[News] US is Promoting Secession in Bolivia
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue May 6 11:28:43 EDT 2008
May 6, 2008
http://www.counterpunch.org/kozloff05062008.html
It's Not the First Time
U.S. is Promoting Secession in Bolivia
By NIKOLAS KOZLOFF
Having avoided any meaningful coverage of Bolivia
since the election of Evo Morales in December,
2005, the international media is now obliged to
play catch up. Yesterday, the Andean nation of
9.1 million held a crucial vote which could pave
the way for secession of the resource-rich Santa Cruz region.
In a challenge to Morales authority, more than
80% of voters approved a referendum which would
allow more powers for Santa Cruz, an area which
is responsible for about 30 percent of Bolivia's
gross domestic product while making up about a
quarter of the country's population. Morales,
who rejected the autonomy vote as illegal, called
on the opposition to engage in a dialogue with his government.
Fundamentally, the Santa Cruz imbroglio is a struggle over oil and gas.
The mixed race elite in the lowlands wants more
local control over the resources while Morales,
who has the support of indigenous peoples in the
highlands, wants the wealthier eastern regions to
contribute more to the poorer west.
Affluent leaders in Santa Cruz are particularly
incensed by a new draft constitution which would
limit large land holdings. In a repudiation of
the constitutional reforms, the people of Santa
Cruz voted yesterday to give their region more
control over land distribution, as well as rich oil and gas reserves.
So what happens next?
The Santa Cruz referendum has set an ominous
precedent: three other eastern provinces, Tarija,
Pando, and Bendi, which also possess large fields
of crude oil and natural gas, have said they too
will vote on greater autonomy. If voters there
move to repudiate the central government as well,
it could set up a civil war scenario leading to national breakup.
The Secret Hand Behind Secession
If political tensions were not high enough,
Morales escalated matters further when he accused
the U.S. of backing eastern
secessionists. Warning that he would take
radical decisions against foreign diplomats who
become involved in Bolivian politics, Morales
remarked I cannot understand how some
ambassadors dedicate themselves to politics, and
not diplomacy, in our country. That is not called
cooperation. That is called conspiracy."
Meanwhile, Vice President Álvaro García accused
the U.S Embassy of financing "publications,
trips, and seminars" to help Morales' opposition
develop "ideological and political resistance" to the administration.
Morales has some just reason to be paranoid. As
I document in some detail in my current
book,<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0230600573/counterpunchmaga>Revolution!
South America and the Rise of the New
Left(Palgrave-Macmillan), Moraless socialist
agenda, coca-style nationalism and hostility to
economic neo-liberalism has hardly succeeded in
ingratiating himself amongst the Beltway
elite. The Bolivian leaders increasingly close
ties to Venezuela and Cuba have similarly set off
the alarm bell for U.S. diplomats.
In an effort to rollback social and political
change in Bolivia, the U.S has funneled millions
of dollars to opposition groups through USAID and
The National Endowment for Democracy. Whats
more, USAID explicitly supports demands of the
right wing for greater regional autonomy in the east.
Its not the first time, however, that the U.S.
has sought to encourage secessionist sentiment
within South American regions possessing rich natural resources.
Flashback: Venezuela
In 1908, the US helped to support a military coup
d'etat in Venezuela launched by Juan Vicente
Gómez. Gómez's primary goal was to establish a
strong, centralized state. To achieve this, he
would have to head off secessionist sentiment in
the westernmost state of Zulia.
Gómez, a brutal dictator, could ill afford
political problems in the west. Measuring 63,100
square kilometers, with 178,388 inhabitants in
1908, Zulia was not only large in terms of sheer
land mass, but also economically important. When
Gómez took power, Zulia had the most substantial
budget of any Venezuelan state. The largest city,
Maracaibo, had a population of about 39,000 at the turn of the century.
The discovery of vast oil deposits in Lake
Maracaibo complicated matters somewhat for
Gómez. U.S. President Warren Harding attached
singular importance to promoting the expansion of
U.S. oil interests abroad, and the State
Department was riddled with officials compromised by conflicts of interest.
For example, William T.S. Doyle, the resident
manager of Shell Oil in 1919-1920, was a former
head of the State Department's Division of Latin
American Affairs. Jordan Stabler, another State
Department official, went on to work for Gulf
Oil. Francis Loomis, a powerful State Department
official, later worked for Standard Oil.
In December 1921, Gómez received a shock when he
was apprised of a plot for a military invasion of
Venezuela. The plan was foiled when the Dutch
authorities stopped a ship setting forth from
Holland. The ship had been chartered to travel to
Venezuela, apparently to engage in a
"filibustering expedition." Another ship was
prevented from setting sail from England. Both
ships, the British Public Records Office stated,
had been funded to the tune of $400,000 by "oil
interests of the United States," which "had been
pulling every possible string in order to block
the development of the British Concessions which
they ultimately hoped to get hold of."
Though the plot hatched by American oil interests
never came to fruition, the growing oil presence
was a concern for Santos Gómez, the Zulia state
governor. In 1923, he personally wrote Gómez,
warning his chief that oil workers could be
subverted by enemies of the regime.
