[News] COP27 and the 10 Rules of Corporate Greenwashing

[Anti-Imperialist News]

counterpunch.org <https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/11/30/266951/>
COP27 and the 10 Rules of Corporate Greenwashing
Thomas Klikauer - December 1, 2022
------------------------------

Photograph Source: IAEA Imagebank – CC BY 2.0
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/>

With the Coca-Cola sponsored
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/04/cop27-climate-summit-sponsorship-polluter-coca-cola-condemned-as-greenwash>
blah-blah-blah festival <https://www.workers.org/2022/11/67706/> of COP27
<https://truthout.org/articles/greenwashing-governments-and-oil-companies-turned-cop27-into-a-climate-disaster/>
in the Egyptian dictatorship
<https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/egypt> done and
dusted – until the next one –  corporate greenwashing
<https://earth.org/greenwashing-companies-corporations/> has worked its
magic again. And this is not just because Rachel Rose Jackson
<https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63571610> of Corporate
Accountability <https://www.corporateaccountability.org/> commented
that, *COP27
looks like a fossil fuel industry trade show*.

Egypt’s Sharm El-Sheikh
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/30/greenpeace-egypt-greenwashing-cop27>
made itself looking green
<https://globalvoices.org/2022/11/08/egypts-systemic-greenwashing-is-sabotaging-cop27-before-it-begins/>
and sustainable
<https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/cop27-hillknowlton-pr-greenwash-egypt/> –
thanks to corporate PR superstar company Hill+Knowlton
<https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/cop27-hillknowlton-pr-greenwash-egypt/>
which also supplied corporate propaganda for ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron,
and Saudi Aramco.

Like whitewashing that seeks to wash things clean, corporate greenwashing
is a form of corporate marketing spin
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxdD_XIkNbo> telling you that *toxic
sludge* <https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/egypt>* is
good for you*. In short, greenwashing
<https://medium.com/disruptive-design/what-is-greenwashing-how-to-spot-it-and-stop-it-c44f3d130d5>
is designed to make people believe that a company is doing more to protect
the environment than it really does. It sells lies.

Corporate greenwashing is deceptively used to persuade the public that a
company’s products, their corporate aims, their policies and politics
(read: lobbying – a $3.5bn industry
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZVfTCBUkgM>) are environmentally friendly.

The top-10 <https://earth.org/greenwashing-companies-corporations/>
corporate greenwashing corporations are: Volkswagen, BP, Exxon, Nestle,
Coca-Cola, Starbucks, IKEA, plastic bottle water companies, major banks,
and fashion companies like H&M, Zara and Uniqlo.

By now, one of the more classical textbook
<https://sk.sagepub.com/cases/volkswagens-greenwashing-backfires-the-road-to-redemption>-style
cases of corporate greenwashing
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfVceaeCuSk> remains that of the German
car-giant Volkswagen <https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772>. VW was
forced to admit to cheating emission
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5TvFY7xRDM> tests by fitting various
vehicles with a so-called *defeat* *device*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ4irwe3ZDk>. This is a software that
could detect when it is undergoing an emission’s test and then alters the
performance to reduce the emission’s level – simple but effective.

This was done while hyping-up the low-emission features of VW
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scGoHy6VLIk> vehicles through marketing
campaigns <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOTKIZgppbs>. In truth, however,
Volkswagen engines were emitting up to 40-times
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxPjWL5X63I> the allowed limit for
nitrogen oxide pollutants.

Yet, VW still means *V*olks*w*agen and not *V**ery Worried* as VW made a
whopping $15.5bn in 2021 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group>.
Corporate greenwashing works – for corporations and that is the *raison
d’être* for doing it. Yet, there are other countless cases.

Take for example, the global fossil fuel giant BP
<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-14/congressional-committee-says-documents-show-big-oil-greenwashing>
that has even changed its name. Such a move is also known as re-branding.
Now, BP wants to be known as *Beyond Petroleum*
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottcarpenter/2020/08/04/bps-new-renewables-push-redolent-of-abandoned-beyond-petroleum-rebrand/>
– it sounds really green!

To greenwash one of the world’s major corporations, BP
<https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/15/bp-ceo-says-oil-and-gas-giant-is-a-greening-company.html>
even put solar panels on their gas stations – that looks so green! Sadly
for BP
<https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/king-charles-greenwash-bp-sustainable-markets-initiative/>,
the corporation got called out for their self-greening deceptions.

