[News] Reclaiming Palestine: How Israeli Media Misread the Intifada
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu Dec 3 10:34:19 EST 2015
December 3, 2015
Reclaiming Palestine: How Israeli Media Misread the Intifada
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/03/reclaiming-palestine-how-israeli-media-misread-the-intifada/>
by Ramzy Baroud <http://www.counterpunch.org/author/ramzy-baroud/>
*http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/03/reclaiming-palestine-how-israeli-media-misread-the-intifada/*
Israeli commentators, Yaron Friedman, of “Ynet News” and Haviv Rettig
Gur, of the “Times of Israel” are clueless about the driving force
behind the Palestinian mobilization and collective struggle. In two
recent articles, and with unmistakable conceit, they attempted to
highlight what they perceive as the failure of the current Palestinian
uprising, or ‘Intifada’.
Gur argues that ‘the terrorism’ of the Palestinians is not a surge of
opposition to Israel but a “howl against the pervasive sense that
resistance has failed”. He reduces the Intifada to the mere act of
alleged stabbing of Israelis, and points out to the painful truth that
the Palestinian Authority ‘elites’ are paying lip service to the
‘martyrs’, while “simultaneously acting with determination on the ground
to disrupt and stop attacks”.
In his long-winded article, “Losing Palestine”, Gur essentially claims
that the current struggle against Occupation stems mostly from internet
fervor and is more a deceleration of defeat than a strategy for victory,
and that no Palestinian leader dares to be the first to accept this.
Friedman, on the other hand, describes the ‘knife Intifada’ as a ‘fire
without coal’; that the “insane actions of the stabbers” is designed to
ignite religious fervor, ultimately aimed at blaming the Jews.
Those who launched the Intifada “have no real internal or external
support (financial or with weapons) and it broke out at a time when the
nightmare of all the Arab world’s leaders is the social protests turning
into anarchy,” he wrote.
There is little sense in arguing against the unsympathetic approach
Zionist commentators use to describe Palestinians or their insistence on
seeing Palestinian collective action, violent or otherwise, as an act of
‘terror’; on their refusal to see any context behind Palestinian anger
or on how they inject a religious narrative at every turn, and lob
‘anti-Semitic’ accusations unfairly, whenever they see fit.
But what is particularly interesting about the Israeli take on the
Palestinian Intifada, as presented by Friedman, Gur and others in the
media, including from within the Israeli political establishment, is the
attempt to display an exaggerated sense of confidence, that unlike other
uprisings, this one is a farce.
In fact, the Israelis are certain that the uprising is likely to deflate
once the limited tools at its disposal are contained. This supposition
has led Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Tzipi Hotovely, to meet with
representatives of YouTube and Google “to discuss ways to cooperate in
what she calls the fight against ‘inciting violence and terrorism’,”
reported MEMO, citing Israeli daily, ‘Maariv’.
This hasty self-assurance among Israeli state officials and media is
predicated on several suppositions:
First, while the PA has not yet moved to take part in crushing the
Intifada, it has done its utmost to thwart the people’s effort at
mobilizing Palestinians beyond the limited confines of the ruling Fatah
faction and its worthless promises of peace and statehood.
The PA knows well that if the Intifada escalates beyond its current
scale, it could undermine – if not entirely challenge – the PA itself,
which has served for many years as a line of defense for the Israeli
Occupation. Thanks to the ‘security coordination’ between the Israeli
army and the PA, Palestinian resistance in the West Bank has, until
recently, been largely contained.
Second, Hamas, although it has openly called for an escalation of
protests against Israel, is swamped in its own problems. The siege on
Gaza, tightened further with the closure of the Rafah border and the
desperate need to rebuild what successive Israeli wars have destroyed,
makes it difficult for Hamas to take part in any effort that could open
up another war front with Israel.
One must recall that the Israeli war on Gaza in the summer of 2014 was,
itself, an Israeli attempt at redrawing the battle lines. At that time,
a momentum for an Intifada was taking shape in the West Bank following
an increase in Israeli army and settler violence against Palestinians.
The war on Gaza managed to change the narrative of that budding conflict
into an Israeli war aimed at defending its own borders, as Israeli
hasbara dictated. Israel is now relying on the assumption that Hamas
would avoid, at least for now, a repeat of that scenario which cost
Palestinians over 2,200 lives and thousands of wounded and maimed, let
alone the massive destruction of the already impoverished Strip.
Third, Arabs are consumed with their own regional fights, whether for
political or sectarian domination. Almost every Arab country is somehow,
either fully or partially, involved or is affected by the various wars
and conflicts under way in Syria, Libya, Egypt’s Sinai, Iraq and Yemen.
The supposedly successful Tunisian model is suffering its own fallout,
too, from militant violence, whether homegrown or that which spills over
from violent borders.
Previous intifadas succeeded, or so goes the Israeli logic, because of
Arab backing. But the most that Arabs have done is to pay lip service
and nothing more. In fact, if the PA itself is keen on spoiling popular
Palestinian initiatives, little can be expected of the Arabs, who are
busy fighting one another.
However, the Israeli argument is, as has always been the case,
narrow-minded in its view of history, or it conveniently applies history
to fit whatever political argument Israeli officials or mouthpieces deem
handy. Just a few weeks ago, Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu,
absolved the Nazis from the idea behind the Holocaust and pinned the
blame on the Palestinian Mufti instead.
Previous intifadas, but more importantly the 1987 ‘Intifada of the
stones’, was not constructed as a strategy for liberation, but was a
spontaneous reaction to a series of Israeli provocations, and the
adjacent failure of the Palestinian leadership, all positioned within
the larger context of the ongoing Israeli occupation.
Palestinians do not revolt when ‘the time is right’ for them to do so,
but whenever their collective suffering has culminated to the point that
they cannot be silenced anymore.
Those, whether Israeli or even Palestinian intellectuals, who opine
about the need for the intifada to do this or that, change directions or
tactics, stop altogether or move forward, are simply unable to
understand that the momentum of a collective struggle cannot be dictated
from above.
This is not to argue that a grassroots, genuine Palestinian leadership
that operates outside the confines of fatalism and defeat as
demonstrated by the PA is not a necessary step needed to galvanize the
popular efforts. But that is a decision to be taken by the youth
themselves, and its timing and nature should be determined based on
their own reckoning.
The Israelis are counting on their shoot to kill policy. The Palestinian
leadership is waiting for the anger to fizzle out before resuming its
endless quest for a frivolous peace process and financial handouts. The
Intifada itself, however, operates on the basis of an entirely different
arithmetic: a collective spirit that can neither be intimidated by
violence nor procured by funds.
In fact this is precisely why the Intifada started in the first place
and, as long as the factors that led to its inception remain in place,
it, too, is likely to continue and escalate, not for the sake of
liberating Palestine through some magic formula, but for the urgent need
to regain national initiative, redefine priorities and a new sense of
collective, as Palestinian first and foremost.
/*Dr. Ramzy Baroud* has been writing about the Middle East for over 20
years. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media
consultant, an author of several books and the founder of
PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom
Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London). His website is:
ramzybaroud.net/
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20151203/e8d21a8d/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list