[News] The Cash Cops of Tenaha
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Oct 19 11:35:55 EDT 2009
http://www.counterpunch.org/moses10192009.html
October 19, 2009
Bizarre License on Highway 59
The Cash Cops of Tenaha
By GREG MOSES
It was Friday of the last day of August, 2007 when Arkansas resident
James Morrow attempted to mind his own business while driving
peaceably through Tenaha, a small East Texas town in Shelby
County south of Shreveport and Longview. According to a federal
lawsuit (Morrow v Tenaha) filed by the American Civil Liberties Union
there was "no legal justification" for what happened next. Morrow
was stopped by Tenaha Deputy Marshall Barry Washington and asked to
step out of his car. Deputy Washington then searched Morrow's car.
Then Deputy Washington was joined at the scene by Shelby County
Precinct Four Constable Randy Whatley who searched the car with a
dog. Following two searches of his car, Morrow was asked by Deputy
Washington if he had any money, and he said yes, he was carrying
about $3,900 in his wallet. Deputy Washington promptly seized $3,969
from Morrow, confiscated his two cell phones, and arrested him for
"money laundering."
"Washington had no reason to believe Plaintiff Morrow was guilty of
money laundering," says the federal lawsuit. "Defendants Washington
and Russell told Plaintiff Morrow they would hold him prisoner and
prosecute him for money laundering unless he would agree to
forfeit the $3969. Under this duress and these threats, Defendants
Washington and Russell coerced Plaintiff Morrow to execute documents
memorializing the forfeiture, and released him, and warned him to not
hire a lawyer or try to get his money back." The "money laundering"
charges were subsequently dismissed.
Morrow is a black African American and the lead plaintiff in a case
involving eight motorists who claim they were stopped and stripped of
their cash for no other provocation than driving or riding through
Tenaha while black. The cars they all drove were either rented or
displayed out-of-state license plates.
On August 13, 2007, Deputy Washington lifted $50,291.00 from two
black African Americans from Washington D.C. and Maryland who were
traveling through Texas together.
"Washington threatened Plaintiffs with charges of money laundering
and lengthy sentences if they would not execute documents allowing
the seizure or if they otherwise contested the seizure," says the lawsuit.
"Washington did not charge Plaintiffs with any criminal offense, nor
did he have legal justification to do so." On June 11, 2008, Deputy
Washington confiscated $13,000 from a black African American from Wisconsin.
"Washington threatened to bring money laundering charges against
Plaintiff, and to prosecute him on those charges, if he did not
execute documents permitting Defendant Washington's seizure and
forfeiture of the money," says the lawsuit. "Under this coercion,
Plaintiff signed the documents." On April 18, 2007, Deputy Washington
stopped and detained another pair of black African American
motorists, Linda Dorman and Marvin Pearson, both from Ohio. While
under detention they were questioned by Shelby County District
Attorney Investigator Danny Green. He asked them if they had any
money. According to court documents Dorman and Pearson admitted to
having $4,500, but after Green confiscated the cash under the usual
coercive threats, he handed them a receipt for only $4,000. No
charges against Dorman or Pearson were ever filed. Jennifer
Boatwright is a white woman from Texas, but on April 26, 2007 she was
driving down Highway 59 near Tenaha with Ronald Henderson, a black
African American. They were stopped and detained by Deputy
Washington, then questioned by Washington and D.A. Investigator Green.
"Green threatened to bring money laundering charges against
Plaintiffs Boatwright and Henderson, and to take their children and
put them in foster care if Plaintiffs would not sign papers prepared
by Defendant Green to authorize the seizure," says the
lawsuit. "Under coercion, Plaintiffs Boatwright and Henderson
complied." They handed over $6,000 in cash. No charges were ever
filed against them.
"Now, under Texas law, if you are pulled over and accused of a real
crime, police are permitted to take money and other valuables that
you might have used in your crime, or received from your crime,"
explains CNN correspondent Gary Tuchman in a May, 2009 blog post at
AC360. As Tuchman explains, the forfeiture law is intended to take
bad money and put it to good use, but after an extensive public
information request, the CNN team discovered that District Attorney
Lynda K. Russell has collected an estimated $3 million in forfeiture
funds to purchase such things as $195 for Tootsie Pops, Dum Dums, and
Dubble Bubble that she contributed to a poultry festival, $524 for a
popcorn machine and popcorn, $400 for barbecue catering, and at least
two checks totaling $6,000 to a local Baptist church.
