[News] In Lieu of a Liberation Strategy: Palestinian Elections Are Designed to Buy Time
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Oct 5 12:20:06 EDT 2020
Lieu of a Liberation Strategy: Palestinian Elections Are Designed to Buy
by Ramzy Baroud <https://www.counterpunch.org/author/ramzy-baroud/> -
October 5, 2020
It is abundantly clear that Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas,
has underestimated the seriousness of the challenges facing Palestine and
The rushed agreement
between his party, Fatah and Hamas in Istanbul on September 24, and the
Palestinian leader’s speech <https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/120336>
at the 75th session of the UN General Assembly the following day, indicate
that the Palestinian leadership insists on operating within the stifling
confines of the Oslo accords and the dead-end road of the ‘peace process’.
Abbas has spent most of his political career mastering an intricate
balancing act, one that would allow him to remain the favored leader of
Palestinians – to the West – while legitimizing his rule among ordinary
Palestinians through a system of political patronage – itself subsidized by
US-led international funders.
The outcome worked well for Abbas and a clique of Palestinians who became
rich because of their ties to Abbas’ Authority, but bode terribly for the
For a quarter of a century, particularly since the establishment of the PA
in 1994, the Palestinian cause has subsisted in its darkest and most
demoralizing periods, one that is defined by extreme Israeli violence
rapid expansion <https://apnews.com/98e4ad57e0784e05b9fdde2e0ffd7439> of
the illegal Jewish settlements, unhindered corruption
among Palestine’s political elite and unprecedented disunity among
The PA’s scheme would have continued longer, were it not for US President
Donald Trump’s decision to disengage
<https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38407226> from his predecessors’
previous strategies in the Middle East – foremost among them, the fruitless
However, it was not the Trump administration that opted for an American
retreat from the Middle East, in general, and Palestine, in particular.
Trump merely accelerated what was becoming the new American foreign policy
doctrine. During the two terms of former President Barack Obama, Palestine
featured fleetingly in US calculations: in the early months, and again,
when the ‘lame duck’ administration refrained
in December 2016, from vetoing UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which
condemned Israel’s illegal Jewish settlements.
For many years, the ‘peace process’ existed nominally. On the ground, the
Oslo accords were transformed to that of technical security and financial
between the PA’s upper echelon and the Israeli government.
When, in February 2019, Washington decided to cease
<https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-47095082> its financial
assistance to the Palestinian leadership, Abbas and the PA understood this
decision as a political declaration that Washington and Tel Aviv no longer
saw their ‘moderate’ Palestinian allies as assets.
Bewildered by the abrupt American policy shift, Abbas sought alternatives.
Instead of offering an unconditional apology to the Palestinian people for
his leadership’s corruption, his personal failures, the factionalism and
the squandered opportunities to unify Palestinians around a new national
liberation strategy – one fueled by popular resistance
and global solidarity – Abbas continued with the same old discourse,
At his UN speech on Friday, Abbas insisted on referencing the peace process
calling, again, for an international peace conference, among other
fantasies. Abbas’ references are both outdated and unfeasible, for
Washington is now turning to a new phase, one that is predicated on the
of international law and the de facto acceptance of Israel’s colonialism
Aside from appealing to Western sensibilities, another crucial element in
the PA’s new balancing act is to reinvent itself among ordinary
Palestinians who, for decades, have felt abandoned and leaderless.
In his UN speech, Abbas labored to rebrand himself to these two different
target audiences. “We will continue creating life and hope under the flag
of national unity and democracy,” he said, adding “We will remain faithful
to peace, justice, human and national dignity under all circumstances.”
In fact, Abbas has neither committed to democracy nor to Palestinian unity.
He is currently unelected as his presidential mandate expired
in 2009, and never in his 15-year rule did he earnestly opt for inclusion
or unity among his people.
The latest episode of the ‘unity’ saga took place in Istanbul on September
24. Despite the triumphant speeches afterwards, this too, seemed like a
mere self-serving exercise.
The expeditious declaration that rivals Fatah and Hamas are finally ready
for democratic elections, is a cunning but, ultimately, futile initiative.
The agreement will buy Abbas time to promote himself as a political
moderate, although free and democratic elections can never be held under
It is doubtful that any kind of elections, free or otherwise, is
possible. Following the agreement, Fatah representative at the talks, Azzam
al-Ahmad, declared that “without Jerusalem, there will be no elections.” In
other words, “there will be no elections.”
During Palestine’s first elections in 1996, Israel barred Jerusalemites
from participating, merely agreeing to very limited votes in areas located
on the outskirts of the city, and only through the post office. It is
unthinkable that Israel will allow for a mass Palestinian vote in Jerusalem
now that Washington has fully recognized
the city as Israel’s capital.
What about Palestinians living in Areas B and C, which are, more or less,
under total Israeli military control <https://www.btselem.org/topic/area_c>?
Will they be included in the vote? What about Palestinians trapped behind
the Israeli apartheid wall in the West Bank? In the ‘firing zones’? Or
those isolated in small pockets in the Jordan Valley, etc.?
Democratic elections are ideal under circumstances where a nation has true
sovereignty, legal and political jurisdiction, and territorial control. The
PA has none of this.
Moreover, insisting on elections, which, even if possible, will merely lead
to the overhaul of the Palestinian Authority, is equivalent to sustaining
the many illusions of Oslo and its adjoining ‘peace process’.
While Oslo failed Palestinians entirely, it was useful for Israel as it
brought to an unceremonious end the entire Palestinian national liberation
project, in favor of a ‘state-building’ program that had no tangible basis
in reality. If serious in its intentions, the Palestinian leadership must
demolish, not sustain the status quo.
Even successful elections within the Oslo framework would further divert
Palestinian energies from their liberation project in favor of another
political dead end, that will only protect the ‘gains’ of Palestine’s
ruling elites, while selling more false hope that the coveted peace is
still at hand to ordinary Palestinians.
*Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He
is the author of five books. His latest is “**These Chains Will Be Broken*
Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity
Press, Atlanta). Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the
Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul Zaim University (IZU).
His website is **www.ramzybaroud.net* <http://www.ramzybaroud.net/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the News