[News] Why the emphasis on white skin privilege is white chauvinist
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Jun 2 13:38:39 EDT 2008
WHY THE EMPHASIS ON WHITE-SKIN PRIVILEGE IS WHITE CHAUVINIST: THE
PROBLEMATIC OF "RACE" NEEDS TO BE REPLACED BY THE RESTORATION OF THE
NATIONAL QUESTION/S.
Speech by Fred Ho, June 5, 2008, State University of New York-Stony
Brook, Conference on Class in America and Tribute to Ted Allen,
organized by Michael Zweig
My essay is a challenge to everyone in this room and at this conference.
First, I will argue for a replacement view of American history that
rejects the inevitability of a white majority population, the
sanctity of the presently configured borders of the U.S.A., and
reject any notion of a white working class whose interests are
special or distinctive for being white.
Second, I shall vigorously critique the emphasis given to "white-skin
privilege" as the dominant characteristic in the conceptualizing of
the oppression of so-called "peoples of color" in the U.S., and for
its odious contribution to reinforcing white chauvinism within the
U.S. left and working-class by delimiting the struggle of "oppressed
nationalities" (what I prefer to call so-called "peoples of color")
to the goal of integration (with the white oppressor nation).
Third, I reject the dominance, centering, emphasis or assumed
leadership of any struggles for revolutionary change in the U.S.A. to
be based upon whites or white workers.
I shall argue for the replacement of the "race" formulation and the
over-emphasis upon "white-skin privilege" with a "return" to the
national question(s) framework and argue that no separate politics or
forms of organizing that centers and emphasizes its focus upon whites
is correct or efficacious, but arguably, harmful and hurtful to the
cause of building working class unity and power within the U.S.
I propose that Leftists must center and concentrate their efforts
upon the actual political and structural dismembering of the U.S.A.
by building the multiplicity of national liberation struggles among
the oppressed nations and nationalities, the destruction of the
American nation-state as it has been constructed and construed, with
the replacement of a multiplicity of new national identities and
political energies that centers the U.S. revolutionary struggle among
the workers of these national liberation struggles.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S.A. has a peculiar historical development. Founded by
European settler colonization, the U.S.A. grew to its present borders
through military force, the purchasing of vast land territories that
were the spoils from former colonial powers (viz., the Louisiana
purchase from France and the $7.2 million purchase of Alaska from
Russia), the military annexation of northern Mexico and the Hawaiian
islands, the expansion of settlements and industries to the Pacific
Ocean, and the acquisition of islands and territories throughout the
Caribbean, central America (eg., the Panama Canal) and the Pacific
Islands (eg., Guam, America Somoa, etc.). Concurrently, via the
manipulation of immigration laws, a concerted campaign to repopulate
the continent of North America in favor of European-descended peoples
and disfavoring all others, continues to the present.
Before the consolidation of the United States of America could occur,
the Native peoples who inhabited the land that we now call "the lower
48", with a rough estimated population range at the beginning of the
16th century to be between one to 10 million, had to be driven off
their lands to make way for the new settlers, and ultimately, given
the resistance by the Natives, nearly annihilated.
At first, the early European settlers were at the mercy of Native
benevolence and assistance. However, as the settlers grew in number,
their capitalist appetite for land and resources intensified. The
Natives were unwilling to participate in the construction of a
capitalist economic and social order. Social stratification and
private ownership of land and resources was completely alien to them,
and once experiencing the cruelties of exploitation and oppression,
resisted such incursions and assaults upon their way of life and homeland.
The Christians brought the Devil to the "New World" and the Devil was
them. So-called primitive peoples did not subscribe to the
monotheism and anthropocentrism of the Europeans. It was not
possible for these societies to regard even their enemies as
sub-human or without a soul. It was not possible for them to regard
nature as not a living being for which they, as humans, came from and
belonged to. The Europeans, however, slaughtered and enslaved them
as if they were logs to be felled, and their land and ecology nothing
more than objects from which money could be made.
