[News] When Were They Radicalized? That’s Not the Right Question!
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Dec 9 11:19:19 EST 2015
December 9, 2015
When Were They Radicalized? That’s Not the Right Question!
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/09/when-were-they-radicalized-thats-not-the-right-question/>
by Rev. Graylan Scott Hagler
<http://www.counterpunch.org/author/revhag0987/>
*http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/09/when-were-they-radicalized-thats-not-the-right-question/*
The big question these days dominating the airwaves is when were Syed
Farook and Tasheen Malik radicalized; or who radicalized them; and how
were they radicalized? This question is a perplexing one because it
assumes that without outside influence everything would be all right and
that there are no valid grievances, or anger, and no desire for revenge
or justice no matter how misguided those desires might be manifested.
This is a strange line of query because it presupposes that without
external forces radicalization would be impossible. This line of
questioning illustrates a blind patriotism of empire proportion that
believes that anyone upset and acting out is either demented or have
fallen under the influences of a political/religious ideology that
exploits the weak minded or the mentally deranged. To even ask the
question is to make the assumption that everything is ok around us and
in our world and would be regarded as such if it were not for outside
influences. But this perspective has a tendency to ignore the realities
of what so many people live under and have to endure daily. It is often
from personal experiences, relationships with those impacted by what
most of us don’t see or care about are the radicalizing factors. The
present queries act as if there are no valid grievances, no real anger,
and as if there is innocence on the part of the powerful, the US and
others. But this is not the way that peoples of the Middle East, North
Africa and Asia see the US or the West.
The US and its partners have been at war for more than 14 years in
Afghanistan. The US began an unprovoked and preemptive war in Iraq in
2003 and virtually destroyed the country where today ISIL is filling
part of the vacuum created by that war, and the President of Afghanistan
literally is presiding over nothing but the capital city of that
country, Kabul. The US under the cry of removing President Bashar Hafez
al-Assad in Syria by helping to orchestrate and sustain a civil war has
created a displacement crisis of epic proportion and caused the deaths
of more than 250,000 people. Conditions in many countries have worsened
under the wars and the remaking of the Middle East and North Africa in
the West’s image. Our continual military support of Israel against
Palestinians challenges the view that everything is ok without the
influences of “outside agitators” radicalizing people and calling them
to arms. According to Ha’aretz
<http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.611001>_,_ an Israeli
newspaper, in an August 2014 report it states concerning military aid to
Israel,
“Since it began in 1962, American military aid to Israel has
amounted to nearly $100 billion. For the past decades The United
States has been regularly transferring aid of about $3 billion
annually. In recent years, the aid has been solely for defense
purposes. Additionally, The US has been giving Israel generous
military aid for projects important both to it and Israel.”
Even in light of Israel’s continued human rights violation Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in November 2015 traveled to Washington, DC
to request an increase to the amount of aid his country receives from
the US.
Then there is also the US drone program designed to make killing more
antiseptic and distant. However in a 2013 speech before the National
Defense University President Obama said, “It is a hard fact that US
strikes have resulted in civilian casualties.”
He did not go on to cite numbers or further details, yet Micah Zenko, a
scholar at the Council on Foreign Relations and lead author of a 2013
study of drones, is quoted in an April 23, 2015 /New York Times
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/world/asia/drone-strikes-reveal-uncomfortable-truth-us-is-often-unsure-about-who-will-die.html?_r=0>/
article on drone strikes, in reference to the President’s 2013
comments, “Most individuals killed are not on a kill list, and the
government does not know their names.”
The program has not been as clean as government leaders would have liked
for us to think. Or lastly among many examples, a November 2014 article
in the Guardian
<http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147>
cites:
“A new analysis of the data available to the public about drone
strikes, conducted by the human-rights group Reprieve, indicates
that even when operators target specific individuals – the most
focused effort of what Barack Obama calls “targeted killing” – they
kill vastly more people than their targets, often needing to strike
multiple times. Attempts to kill 41 men resulted in the deaths of an
estimated 1,147 people…”
The assumption that “radicalization” is not based in some reality is an
empire or White supremacist notion where everything is ok save for those
rabble-rousers, outside agitators, and purveyors of hatred. Again I am
reminded every time I hear some newsperson or some pundit drone on
(excuse the pun) about when, how and who did the radicalization about J.
Edgar Hoover, former Director of the FBI during the Civil Rights era and
the status-quo politicians of the time looking under every rock for
communist agitators from Moscow who had inflamed and radicalized the
Black folks to march, demonstrate and rebel! It is an empire and White
supremacist notion to believe that all is fine save for outside
influences. The assumption is ‘who would not be happy with our way of
life, our agendas, or ways we see the world.’
Keep in mind that I am not condoning acts of violence by any side or
carried out in any name of God or nationalistic identifications. I am
simply pointing out that it is real conditions and experiences that have
given credence to the so-called “radicalization” process. There are
agents recruiting and organizing people to join their cause, but it is
recruitment based on some stark and harsh realities produced by war,
greed, and attempting to fashion entire regions in the United States’
political image.
Therefore it stands to reason that to combat so-called radicalization
the US and its partners need to ethically evaluate it motives and
initiatives and stand to be judged in a world court where warranted. The
US and its allies need to allow countries and regions to develop without
interference, manipulation or control. The mechanisms of radicalization
would be muted and impotent if the US and its partners addressed human
rights violations carried out around the world by itself, its partners
and its allies. There would be no fertile ground to recruit from if
people felt the processes were fair and just rather than exploited by a
few nations and corporations at the expense of everyone else. This is a
part of what needs to happen to thwart radicalization. The US and its
allies must right the wrongs they have done and attempt to restore
regions and people to govern their own selves no matter how those
structures might look in the end.
As far as who, when and how Syed Farook and Tasheen Malik and the
countless others were radicalized? The answer to this question is found
in a world that has been ravished by war and greed; in the conditions of
despair that has been created; in the powerless feeling pushed around by
the powerful; and it is there in refugee camps and at funerals from
drone strikes that we will find the agents of anger that breeds
radicalization that we claim we do not understand.
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20151209/a8b4f4c8/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list