[News] What the Right Wing in Latin America Means by Democracy Is Violence
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jan 24 15:01:52 EST 2020
https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/01/24/what-the-right-wing-in-latin-america-means-by-democracy-is-violence/
What the Right Wing in Latin America Means by Democracy Is Violence
by Vijay Prashad - January 24, 2020/*
*/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a curious exchange. Frustrated by the attacks on his party—the
Movement for Socialism (MAS)—former president of Bolivia Evo Morales
made an audio recording in which he called upon his supporters to form
militias. Maximilian Heath of Reuters went to Argentina to speak with
Morales about this leaked recording; Morales said
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bolivia-evo/bolivia-exiled-ex-president-morales-calls-on-radio-for-armed-militias-idUSKBN1ZC066>,
“In Bolivia, if the armed forces are shooting the people, killing the
people, the people have the right to organize their security.”
Morales’ anxiousness is rooted in fact. The Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights—a body of the pro-U.S. Organization of American
States—reported <https://tinyurl.com/sbr258t> in December 2019 that
there have been a series of massacres conducted by the armed forces of
the current interim government in Bolivia. The use of the word
“massacre” in this report is significant; these were not clashes or
conflicts, but the targeted murder of civilians who supported MAS and
Morales.
The interim president of Bolivia, Jeanine Áñez Chávez, has made
inflammatory statements about the indigenous support base of MAS and
Morales. She has frequently spoken of them with derision, even saying
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/14/what-the-coup-against-evo-morales-means-to-indigenous-people-like-me>
that she dreams of a Bolivia without “satanic indigenous rites” and that
“the city is not for the Indians.” Áñez signed Supreme Decree no. 4078
that exempted the military from any criminal responsibility for its use
of force; she wants to ban MAS, and her interior minister has filed a
warrant for the arrest
<https://twitter.com/ArturoMurilloS/status/1207354063349800962?s=20> of
Morales. This is a rapid and disturbing attack on the political fabric
of Bolivia.
*Apology*
Morales’ statement about militias came merely as a way to say that he
worried about the repression and violence occasioned by the interim
government and the military, now immune from prosecution. U.S. President
Donald Trump’s main envoy to Latin America—Mauricio Claver-Carone (who
organized the bankrupting $57 billion loan to Argentina
<https://www.thetricontinental.org/dossier-10-argentina-goes-back-to-the-imf/>
when he was the U.S. director at the International Monetary Fund)—went
to Bolivia and attacked
<https://www.paginasiete.bo/nacional/2020/1/19/es-inaceptable-que-evo-use-argentina-para-fomentar-inestabilidad-violencia-243909.html>
Morales. Morales, Claver-Carone said, is fomenting insurrection from
Argentina. This is a bizarre statement.
Morales was re-elected in 2014. There was not a whiff of impropriety in
that election. He had a mandate to remain in office until January 2020.
Even if there was a problem in the 2019 election, he should have
remained in office until this month. But he was removed by a U.S.-backed
military coup. That coup is not the insurrection that worries
Claver-Carone. What worries him is that Morales is concerned about his
supporters who are being intimidated and killed
<https://www.defensoria.gob.bo/>. It was not the coup, but Morales’
statement of anguish that became the scandal. Morales then apologized
<https://www.eldiario24.com/nota/argentina/443421/evo-morales-se-disculpa-polemica-propuesta-crear-milicias-populares-bolivia.html>
for his statement.
*Elections*
Bolivia will face an election on May 3. The Movement for Socialism Party
nominated Luis Arce Catacora, Bolivia’s former minister for the economy,
as its presidential candidate, and David Choquehuanca, Bolivia’s former
foreign minister, as its vice-presidential candidate. MAS has been
deeply bruised. More than 100 government officials from the MAS party
are either in detention or face criminal charges, while a handful are in
the Mexican embassy in La Paz (they have been denied safe passage to the
airport).
The anti-coup uprising in Chapare province led the interior minister
Arturo Murillo to make a statement
<https://www.lostiempos.com/actualidad/pais/20191211/murillo-advierte-al-tropico-cuidado-que-ponerse-duros-no-tengan-elecciones>
that he would perhaps disenfranchise the entire province if the
rebellion continues (the rebels burned down
<https://www.opinion.com.bo/articulo/cochabamba/hotel-quemado-murillo-es-vigilado-lugarenos/20191210220056740770.html>
a hotel that he owns). Supporters of MAS and its party workers are
afraid to leave their homes, let alone campaign in the election.
Morales’ statement came as a mirror of their own anxiousness.
No one imagines that there is going to be a “fair election.” The Trump
administration has said it will send a USAID team to Bolivia to monitor
the situation, and then to resume U.S. aid to the country; the U.S. will
also monitor the elections. Between the U.S. monitors and Supreme Decree
no. 4078, the conditions for a fair election simply do not apply.
