[News] How to Fund an American Police State
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Sun Mar 4 19:20:10 EST 2012
How to Fund an American Police State
Real Money for an Imaginary War
By
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tomdispatch.com/authors/stephansalisbury>Stephan
Salisbury
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/#more
At the height of the Occupy Wall Street evictions, it seemed as
though some diminutive version of "shock and awe" had stumbled from
Baghdad, Iraq, to Oakland, California. American police forces had
been "militarized," many commentators
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/09/opinion/navarrette-militarized-police/index.html>worried,
as though the firepower and callous tactics on display were
anomalies, surprises bursting upon us from nowhere.
There should have been no surprise. Those flash grenades
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/28/occupy-oakland-police-tea_n_1239232.html>exploding
in Oakland and the sound cannons on
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/lrad-explains-sound-cannon-use-at-occupy-wall-street.php>New
York's streets simply opened small windows onto a national policing
landscape long in the process of militarization -- a bleak domestic
no man's land marked by tanks and drones, robot bomb detectors,
grenade launchers, tasers, and most of all, interlinked video
surveillance cameras and information databases growing quietly on
unobtrusive server farms everywhere.
The ubiquitous fantasy of "homeland security," pushed hard by the
federal government in the wake of 9/11, has been widely embraced by
the public. It has also excited intense weapons- and techno-envy
among police departments and municipalities vying for the latest in
armor and spy equipment.
In such a world, deadly gadgetry is just a grant request away, so why
shouldn't the 14,000 at-risk souls in Scottsbluff, Nebraska, have a
closed-circuit-digital-camera-and-monitor system (cost: $180,000,
courtesy of the Homeland Security Department)
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/08/12/us_doles_out_millions_for_street_cameras/?page=full>identical
to the one up and running in New York's Times Square?
So much money has gone into armoring and arming local law-enforcement
since 9/11 that the federal government could have
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/09/27/BUGADEUAO01.DTL&ao=all>rebuilt
post-Katrina New Orleans five times over and had enough money left in
the kitty to provide job training and housing for every one of the
record 41,000-plus homeless people in New York City. It could have
added in the growing population of 15,000 homeless in Philadelphia,
my hometown, and still have had money to spare. Add disintegrating
Detroit, Newark, and Camden to the list. Throw in some crumbling
bridges and roads, too.
But why drone on? We all know that addressing acute social and
economic issues here in the homeland was the road not taken. Since
9/11, the Department of Homeland Security alone has
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/monitoring-america/>doled
out somewhere between $30 billion and $40 billion in direct grants to
state and local law enforcement, as well as other first
responders. At the same time, defense contractors have proven
endlessly inventive in adapting
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/18/defense-cuts-force-contractors-to-look-to-sell-spy-tech-to-cops-others.html>sales
pitches originally honed for the military on the battlefields of Iraq
and Afghanistan to the desires of police on the streets of San
Francisco and lower Manhattan. Oakland may not be Basra but (as
former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld liked to say) there are
always the
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_known_knowns>unknown
unknowns: best be prepared.
All told, the federal government
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://nationalpriorities.org/publications/2011/us-security-spending-since-911/>has
appropriated about $635 billion, accounting for inflation, for
homeland security-related activities and equipment since the 9/11
attacks. To conclude, though, that "the police" have become
increasingly militarized casts too narrow a net. The truth is that
virtually the entire apparatus of government has been mobilized and
militarized right down to the university campus.
Perhaps the pepper spray
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AdDLhPwpp4>used
on Occupy demonstrators last November at University of
California-Davis wasn't directly paid for by the federal government.
But those who used it work closely with Homeland Security and the FBI
"in developing prevention strategies that threaten campus life,
property, and environments," as UC Davis's Comprehensive Emergency
and Continuity Management Plan puts it.
Government budgets at every level now include allocations aimed at
fighting an ephemeral "War on Terror" in the United States. A vast
surveillance and military buildup has taken place nationwide to
conduct a pseudo-war against what can be imagined, not what we
actually face. The costs of this effort, started by the Bush
administration and promoted faithfully by the Obama administration,
have been, and continue to be, virtually incalculable. In the
process, public service and the public imagination have been weaponized.
