[News] Haiti’s Permanent Resistance
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Apr 11 20:44:10 EDT 2016
*Haiti’s Permanent Resistance*
Kim Ives April 11, 2016
Our next issue, “Between the Risings,” is out this month. To
celebrate its release, international subscriptions are $25 off.
Haiti is no stranger to political crises — and it is in the midst of its
most severe one in decades.
The latest upheaval, which looks set to last many months, began in
January 2016, when massive demonstrations aborted the final round of
patently fraudulent, US-sponsored elections. An unelected interim
government stepped in to try to reestablish an elected and
constitutional regime, but it’s still too early to know if the outcome
will be revolutionary or a further tightening of US imperialism’s
chokehold on the country.
Although Haitian progressive forces are splintered and weakened after
twelve years of foreign military occupation and internal turmoil, the
shifting social and economic terrain in Latin America and the United
States may offer the Haitian people an opportunity for change.
Haiti, after all, has a long history of resistance. All Haitian children
learn how their ancestors carried out history’s only successful slave
revolution and, in 1804, founded the first independent nation in Latin
America (the second in the Western Hemisphere) and the first black
republic. These accomplishments are the core of the Haitian identity.
From the beginning, the small Caribbean nation clashed with elites in
the United States. During the early nineteenth century, US slave owners
were deeply alarmed by this neighboring nation founded by self-liberated
former slaves. Its existence and survival inspired and emboldened slave
uprisings throughout the United States and Caribbean. US governments
embargoed Haiti and did not recognize it until 1862, during the Civil War.
But recognition did not bring reconciliation. US tensions with Haiti —
which gave support and refuge to Latin American revolutionaries ranging
from Francisco de Miranda and Simón Bolívar to José Marti — continued in
the form of gunboat and diplomatic skirmishes. US Marines invaded the
island nation on July 28, 1915, beginning a nineteen-year military
Haitians responded to the invasion by forming the Cacos, a guerrilla
army with thousands of members. And when Marines killed Caco leaders
Charlemagne Péralte in 1919 and Benoit Batraville in 1920, Haitians
continued resisting through demonstrations, marches, and general strikes.
The resistance paid off, and US troops finally withdrew in 1934. But, in
a template that would later be used in the Dominican Republic and
Nicaragua, Washington left behind a surrogate Haitian force known as the
Garde d’Haïti, which later became the Armed Forces of Haiti (FADH). For
more than two decades this army installed or ousted regimes at will,
until a popular movement drove General Paul E. Magloire from power in 1956.
Two tumultuous years of power struggles and coups followed Magloire’s
ouster, culminating in the election of Dr François “Papa Doc” Duvalier
on September 22, 1957. Using a paramilitary force known formally as the
Volunteers for National Security and informally as the “Tonton
Macoutes,” Papa Doc established a reign of terror and dictatorship that
he liked to call “Presidency for Life.” When Papa Doc died in April
1971, his son Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier took power. Baby Doc ruled
until February 1986, when an uprising forced him to flee to France.
Baby Doc’s exile ushered in a period of crisis that would last almost
five years. Seven provisional or fraudulently elected governments
succeeded each other until a nationalist former parish priest,
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, was elected president in a landslide on December
Free and Fair
The 1990 election was historic. It was the first truly free and fair
election in Haiti’s history. Since the assassination of the country’s
founding father, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, in 1806, Haiti’s two rival
ruling classes — the comprador bourgeoisie and the big landowning class,
known as the grandon — had alternated power, either through coups or
indirect parliamentary elections. The US occupation and FADH had brought
to power a string of bourgeois governments to which the grandon
governments of Dumarsais Estimé (1946–1950) and Papa Doc were reactions.
Aristide didn’t fit into either camp. He was a people’s candidate with
an anti-Duvalierist, anti-imperialist agenda. Fearing for their
interests, Haiti’s rival ruling groups joined together into a grand
alliance to oppose him.
Aristide’s victory also marked the first time the US’s election
engineering had been so grievously defeated. Setbacks in Cuba, Iran,
Nicaragua, and Vietnam pushed Washington to change its paradigm for
controlling states under its sway.
