[News] Haiti - Aristide Stands, the People Stand
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jun 3 16:05:00 EDT 2011
ARISTIDE STANDS, THE PEOPLE STAND
by Nia Imara
With President Jean-Bertrand Aristides return to
Haiti this past March, President Obama once again
landed his administration on the wrong side of
history. After seven years of forced exile in
South Africaan exile orchestrated and imposed by
the United StatesAristide and his family
returned home to the rejoicing of millions of
their fellow citizens. Tens of thousands of
supporters greeted the Aristides at the
Port-Au-Prince International Airport on the
morning of Friday, March, 18 and ushered them to
their home in Tabarre. The grounds surrounding
the house, from which the Aristides were
kidnapped seven years ago by US special forces,
were packed that morning with a jubilant crowd
that included international supporters.
In the predawn hours on Sunday, February 29,
2004, United States Special Forces and more than
two dozen US soldiers came to President
Aristides home, ordered him and his wife get
into a car, drove them to the airport, and put
them onto an American plane that eventually
landed in the Central African Republic. Ever
since his kidnapping, the Haitian people that
overwhelmingly elected him into office in 1990
and 2000 called for his return. Yet instead of
respecting the will of the majority and offering
support that might have expedited the return of
Haitis twice democratically elected president,
Obama followed in the path of the Bush
administration and took measures to stop
Aristides return from South Africa. In the last
days leading up to the planned return, US State
Department officials repeatedly pressured the
South African government to prevent him from
leaving the country. And just a few days before
the family left for Haiti, Obama personally
called South African President Jacob Zuma to
express his concern over Aristides return.
The United States centuries-long bullying of
Haiti, its pressuring of Haiti, and its economic
and military interference in Haiti have not
ceased with the Obama administration. The
ostensible presidential elections held last
November were fraudulent and undemocratic from
the inside out. To start, Haitis Provisional
Electoral Council (CEP) prevented the countrys
most popular political party, Fanmi Lavalas, from
running candidates. Ever since the senatorial
elections in April 2009, in fact, Lavalas has
been banned from participating in elections, due
in no small part to pressure exerted on the CEP
and the UN by Washington. In spite of demands
made by the Haitian grassroots and the
international solidarity movement that the United
Nations, the CEP, and the US not support
elections in which Lavalas was excluded, the
Obama administration spent a total of $16 million
to fund the elections in November and the runoffs in March.
On election day last November, voter fraud of
every variety was documented: the names of
registered voters went missing from polling
stations, ballots were stuffed with the names of
victims who died in the January 2010 earthquake,
votes were miscounted or not counted at all, and
there were only about 2,000 polling stations
across the country, down from 12,000 during the
last elections in which Lavalas participated.
That the elections were fraudulent, however,
could not have come as a surprise to Washington,
the UN, or the CEP, who were forewarned by
Haitian and international organizations.
Immediately following the November elections,
Haitians came out onto the streets by the tens of
thousands to vote with their feet and their
voices. They demanded that the selections be
annulled and they protested the ongoing
occupation of their country by the United States,
France, Canada, and the United Nations. With
hundreds of thousands still homeless since the
earthquake, and in the midst of a cholera
epidemic brought to the country by the UN, how
could such a farcical election be given priority
over the needs of the people? How can there be
democracy when a people are under military
occupation? How can people participate in the
rebuilding of their country when the movement
representing the majority is excluded and
repressed? The contradictions can only be pushed
so far. The crimes committed against the Haitian
people by Washington, the United Nations, and by
the elite within their own country do not go unnoticed.
***
The impartiality with which the American media
treated the return of Jean-Claude Duvalier to
Haiti last January was cynical, if not
immoral. Tens of thousands of people were
murdered during the twenty-nine year long,
US-funded dictatorship of Francois Duvalier and
his son, Jean-Claude. The severe economic divide
in Haiti today and the countrys dependence on
foreign resources directly extend from the
exploitation and corruption that that regime tried to entrench in society.
In 1986, Duvalier the younger was forced out of
Haiti due to the mounting pressure of the
peoples resistance. The driving force of this
movement came to be known as Lavalas. This
Kreyol term means flood or torrent, the idea
being that the people were united in a cleansing
flood that would wash away all the corruption and injustice of Duvalierism.