Farewell to Peaceful Private Life
We're not just talking money eagerly squandered. That may prove the
least of it. More importantly, the fundamental values of American
democracy -- particularly the right to lead an autonomous private
life -- have been compromised with grim efficiency. The weaponry and
tactics now routinely employed by police are visible evidence of this.
Yes, it's true that Montgomery County, Texas, has
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/texas-county-police-buys-drone-can-carry-weapons>purchased
a weapons-capable drone. (They say they'll only arm it with tasers,
if necessary.) Yes, it's true that the Tampa police have
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www2.tbo.com/news/breaking-news/2012/jan/05/4/tampa-police-to-buy-armored-vehicle-communication--ar-344028/>beefed
the force up with an eight-ton armored personnel carrier, augmenting
two older tanks the department already owns. Yes, the Fargo police
are ready with
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://americaswarwithin.org/articles/2011/12/21/local-police-stockpile-high-tech-combat-ready-gear>bomb
detection robots, and Chicago
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704538404574539910412824756.html>boasts
a network of at least 15,000 interlinked surveillance cameras.
New York City's 34,000-member police force is now the ground zero of
a
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.northjersey.com/news/Justice_Department_to_review_complaints_on_NYPD_spying_of_Muslims.html>growing
outcry over rampant secret spying on Muslim students and communities
up and down the East coast. It has been a big beneficiary of federal
security largess. Between 2003 and 2010, the city
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.emergencymgmt.com/emergency-blogs/homeland/Does-New-York-City.html>received
more than $1.1 billion through Homeland Security's Urban Areas
Security Initiative grant program. And that's only one of the grant
programs funneling such money to New York.
The Obama White House itself has
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/27/nypd-muslim-surveillance_n_1303400.html>directly
funded part of the New York Police Department's anti-Muslim
surveillance program. Top officials of New York's finest have,
however, repeatedly
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-10-16/local/30303646_1_nypd-grant-money-vendors>refused
to disclose just how much anti-terrorism money it has been spending,
citing, of course, security.
Can New York City ever be "secure"? Mayor Michael Bloomberg
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2068428/Bloomberg-I-army-NYPD-State-Department-New-York-City.html>boasted
recently with obvious satisfaction: "I have my own army in the NYPD,
which is the seventh largest army in the world." That would be the
Vietnamese army actually, but accuracy isn't the point. The smugness
of the boast is. And meanwhile the money keeps pouring in and the
"security" activities only multiply.
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.amazon.com/dp/1568584288/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20>
[]
Why, for instance, are New York cops
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://mondoweiss.net/2012/02/newark-mayor-and-yale-university-head-slam-nypd-spying-program.html>traveling
to Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Newark, New Jersey,
to spy on ordinary Muslim citizens, who have nothing to do with New
York and are not suspected of doing anything? For what conceivable
purpose does Tampa want an eight-ton armored vehicle? Why do Texas
sheriffs north of Houston believe one drone -- or a dozen, for that
matter -- will make Montgomery County a better place? What manner of
thinking conjures up a future that requires such hardware? We have
entered a dark world that demands an inescapable battery of
closed-circuit, networked video cameras trained on ordinary citizens
strolling Michigan Avenue.
This is not simply a police issue. Law enforcement agencies may
acquire the equipment and deploy it, but city legislators and
executives must approve the expenditures and the uses. State
legislators and bureaucrats refine the local grant requests. Federal
officials, with endless input from national security and defense
vendors and lobbyists, appropriate the funds.
Doubters are simply swept aside (while legions of security and
terrorism pundits spin dread-inducing fantasies), and ultimately, the
American people accept and live with the results. We get what we pay
for -- Mayor Bloomberg's "army," replicated coast to coast.