Next, there is also Coca-Cola
<https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/2980275/coca-cola-accused-of-greenwashing/>.
Coke also has been accused of greenwashing because of its *‘natural’* sugar
claims. Coca-Cola started its marketing campaign as a way to attract more
health-conscious consumers. And so, Coca-Cola turned itself into a health
drink! More recently, Coca-Cola tried to beef this up through *Innocent
Drinks*
<https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2022/02/22/greenwashing-the-coca-cola-company-juice-advert-rejected-by-watchdog>
– also deemed misleading.

Yet, the reality of the Coca-Cola corporation looks rather different. For
example, many of Coke’s plastic bottles probably end up polluting our
environment – like oceans. Greenpeace listed Coca-Cola as the leading
plastic polluter in 2019. It makes and sells around 100 billion
<https://nyunews.com/culture/2021/05/06/greenwashing/> (no spelling
mistake!) single-use plastic bottles
<https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/2021/06/04/coca-cola-funds-endless-cleanups-but-doesnt-prevent-more-plastic-bottles-ending-up-in-our-oceans/>
a year. In the very same year, the Coca-Cola corporation
<https://www.coca-colacompany.com/press-releases/a-coke-bottle-made-with-plastic-from-the-sea>
announced,

*Coca-Cola is unveiling the first ever sample bottle made using recovered
and recycled marine plastics, demonstrating that, one day, even ocean
debris could be used in recycled packaging for food or drinks. This sample
is the first ever plastic bottle made using marine litter that has been
successfully recycled and reused in food and drink packaging*

Yet, their plastic bottles
<https://oceana.org/press-releases/coca-colas-recycled-content-pledges-wont-save-the-oceans-from-plastic-pollution-says-oceana-senior-vice-president/>
– whether made from recycled material
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/07/coca-cola-pepsi-and-nestle-named-top-plastic-polluters-for-third-year-in-a-row>
or not – still end up in our oceans
<https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/10/31/coke-save-oceans-plastic-promise-refillable>.
Meanwhile, the Coca-Cola corporation
<https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/cop27-hillknowlton-pr-greenwash-egypt/> –
world’s worst corporate plastic polluter for four years in a row – has
resisted legislation intended to force the company into adopting more
environmentally friendly practices. At the same time, corporate greenwashing
<https://greenbusinessbureau.com/green-practices/the-seven-sins-of-greenwashing/>
continues, for example, when Coke’s very own website says,

*w**e make brands and products that …*

*build a more sustainable future*

These and plenty of other companies intentionally and deliberately
instigate greenwashing PR
<https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0896920518774091> strategies.
Often, they do so in order to distance themselves from their – equally
intentional and deliberate – environmental vandalism.

Through corporate greenwashing, even oil corporations
<https://balkangreenenergynews.com/big-oils-climate-pr-strategy-is-greenwashing-study-finds/>
can be made to appear green and sustainable. The successes of, for example,
oil corporations in circumventing COP27 remains hidden behind a green
corporate logo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeTgLKNb5R0>.

Corporate greenwashing means that companies and corporations spend very
significant resources on corporate PR
<https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-87958-7> advertising the
false image of being green. And usually, this comes in three versions:

   1. corporations’ greeewashing makes their products look sustainable;
   2. corporations also greenwash the production process of these products;
   and
   3. they greenwash themselves – as a business to make them look
   sustainable.

Corporate greenwashing can range from changing the name of the corporation,
the logo, and the label of a certain product to pretend to be supporting
the natural environment while these products still contain harmful
chemicals.

Yet, there are also multi-million dollar corporate PR campaigns
<https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/1344/1473> that
portray, for example, highly-polluting energy companies as eco-friendly.
The key idea behind corporate greenwashing is that it covers up
unsustainable and destructive corporate agendas and policies
<https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10242589221123774a> while,
simultaneously, allowing corporations to carry on making profits.

Corporate PR <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4jdcdlquF0> firms like
Edelman <https://www.edelman.com/>, for example, have even facilitated climate
change denial
<https://www.routledge.com/Greenwashing-Culture/Miller/p/book/9781138962712>.
The corporate PR industry – and more importantly “routinely” – also
funds astroturf
organizations
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/24/the-mass-deception-machine-of-computational-propaganda/>.
These are PR firms that set up other – even more evil – organisations that
falsely pretend to be grassroots activists while being paid by
corporations. Some examples
<https://davidsuzuki.org/story/fake-grassroots-campaigns-deserve-uprooting/>
are: Ethical Oil
<https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/09/29/Ethical-Oil-Falsehoods/>, Resource
Works <https://thenarwhal.ca/resource-works-two-cheers-natural-resources/>,
and the International Climate Science Coalition
<https://www.desmogblog.com/international-climate-science-coalition>.

