[News] Political ambiguity or a doomsday weapon: Why Abbas abandoned Oslo

[Anti-Imperialist News]

https://english.palinfo.com/articles/2020/5/27/Political-ambiguity-or-a-doomsday-weapon-Why-Abbas-abandoned-Oslo
Political
ambiguity or a doomsday weapon: Why Abbas abandoned Oslo
By Ramzi Baroud - May 27, 2020
------------------------------
This time, we are told, it is different and that President of the
Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, is absolutely serious about his
decision to absolve his leadership from all previous agreements signed with
Israel and the United States.

But this time is not different, and Abbas is not serious.

“The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the state of Palestine are
absolved  … of all the agreements and understandings with the American and
Israeli governments  … including the security ones,” Abbas declared at an
emergency meeting of his leadership held in Ramallah on May 19.

Unsurprisingly, there were no massive demonstrations reported throughout
Occupied Palestine in support of Abbas’ latest decision. Aside from a few
loyalists in PA-controlled media, it seemed as if the man did not utter a
word, let alone cancel all agreements that justified the very existence of
his Authority over the course of nearly 30 years.

The demonstrable truth is that Abbas ceased to matter to Palestinians a
long time ago. However, for Israel, he mattered greatly, because his
Authority has served as an additional security buffer between occupied
Palestinians and the occupation army. Thanks to ‘security coordination’,
Israel was allowed to fortify its occupation in peace.

Palestinians have long lost faith in Abbas as proved by one public opinion
after another. This is not a sudden occurrence, but the accumulation of
decades of failure and disappointments. Abbas’ commitment to the Oslo
Accords led to absolutely nothing, except for the creation of a massive and
utterly corrupt security apparatus that largely exists to ‘coordinate’ the
subjugation of Palestinians with their Israeli oppressors.

Since his advent to power in 2005, Abbas and his faithful followers within
the Fatah party became obsessed with their enmity, not with Israel and the
United States, but with Abbas’ own Palestinian rivals, within Fatah itself
– Mohammed Dahlan, etc. – and, to a larger extent, with Hamas in Gaza.

Israel mainly factored in Abbas’ many speeches in Ramallah and at the UN
General Assembly in New York; despite all the rhetoric, little or no action
ever followed. Concurrently, Israeli soldiers and illegal Jewish settlers
carried on with their systematic abuse of Palestinians, unhindered.

Not once did Abbas’ ever-growing security forces (estimated at 80,000
strong) move to block the path of a single Israeli bulldozer demolishing a
Palestinian home or uprooting an ancient olive grove in the West Bank. Nor
did they prevent the arrest of an anti-Israeli occupation activist. Often,
they carried out the arrests themselves.

Even as Israel was pounding Gaza with massive bombs and white phosphorus,
Abbas continued barking insults at his Palestinian enemies. He berated
Gaza’s armed resistance, yet offered no meaningful alternative to whatever
version of ‘resistance’ he championed.

But if Abbas managed to co-exist under these humiliating conditions, why
did he decide to cancel the agreements now? To answer this, first, let us
look at the political context of Abbas’ decision.

In February 2015, Abbas threatened to sever security ties with Israel as a
response to the Israeli decision to withhold millions of dollars of
Palestinian tax revenues, which Tel Aviv obtains on behalf of the PA.
Similar threats were made in July 2017, this time in response to Israel’s
illegal measures around the Muslim holy sites in occupied Jerusalem. And
again, in September 2018, when the US unilaterally recognized Jerusalem as
the capital of Israel. And, yet again, in July 2019, when Israel demolished
Palestinian homes in occupied East Jerusalem.

The latest episode, Abbas’s threat to dissolve the PA, was in response to
the American announcement of the so-called ‘Deal of the Century’.

These are only the notable threats that registered in media coverage. In
reality, Abbas has waged his ‘war’ on Israel in the form of endless threats
that were always met with disdain in Israel.

The difference, this time, is because Abbas has never experienced this
degree of abandonment and political vulnerability. Discarded by the
Americans and disowned by the Israelis, Abbas’ credibility is at an
all-time low. More importantly, the Palestinian people have long abandoned
any illusion that the path of liberation will go through Abbas’ office in
Ramallah.

Overwhelmed by many odds, Abbas decided to conduct what is, most likely, to
be his final political act. What happens next matters little, because at
this stage the 84-year-old Palestinian leader is left with nothing to lose.

Canceling the Palestinian commitment to the agreements should translate
into little on the ground, considering that Israel and the US have already
reneged on these agreements.

The Oslo Accords were meant to be relevant up to a point, until 1999, when
the final status negotiations were meant to be held as the last step before
the establishment of an independent Palestinian State.

Jerusalem, like the rights of Palestinian refugees, was meant to be
resolved then, not to be completely “taken off the table”, two decades
later. No territorial swap, let alone annexation, was to be permitted
without a bilateral agreement between both parties.

Only two components of these agreements survived Israel’s numerous
violations: the ‘security coordination’ and the ‘donors’ money’, which kept
the PA and its massive – but useless – army in operation.

Now that the US has withheld all funds to Abbas’ Authority, and Israel’s
new national unity government has agreed, in principle, to annex much of
the West Bank, Abbas is left with nothing.

By canceling all agreements, Abbas and his supporters are hoping that alarm
bells sound in Washington and Tel Aviv, especially since the halting of
‘security coordination’ could prove costly to the safety of Israel’s Jewish
settlers.

If Abbas was, indeed, serious in his announcement, he would have included
in his speech a clear articulation of a new Palestinian political agenda
that is predicated on unity – but a true Palestinian strategy was never the
PA leader’s ultimate goal.

What Mahmoud Abbas is hoping to achieve, with his latest theatrics, is the
establishment of a new political game, one that is based on political
ambiguity, so that he is not entirely abandoned by his Western backers, or
finally shunned as a collaborator by his own people.

*- Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of Palestine Chronicle.
He has authored a number of books on the Palestinian struggle including
‘The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story’. Baroud has a Ph.D. in Palestine
Studies from the University of Exeter and is a Non-Resident Scholar at
Orfalea Center for Global and International Studies, University of
California Santa Barbara.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20200527/934e508b/attachment.htm>