[News] Condemn if you wish, but Palestinians will pay a heavy price
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Sat Nov 11 21:36:36 EST 2023
jonathancook.substack.com
<https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/condemn-if-you-wish-but-palestinians?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email>
Condemn if you wish, but Palestinians will pay a heavy price
Jonathan Cook - November 10, 2023
------------------------------
However counter-intuitive it may sound, there are three good grounds –
*ethical* ones, at that – for refusing to join in the chorus of
condemnation of Hamas' actions on October 7.
That isn't the same as condoning what Hamas did. It is clear the group
carried out war crimes that day – not least by attacking civilians and
taking them as hostages.
But there is an important distinction to be made between recognising that
crimes were committed, and colluding in an act of condemnation that has
been openly politicised, and continues to be politicised, to justify
harming Palestinian civilians.
<https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F16ff9c73-ade4-467d-b406-3b213114b7b5_1567x1175.jpeg>
How so?
1. Those demanding condemnation are chiefly interested in imposing a
consensus, and a dangerous one, that insists the atrocity clock started on
Oct 7.
Such people want to wipe from the score card decades of atrocities by
Israel towards Palestinians: ethnic cleansing, massacres, colonisation,
siege, violent dispossession.
And they can achieve their goal because of a stark narrative power
imbalance on Israel-Palestine. In western societies, pro-Israel sentiment
is baked in, articulated constantly by our politicians and media. Anyone
who condemns Hamas has no control whatsoever over the ends to which their
condemnation will be put.
In short, condemnation of the kind demanded of everyone about Oct 7 is not
cost-free. It has been weaponised to drive out context, to erase
Palestinian suffering and Israeli oppression, and to simplify and distort
history.
2. Those demanding condemnation want the condemnation not so the world can
be made a better, safer place, but so their rationalisations for the
continuing bombing campaign against Palestinian civilians in Gaza sound
more plausible.
If Hamas' actions need to be singled out for special condemnation (while
Israel's decades of crimes do not), then Hamas' actions must be an order of
magnitude worse than anything Israel has ever done.
Hamas can then be considered a special kind of depraved, inhuman, barbarous
enemy. Which means, in turn, that there is both an especial urgency to
eradicating Hamas and special conditions that justify Israel using especial
cruelty to achieve that end.
In these circumstances, colluding in what amounts to a politicised act of
condemnation is beyond unwise. It is not an act of solidarity with
Israelis. It is not an expression of shared humanity. It is a tool for
fanning the flames of hatred, for justifying ethnic cleansing and genocide
against Palestinians.
3. Implicit in the demand for condemnation is an intention to strip
Palestinians of the right to *any* kind of resistance to brutal military
occupation by Israel.
International law is clear on this point, even if western politicians and
the media are not. Palestinians have a right to resist.
There are plenty of things Hamas did on Oct 7 that were legitimate under
international law, such as attacking Israeli military bases that have been
enforcing the siege of Gaza for 16 years. That is the main reason why such
large numbers of Israeli soldiers died that day.
But the demand for condemnation intentionally seeks to blur the distinction
between what Hamas had every legal right to do – attack the Israeli army –
and what it did not have a right to do, which is kill civilians and take
them hostage. Instead, all of the day's events are painted as illegitimate,
all of the day’s events are blended into one giant atrocity.
If that isn't clear, watch the BBC and Sky News’ highly sympathetic reports
about soldiers injured in Hamas' attack.
The BBC’s Reeta Chakrabarti, for example, spent time with one soldier who
chose to avenge his dead comrades by taking part in the invasion of Gaza.
The report accorded him near-hero status. But the truth is that he and his
comrades were stationed next to Gaza because they were helping to enforce
the collective punishment of 2.3 million Palestinian civilians through a
16-year siege – a war crime.
Those actions made him and his comrades an entirely legitimate target for
Hamas' attack. But to point that out, to support international law, has
been made taboo by western politicians and media.
In all these ways, the demand for condemnation is designed to implant the
idea that Palestinians must accept their fate: to be permanently enslaved
by Israel's settler-colonial project, to be permanently subjected to
Israel's apartheid rule, to be under a permanent siege that counts the
minimum calories needed for survival, and to be bombed whenever the mood
takes Israel.
Condemnation of October 7 is what the West's war machine wants from you. It
is what ensures Palestinian children keep being killed, and that
Palestinians never get their freedom or dignity.
Condemn if you wish, but understand that Palestinians will pay a heavy
price for your words.
Share
<https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/condemn-if-you-wish-but-palestinians?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share>
Leave a comment
<https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/condemn-if-you-wish-but-palestinians/comments>
*All my posts are freely accessible, but my journalism is possible only
because of the support of readers. If you liked this article or any of the
others, please consider sharing it with friends and making a donation to
support my work. You can do so by becoming a paid Substack subscriber
<https://jonathancook.substack.com/>, or donate via Paypal
<http://paypal.me/cookjournalist> or my bank account
<https://www.jonathan-cook.net/supporting-jonathan/>, or alternatively set
up a monthly direct debit mandate with GoCardless
<https://www.jonathan-cook.net/supporting-jonathan-2/>. A complete archive
of my writings is available on my website <https://www.jonathan-cook.net/>.
I’m on Twitter <https://twitter.com/Jonathan_K_Cook> and Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/Jonathan.Cook.journalist/>.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20231111/ddaf0804/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list