for "Israel", the mounting legal challenges
faced by its leadership, and the broader regional and international
implications of this historic confrontation.
Sustained Resistance and Strategic Achievements
Hezbollah’s steadfast ability to endure and confront one of the most
technologically advanced militaries on the planet illuminates its
remarkable strategic accomplishments during the war. Over more than a
year of relentless hostilities, the Resistance inflicted profound
military losses
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/beacon-of-victory--hezbollah-s-operations-room-issues-statem>
on "Israel," demonstrating not only its advanced tactical acumen but
also its capacity to reshape the contours of regional power dynamics.
*Personnel Losses*: While the Israeli army keeps its true casualties
undeclared, statements by the Islamic Resistance's Operations Room
confirm that over 130 Israeli soldiers and officers were killed, and
more than 1,250 were wounded since October 1, 2024. These casualties
resulted from direct combat engagements in southern Lebanon, precision
rocket and missile strikes on military advancements, and the ambushes
orchestrated by Hezbollah fighters in fortified regions, but do not
include losses sustained from rocket strikes inside occupied
territories. These numbers reflect a sharp escalation
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/war-with-hezbollah-to-be-deadliest-for--israel---130-page-re>
in personnel losses compared to previous confrontations.
*Armored Vehicle Losses*: Hezbollah’s adept use of advanced anti-tank
guided missiles (ATGMs) devastated the Israeli armored fleet, resulting
in the destruction of 59 Merkava tanks, including the Merkava Mk. IV
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/al-mayadeen-breaks-down-hezbollah-s-merkava-massacre-in-sout>—the
pride of Israeli military engineering. Additionally, 11 military
bulldozers, two Humvees, two armored vehicles, and one armored personnel
carrier were rendered inoperable, primarily in strategic battlegrounds
such as Khiam
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/hezbollah-s-fierce-resistance-preventing--israel--from-captu>
and Bint Jbeil. In these arenas, Hezbollah's mastery of asymmetric
warfare rendered Israeli advances impotent, exposing the vulnerabilities
of a military apparatus touted as invincible.
*Drone Losses*: The Israeli regime also suffered a blow to its aerial
superiority, losing at least nine unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs),
including six Hermes 450 drones
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/hezbollah-downs-israeli-hermes-450-drone--rocket-hit-kills-i>,
two Hermes 900 drones, and one Quadcopter. These losses underscored the
Resistance’s burgeoning air defense capabilities, which dealt a
significant blow to Israeli reconnaissance and operational dominance in
the skies.
*Operational Setbacks*: Hezbollah disrupted the Israeli occupation’s
logistical chains and military convoys, compelling the constant
redeployment of troops and resources to counter emerging threats.
Strategic rocket and missile salvos reached deep into occupied
territories, diverting Israeli resources to protect civilian
infrastructure while further complicating its military calculations.
Particularly notable were the Khaybar series of strikes
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/hezbollah-conducts-three--khaybar--ops--strikes-base-in-haif>,
which employed advanced ballistic rockets, cruise missiles, and assault
drones to target sensitive military and intelligence installations with
precision.
*Strategic Implications*: These cumulative losses shattered the illusion
of "Israel’s" regional military supremacy. Hezbollah’s ability to
extract both direct and indirect costs from the occupation regime
underscored the Resistance’s tactical evolution and operational depth.
The relentless pressure imposed by Hezbollah forced "Israel" to curtail
its ambitions, ultimately agreeing to a ceasefire whose terms heavily
favored the Resistance. This result affirmed Hezbollah’s status as a
formidable regional force and fortified its narrative of resilience and
triumph against imperialist-backed aggression.
Economic Repercussions for 'Israel'
The economic toll of the war on the Israeli settler-colonial regime
reverberated across critical sectors, exposing the fragility of its
economic foundations and the cascading vulnerabilities of its
occupation-driven model of governance. Infrastructure, key industries,
fiscal stability, and financial markets all bore the brunt of
Hezbollah’s sustained resistance.
