[News] Psychologists in an Age of Torture
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Jan 13 11:51:33 EST 2010
http://www.counterpunch.org/bond01132010.html
January 13, 2010
An Open Letter to Dr. Carol Goodheart
Psychologists in an Age of Torture
By Dr. TRUDY BOND
"We've seen a lot of negative e-mail discourse in recent years as APA
has made decisions and released reports that have triggered
controversy among our members . . . We also saw heated disputes over
APA's stance on the role of psychologists in interrogations . . . The
difference is that in the new age of outrage, criticism on these
issues quickly escalated to unwarranted heights. In 24/7 instant
communications, extreme voices dominate . . .I see four elements
converging online to strain the collegiality within APA . . .viral
distortion (a small number perpetuate shocking misrepresentations
about APA's actions, policies and procedures). The effect on APA is
damaging when members and the public believe the distortions . . .
Let's turn down the temperature on outrage."
APA in the age of outrage
by Dr. Carol D. Goodheart
President, American Psychological Association
I am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is
there not cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as
uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think,
or to speak, or write, with moderation. No! no! Tell a man whose
house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately
rescue his wife from the hands of the ravisher; tell the mother to
gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen;
-- but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. I
am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will
not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD. The apathy of the
people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal, and to
hasten the resurrection of the dead.
William Lloyd Garrison
White Abolitionist, 1831
Dear President Goodheart:
I take issue with your column, "APA in the Age of Outrage" in
January's APA Monitor. As president of the APA you seem to have
diminished the concept of outrage, defining it as the freedom of
others to express their disagreement with your "majority opinion." In
my universe, there will never be enough outrage to counteract the
injustices in the world. Rather than "turning down the temperature"
as you wish to do in your universe, which I assume would make you
more comfortable, ratcheting up the outrage is necessary to save humanity.
In the universe where I live, people with malevolent intentions are
sometimes elevated into positions of power over thousands or even
millions of other people. When their actions are murderous, or
physically threatening, or destructive of others' life chances, or
are unjust, others who do not share their belief systems take
measures, ranging from reasoned criticism to election participation
to organizing others against such actions. When the actions of those
in power, such as experimentally calibrating just how much physical
or mental torture is enough to make a human prisoner confess, are
violations of international law and human rights, many are outraged.
In my universe, "outrage" did not come into being only with the
latest communication technologies, including the internet. Unlike
your universe, these "outrages" predate the latest communication
technologies, including the internet, sad to say. Our history is
replete with dreadful and callous "outrages", going back to very
nearly the beginning of human existence.
In my universe, I and others find it necessary to work with real
facts and circumstances. For example, while some insist that we must
fight a "war on terror," others of us - who, I admit, become a little
"outraged" at the irrationality of "terror" as an enemy - try to
reason that wars are fought against human beings, not abstract
concepts. And that before human beings must be exterminated or
tortured in the name of fighting "terror," certain reality-based
accountings and considerations, such as the law, should be
unavoidable. When they are not, I am outraged.
In your column it seems that your universe has suddenly become
populated with abstractions to be eradicated. "Email tyranny," and
"viral distortions" appear to be causing a "lack of civility." This
"lack of civility" seems to be one of the very worst things that can
happen in your universe, enough to devote a presidential column to
the subject. I must admit to a certain amount of jealousy here,
because in my universe, facts and circumstances reveal vastly
different problems.
In my universe, illegally-undertaken wars have killed tens of
thousands of people and thousands are jailed because of "terror" when
most of the time there is little or no factual reason for them to
lose their rights and recourse, their lives and their families. In my
universe, some psychologists who have taken an oath to use their
educations and healing abilities only for beneficent purposes instead
have deliberately and knowingly used them to oversee the intentional
infliction of physical and mental harm to others.
Those of us who are "outraged" by the misuse of psychologists'
intellectual gifts and skills have demonstrated that laws and
standards are being unmistakably violated. Yet in your universe, you
are more outraged by the communication of these atrocities.
Most recently in my universe (and yours), a new abstraction has been
posed: "operational psychology," the deliberate use of psychological
principles in warmaking and intelligence. In my universe, many think
this abstract "operational psychology" isn't a legitimate field of
psychology at all, but is a deliberate attempt at the misapplication
of humane learning to do harm to others, illegal, inhumane and, yes -
outrageous - transmutation of a great good to something unmistakably evil.
In my universe, those who promote abstractions like "terror", "email
tyranny" and "viral distortion" as disembodied enemies of "civility"
tend to be people who rotely repeat untested notions, subjective
beliefs and unconsidered generalities so often that they come to
mistake phantasms for facts. By quarreling with the means of
communication, they avoid looking at the content of communications.
They shut themselves off from learning by coming to view those whose
opinions differ with their own as viruses or people whose mission is
simply to not be civil because they're "outraged."
Those who traffic in abstractions destroy their own credibility with
their decided anti-intellectual stereotyping. Accusations that those
who use email are "distorting" and amplifying their misplaced
"outrage" to destroy "civility" are peddling diversionary tripe. They
are refusing to do the intellectual work they were trained to do and
are obligated to do as thinking human beings: engaging in fact-based,
science-implicated investigation and discussion.
One final outrage: almost three years ago I submitted a professional
ethics complaint to the APA over which you now preside. This
complaint concerned the alleged involvement of Major John Leso,
psychologist and APA member, in the planning and use of torture on
prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Two years later, your ethics office
acknowledged receipt of that complaint. To date, no further action
has been taken. That is an outrage.
Dr. Trudy Bond is a licensed independent psychologist in Toledo,Ohio.
She can be reached at <mailto:trudybond at att.net>trudybond at att.net.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20100113/6edd0931/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list