[News] Ecuadorians Protest New Water Law
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Sep 30 11:22:46 EDT 2009
Ecuadorians Protest New Water Law
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2136/1/
Written by Jennifer Moore
Wednesday, 30 September 2009
We're crazy for water, chanted about a thousand
campesinos as they marched through the streets of
downtown Cuenca in southern Ecuador on Monday.
The march, called for by the Confederation of
Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE), was
part of a nation-wide mobilization against a new
water law. It included intermittent road
blockades throughout the highlands over the
course of the day that by all acounts were peaceful.
The protests took place amidst a heavy onslaught
of insults and efforts to delegitimize their
concerns, largely by President Rafael Correa.
Correa told EFE news service that the popular
movements are being used by the right to
destabilize his government. He also interrupted
national television programming over the weekend
to urge Ecuadorians not to let themselves be
deceived by the same old manipulators...who benefit from chaos.
However, despite Correa's insistence that he
would not be forced to dialogue, by day's end the
CONAIE had suspended protests to enter into talks
with him. Campesino organizations in Cuenca also
agreed to dialogue, while the Amazonian branch of
the CONAIE reported that it remains mobilized,
asking for its own talks with the government in
order to address issues specific to the region.
The protests come exactly one year since
Ecuador's 2008 political constitution was passed,
which recognizes the right to water, rights for
nature and which declared the country a
plurinational state. However, indigenous and
campesino organizations involved in the protests
criticize the government for having digressed
from the highly lauded constitution. The
constitution passed in a national referendum on
September 28, 2008 with 64 percent of the vote.
Criticisms concerning the new water law, which
was initially scheduled for first debate in the
National Assembly last Saturday, apply to the
privatization of water, limits on community
participation in water management, prioritization
of water access for industrial users and lack of
sanctions for water contamination, and more. In
anticipation of this week's protests, the debate
was postponed for several weeks.
In Cuenca, representatives of rural water systems
from across the south-central province focused
on aspects of the water bill pertaining to water
use for mining projects that are deemed a
national priority. Some of the most advanced
metal mining projects in the country are being
developed within the páramo outlying the city.
Páramo are fragile high altitude wetlands, or
essentially a deep sponge composed of soil and
vegetation that regulates the water supply for
the city and rural populations involved in dairy
farming and other agricultural activities.
Campesino groups, led by Rural Water Systems
President Carlos Pérez, proposed that mining
should be prohibited in the páramo, which should
also be off limits to other intensive activities
such as farming and motorized sports. Communities
within the vicinity of Cuenca have for years been
opposing large scale gold mining projects
belonging to Canadian-financed companies such as
Iamgold and International Minerals Corporation.
These groups were also concerned about reduced
participation for rural water boards in water
management under the draft law, which Pérez says,
are organizations that have been created at the
community level over many years of hard work,
questioning the state's interest to now step in and overtake control.
Pérez is hopeful that they will have time now
before the water law is debated for a national
dialogue. However, he says, such dialogue will
only be meaningful if there is a serious
commitment on the part of Assembly Members and
the President, given our current lack of
confidence in this government. Pérez's
organization previously got involved in talks
over a new mining law passed in January, which
did not substantially incorporate their
proposals. They hope the mining law will be
declared unconstitutional by Ecuador's
Constitutional Court based upon an appeal they filed earlier this year.
Before yesterday the potential for dialogue did
not seem promising. President Correa had
repeatedly insulted indigenous organizations and
their leaders, insisting that they are lying
when they say the water law allows for
privatization. He has cited both Article 3 of the
law and the constitution which oppose
commodification of the precious resource. He also
accused leaders of the CONAIE and the highland
indigenous organization ECUARUNARI of being part
of a privileged class. Both groups rejected his
insults and cite them as part of their rationale for Monday's protests.
Assembly Member Lourdes Tibán from the indigenous
Pachakutik movement also wrote an open letter to
Correa on Monday, saying, Enough of your insults
Mr. President. She criticized him for using the
term golden ponchos against indigenous movement
leaders, which she says was coined by the
right-wing oligarchy more than 10 years ago,
around the time that the indigenous movement was
growing in political influence and participated
in the overthrow of two governments.
She further observed that Correa has not made
such accusations against indigenous members who
are supportive of his political movement, despite
personal achievements that have brought them a
long way out of poverty and marginalization,
including past employment with the Interamerican
Development Bank in one case. The difference, she says, is political:
You are very mistaken to think that the
indigenous person who is servile is good, while
the indigenous person who is critical of your
government is part of the elite and a golden
poncho," said Tibán. "If this is what you think,
it is a very poor definition and an unacceptable perspective.
She also did not hesitate to recall a recent
scandal over President Correa's brother who was
revealed to have obtained tens of millions of
dollars in public contracts over the last couple
of years, and says his insults deserve to be tried in court.
Finally, Pérez publicly denied that his
organization has any interest in causing
upheaval in the country or in overthrowing any
government. However, he indicated that they are
serious about their demands and calls Monday's
march just a warm up for further actions which
could escalate depending on how talks progress.
If [the President] continues with his
high-handed attitude and insults, he concludes,
we know that he who sows wind, reaps tempests.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20090930/b4e3ef27/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list