Beginning in the late 1970s it let go of or phased out corrupt,
repressive strongmen like Duvalier, Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua,
Augusto Pinochet in Chile, and Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, and
instead began empowering civilian puppet presidents through
The demonstration elections would be won by the candidate with the most
money, just like in the United States. And if there were trouble or
surprises, Washington would no longer use the local army, which was sent
back to its barracks. Instead it would deploy the empire’s new enforcer:
the international “peacekeeping” force.
After Baby Doc’s ouster, the United States figured it would be fairly
easy to get former World Bank official and Duvalier finance minister
Marc Bazin elected president, providing him coaching and support from
the newly formed National Endowment for Democracy (NED). With a war
chest of $36 million raised from the US and Haitian ruling classes,
Bazin outspent Aristide’s $500,000 campaign 72 to 1. It wasn’t enough.
Aristide swept the election, from a field of eleven candidates,
garnering more than 67 percent of the vote.
Just as Haiti’s 1804 independence inspired “the Great Liberator” Simón
Bolívar to wage similar wars to free Spanish colonies on the continent
(with pivotal Haitian financial and military support), nearly two
centuries later, Aristide’s 1990 victory inspired Bolívar’s admiring
descendant Hugo Chavez to attempt the same tactic in Venezuela in 1999.
Soon a wave of pink “electoral revolutions” washed across Latin America,
with countries like Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador,
Paraguay, and Uruguay all electing progressive candidates.
The Clinton Approach
Washington didn’t take its defeat lightly. Eight months after Aristide’s
February 1991 inauguration — or, as Aristide called it, “Haiti’s second
independence” — the Haitian elites, with support from George H. W. Bush,
staged a bloody FADH coup. The nature of the attack was clear. Haitians
throughout Haiti and its international diaspora rose up in spirited
resistance, and an international solidarity movement sprang into life.
Bill Clinton was elected in 1992 and quickly saw the futility of
returning to the old paradigm to counter Haiti’s democracy movement. The
quintessential representative of the transnational “enlightened
bourgeoisie,” Clinton made a deal to bring Aristide back on the
shoulders of twenty thousand US troops if the former anti-imperialist
priest agreed to champion neoliberal reforms, including nationalizing
state industries and lowering tariff walls. Aristide agreed, or
After US troops returned Aristide to power in October 1994, all while
protecting the FADH troops that had overthrown him, Clinton turned to
the United Nations to play its role as US occupation surrogate, just as
the Garde d’Haïti had replaced US Marines sixty years earlier.
In March 1995, US troops handed over command of Haiti’s military
occupation to the United Nations Mission in Haiti, which then morphed
into and spawned the United Nations Support Mission in Haiti, the United
Nations Transition Mission in Haiti, and the United Nations Civilian
Police Mission in Haiti (MIPONUH), which lasted until March 2000.
(Aristide had “demobilized” the FADH in early 1995, so Haiti was left
with only the Haitian National Police after MIPONUH’s departure.)
The Bush Approach
Aristide was reelected by a landslide in November 2000, just as George
W. Bush was also coming to power. The new president brought with him a
pack of neoconservative officials keen to oust Aristide. After
Aristide’s 2001 inauguration, the Bush administration stepped up a
coordinated campaign of political isolation, economic sanctions,
diplomatic pressure, and paramilitary guerrilla attacks to drive him
They finally succeeded on February 29, 2004. After a night of threats
from the US Embassy’s deputy chief of mission, Luis Moreno, a US SEAL
team took Aristide from his home in Tabarre (along with his entire
security detail) to an unmarked jet with all the window shades closed
and flew him to the Central African Republic. Aristide later called it a
Aristide’s rapid departure — the second coup d’état in thirteen years —
following on the heels of a relentless, punishing three-year campaign,
left the Haitian people exhausted and confused. US, Canadian, and French
troops immediately swarmed the island and occupied Haiti from March
until May 2004. Then, just like in 1995, the United States passed off
the mission to the United Nations Mission to Stabilize Haiti (MINUSTAH).