Native Americans could not be coerced into American plantation
society or indentured servitude. Their completely non-capitalist
mode of production, which had proven to be self-sufficient and stable
for eons, were devoid of highly developed state repression
structures, which could not be appropriated by and made to service
the formation, facilitation and social control needs of a capitalist
economy. The capitalist mode of production was as inimical to Native
peoples as the diseases that the Europeans brought. Not predicated
upon nor driven by profits and its concomitant social and cultural
precepts of individualism, private ownership, monotheism, repressive
state institutions, patriarchy and the nuclear family, etc. large
scale social production was both completely foreign and toxic. Never
had the Native peoples experienced such pandemics on the order
introduced by Europeans: both biological and sociological.
Once it became clear that Native submission wasn't going to happen,
American settler-colonialism proceeded full force with genocide: the
destruction of the native mode of production, a horrific
"ethnic-ecological cleansing" that cleared natural and human life,
which had existed and evolved for tens of thousands of years, an
unprecedented ecocide, genocide and matricide waged for a few
centuries, all for the purpose of the imposition of a new
settler-colonial society that would become the U.S.A.
Once the process of ecocide-genocide-matricide was underway, and
settler-colonialist society expanded, endeavoring to build a
capitalist mode of production foisted upon a continent that neither
needed nor engendered it, the newly expanding U.S.A. proceeded with
the importation of a foreign-originated labor force, to at first
supplement the already-existing indentured labor force of former
Europeans, and then once the cotton gin revolutionized the
instruments of mass production, for large scale agrarian labor.
Why were enslaved Africans more suitable? African feudalism and
proto-capitalism (the production of commodities for exchange and the
social and class relations needed to facilitate that exchange) had
similarities to European feudalism and emerging capitalism: Large
scale social production, huge surpluses, huge repressive state
apparatuses (often used to facilitate slave trading among other
Africans, Arabs and Europeans), widespread use of precious metal
currency and also non-metal symbolic currency (eg., cowry shells),
development of large sectors of production for exchange (textiles and
food production), rich resources for luxury items coveted by the
European market (precious metals, ivory, etc), elaborate
infra-structure from centuries of inter-continental trade with Europe and Asia.
Imported Africans didn't arrive as a ready-amalgamated nationality or
people. They were valued precisely because they were so disparate
and ethnically-culturally-linguistically so varied, and with the
forced splitting of kinship and family ties, made even more conducive
to organized exploitation for capitalist plantations. Hence U.S.
capitalism necessitated this ironic amalgamation of Africans in the
U.S.A., erasing particular African national or tribal identities for
the new, amalgamated oppressed nationality identity as African Americans.
During the entire 19th century, the expansion and consolidation of
the U.S.A. nation-state included massive land acquisitions that
included the 1803 Louisiana Purchase from France battered by the loss
of Haiti and strained from its foreign wars and domestic revolts; the
military conquest of 2/3rds Mexico which became incorporated as the
U.S. southwest; the ongoing pacification wars against the Native
peoples; the acquisition of territorial spoils from the
Spanish-American War; and the illegal military annexation of the
Hawaiian islands, 3000 miles from the Pacific shores of the
U.S.A. In the early 20th century, the vast territory of
resource-rich Alaska, purchased from a war-and-revolution-battered
Russia for a measly $7.2 million in 1867, would be conferred U.S.
territory status in 1912. By 1959, two lands, completely
disconnected from the other 48 states, would become the 49th and 50th
states of the U.S.A. (respectively, Alaska on January 3, 1959 and
Hawaii on August 21, 1959).