In the early 1980s, a young priest whose parish
was in La Salinean especially impoverished area
in Port-au-Princeemerged as a courageous
opponent of Duvalier, Duvalierism, and policy of
the US government, which had provided the
dictatorship with millions of dollars over the
decades. He was guided by liberation theology,
he worked on behalf of the poor, the youth, and
political prisoners, and he spoke about the right
of Haitians to be free from foreign
interference. Jean-Bertrand Aristide shared in
the suffering of the people and uncompromisingly
fought for a society in which dignity, education,
shelter, healthcare, and jobs were not the rights
of a privileged few. He mirrored the
aspirations of Lavalasits slogan was justice,
transparency, participationand at the peoples
urging, he became the partys presidential
candidate. In 1990, during the first democratic
election in Haitis history, the people elected
Jean-Bertrand Aristide by an overwhelming 67% of the vote.
Although Duvalier was removed from power, the
small, very powerful, and very rich elite that
supported him remained intact. Aristide was and
is so loved by his people because he stands for
everything the Haitian elite, America, and
FranceHaitis former colonizerare
against. Seven months after he assumed office,
the Haitian militarywhich had been trained and
funded by the USstaged a coup détat, and
Aristide was forced into exile. Anti-Lavalas
forces took over the government and, in their
attempt to maintain power, reassumed their
repressive Duvalierist tactics. Meanwhile, Bill
Clinton tried to manipulate the situation to the
advantage of US big business by trying to
pressure Aristide into making a number of
unacceptable concessions. If Aristide agreed to
privatize his countrys national
resourcesincluding the airport, banks, the
telephone company, and the electrical companyand
sell them primarily to American corporations,
then Washington would sanction Aristides return
and provide him with the protection of the US
military. But Aristide refused, and due to the
sustained resistance of the grassroots movement
in Haiti, in combination with the mounting
international support, he was able to return in 1994.
But Clinton is back and is pursuing Washingtons
agenda of transforming Haiti into one of its
markets. After the 2010 earthquake, Obama placed
him and George W. Bush in charge of Americas
fundraising efforts for relief. Given Clintons
record with Haiti, and considering that Bushs
administration blocked 500 million dollars in
international loans to Haiti, Obamas decision
must be regarded as rather cynical. Last year,
the occupation government of Haiti made Clinton
co-director of the Interim Reconstruction
Committee. Soon afterward, his wife Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton brokered a deal in which a
South Korean clothing company called Sae-A
Trading would open sweat shops in Haiti.
When Aristide stepped down from office at the end
of his first term in 1995, the people elected
René Préval, who became the first president to
serve his full five-year term in
office. (Although after he was reelected in
2006, he betrayed the people by allying himself
with the occupational forces.) Aristide was
popularly elected president again in 2000, and
again he faced attacks from the US, France, and
also Canada. These governments and the big
business interests they represented did not want
Aristide in office because he empowered his
people, making it more difficult for them to be exploited.
President Aristide stands for education and
literacy of the people. Between 1994 and 2004,
the Lavalas administrations built hundreds of
schools195 primary schools and 104 high
schoolsmore than had ever been built in Haitis
history up to that point. (The US and UN have
not built any schools during their seven-year
occupation of Haiti.) The nationwide literacy
campaign instituted by Lavalas reduced the rate
of illiteracy from 85 to 55 percent, and in 2001
Aristide designated twenty percent of the
national budget for education. Since his return
to Haiti in 2011, Aristide again declared his
intention to focus on education. As he has
explained many times before, education and the
day-to-day participation of people in the running
of the country are the true tests of a democracy.
Aristide stands for economic justice. During his
second term in office, he nearly doubled the
minimum wage from 36 to 70 gourdes (about $1.70)
per day. His administration also initiated a
campaign to collect unpaid taxes that the elite
owed the government. For decades, dictators did
everything they could to economically and
socially disenfranchise the masses. Lavalas
empowered and enabled the people. Tens of
thousands of fishermen were provided with
assistance, new tools and boats, and fifty new
lakes with stock fish were constructed. Lavalas
built hundreds of new stores and restaurants at
which food was sold at lower prices, thus
challenging the monopolies of the elite. Moves
like these, while they solidified Aristides
support amongst the poor majority, obviously
increased the elites animosity toward him and Lavalas.