But Haitians were not quiescent. As in 1915, an armed resistance sprang
up to fight the foreign military occupation and President Boniface
Alexandre and Prime Minister Gérard Latortue’s puppet regime.
Most of the resistance fighters — called “bandits,” just like Péralte
and Batraville — were based in the teeming Port-au-Prince slums of
Belair and Cité Soleil, although the Dessalinien Army of National
Liberation (ADLN), a rural-based guerrilla force, carried out a half
dozen successful attacks in Haiti’s north against PNH stations and
Resistance also showed its face in elections. Although Aristide’s
Lavalas Family party (FL) remained banned, his supporters voted
erstwhile Aristide ally René Préval into power in 2006 for a second
time. (He had succeeded Aristide from 1996–2001). The Lavalas masses
hoped Préval would bring Aristide back from exile in South Africa, but
he didn’t, and Lavalas began to splinter into factions as a result.
The party became divided between Préval supporters and those remaining
loyal to Aristide, and Préval used the divisions to keep the FL out of
elections planned for 2010.
Then on January 12, 2010, an earthquake hit just outside of
Port-au-Prince. Tens of thousands died, and over one million were left
homeless. The United States unilaterally sent in 22,000 troops, rapidly
taking control of the main airport and the international relief and aid
response. Former president Bill Clinton designated himself ringleader
and became the co-chair of the International Haiti Recovery Commission
(IHRC), which decided how some $13 billion in aid would be spent to have
Haiti “build back better.”
The United States was not working to build a better Haiti. It was using
its reach to dismantle the last vestiges of Haitian sovereignty and
popular power that remained from the 1990 election. Their puppet in the
process was a vulgar neo-Duvalierist coup cheerleader and konpa musician
named Michel Martelly, also known as Sweet Micky.
Martelly was ushered in after Préval had appeared ineffectual in his
response to the earthquake and beholden to Washington. Préval made a few
symbolic protests, like walking out of a ceremony when Bill Clinton took
the microphone or pointedly typing on his Blackberry in the back of a
room while a US general gave a press conference on earthquake response,
but his lack of control was clear to all.
Martelly, on the other hand, was a Donald Trump–like character: tough
talking, media savvy, simplistic, and charismatic — all the things
Préval was not. And he had a professional election team, Ostos & Sola,
whose personnel had engineered campaigns for John McCain and Mexican
president Felipe Calderòn, behind him.
But Martelly’s slick campaign and US backing didn’t guarantee success.
Indeed, the first round of presidential elections held in late November
2010 were a disorganized mess. The Provisional Electoral Council (CEP)
declared Mirlande Manigat and Swiss-trained engineer Jude Célestin,
Préval’s protégé, the two candidates that would go to a run-off.
Martelly came in a close third.
Martelly’s partisans took to the streets to burn buildings and wreak
havoc, while Washington deployed the Organization of American States
(OAS) to review the election results. Unsurprisingly, the OAS — using a
thoroughly arbitrary calculation — declared Martelly the second-place
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton flew to Port-au-Prince in January
2011 to pressure Préval to supplant Célestin with Martelly. As usual,
Préval complied, although the CEP members — constitutionally the “final
arbiter” of any Haitian election — never validated the US-altered
election results. Martelly won a run-off victory in March 2011.
The United States was also victorious. It had managed to stage, in the
words of dissident and later fired OAS representative Ricardo Seitenfus,
an “electoral coup d’état” — the type of soft-power play that has come
to epitomize the Clinton-Obama approach.
The Martelly Regime
Like Baby Doc’s, Martelly’s regime was a macouto-bourgeois alliance
marked by outrageous corruption, excess, infighting, dysfunction, and
repression. It was so unpopular that it sparked a mass rebellion that
nearly drove it from power in late 2014.
To save his presidency, Martelly sacrificed his longtime business
partner and prime minister, Laurent Lamothe, who otherwise would likely
have been the 2015 presidential candidate of Martelly’s Haitian
Bald-Headed Party (PHTK). (Constitutionally, Haitian presidents are
limited to two non-consecutive terms.)