*Direct Costs*: The Israeli regime allocated billions to military
operations, covering troop mobilization, logistics, and equipment
expenditures. Hezbollah’s precision rocket attacks inflicted widespread
damage on residential buildings, commercial hubs, and public
infrastructure, with property damage alone estimated at $273 million
<https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/costs-israel-hezbollah-conflict-lebanon-israel-2024-11-26/>.
In the northern settlements, damages exceeded five billion shekels ($1.3
billion), further exacerbated by widespread forest and land destruction.
These financial hemorrhages underscore the inability of the occupation
to shield its hinterlands from the Resistance’s strategic strikes.
*Impact on Agriculture*: Northern occupied Palestine, a vital
agricultural hub
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/israeli-north-lost-some--131mln-in-agriculture-under-hezboll>
contributing a third of the settler economy’s output, faced severe
disruptions. The displacement of farmers and destruction of facilities
led to acute shortages, particularly in eggs, where 73% of "Israel’s"
annual production
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/once-thriving-agriculture-struggles-to-stay-afloat-in-evacuation-northern-border-area/#:~:text=Israel's%20northern%20region%20accounts%20for,regions%2C%20the%20Agriculture%20Ministry%20said.>
originates. To mitigate the crisis, the regime was forced to import 45
million eggs—a stark indication of the systemic vulnerabilities exposed
by the war. The loss of agricultural stability not only weakened local
food security but also underscored the dependence of the regime’s
economy on fragile and highly contested territories.
*Tourism Disruption*: Tourism, a cornerstone of the settler economy,
suffered dramatic setbacks. The northern region’s evacuations and the
constant threat of rocket fire rendered it inhospitable to visitors.
Overnight bookings plummeted by 63%
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/Economy/tourism-in--israel--collapsing-amid-ongoing-wars>
compared to October 2023 and an even more staggering 86% relative to
October 2022. Such disruptions further deepened the financial strain on
the regime, dismantling one of the key narratives of economic stability
that it touts to its international backers.
*Financial Market Volatility*: The war sent shockwaves through financial
markets, triggering sharp declines in the shekel’s value as investor
confidence waned. Bond markets experienced significant volatility,
driving up borrowing costs for the regime. While external traders,
particularly Wall Street banks
<https://www.reuters.com/markets/wall-street-banks-get-lift-trading-israeli-currency-bonds-2024-11-26/>,
capitalized on this instability, reporting record revenues from trading
Israeli assets, the short-term profits for global capitalists
highlighted the long-term economic precarity of the occupation. These
dynamics underscored the extent to which "Israel" remains an
economically vulnerable entity, reliant on external intervention and
speculative capital.
*Broader Implications*: The war plunged the Israeli regime’s budget
deficit to 8% of GDP
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/-israel-s--budget-deficit-could-surge-to-8---israeli-media>,
driven by skyrocketing military expenditures and the cost of
reconstruction. Inflation rose to 3.5%
<https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202411254812/bank-of-israel-holds-interest-rate-as-inflation-exacerbates-war-uncertainties-update>,
compounding household hardships amid rising prices and disrupted supply
chains. Despite an illusory 3.8% annualized GDP growth in Q3
2024—largely driven by emergency reconstruction and consumption—this
uptick reflected reactive, short-lived economic activity rather than any
genuine recovery or stability. The dependence on ephemeral drivers of
growth highlighted the underlying fragility of an economy structured
around settler colonialism and military expansionism.
Impact on Haifa Port: A Symbolic and Strategic Loss
Hezbollah's precision strikes on Haifa Port during the war further
exposed the vulnerabilities of one of "Israel’s" most vital economic
arteries, delivering a decisive blow to its maritime infrastructure.
Haifa Port, a keystone of the Israeli settler-colonial economy, endured
significant damage that disrupted trade routes and exposed the fragility
of an entity reliant on global economic networks to sustain its
occupation-driven model.
The first salvo of rockets targeting Haifa on October 6, 2024, marked a
turning point in the war. Subsequent barrages, including a large-scale
attack on November 24 involving over 250 rockets
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/hezbollah-establishes-security-belt-reaching-tel-aviv--israe>,
caused extensive damage to port facilities and surrounding
infrastructure. The strikes set cargo containers ablaze, crippled
docking stations, and rendered several operational zones inoperative,
forcing the rerouting of maritime traffic to alternative ports. These
disruptions reverberated across "Israel’s" economy, stalling the flow of
goods and amplifying supply chain vulnerabilities.