Aristide stands for healthcare. Before the 2004
coup, Lavalas spent more on health care than any
previous government. And during the ten-year
period leading up to the coup, the malnutrition
rate dropped from 63% to 51%. The administration
began an AIDS treatment and prevention program;
people were provided with free healthcare; forty
clinics and hospitals were built or rebuilt; and
clean water was being made accessible to the
poorest parts of the country that up till then
had been neglected. Eight hundred Cuban health
care workers came to work in the traditionally
underserved rural areas in Haiti, and over three
hundred Haitians went to Cuba to be trained as
doctors. A new nursing school was also being
planned, but the work was halted when the US
military appropriated it after the 2004 coup.
Above all, Aristide stands for the dignity of his
people. And not just symbolically. During his
first term in office, he disbanded the Haitian
army, which was created by the United States
during its first occupation of Haiti in 1915, and
which was notorious for terrorizing the
people. When he was elected for the second time,
Aristide made it clear that France owed Haiti
restitution for the 21.7 billion dollars it
extorted from the ex-slaves after the Haitian
Revolution. (It is doubtful that the president
of this country would ever make moves to disband
the police, the military, or to demand
restitution for the descendents of slaves.) In
making the demand for restitution, Aristide was
speaking not only for the people of Haiti but for
black people everywhere who are descendants of slavery.
At every turn, Aristide challenged the unjust
power structure in Haiti and in the worlda power
structure characterized by a privileged few
profiting from the exploitation of the poor
majority. Thus, in February 2004, the United
States and a Haitian paramilitary consisting of
Duvalierists and former army members violently
took over the government of Jean-Bertrand
Aristide. The US Marines occupied the country
and were later replaced by the United Nations,
which has since acted as a proxy military force
for America, France, and Canada, whose mission
has been to transform Haiti into a safe
playground for big business. In order to do
this, these governments have worked with the
Haitian elite to crush the Lavalas
movement. During the first months of the
occupation, many Lavalas leaders fled the country
because their lives were threatened by the
coup-makers. In the years that followed,
thousands of people were either murdered,
disappeared, or imprisoned by the police, UN
troops, and paramilitaries acting on behalf of
the rich. The casualties number in the
thousandsmen, women, children, elderly.
The occupation put a halt to the reforms begun by
Lavalas, and the quality of life has plunged
dramatically during the last seven years. The
elite and the defacto Haitian government have
acted completely contrary to the most fundamental
aspects of the Haitian constitution, which states
that The State recognizes the right of every
citizen to decent housing, education, food, and
social security. And in condoning Aristides
kidnapping and preventing his return to Haiti,
Obama has violated the clause of the constitution
that states, No person of Haitian nationality
may be deported or forced to leave the national territory for any reason.
All along, the UN has protected the coup-makers
and has itself participated in murder and
rape. In 2006, the medical journal The Lancet
published research showing that at least 8,000
Haitians had been murdered and 35,000 women raped
since the coup, and the UN has participated in
these crimes. Since its presence in Haiti,
political repression has increased, the cost of
living has skyrocketed, the infrastructure has
deteriorated, and access to medical care,
employment, and education have plummeted. Many
Haitians have compared this period to the
Duvalier regime at its worst. The idea that the
more than 10,000 UN troops in Haiti are there to
bring about peace and stability is a myth. They
are there to enable the occupation and provide it
with a facade of legitimacy. The strategy of the
US/UN occupation has been to re-enslave Haiti;
and if the US is the equivalent to the slave
master in this affair, then the UN is equivalent to the overseer.
The veneer, however, is thin. The people of
Haiti know well that the holding of elections
should not be mistaken for democracy. The
runoff held in March did not have a much higher
voter turnout than did the November
electionsbetween 10% and 25%. The CEP recently
announced that the majority of the votes were
taken by Michel Martelly, a man who supported the
Duvalier regime and its death squads. But given
the Haitian peoples history of resisting
corruption and repression, the story is not over
yet. Neither truth nor justice can be evaded forever.
Indeed, the people persevere. In Haiti is a
people born out of strugglea people who have
pledged their determination to die in struggle
rather than live as slaves. The return of
Aristide gives reason to hope and proves that
their struggle has not been fruitless. If we
stand with the people of Haiti, we stand on the right side of history.
Haiti Action Committee
<http://www.haitisolidarity.net/>www.haitisolidarity.net and on FACEBOOK
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a
message with the subject header UNSUBSCRIBE to
<mailto:action.haiti at gmail.com>action.haiti at gmail.com
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20110603/4354a364/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list