[News] Chávismo and Its Discontents: International Left Intellectuals Respond to Venezuelan Government’s Legislative Election Setback
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jan 20 11:38:51 EST 2017
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/01/20/chavismo-and-its-discontents-international-left-intellectuals-respond-to-venezuelan-governments-legislative-election-setback/
Chávismo and Its Discontents: International Left Intellectuals Respond
to Venezuelan Government’s Legislative Election Setback
by Roger Harris – Chuck Kaufman
<http://www.counterpunch.org/author/roger-harris-chuck-kaufman/> -
January 20, 2017
Five hours after the polls had closed
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35019111>, the National
Electoral Council (CNE) announced a landslide victory for the opposition
in Venezuela’s the National Assembly elections.
Almost immediately after, President Maduro addressed
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35019111> the nation
accepting “these adverse results,” the worst defeat for the followers of
Hugo Chávez in the 20 elections since 1998. Maduro subsequently has
called <http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/11765> for a “deep process of
revision and self-criticism” in the wake of the December 6^th , 2015,
election.
The response of international left intellectuals has ranged from
critical support to outright rejection of the socialist project in
Venezuela. We argue for the importance of recognizing the overarching
influence of US imperialism and for the acceptance of using the state as
an instrument of popular power by the international solidarity movement.
*Report from Venezuela*
Reporting from Venezuela three weeks after the election, Lisa Sullivan
(pers. com.) comments: “In my experience, I have witnessed a whole
generation of my neighbors and friends gain access to dignified housing,
free education, stable jobs with honorable wages, free health care and a
sense of profound citizenship as full participants in rebuilding their
country.”
Sullivan, from the US, is a long-term solidarity activist who brought up
her family in Venezuela. She acknowledges that “a lot of this is now
falling apart,” but adds “to slander everything that took place in the
past 15 years in order to justify critiques today” renders one
“irrelevant” at best.
*Need for an Attitude Change*
Chilean sociologist and activist Marta Harnecker continues to be a
critical supporter of Chávismo. Writing in the January 2016 issue of
/Monthly Review,/ Harnecker advocates for a union of social movements
with the left government, as long as each side of the equation learns to
behave themselves properly.
Critical of the Leninist formulation of state and party, Harnecker calls
instead for an attitude change where social movements “overcome the
impulse to oppose everything that comes from the government,” while left
governments have to “be very flexible and patient in working with social
movement leaders.”
Harnecker cautions that “the road to socialism (is) difficult but not
impossible,” due to many constraints including what she characterizes as
“elites who were previously dominant.” The pivotal presence of US
imperialism is largely down played from her configuration of the
wielders of political power.
*Transnational Capitalist Class*
Ignoring, or indeed denying, the phenomenon of US imperialism gets
further developed by prominent academic leftist William L. Robinson at
the University of California, Santa Barbara, and author most recently of
/Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1107691117/counterpunchmaga>
/(2014, Cambridge University Press). Robinson acknowledges that in
former times Latin America was subject to Spanish, Portuguese, and
British colonialism. But in the current era a transnational capitalist
class has arisen, which transcends state boundaries and renders the
notion of US imperialism moot.
This formulation of an amorphous transnational capitalist class, rather
than US imperialism, as the primary international antagonist of the
social movements has gotten considerable currency among international
left intellectuals, but little traction on the ground in Venezuela where
it stands in contradiction to the iron heel of the US military’s some
half dozen bases in Colombia on Venezuela’s western border, the US
Fourth Fleet patrolling Venezuela’s Caribbean border along with
additional US military bases a few air minutes away in Aruba and Curaçao.
*US Regime Change Efforts in Venezuela*
Our experience on delegations to Venezuela is that grassroots activists
to a person will tell you of the interference by US governmental
agencies such as the CIA and USAID along with quasi-US-governmental
organs such as the National Endowment for Democracy, International
Republican Institute, National Democrat Institute for International
Affairs, etc.
