[News] ‘Freedom is Never Voluntarily Given’: Palestinian Boycott of Israel is Not Racist, It is Anti-Racist - Politics For The People

[Anti-Imperialist News]

http://www.ramzybaroud.net/freedom-is-never-voluntarily-given-palestinian-boycott-of-israel-is-not-racist-it-is-anti-racist/
‘Freedom
is Never Voluntarily Given’: Palestinian Boycott of Israel is Not Racist,
It is Anti-Racist - Politics For The People
February 3, 2021, 3:28 pm

*By Ramzy Baroud*

Claims made by Democratic New York City mayoral candidate
<https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/andrew-yang-officially-launches-nyc-mayoral-campaign/2830731/>,
Andrew Yang, in a recent op-ed
<https://forward.com/opinion/462603/andrew-yang-mayoral-race-new-york-city-jewish-community/>
in the Jewish weekly, ‘The Forward’, point to the prevailing ignorance that
continues to dominate the US discourse on Palestine and Israel.

Yang, a former Democratic Presidential candidate, is vying for the Jewish
vote in New York City. According to the reductionist assumption that all
Jews must naturally support Israel and Zionism, Yang constructed
<https://forward.com/opinion/462603/andrew-yang-mayoral-race-new-york-city-jewish-community/>
an argument that is entirely based on a tired and false mantra equating
criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.

Yang’s pro-Israel logic is not only unfounded, but confused as well. “A
Yang administration will push back against the BDS movement which singles
out Israel for unfair economic punishment,” he wrote, referring to the
Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.

Yang compared the BDS movement to the “fascist boycotts of Jewish
businesses”, most likely a reference to the infamous Nazi boycott
<https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/1933-anti-nazi-boycott> of Jewish
businesses in Germany, starting in April 1933.

Not only does Yang fail to construct his argument in any historically
defensible fashion, he claims that BDS is “rooted in anti-Semitic thought
and history.”

BDS is, in fact, rooted in history, not that of Nazi Germany, but of the
Palestinian General Strike <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4284312?seq=1> of
1936, when the Palestinian Arab population took collective action to hold
colonial Britain accountable for its unfair and violent treatment of
Palestinian Muslims and Christians. Instead of helping Palestine achieve
full sovereignty, colonial Britain backed the political aspirations of
White European Zionists who aimed to establish a ‘Jewish homeland’ in
Palestine.

Sadly, the efforts of the Palestinian natives failed, and the new State of
Israel became a reality in 1948, after nearly one million Palestinian
refugees were uprooted and ethnically cleansed
<https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/the-meaning-of-nakba-israel-palestine-1948-gaza/560294/>
as a result of a decidedly violent campaign, the aftershocks of which
continue <https://www.unrwa.org/palestine-refugees> to this day. Indeed,
today’s ongoing military occupation and apartheid are all rooted in that
tragic history.

This is the reality that the boycott movement is fighting to change. No
anti-Semitic, Nazi – or, according to Yang’s ahistorical account, ‘fascist’
– love affair is at work here; just a beleaguered and oppressed nation
fighting for its most basic human rights.

Yang’s ignorant and self-serving comments were duly answered most
appropriately, including by many anti-Zionist Jewish intellectuals and
activists throughout the US and the world. Alex Kane, a writer in ‘Jewish
Currents’ tweeted <https://twitter.com/alexbkane/status/1352623125062688768>
that Yang made “a messed up, wrong comparison”, and that the politician
“comes across as deeply ignorant about Palestine, Palestinians and BDS”. US
Muslim Congresswoman, Ilhan Omar
<https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-ilhan-omar-spars-with-pro-israel-democrats-after-andrew-yang-s-bds-nazi-comparison-1.9483042>,
and the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) added
<https://www.adc.org/adc-demands-yang-redact-apologize-for-bds-comments/?fbclid=IwAR0wbEFzLtBbujMZlujz34BHp9DbPSoRrAAG8VBtXDeeLOivwkA3DCOJnt0>
their voices to numerous others, all pointing to Yang’s opportunism, lack
of understanding of history and distorted logic.