From the 18th to mid-19th centuries, during the consolidation
process of the U.S.A. nation-state, the American bourgeoisie had
constant external conflicts primarily from England and France, as
well as a growing internal conflict between the southern agrarian
capitalists with the northern industrial capitalists. The Civil War
was the consolidation of a unified nation-state under the political
and economic leadership of the northern industrial capitalists, who
victorious, and in control over the surplus profits of the
internationally-traded southern-produced cash crops (cotton, tobacco,
etc.) could now begin the formation of American finance capital and
expand throughout the Americas and to the rest of the world
(exporting either direct U.S. colonial rule and/or financial
domination). As this unprecedented and exponential expansion of
capital was occurring, huge labor needs had to be filled with the
importation of labor from around the world and this period of the
late 19th century is really the emergence of a U.S. multi-national
proletariat, tho fitted into a constantly shifting racial
matrix. This shift is primarily characterized by the increasing
binary categorizing of "race" as "white" and "colored". The price of
the ticket to settler-colonial Yankee American society was to become "white."
The myriad forms of national inequality conjoined with white
supremacy to consolidate the U.S.A. as a racially defined
nation-state in which an American or anything American became
synonymously white.
Both for the purposes of social control, detailed in the important
work of Ted Allen and others, and for what I've argued as the
necessity of nation-state identity and structural formation and
consolidation, the separation of peoples into "white" versus
"others/foreigners/oppressed" in the U.S.A. was facilitated by the
virus of "race" as a bio-social pseudo-scientific/cultural
construction, extended from its original applications by European
colonization.
The privileges accorded to "whites" (i.e., those accorded the
status/identity as Americans) were consequently rooted in the
conquest and subjugation of entire peoples, and reproduced and
consolidated by a matrix of ideological, political and socio-cultural
privileges granted to those who were accorded the status and identity
of being "American" (which meant white). Those deemed white/American
had the benefits of glorification and "manifest destiny", whereas
complete dehumanization was the condition for all those deemed
"non-white" and excluded from consideration as Americans. White
racism and white supremacy thus become normative. That which is
American is equated as white. That which is or who is not "white"
are NOT American.
Large influxes of Europeans to the U.S.A., including those who
suffered national oppression in their homelands, such as the Irish,
or faced harsh persecution, such as Jews and other religious-ethnic
groups, were accorded the opportunity to join white American society,
and share in the spoils of white-settler colonialism and
expansionism. Though such European groups encountered initial
discrimination, overall, the access and possibility for white
assimilation was far preferable as participants in the consolidation
of the Yankee nation-state than the perpetual wretchedness of
exclusion and oppression for non-whites.
The unprecedented opportunities of settlerism, both real and hyped,
included such privileges and enticements as the possibility for
ownership of small plots of land, relative freedoms including voting
rights for white males, small business ownership, and a host of other
opportunities. What was required to access these real or
propagandized privileges was a dedication to and support for the
Yankee American way of life: kill off the Indians and take all of
their land, disallow citizenship and competition from formerly
enslaved Africans, remove and exterminate the Asiatics, keep the
Mexicans subjugated. All "white" immigrants were given relatively
unrestricted access to American citizenship. With the Chinese
exclusionary immigration laws, tantamount to genocide, the Chinese
were the only immigrant group which steadily decreased in number for
nearly a century. Racist immigration exclusion and persecution
extended to all Asian/pacific groups until 1964. Asian/Pacific
peoples were the first and primary targets of racially-explicit
immigration quotas and restrictive laws.
The formal history of the U.S. is the narrative of oppressor nation
building. The counter-narrative is the history of the oppressed
nations and nationalities. The American multi-national proletariat
emerges during this historical process, beginning after the Civil War
with the unification of American capital, the integration of a common
national market (greatly facilitated by the trans-continental
railroad for which super-exploited
Chinese labor outperformed the higher paying Irish workforce, and for
which the Chinese workers were both barred from the ranks of U.S.
organized labor as well as the annals of American history), the
promotion of a white supremacist American historico-cultural
narrative and identity with a full repertoire of Yankee Doodle Dandy
mythologies and grand master narratives from song to scholarship.