The damage sustained by Haifa Port not only laid bare the limits of the
regime's defensive capabilities but also signaled a broader collapse of
confidence in its infrastructure. Global shipping companies hesitated to
dock in Haifa
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/18-shipping-companies-re-routing-around-africa-amid-yaf-atta>,
further isolating "Israel" economically. Haifa's symbolic significance
as a hub of Zionist settler colonial expansion deepened the impact of
its targeting. By striking a nerve center of "Israel’s" economic
apparatus, Hezbollah effectively demonstrated the hollowness of
"Israel’s" claims of invulnerability.
Hezbollah's Strategic Narrative
Hezbollah's strategic narrative has undergone a profound transformation,
cementing its position as not merely a defender of Lebanese sovereignty
but as a pivotal force in the broader resistance against the
settler-colonial Israeli regime. This narrative, deeply rooted in the
material realities of the region, has resonated both locally and
internationally, bolstering Hezbollah's legitimacy and redefining the
balance of power in the Middle East.
*Defender of Lebanon and the Resistance*: Hezbollah’s portrayal as the
unwavering protector of Lebanese sovereignty against Zionist aggression
has become a cornerstone of its identity. This role is not merely
rhetorical; it is a material response to decades of occupation,
invasion, and dispossession inflicted by the Israeli regime. By
embodying the aspirations of a population denied its fundamental rights,
Hezbollah has transcended the confines of sectarian politics,
positioning itself as a symbol of defiance against imperialism and
colonial violence. This self-image has reverberated across the Arab
world, where the Resistance is increasingly viewed as a legitimate and
indispensable movement.
*Enhanced Military Capabilities*: The post-2006 period marked a
significant evolution in Hezbollah's military doctrine. The group’s
arsenal now includes an extensive array of precision-guided rockets and
missiles capable of reaching deep into occupied territories. These
advancements, demonstrated with devastating effectiveness during the
recent war, are not accidental but the result of deliberate preparation
in anticipation of prolonged asymmetrical warfare. Throughout the
conflict, Hezbollah introduced new variations
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/hezbollah-s-latest-strike-on-ramat-david-base--the-fadi-type>
of existing weaponry, such as the Fadi-1 series of rockets, maintaining
the capacity to disrupt Israeli operations while sustaining its own
operational tempo. This ability to innovate and adapt underscores the
strategic depth of the Resistance, which has not only survived but
thrived under conditions of constant external aggression.
*Negotiating Power in Ceasefire Agreements*: The recent ceasefire
negotiations epitomize Hezbollah's ascension as a decisive actor in the
region. Far from being a passive participant, Hezbollah dictated terms
that forced the Israeli regime to retreat from southern Lebanon,
effectively conceding ground to the Resistance. This outcome reflects
Hezbollah's capacity to translate battlefield successes into political
leverage, securing agreements that align with its strategic objectives.
In doing so, the group has demonstrated its ability to challenge not
only the Israeli occupation but also the imperialist powers underwriting
its existence.
*A Material Narrative of Resistance*: Hezbollah's strategic narrative is
grounded in the material realities of resistance. Its military
advancements, political influence, and negotiating power are not
abstractions; they are the concrete expressions of a movement that has
repeatedly outmaneuvered a heavily militarized occupation. The outcomes
of recent wars, including the reshaping of ceasefire dynamics, have
further solidified Hezbollah's standing as an outstanding force capable
of altering the political and military landscape of the Middle East.
Ceasefire as a Tactical Win
The ceasefire agreement, brokered by imperialist powers such as the
United States and France, stands as a resounding tactical triumph for
Hezbollah, cementing provisions that decisively aligned with the
Resistance's strategic objectives. The deal mandated the withdrawal of
Israeli forces from southern Lebanon within 60 days, stripping the
occupation of its direct military foothold near Hezbollah strongholds,
while simultaneously affirming the Resistance’s control over key
territories north of the Litani River. In doing so, the agreement
underscored Hezbollah's dual role as a resilient military force and an
unyielding defender of Lebanese sovereignty.