Budgets Tell the Story
Militarized thinking is made manifest through budgets, which daily
reshape political and bureaucratic life in large and small ways. Not
long after the 9/11 attacks, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft,
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/testimony/2001/1206transcriptsenatejudiciarycommittee.htm>appearing
before the Senate Judiciary Committee, used this formula to define
the new American environment and so the thinking that went with it:
"Terrorist operatives infiltrate our communities -- plotting,
planning, and waiting to kill again." To counter that, the
government had urgently embarked on "a wartime reorganization," he
said, and was "forging new relationships of cooperation with state
and local law enforcement."
While such visionary Ashcroftian rhetoric has cooled in recent years,
the relationships and funding he touted a decade ago have been
institutionalized throughout government -- federal, state, and local
-- as well as civil society. The creation of the Department of
Homeland Security, with a total 2012 budget of about $57 billion, is
the most obvious example of this.
That budget only hints at what's being doled out for homeland
security at the federal level. Such moneys flow not just from
Homeland Security, but from the Justice Department, the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Commerce Department, the Department of
Agriculture, and the Department of Defense.
In 2010, the Office of Management and Budget
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=b7e871b1-77af-464e-ab6e-3fca8511c1ce>reckoned
that 31 separate federal agencies were involved in homeland
security-related funding that year to the tune of more than $65
billion. The Census Bureau, which has itself been
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.adc.org/index.php?id=2327>compromised
by War on Terror activities -- mapping Middle Eastern and Muslim
communities for counter-terrorism officials -- estimated that federal
homeland security funding topped $70 billion in 2010. But government
officials acknowledge that much funding is not included in that
compilation. (Grants made through the $5.6 billion Project BioShield,
to offer but one example, an exotic vaccination and medical program
launched in 2004, are absent from the total.)
Even the estimate of more than $635 billion in such expenditures does
not tell the full spending story. That figure does not include the
national intelligence or military intelligence budgets for which the
Obama Administration is seeking $52.6 billion and $19.6 billion
respectively in 2013, or secret parts of the national security
budget, the so-called black budget.
Local funding is also unaccounted for. New York's Police Commissioner
Raymond Kelly
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/09/08/exclusive-elaborate-new-york-city-post-911-security/>claims
total national homeland security spending could easily be near a
trillion dollars. Money well spent, he says -- New York needs that
anti-terror army, the thousands of surveillance cameras, those
sophisticated new weapons, and, naturally, a navy that now includes
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.policeone.com/police-products/investigation/video-surveillance/articles/4780384-NYC-cops-skim-for-bombs-using-drone-submarines/>six
drone submarines (thanks to $540,000 in Homeland Security cash) to
keep an eye on the terrorist threat beneath the waves.
And even that's not enough.
"We have a new boat on order," Kelly
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/09/08/exclusive-elaborate-new-york-city-post-911-security/>said
recently, alluding to a bullet-proof vessel paid for by, yes,
Homeland Security (cost unspecified). "We envision a situation where
we may have to get to an island or across water quickly, so we're
able to transport our heavy weapons officers rapidly. We have to do
things differently. We know that this is where terrorists want to come."
With submarines available to those who protect and serve (and grab
the grant money), a simple armored SWAT carrier should hardly raise
an eyebrow. The Tampa police will get one as part of their security
buildup before the city hosts the Republican convention this summer.
Tampa and Charlotte, which will host the Democratic convention, each
received special $50 million security allocations from Congress to
"harden" the cities.
Marc Hamlin, Tampa's assistant police chief,
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/article1209265.ece>told
the Tampa city council that two old tanks, already owned and operated
by the police, were simply not enough. They were just too
unreliable. "Thank God we have two, because one seems to break down
every week," he lamented.
Not everyone on the council seemed convinced Tampa needed a truck
sheathed in 1.5-inch high-grade steel, and featuring ballistic glass
panels, blast shields, and powered turrets. City Council Vice
Chairwoman Mary Mulhern claimed she found the purchase "kind of
troubling," a sign that Tampa is becoming "militarized." Then she
voted to approve it anyway, along with the other council members.
