[News] A Work of Negation: A Critical Review of Manning Marable's "Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention"
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri May 20 17:22:02 EDT 2011
A Work of Negation: A Critical Review of Manning Marable's, "Malcolm
X: A Life of Reinvention"
by Kali Akuno
Written for Left Turn Magazine
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Manning Marable's, "Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention", must be seen
for what it is, an ideological polemic. The general focus of this
polemic is Black Nationalism, and Black revolutionary nationalism in
particular. Manning's critical focus and fixation on Malcolm X as the
quintessential point of reference for Black Nationalists since his
cold blooded assassination in 1965, is a means to socially advance a
line of reasoning against this broad political philosophy and social
movement by turning its iconic figurehead on his head. The objective
of this inversion is to prove, in 594 pages no less, that those who
adhere to and seek to advance some variant of a Black nationalist
program not only have it all wrong, but in fact are distorting what
Malcolm himself stood for at the end of his days.
As Manning would have it, at the time of his assassination, Malcolm X
had all but abandoned Black nationalism, and had instead become a
pragmatic, liberal humanist, with social democratic political
leanings. As several critics have already pointed out, this character
bears a striking resemblance to Manning himself. Paraphrasing Patrick
Moyniham, although Manning is unquestionably entitled to his own
opinion, he is not entitled to his own facts. And the fact stands
that the document that most clearly reflects Malcolm's political
philosophy and programmatic orientation at the time of his death was
the Program of the Organization of Afro-American Unity. This program
is without question a revolutionary nationalist program. The OAAU's
program is modeled on the anti-imperialist program of the
Organization of African Unity (OAU) advanced by the Casablanca block
of the Union in the early 1960's. The Casablanca Group included
several progressive states offering political, financial and military
aid to the revolutionary anti-colonial struggles then raging on the
continent, particularly in the Portuguese held colonies and Southern
Africa. Chief amongst the Casablanca states were Kwame Nkrumah's
Ghana, Sekou Toure's Guinea, and Gamal Abdel-Nassar's Egypt, all of
which Malcolm X had long standing knowledge and admiration of. This
is evidenced by his constant references to the 1955 Afro-Asian or
Bandung Conference, even prior to his departure from the Nation of
Islam (NOI), and the Non-Aligned Movement which he was concretely
relating to at the time of his death. Manning consistently tries to
tip toe around these and other clearly known facts, and where he
can't he insists on trying to twist their meaning into something more
temperate and palatable to the liberal, non-racial or multi-cultural,
social democratic movement and program he was seeking to advance.
No where was this more painfully evident than on pages 484 - 486 of
the book. The portion that perhaps best illustrates Manning's disdain
for Black nationalism and his narrow interpretation of it is found on
page 485. He states:
"The unrealized dimension of Malcolm's racial vision was that of
black nationalism. A political ideology that originated before the
Civil War, black nationalism was based on the assumption that racial
pluralism leading to assimilation was impossible in the United
States. So cynical were many nationalists about the incapacity of
whites to overcome their own racism that they occasionally negotiated
with white terrorist groups like the Ku Klux Klan, in the mistaken
belief that they were more honest about their racial attitudes than
liberals. Yet as Malcolm's international experiences became more
varied and extensive, his social vision expanded. He became less
intolerant and more open to multiethnic and interfaith coalitions. By
the final months of his life he resisted identification as a 'black
nationalist', seeking ideological shelter under the race-neutral
concepts of Pan-Africanism and Third World revolution."
First, he rehashes an old, liberal line against Black nationalism
that it is the largely rejected strain of Black politics that
periodically reemerges like a phoenix during times of heighten
oppression against Black people. Manning, like many of his
predecessors who held and advanced this line, has a hard time
grasping that since the inception of the genocidal white-settler
project that is the United States, that there have been African
people not in the least mystified by the material and ideological
trappings of their would be masters, and have sought to establish
their own independent states or safe havens on American soil or
sought repatriation back to Africa. Uncompromising self-determination
and sovereignty has always been the fundamental objective of this
tendency of the Black Liberation Movement. Further, Manning's
statement assumes that structurally the US is qualitatively less
white supremacist now than it was in the 19th century. While some of
the formal trappings of white supremacy have changed, and changed
considerably as in the case of the elimination of de jure apartheid,
the fundamental essentials of the racist political economy remain the
same. And we have to keep in mind, that although history never
repeats itself exactly, there are plenty of signs that the "second
reconstruction" has exhausted itself with the election of President
Obama, and is in the process of being reversed, much as the first
reconstruction was between the late 1870's and 1890's.
