[News] Microsoft Verses Venezuela
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu Jul 16 11:29:52 EDT 2009
Microsoft Verses Venezuela
July 15th 2009, by Tamara Pearson Venezuelanalysis.com
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4633
Yesterday, Microsoft MSN (Spain) featured a
montage photo of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez
and the ex president of Cuba, Fidel Castro,
wearing king's crowns, accompanied by the
colourful title, "When power corrupts: Striving
to be kings." The Venezuelan government and a
grassroots technology movement here are both
promoting the use and creation of open source
(free) software, so it's no surprise that
software tyrant, Microsoft, is lambasting Chavez.
Following the MSN headline was a slide show of
photos of nine world leaders with paragraphs
accompanying each, describing just how
undemocratic and power hungry they all are. All
of the leaders bar two are from Latin America or
East Asia, reflecting the racist sentiment that
the "West" is democratic perfection. Also,
perhaps just a coincidence, East Asia and Latin
America are regions with some of the strongest open source software movements.
Ironically, of the two Western leaders featured,
the king of Spain is the one leader of the whole
bunch who wasn't in any way elected, whilst the other, Napoleon, is long dead.
The paragraph accompanying Chavez's photo read,
"Hugo Chavez is in it for the long run. He has
touched up laws at his whim and for his own
interest. And why not, he did the same with the
constitution that he devised in 1999 but in which
he made one mistake: term limits. After his first
election (1999) and the two after that (2001 and
2007), the law hasn't allowed him the option of
running again as president. And instead of
accepting that, he changed the law."
First of all, MSN, do your research. The last
presidential election was in 2006, not 2007.
Secondly, the commentary does not mention that
the constitution (created by a constitutional
assembly with members elected by the public) and
the constitutional amendment were both approved by popular referendum.
MSN, the default home page for Microsoft Internet
Explorer, and a hub page of Microsoft services
such as Hotmail, Messenger, downloads, "news", a
search engine, advertisements and so on, is just
an extension, or a facilitator, of the Microsoft
software and technology empire.
It is hard to miss the irony of such an
unaccountable, billion dollar, US based
multinational corporation which monopolises its
industry, calling a president who has held 15
elections (amendments, referendums, recalls,
regional elections and so on) in 10 years, a wannabe king.
Microsoft, founded in 1975 by current billionaire
Bill Gates, and Paul Allen, is the producer of
Microsoft Windows, Word, Explorer, Messenger, and
so on. It has risen to dominance by patenting
products frequently based on other people's work
or on common, global ideas. It monopolises the
computer world through its ownership of the
operating system Windows, and through a strategy
of program compatibility. Then it multiplies its
profits by convincing (and obliging) program
users to buy upgrades every few years.
In 1994 Microsoft's operating system was driving
93% of the world's desktops, and its software-
90% of the market. The company has, what
basically amounts to, tyrannical control over
software, and by extension, computers, the
internet, and modern communication. It's
domination of information- how it is accessed,
produced, processed, and organised, is dangerous.
The open source software movement is challenging
such domination. The movement, which developed
Linux, the free operating system, for example,
sees information as vital to human development
and something that should not be for profit, but
rather for personal development, awareness, and
expression. Software is a social creation rather
than a private creation, where users around the
world can add code to code, and fix bugs on a
daily basis rather than via regular, purchasable, upgrades.
Edgar Gutierrez, a software activist in Merida,
Venezuela, said technology is simply, "the
extension of the capacity of man" and argued that
it shouldn't be limited to first world countries
or those who can afford to pay $100 for a program
in order to design, write, express, photograph,
use the internet, communicate, translate, learn
languages or maths or science. He said, "When
[software] is not free, there is a massive inequality of power."
Leandro Leon, also from Merida, Venezuela,
speaking to alternative media, described the four
freedoms of open source software, freedoms denied
by private software like that made by Microsoft:
* The freedom to use the program for whatever
you want (Licensed software generally stipulates
what the program should be used for).
* The freedom to study the program.
* The freedom to modify it, that is- to
improve it, add to the coding and get rid of bugs.
* The freedom to distribute the program.
Leon argues that Linux, a system developed by
many people, is a far superior a system to
Windows. "The lack of restrictions makes it
possible for many people to participate," he
said, "like the difference between solving a
problem alone or in a group." When lots of people
are involved, they discover the bugs and fix them
much quicker as well, Leon argued. "A private model doesn't work like that."
In September 2004 the Venezuelan government
announced its decision to switch all public
administration and national industry over to open
source software. Chavez explained the move was
for "national scientific independence, so that we
do not depend on privately owned software. If
knowledge does not have owners, then intellectual
property is a trap set by neo-liberalism." The
change over will also save the government a lot
of money on software purchasing, money which can
be put to better use on social programs, health, and education.
However, getting whole sections of administration
to change over their operating systems and
programs is not an easy process, and at last
count, the aim was to have 50% of public
administration using free software by 2007.
The government has also set up the National
Centre for Development and Research of Open
Source Technology (CENDITEL), which has centres
dedicated to creating open source software,
training in open source software creation,
organising its distribution, and promoting
awareness around its use, among other things. It
has organised technology fairs where locals can
bring their computers and have Linux installed for free.
However, clearly it's not useful to talk about
open source software when computers are still too
expensive for the majority of the world's
population. To combat this, since 2000 the
government has been constructing infocentres',
places with up to 80 computers, located in the
barrios, in rural and isolated areas, and city
centres. These centres also often offer free
computer training and internet access, and there
are currently almost 700 such centres across the country.
Now that's democratic.
----------
Source URL (retrieved on Jul 16 2009 - 11:28):
<http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4633>http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4633
License: Published under a Creative Commons
license (by-nc-nd). See creativecommons.org for more information.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20090716/ffec41ae/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list