It is not for nothing that the US had an Office of Transition Initiates
<https://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/organization/bureaus/bureau-democracy-conflict-and-humanitarian-assistance/office-1>
(OTI) – tagline “helping local partners advance peace and democracy” –
to achieve regime change in Venezuela. The US illegally
<http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/5894> funnels millions of dollars
<http://www.vice.com/read/does-the-uss-funding-of-the-venezuelan-opposition-matter>
annually to the Venezuelan opposition, coordinated by the US embassy.
These efforts to mobilize and organize the opposition and build its
capacity – so-called “democracy promotion,” though really the opposite –
have borne fruit in the most recent Venezuelan election.
*To My Chávista Friends*
The existence of US imperialism is not denied by Berkeley author Clif
Ross who has written several books about Venezuela and Latin America. He
is a former faithful Chávista supporter turned apostate. Ross doesn’t
distinguish US imperialism from, say, a non-existent Cuban imperialism.
He is on record
<http://www.cliftonross.com/#%21Full-article-from-Counterpunch/acsgo/566b06e10cf2bbe8cab5210b>
to “defend the Bolivarian process” against both imperialisms.
His /To My Chávista Friends/
<http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/12/to-my-chavista-friends/> is a
critique of Chávismo that provides a left gloss to a view that is
fundamentally consonant with the US State Department. Ross proclaims:
“The ‘Bolivarian Revolution’ is over. It failed.”
Further, the “20^th century socialism” of the USSR, China, and Cuba is
dismissed as simply a “nightmare,” without any acknowledgement of the
social orders that were replaced and the enormous material gains
attained by those populaces.
Ross gives Chávismo failing grades for not accommodating to neo-liberal
capitalism, criticizing the Venezuelan government for having “the most
business unfriendly environment in the world,” referencing the World
Bank. Adding, “I wouldn’t blame the business sector for fighting back
against the relentless onslaught of attacks by the government over the
past 16 years.”
His sympathies are further revealed in his resurrecting hardline
opposition politician Leopoldo López as some kind of socialist. López,
scion of one of Venezuela’s wealthiest families, is currently serving
time for inciting violent protests in February 2014 following opposition
electoral losses. The economic sabotage in Venezuela by large privately
held corporations, including proven uncovering of massive hoarding, is
deemed “some imaginary ‘economic war.’”
We believe that it is not Ross’s intention to promote US imperialism.
Rather his is a reaction to the deep disillusionment shared by many of
the failure of Chávismo to overcome in a decade and a half some of the
challenges of transitioning from capitalism to socialism, including
transforming the relations of production. Seeing blemishes on both
sides, he wishes for an untainted, pure third way transcending statist
solutions.
*Rats Leaving a Sinking Ship*
We do not believe that the metaphor of rats leaving a sinking ship
applies to the international left defectors from the Chávista camp. The
ship has not sunk.
Of the five branches of the Venezuelan government, only the unicameral
National Assembly is currently controlled by the notoriously fractious
opposition coalition made up of 20 political parties. The executive is
still held by Maduro, whose term extends to 2019, although he may have
to weather a recall referendum. Meanwhile the Venezuelan Defense
Minister Vladimir Padrino pledged the military’s allegiance
<http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Venezuelan-Military-Vows-Absolute-Loyalty-to-Nicolas-Maduro--20160107-0042.html>,
stating “The president is the highest authority of the state and we
reiterate our absolute loyalty and unconditional support for him.”
The Chávista’s United Socialist Party (PSUV) remains by far the largest
in Venezuela with some 6 million giving the party 42%
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/venezuelan-election-results-the-electoral-system-and-democracy/5495343>
of the vote in the December election. A militant Chávista base will
staunchly resist neoliberalism and defend the advances of the last 15
years such as a million new housing units and access to medical care and
education.