"But this one, this check, really stands out," reports Tuchman in an
archived transcript of the story. "This is the check the DA wrote
for $10,000 and paid directly to police officer Barry Washington for
what are described as investigative costs."
With camera rolling, Tuchman asks Russell and Washington for
comments, but they both refuse on account of pending litigation. In
federal court documents the defendants deny the charges, claim to
have no knowledge of alleged facts, claim immunity as officials, and
ask that the case be dismissed.
Republican D.A. Russell was elected by 53 percent of the vote against
a Democrat opponent in 2000, according to official numbers posted by
the Texas Secretary of State. In 2004 she increased her general
election share to 59 percent against her predecessor, Democrat Karen
S. Price, who tried to stage a comeback after a failed effort to get
elected in 2000 as a Republican District Judge. In 2008, D.A.
Russell ran unopposed. No one that year could have made a campaign
issue of the federal suit that was filed after the Spring primary but
before the Fall general election. During the summer of 2009, lawyers
battled over discovery motions. Plaintiffs are trying to certify a
class action lawsuit and therefore want volumes of video and
documentation well beyond the eight named cases. On August 20,
Federal District Judge T. John Ward largely granted ACLU requests for
more materials and clarified the legal path to possible class action
certification.
On the defense side, attorneys argued that they should be allowed to
discover "travel itineraries, calendars, journals, or other documents
reflecting schedule and/or any travel; all credit card
bills/receipts; all receipts for hotel, gas, meals, rental cars; and
photographs from any trips and of any items seized." Judge Ward
agreed, but only if the records were "readily available."
Lawyers for the police and D.A.'s office also wanted plaintiffs to
turn over bank records, income tax returns, and employment records;
in an apparent attempt to revisit the "money laundering" charges that
were never filed in the first place. It was a scary request
supported by scary argumentation: "In other words," argued lawyers
for the Shelby County law enforcement establishment in their federal
filings, "even if the initial traffic stop lacked probable cause, the
forfeiture action could proceed and the State could still meet its
civil case burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence and the
property could still be forfeited."
The authority the cops were seeking was chilling. They could stop
people for no reason, take their cash, spend it, meanwhile filing no
charges of wrongdoing. All the while, the authorities of East Texas
or wherever could count on a federal court order that would allow
them to go after the banking, tax, and employment records of their
innocent victims if they tried to get their money back. Judge Ward
denied those parts of discovery.
The discovery motions also revealed that collection accounts were not
always well kept. One front-line collector argued that he kept bulk
numbers only and could not provide evidence of how much money was
taken on any single occasion. To get your money back from these
actors, they may demand that you prove it's not contraband and then
prove how much they took. But these East Texas law enforcers are not
finished grasping at bizarre license to ply their trade as the cash
cops of Highway 59. D.A. Russell now seeks to use the forfeiture
funds to pay for her defense. In early October the ACLU filed a
brief with the Texas Attorney General's Office to prevent the
forfeiture funds from being spent to defend alleged abuse of
forfeiture powers.
"Even if it were determined that, under other circumstances, the
District Attorney should be permitted to use forfeited assets to pay
for legal representation, such an action in this case should be
prohibited because it would give the appearance of impropriety,"
argues the ACLU brief. "The Plaintiffs claim the funds were taken
illegally. To permit the District Attorney to use them would suggest
that law-breakers may profit from ill-gotten gains, the very problem
that the asset forfeiture law was created to prevent." Cash is a
lucrative temptation. Empowering officials to take cash money from
passing motorists and give it to attorneys who can help them keep it
is a plain recipe for placing law enforcement powers in the hands of
highway forfeiture gangs.
Greg Moses is editor of the Texas Civil Rights Review and author of
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1572304073/counterpunchmaga>Revolution
of Conscience: Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Philosophy of
Nonviolence. He is a contributor to
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904859844/counterpunchmaga>Red
State Rebels: Tales of Grassroots Resistance in the Heartland,
published by AK Press. He can be reached at:
<mailto:gmosesx at gmail.com>gmosesx at gmail.com
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20091019/ff4b2291/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list