[News] What is a Revolution?
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Sep 4 12:59:03 EDT 2013
September 04, 2013
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/04/what-is-a-revolution/
*A Total Mess*
What is a Revolution?
by TARIQ ALI
Ever since the beginning of the Arab Spring there has been much talk of
revolutions. Not from me. I've argued against the position that mass
uprisings on their own constitute a revolution, i.e., a transfer of
power from one social class (or even a layer) to another that leads to
fundamental change. The actual size of the crowd is not a determinant
unless the participants in their majority have a clear set of social and
political aims. If they do not, they will always be outflanked by those
who do or by the state that will recapture lost ground very rapidly.
Egypt is the clearest example in recent years. No organs of autonomous
power ever emerged. The Muslim Brotherhood, a conservative social force,
that belatedly joined the struggle to overthrow Mubarik, emerged as the
strongest political player in the conflict and, as such, won the
elections that followed. Its factionalism, stupidity, and a desire to
reassure both Washington and the local security apparatuses that it
would be business as usual led it to make several strategic and tactical
errors from its own point of view. New mass mobilizations erupted, even
larger than those that had led to the toppling of Mubarak. Once again
they were devoid of politics, seeing the army as their saviour and, in
many cases, applauding the military's brutality against the Muslim Brothers.
The result was obvious. The /ancien/ /regime/ is back in charge with
mass support. If the original was not a revolution, the latter is hardly
a counter-revolution. Simply the military reasserting its role in
politics. It was they who decided to dump Mubarik and Morsi. Who will
dump them? Another mass mobilization? I doubt it very much. Social
movements incapable of developing an independent politics are fated to
disappear.
In Libya, the old state was destroyed by NATO after a six-month bombing
spree and armed tribal gangs of one sort or another still roam the
country, demanding their share of the loot. Hardly a revolution
according to any criteria.
What of Syria? Here too the mass uprising was genuine and reflected a
desire for political change. Had Assad agreed to negotiations during the
first six months and even later, there might have been a constitutional
settlement. Instead he embarked on repression and the tragically
familiar Sunni-Shia battle-lines (this divide a real triumph for the
United States following the occupation of Iraq) were drawn. Turkey,
Qatar and the Saudis poured in weaponry and volunteers to their side and
the Iranians and Russians backed the other with weaponry.
The notion that the SNC is the carrier of a Syrian revolution is as
risible as the idea that the Brotherhood was doing the same in Egypt. A
brutal civil war with atrocities by both sides is currently being
fought. Did the regime use gas or other chemical weapons? We do not know.
The strikes envisaged by the United States are designed to prevent
Assad's military advances from defeating the opposition and re-taking
the country. That is what is at stake in Syria.
Outside the country, the Saudi's are desperate for a Sunni takeover to
further isolate Iran, strengthened by the semi-clerical Shia regime in
Iraq created by the US occupation. Israel's interests are hardly a
secret. They want Hezbollah crushed. Whatever else may or may not be
happening in Syria, it is far removed from a revolution. Only the most
blinkered sectarian fantasist could imagine this to be the case.
The idea that Saudia, Qatar, Turkey backed by NATO are going to create
a revolutionary democratic or even a democrat set-up is challenged by
what is happening elsewhere in the Arab world. The democrat Hollande
defends and justifies the Moroccan autocracy, the Saudis prevent Yemen
from moving forward and occupy Bahrein, Erdogan has been busy with
repression at home, Israel is not satisfied with a PLO on its knees and
is pushing for Hamas to do the same (Morsi might have helped in that
direction) so it can have another go at Hezbollah.
The region is in a total mess and most Syrian refugees in Lebanon and
Jordan are only too well aware that US strikes will not make their
country better. Many of the courageous citizens of Syria who started the
uprising are in refugee camps. Those at home fear both sides and who can
blame them.
/*Tariq Ali* is the author of The Obama Syndrome
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1844677575/counterpunchmaga> (Verso)./
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20130904/11aacaf1/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list