This victory illuminated Hezbollah’s unparalleled ability to influence
negotiations with global powers, exposing the inherent limitations of
Western-led campaigns to dismantle the Resistance. Despite the
overwhelming support of the United States and France—staunch patrons of
Israeli security—the terms of the ceasefire reflected Hezbollah's
superior strategic positioning. The failure of these powers to curtail
Hezbollah's influence further underscored the hollowness of their
interventionist ambitions, as their efforts unraveled under the weight
of the Resistance’s growing legitimacy and operational sophistication.
The ceasefire also laid bare the vulnerabilities of the Israeli
settler-colonial project. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s
admission of the regime’s need to regroup and shift focus to other
regional threats tacitly acknowledged the toll inflicted on its military
and economic apparatus.
Within the Knesset, the ceasefire was branded an "all for nothing
<https://www.thetimes.com/world/middle-east/israel-hezbollah-war/article/israeli-view-netanyahi-ceasefire-hezbollah-3rgs2k3lp>"
outcome, with some ministers conceding that the deal was a necessary
retreat to avert catastrophic losses. Such revelations dismantled the
long-standing myth of Israeli military invincibility, revealing the
occupation's incapacity to decisively counter Hezbollah’s resistance.
Moreover, the ceasefire signified the broader collapse of Western
interventionist policies in the region. Decades of military aid,
diplomatic isolation tactics, and coercive measures designed to erode
Hezbollah’s capabilities were rendered futile. Instead, the Resistance
emerged from the war with its stature not only intact but significantly
bolstered, reaffirming its centrality to anti-colonial struggles in the
Middle East. The unwavering connection between Hezbollah and its local
and regional support base, rooted in material resistance to occupation
and dispossession, proved far more durable than the imperialist
strategies designed to undermine it.
In essence, the ceasefire agreement was not merely a tactical win for
Hezbollah but a symbolic defeat for Western imperialism. It demonstrated
the capacity of grassroots Resistance movements to withstand and
counteract the hegemony of global powers and their regional proxies.
This victory reinforces Hezbollah’s narrative as a legitimate and
steadfast force, committed to defending Lebanon and challenging the
broader structures of domination that underpin imperialist aggression in
the Middle East.
Regional and Popular Support
The 2023-2024 war indelibly fortified Hezbollah's status as a vanguard
of resistance across the Arab and Islamic worlds, embedding its regional
and popular support within the material realities of anti-colonial
struggle. In the face of Lebanon’s profound economic and political
crises, Hezbollah’s actions resonated powerfully with populations
throughout the Middle East, reaffirming its role as the unwavering
defender of sovereignty and an unrelenting opponent of Zionist
aggression. Its appeal lay in its ability to articulate and embody the
collective yearning for dignity and resistance against occupation.
At the heart of this narrative stood the towering figure of martyr
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/it-s-been-40-days--but-he-will-live-on-forever>,
whose leadership and steadfast resolve became the living symbol of
defiance. His strategic acumen and unshakable commitment to the cause
inspired deep loyalty and admiration, not only in Lebanon but throughout
the region. Revered in life and in martyrdom, Sayyed Nasrallah
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/what-we-never-got-to-tell-you>
came to personify the resilience and justice sought by those for whom
resistance is not merely an option but a necessity for liberation. His
legacy continues to galvanize the spirit of resistance
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/sayyed-nasrallah-s-martyrdom--a-catalyst-for-renewed-resista>,
embodying the collective aspirations of dignity and sovereignty
The martyrdom of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah a week into the war was an
Israeli attempt at disintegrating Hezbollah and weakening its structure,
military performance, and morale. "Israel", over the past few months,
executed a series of assassinations targeting Hezbollah's top leadership
command. Just like with Hamas, "Israel" gambled on the possibility of
destructuring the Resistance by eliminating not only the masterminds
behind its operational superiority, but the founders of the organization
itself. On September 17 and 18, the Israeli regime also triggered two
mass terrorist attacks by detonating portable pagers and transceivers
used by members of Hezbollah (administrative and military), resulting in
thousands of casualties, hoping to diminish their service before
launching their large-scale aggression on September 23.
