[News] Wikileaks: US Embassy Requests Funding for Anti-Chavez Groups
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu Jun 30 10:39:40 EDT 2011
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
http://www.chavezcode.com/
<http://www.chavezcode.com/2011/06/wikileaks-us-embassy-requests-funding.html>Wikileaks:
US Embassy Requests Funding for Anti-Chavez Groups
The latest Wikileaks releases include cables sent
from the US Embassy in Caracas to the State
Department, Central Intelligence Agency, National
Security Council, and other US entities,
indicating requests for additional US government
funding for opposition groups in Venezuela. The
cables corroborate documents previously obtained
under the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
that evidence ongoing US funding to support
anti-Chavez groups and political parties in
Venezuela actively working to destabilize and
overthrow the South American government.
One document dated March 2009, authored by Charge
DAffaires John Caulfield, reveals $10 million in
funding via the US Embassy in Caracas to state
and municipal opposition governments, as well as
several NGOs, youth groups and political
campaigns to counter the Chavez government.
Curiously, in the confidential cable, Caulfield
requests an additional $3 million (on top of an
already-approved $7 million) due to a change in Venezuelas political map.
Given that the November 2008 elections and
February 2009 referendum created a new political
map for Venezuela, post requests an additional
USD 3 million to increase outreach efforts to
newly elected state and municipal governments, as
well as to continue programs to strengthen civil
society and prepare for the next round of elections in 2010.
Caulfield adds, ...redoubling our effort is
necessary to counter the increasing
authoritarianism of the Chavez government,
indicating clear political intent to justify the funding.
The US diplomat was referring to regional
elections in 2008 during which opposition parties
won in 6 out of 23 states and dozens of
municipalities. Apparently, the Embassy was keen
on providing immediate aid to those regions to reinforce their efforts.
ILLEGAL INTERVENTION
Embassies, consulates and diplomats are
prohibited under the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic and Consular Affairs from intervening
in the politics and internal affairs of a host
nation. Funding from foreign governments for
political groups and campaigns is also prohibited
and illegal in Venezuela, as it is in the United
States. Nonetheless, Caulfield doesnt hide his
intentions when he writes, ...our effort is
necessary to counter...the Chavez government.
Caulfield also admits that US government funding
helped create many of the organizations in
Venezuela receiving the aid and that those same
groups would most likely not exist or survive
without US support. Without our continued
assistance, it is possible that the organizations
we helped create...could be forced to close...Our
funding will provide those organizations a much-needed lifeline.
The majority of Venezuelan groups receiving US
funding were created after 2002, when the State
Department set up its unauthorized Office of
Transition Initiatives (OTI), a political branch
of the US Agency for International Development
(USAID) in Caracas. That same year, a coup detat
was executed against the Chavez government,
briefly ousting the Venezuelan President. He was
later rescued within 48 hours by loyal armed
forces and millions of Venezuelans. Those
involved in the coup were all receiving US
government funding and support through both the
Embassy and the National Endowment for Democracy
(NED), an agency funded by the US Congress. The
OTI, which has consistently funded and
strategically supported dozens of Venezuelan
political parties and NGOs with millions of US
taxpayer dollars annually, abruptly closed at the
beginning of 2011 after being exposed and
denounced for its illegal meddling activities in Venezuela.
Nonetheless, President Obama has already
requested an additional $5 million to fund
opposition groups in Venezuela in his 2012
budget. This amount is expected to increase with
funds from other US agencies in preparation for
Venezuelas presidential and regional elections next year.
The $10 million dished out by the US Embassy to
local opposition governments and civil society
groups was slated to support local NGOs in order
to work as watchdogs on issues key for democratic
development, i.e. against the
democratically-elected government. Five million
dollars were directed towards supporting
political parties and local governance to help
newly elected opposition governments show
delivery on promises made to the people during
the November 2008 political campaigns. Is this
really where US taxpayer dollars should be going?
Another $4 million went to interested political
parties, to develop young leaders and increase
outreach to...the Venezuelan youth movement. A
particular target of US funding, anti-Chavez
student and youth movements have popped up during
the past 3 years receiving overrated media coverage and foreign attention.
Another one million of this funding went towards
preparing the grounds for the 2010 legislative
campaigns. During 2010, however, an additional
$57 million was provided to the Venezuelan
opposition from both US and European agencies.
MONEY AND INTERVENTION
Another US Embassy cable from September 2009,
sent by then US Ambassador to Venezuela Patrick
Duddy, recounted a meeting held between the US
diplomat and three representatives from the small
opposition party, Podemos. During the meeting,
Ismael Garcia, legislator and leader of Podemos,
specifically requested more US government funding
and intervention to counteract President Chavez.
As he has repeatedly done in the past, Garcia
pointedly asked what the United States, through
the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) or
other USG (US Government) channels, could do to
help Podemos. Molina and Garcia suggested that US
support could be used for Podemos to build an
internet or cable TV-based communications
network...The Ambassador emphasized that the
United States is not intervening (sic) in
Venezuela, to which Garcia responded, Yes, but now is the time to begin.
What these documents evidence, besides illegal US
government meddling and hypocrisy, is the ongoing
relationship of dependence between the Venezuelan
opposition and Washington. US efforts to
undermine the Chavez administration have largely
depended on the capacity of the opposition to
destabilize the country and counter Chavez. After
years of multimillion-dollar investments in these
groups, which now depend on US government
funding, few advances have been made. This
scenario could explain the recent aggressive
actions the Obama administration is taking
against Venezuela, imposing sanctions and
attempting to falsely and maliciously link the
Chavez government to terrorism and portray it as a failed state.
Posted by Eva Golinger at
<http://www.chavezcode.com/2011/06/wikileaks-us-embassy-requests-funding.html>8:09
PM
<https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8784238642874849730&postID=1812611444293935005>0
comments
<http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=8784238642874849730&postID=1812611444293935005>
[]
<http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=8784238642874849730&postID=1812611444293935005>
<http://www.chavezcode.com/2011/06/wikileaks-us-embassy-requests-funding.html#links>Links
to this post
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20110630/a261aa46/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list