For the first four years of his five in power, Martelly used an array of
stalling tactics to delay holding elections so that the terms for the
Chamber of Deputies, two-thirds of the Senate, and all of Haiti’s
municipal posts expired.
The result was a rushed forced march to repopulate the entire
government, including the presidency, before parliament’s expiration on
January 12, 2016 (the earthquake’s sixth anniversary) and the end of
Martelly’s term on February 7, 2016.
A three-round staggered electoral schedule was established for August 9,
October 25, and December 27, 2015. The August 9 round was a complete
fiasco, marred by violence and blatant fraud. Thugs from
Martelly-aligned parties guarded many voting center doors, keeping out
their rivals’ partisans. In the Artibonite Department, for example,
eight out of fifteen voting districts had to annul their polling due to
violence and fraud, but the CEP still opted to keep the results.
The second election on October 25 saw less violence, but was plagued by
massive fraud and, despite including the first round of the fifty-four
presidential candidates’ races, extremely low turnout. Most of the votes
were cast by the candidates’ 916,000 poll-watchers, many of whom voted
repeatedly and not for the candidate they represented.
The dubious and contested official result: Martelly’s PHTK led the
presidential pack with 33 percent of the vote. For his successor,
Martelly had picked an unknown provincial businessman, Jovenel “Neg
Banann” Moïse, who had developed, with a $6 million government subsidy,
a tax-free agro-industry, “Agritrans,” exporting bananas mainly to Europe.
Moïse is an apt candidate. With an export-oriented agribusiness built on
the dispossession of small peasants, he perfectly represents the
alliance between the bourgeoisie, which now invests mainly in assembly
industries, and the grandon, who have always bullied and bulldozed the
peasantry off their land.
Moreover, many also speculate that the state lands currently leased to
Agritrans could eventually be turned over to foreign mining interests to
continue their now-stalled exploration and environmentally destructive
gold mining in Haiti’s north.
But whether or not Moïse was the macouto-bourgeois alliance’s favored
choice, a reliable Brazilian exit poll suggests that he didn’t win,
coming in fourth, not first, with just 6 percent of the vote. Even a
Martelly-appointed verification commission found widespread voting fraud.
Nevertheless, Martelly and the US continued to push for a third round of
the scandalous elections. It was postponed twice, until January 24. But
a final giant march on January 22 forced its indefinite postponement and
the disbanding of the CEP.
Reluctantly, under huge pressure, Martelly stepped down on February 7,
and a provisional government with a 120-day mandate (which will surely
be extended) was installed.
There were fifty-four presidential candidates, but only three were
heavyweights in the opposition to Jovenel, and two of them are Lavalas.
The first Lavalas candidate is Dr Maryse Narcisse of Aristide’s FL, who
supposedly placed fourth with 7 percent of the vote.
Then there is the breakaway Dessalines Children platform (PD) of former
senator Moïse Jean-Charles, who supposedly placed third with 14 percent
of the vote. The third heavyweight is the supposed second-place finisher
(with 25 percent), Jude Célestin of the Alternative League for Haitian
Progress and Empowerment (LAPEH), which is affiliated (albeit
informally) with Préval’s platforms Vérité and Inite, under whose banner
Célestin ran in 2010.
Both Washington and Martelly wanted to marginalize the two Lavalas
currents and keep them out of any runoff. Although their leaderships
adopt moderate positions, their popular bases remain mobilized and
Instead, the United States favors a monolithic two-party system in
Haiti, which would establish a regular alternation between “acceptable”
players, parameters of debate, and political programs. The Republican
analog would be the PHTK, while the Democratic surrogate would come from
the current Préval constellation: LAPEH, Vérité, or Inite.
Not surprisingly, Lamothe (who felt betrayed by Martelly and hews
closely to US positions), singer Wyclef Jean, and large sectors of
Haiti’s ruling elite had thrown their support behind Célestin, who could
be expected to give the United States the same grudging but faithful
collaboration that Préval did.