However, because Hezbollah is extraordinarily organized and prepared for
battle, the martyrdom of its frontline command and its most beloved
leader, as well as the loss of thousands of its members, proved, as it
has vehemently stressed before, that assassinations and martyrdom only
nourish its determination. Consequently, its will to march to the
frontlines and rain rockets down as far as Tel Aviv (and beyond), in
eternal service and allegiance to their people, manifested and
strengthened the people's reciprocation of utmost loyalty to the
Resistance.
Domestically, the Israeli war machine sought to undermine Lebanese unity
by deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure and safe zones under
the guise of neutralizing resistance leadership. These acts of terror,
designed to sow division and incite civil strife, ultimately failed to
achieve their objectives. Instead, the massacres and destruction only
solidified national cohesion, as the Lebanese populace rallied around
Hezbollah and its supporters in an unprecedented display of unity. The
Israeli regime's attempts to manufacture internal discord backfired
spectacularly, reinforcing the collective resolve of a society nearing
victory.
Militarily, Hezbollah proved its capacity to sustain prolonged
operations under relentless international scrutiny and military
pressure. Its endurance in the face of one of the most advanced armed
forces in the world underscored its strategic sophistication and
operational resilience. This not only deepened its domestic support but
also resonated across the region, where admiration for its ability to
outlast and outmaneuver the Israeli occupation grew steadily.
Internationally, the war further revealed the moral bankruptcy of
Western powers, whose governments enabled Israeli aggression while
repressing pro-Palestinian voices
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/project-esther--right-wing-scheme-to-liquidate-pro-palestine> at
home. In the collective West, solidarity with Hezbollah and the
Palestinian cause emerged as a direct response to the complicity of
Western states in genocide and colonial violence. Activists and ordinary
citizens across Europe and North America faced state repression for
opposing imperialist aggression, yet their defiance only amplified the
growing disillusionment with the hypocrisy of so-called liberal democracies.
The West’s suppression of dissent—through visa revocations, home raids,
arrests, and police brutality—exposed the hollowness of its claims to
champion human rights. The dissonance between its rhetoric and actions
unraveled rapidly, discrediting government narratives and fueling
widespread anger. Movements like the student uprisings on US campuses,
the protests of Dutch football fans
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/amsterdam-mayor-denounces-use-of--pogrom--as-propaganda>,
and the solidarity campaigns of UK-based groups such as Palestine Actio
<https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/65-student-groups-unite-in-solidarity-with-palestine-action>n
marked the awakening of a global consciousness that shifted support away
from imperialist states to the oppressed and those who defend them.
By steadfastly championing Palestinian rights and opposing external
domination, Hezbollah amplified its influence far beyond Lebanon’s
borders. It became a beacon of resistance against the forces of
oppression, inspiring solidarity across diverse communities united in
the pursuit of justice. Sayyed Nasrallah’s role as a rallying figure
cemented this legacy, galvanizing a shared vision of dignity and
sovereignty in defiance of foreign domination. Through its actions and
narrative, Hezbollah solidified its position not just as a regional
force but as an emblem of global resistance against colonialism and
imperialism.
A Final Victory
Hezbollah's ability to impose sustained and multifaceted pressure on the
Israeli settler-colonial regime—militarily, economically, and
politically—while preserving and fortifying its territorial and
strategic foothold, unequivocally positions the movement as a victorious
force in the eyes of its supporters and beyond. The ceasefire agreement,
far from being a compromise, stands as a testament to Hezbollah's
resilience and tactical superiority. Combined with the devastating toll
inflicted on the Israeli regime’s military apparatus and the cascading
international legal and diplomatic crises confronting its leadership,
this outcome solidifies the narrative of a Resistance that not only
endured but emerged from this protracted war stronger, more legitimate,
and more deeply rooted in the regional and global struggle against
imperialism and occupation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20241128/94161165/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 87e6e943-b9b5-4c07-9467-f4e463391023.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 73552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20241128/94161165/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the News
mailing list