But this goes beyond Yang, as the debate over BDS in the US is almost
entirely rooted in fallacious comparisons and ignorance of history.

Those who had hoped that the unceremonious end of the Donald Trump
Administration would bring about a measure of justice for the Palestinian
people will surely be disappointed, as the American discourse on Palestine
and Israel rarely changes, regardless which President resides in the White
House and what political party dominates the Congress.

So, reducing the boycott debate to Yang’s confused account of history and
reality is, itself, a reductionist understanding of US politics. Indeed,
similar language is regularly infused, like that used
<https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-bds-verges-on-antisemitism-biden-s-pick-for-un-envoy-says-1.9488357?fbclid=IwAR26AtKJo4KBBvxTBEQyrRJRSJt11nJ49VpdKO-xLNJflwQqezdBr4I_0-Q>
by President Joe Biden’s nominee for United Nations envoy, Linda
Thomas-Greenfield while addressing her confirmation hearing at the Senate’s
Foreign Relations Committee on January 27. Like Yang, Thomas-Greenfield
also found boycotting Israel an “unacceptable” act that “verges on
anti-Semitism.”

While the presumptive envoy supported the return of the US to the Human
Rights Council, UNESCO and other UN-affiliated organizations, her reasoning
for such a move is merely to ensure the US has a place “at the table” so
that Washington may monitor and discourage any criticism of Israel.

Yang, Thomas-Greenfield and others perpetuate such inaccurate comparisons
with full confidence that they have strong support among the country’s
ruling elites from the two dominant political parties. Indeed, according to
<https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/anti-bds-legislation> the latest
count produced by the pro-Israel Jewish Virtual Library website, “32 states
have adopted laws, executive orders or resolutions that are designed to
discourage boycotts against Israel.”

In fact, the criminalization of the boycott movement has taken center stage
of the federal government in Washington DC. Anti-boycott legislation was
passed with overwhelming majorities in both the Senate
<https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-u-s-senate-passes-anti-bds-legislation-with-strong-majority-1.6912547>
and the House of Representatives
<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/us/politics/house-israel-boycott-bds.html>
in recent years and more are expected to follow.

The popularity of such measures prompted former Secretary of State, Mike
Pompeo, to declare
<https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-pompeo-labels-bds-movement-anti-semitic/>
the Israel boycott movement to be anti-Semitic, describing it at as ‘a
cancer’ at a press conference in November, alongside Israeli Prime
Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, while in the illegal settlement of Psagot.

While Pompeo’s position is unsurprising, it behooves Yang and
Thomas-Greenfield, both members of minority groups that suffered immense
historical racism and discrimination, to brush up on the history of popular
boycott movements in their own country. The weapon of boycott was, indeed,
a most effective platform to translate political dissent into tangible
achievements for oppressed Black people in the US during the civil rights
movement in the mid-20th century. Most memorable, and consequential of
these boycotts was the Montgomery Bus Boycott
<https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/montgomery-bus-boycott> of
1955.

Moreover, outside the US, numerous volumes have been written about how the
boycott of the White supremacist apartheid government in South Africa
ignited a global movement which, combined with the sacrifices of Black
South Africans, brought apartheid to an end
<https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/2019/04/how-south-africa-changed-since-apartheid-born-free-generation/>
in the early 1990s.

The Palestinian people do not learn history from Yang and others, but from
the collective experiences of oppressed peoples and nations throughout the
world. They are guided by the wisdom of Martin Luther King Jr., who once
said that “We know through painful experience that freedom is never
voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

The boycott movement aims at holding the oppressor accountable as it places
a price tag on military occupation and apartheid. Not only is the
Palestinian boycott movement not racist, it is essentially a rallying cry
against racism and oppression.

*– Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle.
He is the author of five books. His latest is “**These Chains Will Be
Broken*
<https://www.amazon.com/These-Chains-Will-Broken-Palestinian/dp/1949762092>*:
Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity
Press). Dr. Baroud is a non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center
for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA) and also at the Afro-Middle East Center
(AMEC). His website is **www.ramzybaroud.net* <http://www.ramzybaroud.net/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20210204/0216e707/attachment.htm>