Hamlin was pleased. "It's one of those things where you prepare for
the worst, and you hope for the best," he
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/baybuzz/content/tampa-ready-begin-spending-republican-national-convention-security-funds-police-upgrades>explained.
When Mulhern suggested that some of the windfall $50 million might be
used to help the city's growing homeless population, Tampa Mayor Bob
Buckhorn
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/article1209265.ece>set
her straight. "We can't be diverted from what the appropriate use of
that money is, and that is to provide a safe environment for the
convention. It's not to be used for pet projects or things totally
unrelated to security."
Tampa will also be spending more than $1 million for state of the art
digital video uplinks to surveillance helicopters. ("Analog
technology is almost Stone Age," commented one approving council
member.) Another $2 million will go to install 60 surveillance
cameras on city streets. That represents an uncharacteristic pullback
from the city's initial plan to acquire more than 230 cameras as well
as two drones at a cost of about $5 million. Even the police deemed
that too expensive -- for the moment.
All of this hardware will remain in Tampa after the Republicans and
any protestors are long gone. What use will it serve then? In the
Tampa area, the armored truck will join the armored fleet, police
officials said, ferrying SWAT teams on calls and protecting police
serving search warrants. In the past, Hamlin claimed, Tampa's tanks
have been shot at. He did not mention that crime rates in Tampa and
across Florida are at four-decade lows.
The video surveillance cameras will, of course, also
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/tampa-gets-six-bids-for-surveillance-cameras-at-the-republican-national/1211236>stay
in place, streaming digitized images to an ever-growing database,
where they will be stored waiting for the day when facial recognition
software is employed to mix and match. This strategy is being
followed all over the country, including in Chicago, with its huge
video surveillance network, and New York City, where all of lower
Manhattan is now on camera.
Tampa has already been down this road once in the post-9/11 era. The
city was home to a much-watched experiment in using such
software. Images taken by cameras installed on the street were to be
matched with photographs in a database of suspects. The system failed
completely and was
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=security/bigbrother/tech/tampa-scraps-facial-recognition.txt>scrapped
in 2003. On the other hand, sheriffs in the Tampa Bay area are
currently
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/article1019492.ece>using
facial recognition software to match photographs snapped by police on
the street with a database of suspects with outstanding warrants.
Police are excited by that program and look forward to its future expansion.
The Rise of the Fusion Centers
Homeland Security has played a big role in creating one particularly
potent element in the nation's expanding database network. Working
with the Department of Justice in the wake of 9/11, it launched what
has grown into 72 interlinked state "fusion centers" -- repositories
for everything from Immigration Customs Enforcement data and
photographs to local police reports and even gossip.
"<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.vsp.state.va.us/FusionCenter/Report_Suspicious_Activity.shtm>Suspicious
Activity Reports" gathered from public tipsters -- thanks to Homeland
Security's "if you see something, say something" program -- are now
flowing into state centers. Those fusion centers are possibly the
greatest facilitators of dish in history, and have vast potential for
disseminating dubious information and stigmatizing purely political
activity. And most Americans have never even heard of them.
Yet fusion centers now operate in every state, centralizing
intelligence gathering and facilitating dissemination of material of
every sort across the country. Here is where information gathered by
cops and citizens, FBI agents and immigration officers goes to
fester. It is a staggering load of data, unevenly and sometimes
questionably vetted, and it is ultimately
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1883101,00.html>available
to any state or local law-enforcement officer, any immigration agent
or official, any intelligence or security bureaucrat with a computer
and network access.
The idea for these centers grew from the notion that agencies needed
to share what they knew in an "unfettered" environment. How
comforting to know that the walls between intelligence and law
enforcement are breached in an essentially
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://epic.org/privacy/fusion/>unregulated
fashion.
Many other states have monitored antiwar activists, gathering and
storing names and information.
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/fusion-center-encourages-improper-investigations-lobbying-groups-and-anti-war>Texas
and other states have stored "intelligence" on Muslims.
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175303/>Pennsylvania
gathered reports on opponents of natural gas drilling.