And not many outside the region seem to have any problem with this
attack against democracy.
*‘Staggering Number’*
On January 14, the UN’s human rights body released a brief statement
<https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25461&LangID=E>
on the killings of human rights activists in Colombia. The UN said that
a “staggering number of human rights defenders” were killed last year in
Colombia; by the UN’s count, between 107 and 120 activists were
murdered. In 2018, 115 human rights defenders were killed, and in the
first two weeks of January of this year, 10 human rights defenders have
already been murdered. Most of them are from left-wing people’s
organizations.
The UN numbers are conservative. For 2018, the Center for Research and
Popular Education Peace Program, based in Colombia, documented
<https://www.cinep.org.co/Home2/component/k2/690-informe-ddhh-violencia-camuflada-la-base-social-en-riesgo.html>
1,151 death threats, 648 assassinations, and 304 cases of physical
injuries. But the UN’s trendline is correct. Of the murders last year,
98 percent took place in very poor rural areas. The killers, the UN
suggests, are “criminal groups and armed groups linked to illicit
economies in areas vacated by the FARC-EP
<https://www.thetricontinental.org/newsletterissue/newsletter-50-2019-war/>.”
In other words, right-wing paramilitary groups and their affiliated drug
gangs have taken advantage of the peace treaty signed by the Left to
terrorize the countryside.
In the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research dossier
<https://www.thetricontinental.org/peace-neoliberalism-and-political-shifts-in-colombia/>
on Colombia (December 2019), the argument is made that the Colombian
oligarchy does not want to move toward peace because this would shift
the needle of Colombian politics toward the people’s movements and the
Left. The continuation of the war—now as assassination and
intimidation—favors the oligarchy. They prefer this violence to
democratic politics.
These targeted murders and this targeted intimidation is only one part
of the problem in Latin America. The other is that this region—with its
outrageous social inequality—experiences violence at extreme levels.
While Latin America is home to only 8 percent of the world’s population,
33 percent <https://www.jornada.com.mx/2018/04/29/mundo/021n1mun> of all
homicides occur in the region. This includes high violence against young
men, and it includes the highest rates of femicide in the world. None of
the right-wing governments are interested in addressing this fundamental
problem for the hemisphere.
What the government of Iván Duque is doing in Colombia is what the
interim government of Jeanine Áñez is doing in Bolivia—both are using
extreme state violence against trade unionists and peasant organizers,
against socialist leaders and indigenous leaders. This extreme violence
undermines the possibility of democracy and allows the oligarchy to be
re-elected in polling booths where the Left not dare enter.
*Héroes del Ñancahuazú*
In 2016, Evo Morales inaugurated the General Juan José Torres
Anti-Imperialist Command School in the town of Warnes. General Juan José
Torres was the socialist president of Bolivia in 1970-71. He was
overthrown in a coup by the Bolivian general favored by the CIA, Hugo
Bánzer. Bánzer had closely worked with the Nazi leader Klaus Barbie to
set up the CIA-run Operation Condor to search out and kill any and every
communist in the hemisphere. They killed Torres in 1976. The combination
of the CIA, Nazis, and the oligarchies of the region is not something
from the past: Brazil’s culture secretary—Roberto Alvim—recently
plagiarized
<https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2020/01/17/roberto-alvim-e-demitido-da-secretaria-de-cultura-apos-copiar-discurso-nazista/>
a speech from the Nazi Joseph Goebbels.
The interim government’s interim Defense Minister Luis Fernando López
said that his government has renamed the Anti-Imperialist school. “We
are not anti-anything,” he said
<https://erbol.com.bo/nacional/escuela-antiimperialista-pas%C3%B3-llamarse-h%C3%A9roes-del-%C3%B1ancahauz%C3%BA>,
as if his government is not anti-Morales, anti-MAS, and anti-communist.
The school has been renamed Héroes del Ñancahuazú.
In 1967, Che Guevara and his National Liberation Army of Bolivia
operated near the Ñancahuazú River in Bolivia’s southeast. The
government of General René Barrientos Ortuño, the CIA agent Félix
Rodríguez, and the Nazi Klaus Barbie ran the operation to destroy
Guevara’s campaign. They named their operation the Ñancahuazú Campaign.
The Anti-Imperialist School in Bolivia now honors the men—led by a CIA
agent and a Nazi—who killed Che Guevara. It sends a message to the Che
Guevaras of today: We will get you. This is the democracy of the
oligarchy in Latin America today.
/This article was produced by //Globetrotter/
<https://independentmediainstitute.org/globetrotter/>/, a project of the
Independent Media Institute./
/*Vijay Prashad’s* most recent book is No Free Left: The Futures of
Indian Communism (New Delhi: LeftWord Books, 2015)./
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 https://freedomarchives.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20200124/a844f752/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list