Second, neither Pan-Africanism, Third Worldism, or Tri-Continentalism
were ever "race-neutral". All of these social movements were and are
crystal clear that one of their primary enemies was and is white
supremacy in the guise of European and American colonial occupation
and imperialist exploitation. Malcolm X's deepening embrace of
Pan-Africanism and Third World internationalism was never a rejection
or retreat from Black nationalism. If anything, as it pertains to his
adoption of these ideologies and movements, the base of his
contemporary US influences alone (the myth that it was international
travel alone that advanced Malcolm's politics in this vein needs to
be totally debunked) - which run the gamut from Paul Robeson, W.E.B.
DuBois, Queen Mother Moore, Robert F. Williams, CLR James, Vickie
Garvin, Carlos Cooks, Elombe Brath, Harold Cruse, John Henrik Clarke
and Gaidi and Imari Obadele, to name but few - indicate more than
anything, that Malcolm was in fact embracing the more revolutionary
and internationalist currents of the Black Liberation Movement. These
revolutionary currents were brutally repressed in the 1940's and 50's
by the US government and largely sidelined by the liberal, petit
bourgeois leadership of the social movement now labeled the "Civil
Rights Movement", which made a conscious choice to abandon the
economic demands and human rights framework advanced by the BLM in
the 1930's and 40's, so as not to be castigated or associated with
communism and the revolutionary nationalist movements opposed by US
imperialism during the high tide of the Cold War.
In light of these facts, I think it becomes clear that Manning's
distortions are more than just mere twists of fact. "Malcolm X: A
Life of Reinvention", has to be read as a product of the political
and ideological struggles of its own time and historical context,
just as much as it should be read and interpreted as a product of a
singular (or team, as I believe there was more than one hand
responsible for some of the sections of this work) consciousness. It
is the contemporary weaknesses of the Black Liberation Movement on a
whole, and its Black Nationalist wings more specifically, buttressed
by imperialism's hegemonic co-optation of Afrocentrism and other
liberal variants of multi-culturalism into a "post-racial" politics
of American nationalism that define the so-called "age of Obama",
that enabled the production of this work. Nowhere is this most
evident than on page 486, where Manning raises the question:
"If legal racial segregation was permanently in America's past,
Malcolm's vision today would have to radically redefine
self-determination and the meaning of black power in a political
environment that appeared to many to be 'post-racial'."
Here again, Manning displays his narrow understanding of Black
Nationalism. In this leap frog of a statement, Manning fails to
address the more than 40 years of the Black nations internal struggle
over the question of self-determination. What is negated here is an
explanation of the political and military defeat of the Black
Liberation Movement in the 1970's and 80's, and the Black petit
bourgeoisie's broad betrayal of the liberation movement by making
conscious, deliberate and consistent choices since the 1970's to
incorporate itself within the American imperialist project. Thus by
virtue of a vacuum, the Black petit bourgeoisie, in alliance with the
Democratic Party, has assumed an unrelenting hegemonic stranglehold
over Black politics, removing it from the streets, the schools and
the shop floors to ensure that the peoples' political engagement
would be safely confined to narrow electoral channels. The liberal
Black petit bourgeois program and cultural orientation willfully
subjects and subordinates the interests of Black people to the
interests of the American imperial project, essentially to ensure
that its own position within the projected is secured and
consolidated. The "post-racial" political climate that Manning speaks
of is not some neutral phenomenon that somehow spontaneously emerged.
It is the outcome of this struggle, an outcome with clear winners and
losers. The primary loser being the Black working class.