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://publicintelligence.net/florida-fusion-center-monitored-bp-protests-ron-paul-events-code-pink/>Florida
has scrutinized supporters of presidential candidate Ron Paul. The
list of such questionable activities is very long. We have no idea
how much dubious data has been squirreled away by authorities and
remains within the networked system. But we do know that information
pours into it with relative ease and spreads like an oil
slick. Cleaning up and removing the mess is another story entirely.
Anyone who wants to learn something about fusion center funding will
also find it maddeningly difficult to track. Not even the Homeland
Security Department can say with certainty how much of its own money
has gone into these data nests over the last decade. The amounts are
staggering, however. From 2004 to 2009 alone, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) reported that states used about $426
million in Homeland Security Department grants to fund fusion-related
activities nationally. The centers also receive state and local
funds, as well as funds from other federal agencies. How much? We
don't know, although GAO data suggest state and local funding at
least equals the Homeland Security share.
Yet, as Tampa, New York City, and other urban areas bulk up with
high-tech anti-terrorism equipment and fusion centers have
proliferated, the number of even remotely "terror-related" incidents
has declined. The equipment acquired and projects inaugurated to fend
off largely imaginary threats is instead increasingly deployed to
address ordinary criminal activity, perceived political disruptions,
and the tracking and surveillance of American Muslims. The
Transportation Safety Administration is now even
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/10/mission-creep-this-tennessee-highway-is-now-patrolled-by-tsa/247243/>patrolling
highways. It could be called a case of mission creep, but the more
accurate description might be: bait-and-switch.
The
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2011/09/does_the_united_states_spend_too_much_on_homeland_security.html>chances
of an American dying in a terrorist incident in a given year are 1 in
3.5 million. To reduce that risk, to make something minuscule even
more minuscule, what has the nation spent? What has it cost us?
Instead of rebuilding a ravaged American city in a timely fashion or
making Americans more secure in their "underwater" homes and their
disappearing jobs, we have created militarized police forces, visible
evidence of police-state-style funding.
Stephan Salisbury is cultural writer for the Philadelphia Inquirer
and a
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175418/stephan_salisbury_islam-baiting_doesn%27t_work>TomDispatch
regular. His most recent book is
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.amazon.com/dp/1568584288/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20>Mohamed's
Ghosts: An American Story of Love and Fear in the Homeland. To listen
to Timothy MacBain's latest Tomcast audio interview in which
Salisbury discusses post-9/11 police "mission creep" in this country,
click
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://tomdispatch.blogspot.com/2012/03/welcome-to-house-of-fund.html>here,
or download it to your iPod
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=j0SS4Al/iVI&subid=&offerid=146261.1&type=10&tmpid=5573&RD_PARM1=http%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fus%2Fpodcast%2Ftomcast-from-tomdispatch-com%2Fid357095817>here.
[Note on Sources and Further Reading: The following documents can all
be found in pdf format by clicking on "here": the UC Davis
Comprehensive Emergency Management plan
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://safetyservices.ucdavis.edu/programs-and-services/ecp/emergency-plans-1/emergency-plan/UCD%20CEP%20FINAL.pdf>here,
Census Bureau figures on Homeland Security spending
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0526.pdf>here,
a report on questionable fusion center actions
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/privacy/fusion_update_20080729.pdf>here,
the GAO report on fusion centers
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10972.pdf>here,
a report on the decline in the terrorist threat
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://sanford.duke.edu/centers/tcths/documents/Kurzman_Muslim-American_Terrorism_in_the_Decade_Since_9_11.pdf>here,
and Congressional testimony favoring counterterrorism "mission creep"
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/HS-HPSCI-hearing-011812.pdf>here.]
Follow TomDispatch on Twitter @TomDispatch and join us on
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175511/tomgram:_stephan_salisbury,_weaponizing_the_body_politic/http://www.facebook.com/tomdispatch>Facebook.
Copyright 2012 Stephan Salisbury
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20120304/84d80809/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list