The U.S. Navy in Zulia
Officially, the later Republican administration
of Calvin Coolidge espoused a policy of
non-intervention in Latin American
affairs. Nevertheless, Gómez acted decisively to
appoint a stronger and more competent state
governor in Zulia, Vincencio Pérez Soto.
According to the historian Brian McBeth, rumors
of oil companies sponsoring Zulia secession
concerned Gómez and convinced the dictator of the
need to appoint a stronger man as state
president. Clearly, the oil-rich Zulia region was
increasingly critical. By 1928, in fact,
Venezuela would become the leading world oil exporter.
In the 1920s, U.S. economic interests in Zulia
grew, with American oil companies such as
Standard Oil and Gulf joining their British
counterparts in the Lake Maracaibo
area. According to the U.S. consul in Maracaibo,
Alexander Sloan, there was widespread
disaffection in Maracaibo against the Gómez
government. Sloan said that Zulia natives as
well as Maracaibo residents "do not now and have
not for years felt any great affection for the central government."
Meanwhile, Pérez Soto was confronted with
unsettling news. On July 2, 1926 the USS Niagara
arrived off the coast of Zulia. The U.S. consul
requested that the sailors be allowed to
celebrate the 4th of July in Venezuela. When an
air officer attached to the Niagara requested
permission to fly over Maracaibo in honor of July
4th, Pérez Soto grew suspicious. Reports reached
the governor that the real reason for the over
flight was to take aerial photographs of the
region. Pérez Soto barred the disembarking of the
Niagara crew and refused to authorize the over-flight.
Writing Gómez, the governor related that the U.S.
sought to station the Niagara in Venezuelan
waters "as a kind of sentinel of North American
interests in Venezuela." Pérez Soto then employed
his intelligence to obtain detailed reports
concerning the activities of U.S. marines from
the Niagara on Zapara island, located in the mouth of the Maracaibo Bar.
Pérez Soto uncovered that the Niagara crew had
mounted a wireless radio with a reach of 2,000
miles. Pérez Soto was particularly concerned that
powerful sectors of Maracaibo society might
conspire with the United States to further Zulia
secession with the aim of separating the state from the rest of Venezuela.
The Republic of Zulia
In an effort to lessen tensions with foreign
interests, Pérez Soto assured oil company
managers that he was "anxious to discuss their
problems with them and to lend them any aid in
his power." Pérez Soto sought to assert his
authority over the oil companies through
diplomatic and legal means. As the U.S. consul
put it, Pérez Soto and local officials were
determined "that conditions such as existed in
Tampico [Mexico] are not to be tolerated here,
and [they] have become much stricter in enforcing
discipline and obedience to the laws." In a note
to Gómez, Pérez Soto mused that perhaps the oil
companies would put up with legality and
honesty"or maybe not, and they will try to
undermine me," through their representatives in Caracas.
In many respects Pérez Soto had been more a more
forceful governor than his predecessors. For
Gómez, however, the risk was that the more
powerful Pérez Soto became, the greater the
possibility that the charismatic politician would
become a rival in his own right. As Gómez
consolidated power he faced yet further military
unrest, and there were ample opportunities for Pérez Soto to create intrigue.
In July 1928 Col. Jose Maria Fossi, a trusted
Gómez subordinate, turned against the dictator,
taking the city of La Vela de Coro for a few
hours. The military uprising, which called for
revolutionaries to be reinforced by 300
Venezuelan and 90 Dominican rebels working in
Curacao, was crushed by Gómez's troops. Fossi
later remarked that Pérez Soto had approached him
and offered him money in exchange for his support
in fomenting a separatist movement. The ultimate
aim was to form a new republic comprising the
Venezuelan states of Zulia, Falcon, and the
Catatumbo region of Colombia. The venture, added
Fossi, would have the support of the oil companies in Lake Maracaibo.
While such reports must be treated cautiously,
Colombian authorities were apparently concerned
about a plot and Bogotá's House of Deputies met
in secret session to discuss "moves of Yankee
agents in the Departments of Santander and
Goagira which sought to provoke a separatist
movement which, united to Zulia, would form the
Republic of Zulia." Pérez Soto dismissed rumors
of his involvement in Zulia secession as "treason
against the Fatherland, and an immense dishonor."
However, Pérez Soto's credibility was further
damaged when correspondence reached Gómez himself
hinting at efforts to involve Pérez Soto in Zulia
secessionist plots. McBeth writes that "important
oilmen with close connections with the State
Department had enquired about the suitability of
Pérez Soto as President of Zulia."
What is the present day relevance of all this
history? We must remember that the U.S. helped
to install Gómez in the first place and sent U.S.
gunboats to help the dictator to power in
1908. Whats more, Gómez himself was a solid
anti-Communist. And yet, powerful interests in
the United States were still not satisfied with
Gómezs reactionary credentials and sought to
intrigue against the dictator. Given the
history, it is hardly surprising that the U.S.
would now encourage secessionist sentiment in
Bolivia, a country whose President displays far
less ideological affinity with Washington than
Gómez during the early twentieth century.
Nikolas Kozloff is the author of
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1403984093/counterpunchmaga>Hugo
Chávez: Oil, Politics, and the Challenge to the
U.S. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), and
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0230600573/counterpunchmaga>Revolution!
South America and the Rise of the New Left (Palgrave Macmillan, April 2008).
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20080506/465df3e7/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list