Since its qualitative fragmentation (particularly after the collapse
of the National Black Political Convention and the dissolution of the
African Liberation Support Committee in the mid-1970's) and
repression induced retreat in the 1970's, the Black Liberation
Movement has been largely unable to address the deteriorating
conditions of the Black working class produced by capital's
globalizing counter-offensive to the gains of Black workers and the
working class as whole won between the 1930's and 60's, and
fundamentally blocked from enacting on a comprehensive scale an
independent political program that advances the goal of
self-determination. One of the primary results of this defeat has
been a steady right orientated ideological drift in the Black
community that has tailed the growing class fragmentation of the
Black nation into the Haves (and have access) and the Have-Not's. The
Have's occupy the hegemonic center, and through the hegemonic block
that they have constructed within the Black nation have advanced a
program that creates space for the general acceptance of Black
cultural and physical inclusion within the imperial project, just so
long as it doesn't threaten the settler-order at home and the never
ending expanse of capital globally. The Have-Not's meanwhile, due to
the present lack of a strong and viable alternative, are increasingly
excluded from labor markets, warehoused in prisons, and contained in
isolated urban ghetto's or ex-urbanian cantonments seeking economic
justice and self-determination.
Manning spent a considerable portion of his political and academic
life contemplating what could and should be a viable political
alternative for the Have-Not's. As one of his defining political
projects, he was unwavering in his resistance to the advance of
conservative and reactionary Black nationalist politics, as well he
and all of us should be in my own opinion, posing as that
alternative. But, he often displayed a somewhat narrow understanding
of the complexity of Black nationalism, which often led him to short
change revolutionary nationalism and its promise and potential as an
alternative in his works and political engagements. However, its
clear from reading "Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention", that Manning
was not just casting Black nationalism narrowly unintentionally, but
that he was committed to seeing that no version or tendency of this
phenomenon be projected as an alternative. However, as hard as "A
Life of Reinvention" tries to negate the propagation of this
ideological and political alternative by its attempted inversion of
the political life and legacy of Malcolm X, it largely fails. And it
fails because as much a Malcolm X was constantly pushing himself and
being pushed by his peers to grow politically, his commitment to the
self-determination of African people in the US and throughout the
world was unwavering, and no assemblage of minutia can twist this
historical fact.
For reference to many of the historical points raised herein, please
consider the following sources as a sample of the rich history of the
Black Liberation Movement:
1. "Race Against Empire: Black Americans and anti-imperialism, 1937 -
1957", by Penny M. Von Eschen.
2. "Eye's Off the Prize: The United Nations and the African American
Struggle for Human Rights, 1944 - 1955", by Carol Anderson.
3. "Black Reconstruction in America, 1860 - 1880", by W.E.B. Du Bois.
4. "From Civil Rights to Black Liberation: Malcolm X and the
Organization of Afro-American Unity", by William Sales, Jr.
5. "Want to Start a Revolution? Radical Women in the Black Freedom
Struggle", edited by Dayo Gore, Komozi Woodard, and Jeanne Theoharis.
6. "Revolutionaries to Race Leaders: Black Power and the Making of
African American Politics", by Cedric Johnson.
8. "The Golden Age of Black Nationalism, 1850 - 1925", by William
Jeremiah Moses.
9. "Black Power in the Belly of the Beast", edited by Judson L. Jefferies.
10. "Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition", by
Cedric J. Robinson.
11. "We Will Return in the Whirlwind: Black Radical Organizations,
1960 - 1975", by Muhammad Ahmad.
12. "New Day in Babylon: The Black Power Movement and American
Culture, 1965 - 1975", by William L. Van Deburg.
13. "A Nation Within a Nation: Amiri Baraka (LeRoi Jones) and Black
Power Politics", by Komozi Woodard.
14. "Radio Free Dixie: Robert F. Williams and the Roots of Black
Power", by Timothy B. Tyson.
15. "Negroes with Guns", by Robert F. Williams.
16, "Free the Land", by Imari A. Obadele.
-----
Kali Akuno is the National Coordinator for the Malcolm X Grassroots
Movement (MXMG) and the Director of Education, Training, and Field
Work for the US Human Rights Nework (USHRN). Kali is currently
working on a book tentatively entitled "Confronting a Cleansing:
Hurricane Katrina, the Battle for New Orleans, and the Future of the
Black Working Class". The views expressed in this article do not
reflect those of MXGM or USHRN. Email feedback to:
<mailto:kaliakuno at gmail.com>kaliakuno at gmail.com.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20110520/6fcfc636/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list