Although it has faded into the background, Célestin and seven of the
other leading presidential runners-up (except the FL) were in a “Group
of Eight” (G8) whose unity was more formal than real.
Nonetheless, while the masses in giant demonstrations demanded the
elections’ annulment and Martelly’s arrest, the G8 and FL did not. Even
today, they insist on an “independent evaluation commission” to review
the October 25 results, and each of the heavyweight candidates asserts
that they won the election in the first round. Whatever results any
evaluation commission finds, it will surely explode the opposition’s
Senate and National Assembly president Jocelerme Privert, under OAS
supervision, became the interim president in the meantime and, as of
April, has a prime minister, Enex Jean-Charles. Both are under pressure
to convene a verification commission, but the US ambassador, Peter
Mulrean, opposes it.
Washington knows that an election verification commission would even
further ruin their plans. The fraud in the presidential election was so
extensive and profound that the first round would have to be scrapped.
Moreover, and more importantly, any election review would discover that
most of the Senate and Deputy races were just as fraudulent as the one
for president, thereby invalidating the largely US-friendly parliament.
This would leave the road open for the more radical provisional
governments being proposed by Haiti’s left-wing parties, like the
Dessalines Coordination (KOD), and like-minded popular and student
Opportunities for the Left
The missing element in this revolutionary cocktail, at the present
moment, is a revolutionary party or front strong enough to lead and
champion the masses’ increasingly radical demands. Currents like KOD and
others were seriously weakened in 2015, when many of their comrades were
caught up in the electoral euphoria sweeping Haiti.
Although one of KOD’s founders, Moïse Jean-Charles, had repeatedly vowed
to respect the party’s position to never participate in an election held
under Martelly and MINUSTAH, he couldn’t resist taking the plunge,
especially when the FL refused to join him in a boycott and said it
would go into the elections “head first.”
The seductive illusion that another December 16, 1990 miracle can be
performed infects almost the entire political class, but particularly
its Lavalas offshoots.
A similar wave of electoral fever and defections swept the leftist
Patriotic Democratic Popular Movement coalition, one of whose clearest
and most active currents is the Democratic Popular Movement (MODEP). In
the aftermath of the crash of the US/Martelly “selections,” KOD and
MODEP have been talking but have not yet forged an operational unity.
However, if history is any guide, Haiti’s political crisis and
revolutionary potential promises to continue for several months at
least. The window after Baby Doc’s fall in 1986 lasted for four years,
until the popular movement carried out a political revolution with
Aristide’s first election.
Many veterans and students of the 1980s and ’90s struggles now realize
that a deeper social revolution — changing Haiti’s property relations,
above all land reform — is necessary for any progressive government to
survive. As long as Haiti’s tiny ruling class controls 92 percent of
Haiti’s wealth, it can continue to buy and corrupt enough desperately
poor Haitians to do their bidding — whether it is to demonstrate for
them, vote for them, or kill for them.
Most important now is that the ruling class is either divided on or
unsure of how to go forward and maintain power. This offers a unique
opportunity for Haiti’s left. Privert and Jean-Charles are weak
functionaries, trying to reconcile the irreconcilable. Martelly’s
right-wing allies, like former death-squad leaders Senator Youri
Latortue and Senate candidate Guy Philippe, are just waiting for their
opportunity to strike with their paramilitary thugs.
Meanwhile, the US empire is weakened by its own interminable overseas
wars and beset by internal rebellions that are threatening the
“establishment,” particularly the right-wing populist support around
Donald Trump and the social-democratic Bernie Sanders movement.
All these factors offer hope that the democratic, anti-imperialist
movement among peasants, workers, and the urban unemployed that began
with Duvalier’s ouster thirty years ago can finally make some headway
after its many setbacks.
Haiti remains the only nation in the Western Hemisphere militarily
occupied by UN “peacekeepers,” making it the victim of Washington’s
greatest show of force in the Americas. But like their ancestors did to
Napoleon’s legions, Haitians may once again succeed in taking on
colonialism, now in its multinational twenty-first century form, and
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the News