[News] Israel's Nuclear Offer to Apartheid Regime Blows Cover

Anti-Imperialist News news at freedomarchives.org
Wed May 26 11:29:49 EDT 2010


http://www.counterpunch.org/

May 26, 2010


Nuclear Offer to Apartheid Regime Blows Diplomatic Cover


Israel's Nukes Out of the Shadows

By JONATHAN COOK

Nazareth.

Israel faces unprecedented pressure to abandon its official policy of 
"ambiguity" on its possession of nuclear weapons as the international 
community meets at the United Nations in New York this week to 
consider banning such arsenals from the Middle East.

Israel's equivocal stance on its atomic status was shattered by 
reports on Monday that it offered to sell nuclear-armed Jericho 
missiles to South Africa's apartheid regime back in 1975.

The revelations are deeply embarrassing to Israel given its 
long-standing opposition to signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation 
Treaty, arguing instead that it is a "responsible power" that would 
never misuse nuclear weapons technologies if it acquired them.

Reports of Israel's nuclear dealings with apartheid South Africa will 
also energise a draft proposal from Egypt to the UN non-proliferation 
review conference that Israel -- as the only nuclear power in the 
region -- be required to sign the treaty.

Israeli officials are already said to be discomfited by Washington's 
decision earlier this month to agree a statement with other UN 
Security Council members calling for the establishment of a Middle 
East zone free of nuclear arms.

The policy is chiefly aimed at Iran, which is believed by the US and 
Israel to be secretly developing a nuclear bomb, but would also risk 
ensnaring Israel. The US has supported Israel's ambiguity policy 
since the late 1960s.

Oversight of Israel's programme is also due to be debated at a 
meeting of the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy 
Agency, in Vienna next month.

The administration of US President Barack Obama is reported to have 
held high-level discussions with Israel at the weekend to persuade it 
to consent to proposals for a 2012 conference to outlaw weapons of 
mass destruction in the Middle East.

As pressure mounts on Israel, local analysts have been debating the 
benefits of maintaining the ambiguity policy, with most warning that 
an erosion of the principle would lead inexorably to Israel being 
forced to dismantle its arsenal.

Echoing the Israeli security consensus, Yossi Melman, a military 
intelligence correspondent for the Haaretz newspaper, also cautioned 
that declaring Israel's nuclear status "would play into Iran's hands" 
by focusing attention on Tel Aviv rather than Tehran.

Israel refused to sign the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 
having developed its first warhead a few years earlier with help from 
Britain and France.

Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, reported that Israel briefly 
considered showing its nuclear hand in 1967 when Shimon Peres, 
Israel's current president, proposed publicly conducting a nuclear 
test to prevent the impending Six-Day War. However, the test was 
overruled by Levi Eshkol, the prime minister of the time.

Mr Peres, who master-minded the nuclear programme, later formulated 
the policy of ambiguity, in which Israel asserts only that it will 
"not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East".

That stance -- and a promise not to conduct nuclear tests -- was 
accepted by the US administration of Richard Nixon in 1969.

According to analysts, the agreement between Israel and the US was 
driven in part by concerns that Washington would not be able to give 
Israel foreign aid -- today worth billions of dollars -- if Israel 
declared itself a nuclear state but refused international supervision.

Nonetheless, revelations over the years have made it increasingly 
difficult for the international community to turn a blind eye to 
Israel's arsenal.

Mordechai Vanunu, a technician at the Dimona nuclear energy plant in 
the Negev, provided photographic evidence and detailed descriptions 
of the country's weapons programme in 1986. Today the Israeli arsenal 
is estimated at more than 200 warheads.

In 2006 Ehud Olmert, then the prime minister, let slip Israel's 
nuclear status during an interview with German TV when he listed 
"America, France, Israel and Russia" as countries with nuclear arms.

Even more damaging confirmation was provided this week by Britain's 
Guardian newspaper, which published documents unearthed for a new 
book -- The Unspoken Alliance by Sasha Polakow-Suransky, an American 
historian -- on relations between Israel and South Africa's apartheid regime.

The top-secret papers reveal that in 1975 Mr Peres, then Israel's 
defence minister, met with his South African counterpart, P W Botha, 
to discuss selling the regime nuclear-armed missiles. The deal fell 
through partly because South Africa could not afford the weapons. 
Pretoria later developed its own bomb, almost certainly with Israel's help.

Israel, Mr Polakow-Suransky said, had fought to prevent 
declassification of the documents.

Despite publication by the Guardian of a photographed agreement 
bearing the date and the signatures of both Mr Peres and Mr Botha, Mr 
Peres' office issued a statement on Monday denying the report.

Israel's increasingly transparent nuclear status is seen as an 
obstacle to US efforts both to impose sanctions on Iran and to damp 
down a wider potential nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

This month the US surprised officials in Tel Aviv by failing to keep 
Israel's nuclear programme off the agenda of the IAEA's next meeting, 
on June 7. The issue has only ever been discussed twice before, in 
1988 and 1991.

Aware of the growing pressure of Israel to come clean, Benjamin 
Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, declined an invitation to 
attend a nuclear security conference in Washington last month at 
which participants had threatened to question Israel about its arms.

At the meeting, US President Barack Obama called on all countries, 
including Israel, to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

A draft declaration being considered at the UN review conference 
later this week again demands that Israel -- and two other states 
known to have nuclear weapons, India and Pakistan -- sign the treaty.

Egypt has proposed that the 189 states that have signed the treaty, 
including the US, pledge not to transfer nuclear equipment, 
information, material or professional help to Israel until it does so.

Reuven Pedatzur, an Israeli defence analyst, warned recently in 
Haaretz that there was a danger the Egyptian proposal might be 
adopted by the US, or that it might be used as a stick to browbeat a 
recalcitrant Israel into accepting greater limitations on its 
arsenal. He suggested ending what he called the "ridiculous fiction" 
of the ambiguity policy.

Emily Landau, an arms control expert at Tel Aviv University, however, 
said that those who believed Israel should be more transparent were 
"misguided". Ending ambiguity, she said, would eventually lead to 
calls for Israel's "total and complete disarmament".

The last Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference, five years ago, 
failed when the US repudiated pledges to disarm and refused to 
pressure Israel over its nuclear programme.

Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. 
His latest books are 
"<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0745327540/counterpunchmaga>Israel 
and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the 
Middle East" (Pluto Press) and 
"<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1848130317/counterpunchmaga>Disappearing 
Palestine: Israel's Experiments in Human Despair" (Zed Books). His 
website is <http://www.jkcook.net>www.jkcook.net.




Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110

415 863-9977

www.Freedomarchives.org  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20100526/a506fa2f/attachment.html>


More information about the News mailing list