Of course, there are also well-paid business school
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/08/bulldoze-the-business-schools/>
professors in the mix supplying the necessary ideology to camouflage corporate
greenwashing <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-87958-7>.
The ideologies come – mostly – in three forms:

   1. *Business Ethics:* is an oxymoron known as *business ethics *pretending
   that corporations are ethical;
   2. *CSR:* next is management’s all-time favourite ideology of *corporate
   social responsibility* (CSR
   <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2015/11/27/the-dark-side-of-corporate-social-responsibility/>);
   and finally,
   3. *Citizenship:* there is the business school hallucination that there
   is something like *corporate citizenship*
   <https://corporate-citizenship.com/> – corporations pretending to be
   like ordinary citizens.

Ideological support for corporate greenwashing also comes from
coin-operated corporate-sponsored think tanks in which crypto-academics
find additional employment particularly when they are too bad even for a
business school. Their junk science contributes to the crypto-academic
field of management studies
<https://braveneweurope.com/thomas-klikauer-norman-simms-the-madness-and-malady-of-management-studies>
.

The ideologies they create work against democratic regulation and
environmental regulation. All this comes as part of an even more important
ideology – the global ideology of neoliberalism
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/04/skeletons-in-the-neoliberal-cupboard/>
.

One of the methods used by corporate greenwashing are fake grass roots
campaigns involving letter-writing to legislators. This is done on behalf
of an – almost always – undisclosed *interest group *that is in reality,
financed by a corporation. Yet, this sort of greenwashing
<https://www.routledge.com/Greenwashing-Culture/Miller/p/book/9781138962712>
also employs real people posing as volunteers. These corporate stooges
speak at public hearings and participate in real grass roots campaigns.

In any case, such planned PR deceptions are central components of the
corporate propaganda filling us with doubts
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ii9zGFDtc> – and even self-doubt – as
the earth confronts the environmental abyss. Many of such activities amount
to very serious corporate greenwashing
<https://www.ecowatch.com/greenwashing-guide-2655331542.html>.

Yet, corporate greenwashing has more tricks up their sleeves. The Chicago
Climate Exchange <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Climate_Exchange>,
for example, was set up by global greenwashing polluters like BP, DuPont,
and the Ford Motor Company. It was a tool for voluntarily cutting emissions
that fancies the neoliberal hallucination of industry self-regulation
<https://gameofmates.com/>.

Some evil heretics might argue that there is a reason why, for example,
there are drivers’ licenses, why they are regulated by the state, and why
people cannot regulate their own driver’s license printed out on their
kitchen table. The corporate greenwashing idea behind the
self-regulating Chicago
Climate Exchange
<https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/download/15647/12771/37978>
was to reduce pollution. It failed, even as a corporate greenwashing idea.

Ideas like this are only another tool in the box of corporate greenwashing.
Perhaps an even more interesting aspect of corporate greenwashing is
that multi-national
corporations <https://academic.oup.com/book/9537/chapter/156536304> have
become bigger sources of global aid than nation states.

And of course, corporations
<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03932729.2017.1389151>
cold-heartedly promote this fact. Their wealth is partly engineered through
decades of corporate tax-cuts
<https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/raise-the-corporate-tax-rate-and-kill-three-birds-with-one-stone,16738>created
by governments that are under the spell of neoliberalism. Corporate PR
sells this as sustainable corporate social responsibility (CSR).

This gives CSR a human face – as applied to capitalism and to make
capitalism look human-like. It simply means that polluting corporations get
up each morning, get increasingly smeared during the day, and simply wash
off at night. That is the basic idea of CSR. CSR-fancying corporate
polluters make particular use of greenwashing PR. It comes as part of their
search for an environmental-friendly license to operate – a core ideology
of CSR.

Of course, this reaches deep into company accounting where much of this is
rather cosily sold as *triple bottom line*
<https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-the-triple-bottom-line> – people,
profit, planet. Planet being a distant third! This accounting ideology
emerged from none other than the corporate consultancy world.

The ideology behind it is to merge corporate *p*rofits with human society (
*p*eople) and the environment (*p*lanet). Its goal: justifying profit
making. Greenwashing remains a key component of this corporate strategy.