The opposition MUD coalition, despite the US government’s best efforts
to herd these contentious cats, can only agree on their opposition to
Maduro. Voted in reaction to mounting economic problems, MUD may not
have a consensus program beyond opposition leader Henry Ramos Allup’s
announced
<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-04/venezuela-opposition-chooses-henry-ramos-allup-to-lead-congress>
6-month plan to oust Maduro.
*Slippery Slope*
One thing is clear: all of Venezuela’s current problems were inherited
by Maduro when he assumed the presidency in a close election in April
2013. As one of us had commented
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/02/the-legacy-of-hugo-chavez/> back
then: “The problems of building 21st century socialism on a capitalist
foundation include crime, inefficiency/shortages, and
inflation/devaluation. These are the problems inherited from the
existing capitalist order and exacerbated by the sabotage of the
opposition. This is the time bomb that has been handed to Maduro.” And
that time bomb has been ticking ever since.
From the moment that the Venezuelan presidential election results were
announced in 2013, a campaign orchestrated by Washington
<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/18/venezuela-protests-us-support-regime->
was launched by the Venezuelan opposition to show their rage in order to
destabilize the country and overthrow
<http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/10580> Maduro, followed by the
even more violent /guarimbas/ of early 2014. . The opposition launched a
campaign, costing the lives of 43 Venezuelans, to achieve by
extra-constitutional means what could not be achieved through the
democratic election process.
From the get go, Maduro was on a slippery slope of defending his
government while postponing the hard decisions required to raise the
ridiculously low price of oil, the dysfunctional multiple currency
exchange rates, food shortages, etc. The longer he delayed, the worse
the problems became while his political capital continued to dissipate.
A flurry of recommendations have been floated to right the economic
ship, as characterized by James Suggett
<http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/11790>, ranging from right to
left: neoliberalism, market-based reform, correction and maintenance of
current policies, socialism with the state, and socialism without the
state. None are without high risks, and all require a societal consensus
which presently does not exist in Venezuela’s highly polarized polity.
*Role of International Solidarity*
So what is the role of international solidarity at this historical
moment in Venezuela? Particularly what is the role of us in the United
States given our government’s clear intervention on behalf of “regime
change?”
First we need to guard against buying into American exceptionalism,
which sees our country as having a unique role – some would say
god-given role – as arbiter of freedom and democracy in the world.
American exceptionalism is a deep-seated heresy that even infects the
left in this country. All too often we assume a natural right to
appropriate and to enter into debates in other countries on an equal
footing with those who will bear the consequences resulting from those
debates. This hubris is particularly prevalent among left intellectuals.
In fact, we only bear the consequences in a general sense that set-backs
in left governments and movements affect our own efforts to build a
better world through changing our own government. But we are personally
untouched by the economic and social effects of decisions in countries
like Venezuela.
We are not stakeholders in Venezuela’s “deep process of revision and
self-criticism” and therefore need not insert ourselves in their
process. Rather, we need our own deep process of revision and
self-criticism to determine why the solidarity movement is not more
effective in its efforts to modify US behavior. We clearly are
stakeholders in US imperialism and thus share responsibility for the
suffering it imposes on the lives of Venezuelans and movements
throughout the world that dare to chart their own course.
We have to ask ourselves, “Do my statements empower and amplify the
articulated priorities of the movements and governments I am in
solidarity with, or do they strengthen the US government narrative and
create even greater space for it to intervene in the sovereign affairs
of other countries?” Anyone who does not include the effects of US
imperialist intervention in their analysis is almost surely doing the
latter. And, anyone who ignores the expressed priorities of the
movements and governments that are living the struggle, most certainly
cannot claim the mantle of “critical support” to validate their commentary.
*/Roger D. Harris/*/is the past president of the Task Force on the
Americas (//http://taskforceamericas.org///). / /*Chuck Kaufman*/ /is
national co-coordinator of the Alliance of Global Justice
(//https://afgj.org///). Both have traveled to Venezuela on a number of
political delegations, where they met with both Chávista and opposition
representatives. They may be contacted through the websites of their
respective organizations./
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20170120/5e74e9ef/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list