Following this business strategy, many companies and corporations have
wrapped themselves in a green cloak
<https://texas.deepgreenresistance.org/civilization/eleven-inherent-rules-of-corporate-behavior/>.
Today, brands even try to outdo one another with their eco-credentials to
become the – hopefully undetected – master of corporate greenwashing. To
win the green consumer game, companies often exaggerate environmental
claims or simply make things up – whatever works best for the corporation.

Worse, criminal polluters
<https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:58903/>
even engage in a rather new form of corporate greenwashing
<https://texas.deepgreenresistance.org/civilization/eleven-inherent-rules-of-corporate-behavior/>.
They share positive information about their environmental records while
concealing negative aspects which, so the hope goes, can be offloaded onto
others. This is known as externalisation
<https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28363/chapter/215233551>.
Meanwhile, the public should no longer see what is real – environmental
pollution – and what a public relation constructed image of the corporation
is.

One of the goals is to blur the boundary between what is reality and what
is faked. This is also known as gaslighting
<https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4883&context=buffalolawreview>.
The idea of gaslighting is based on a 1940’s movie called Gaslight
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYmtzaHwCKo> in which one is no longer
sure whether the flickering of the gaslight is real or not.

Today, gaslighting <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqQMS9c0Qfs> is a
propagandistic and manipulative-psychological tool used by, for example,
global warming deniers that seeks to induce the doubting of one’s own
reality and even sanity.

One of the goals of the more severe forms of corporate propaganda is that
once a person’s underlying reality is lost, the person becomes more open to
propaganda as words, images, and signs become self-referential while
bypassing reason. Yet, the entire process is driven by the propagandist
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8L8tGErQPs>.

With no residual correspondence to the real anymore, corporate propaganda
has achieved its goals. Reality has adapted to corporate propaganda.
Reality has become a mere simulation. French philosopher Baudrillard calls
this *simularcra* <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCgoKIT0Ufc> – the
simulation of reality. For corporate greenwashing, this also means that
being green and sustainable is just a matter of simulation –pretending.

The simulation of corporate sustainability is about the pretence of a
corporation as being environmental. And now comes the crucial bit. This is
within the dynamic core of the capitalist economy
<https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/653091>.

Necessarily, corporate greenwashing has to leave out some very
uncomfortable facts, like global environmental vandalism
<https://braveneweurope.com/thomas-klikauer-nadine-campbell-dark-water-rising>,
starvation, sweatshops, slavery, managerial despotism
<https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/19288_despotism-on-demand-how-power-operates-in-the-flexible-workplace-by-alex-j-wood-reviewed-by-thomas-klikauer-nadine-campbell/>,
mass poverty, and global warming
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/08/23/global-warmings-walking-dead/> – *our
**highway to climate hell* <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlnlO-Ic9VQ>.
To divert attention away from the pathologies of corporate capitalism,
corporate greenwashing does ten things:

1) it pretends that there is a trade-off between consumer choices and
sustainability;

2) many corporations offer next to no proof that their supposedly
environmental initiatives have a positive impact on nature;

3) corporate greenwashing lives from general statements that are
deliberately kept vague and non-specific;

4) corporate greenwashing uses false labelling – often in the form of
self-invented “eco-certification” that, in reality, is no certification at
all;

5) corporate greenwashing pretends to be sustainable in areas that have
next to no relevance to the corporation, their product, and the production
process used to make these products;

6) corporate greenwashing presents false choices, at times, framed
<https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/05/11/the-politics-of-framing-and-the-framing-of-politics/>
as *the lesser of two evils*;

7) of course, corporate greenwashing lies by presenting something – a
something that simply does not exist;

8) corporate greenwashing sells false hopes into a corporate-based
environmental future that does not exist;

9) corporate greenwashing also covers up serious corporate dangers, harms
to the environment, environmentally hazardous products, and negative
environmental consequences; and finally,

10) corporate greenwashing converts capitalism’s reality of profits over
people and the environment into pretending to be environmentally
sustainable.

In the end, corporate greenwashing is an important tool in the arsenal of
propaganda and corporate public relations. Capitalism not only lives by
flooding us with consumer goods, it also needs an accompanying ideology
telling us that two iPads
<https://nupge.ca/content/apple-admits-using-child-labour> will make us
twice as happy.

Part of this necessary ideology to sustain capitalism is not only to hide
capitalism’s environmental impact but also the pretence that capitalism
<https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/653091> and its corporations
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y888wVY5hzw> are environmentally friendly.
This marks the moment when corporate greenwashing enters the scene.
Corporate greenwashing is the ideological by-product of living in a
capitalist society.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20221201/df6e334b/attachment.htm>