To conclude my analysis of the historical development of the American
nation-state, I want to summarize the concomitant white oppressor
nation building process and the process of national oppression as
indelible to American society:
1. White skin privileges both are byproducts of and contributors to
white settler colonial national construction.
2. White privileges, as partial, tenuous and minor as they may be
for poor and exploited whites, exceed the condition of national
oppression relegated to those not conferred as white: genocide,
terror, extreme restrictions, exclusion and constant brutal oppression.
3. In many cases whites have not been the majority population in
"American history", but became dominant both numerically and
socio-politically through genocide, unjust immigration laws, forced
exodus, ghettoization and marginalization, all practices aimed at the
repopulation of the continent to ensure the hegemony of white supremacy.
The problem of race is that it primarily juxtaposes the political
question as one of integration, as one of learning how to get along
with one another, and not dealing with the question of returning land
and territory and the battle for national equality. So it is about
how do we get rid of our racist ideas or how do we deal with white
privilege. White privilege is only one phenomenon of national
oppression. The privileges happen because of the inequality between
peoples, of which the first basis was depriving people of their land,
resources and control of the fruits of their labor and
innovations. The process of Americanization was the seizure of land
and territory and then absorption or assimilation of that territory
and those peoples into this mythical white supremacist thing called
America. African Americans become Black Yankees when they assimilate
the imperialist history and values of the Unites States, as opposed
to seeing themselves as oppressed nationalities. Malcolm X
demarcated the difference between identifying as oppressed versus
identifying with the oppressor values and narrative: "We [Africans in
the U.S.] are not Americans, we are victims of America".
The political logic of "anti-racism" or "fighting white-skin
privileges" ironically privileges the target of struggle upon the
attitudes and behaviors of whites. It presumes white leadership, the
apriori-ness of white numerical majority, the sanctity of the current
borders and configuration of the 50 states, and even the presumption
of white working class inclusion in the revolutionary struggle to end
U.S. imperialism, viz., the domination of U.S. monopoly capital in
the domestic aspect of such struggle. And hence, the U.S. left since
its formal inception, with the exception of such notable energies as
the African Blood Brotherhood, the CPUSA adoption of the Comintern
position of the Black-belt Nation thesis, and the revolutionary
oppressed nationality movements of the 1960s-early 1970s, has been
plagued with the fundamental white chauvinist problem of centering
and basing the U.S. multinational working class movement upon the
white working class, i.e., the focus and concentration upon the
workers of the oppressor nation, rather than centering, focusing and
basing the leadership and development of forces among the workers of
the oppressed nations/nationalities.
The U.S. multinational working class has erroneously been viewed as
necessarily being a white majority (and the attendant chauvinist
presumption, with majority white leadership). Rather, oppressed
nationality workers are not only the numerical majority relative to
their populations, but have, both respectively and collectively, it
can be argued, greater political inclination towards radical and
revolutionary positions due to the intrinsic nature of their
contradiction with imperialism: super-exploitation combined with
national oppression and external domination.
Only in the above cited notable exception of focus and concentration
upon building the political leadership of the revolutionary national
movements have any forces truly respected and grasped the objective
reality that the national movements are objectively revolutionary,
irregardless of, and with or without, the approval, presence or
support of whites and white workers.
Thus the white integrationist-white chauvinist plagued Left has
disregarded the importance of building and leading
"nationality-in-form" formations, such as oppressed nationality
student unions, militant community forces, independent cultural
institutions, and the creative labor formations that elevate the role
and leadership of oppressed nationality workers. The U.S. left has
given scant emphasis upon the struggle to force the U.S. government
to honor all treaties made with the Native nations, fighting for
national rights, self-government, return of stolen lands and
resources, reparations and the dismantling and eradication of all
vestiges of white settler-colonialism, including the hegemony of
classical music orchestras, white mythologies in education and
scholarship, and even the notion of a white identity.
As part of upholding national self-determination, the U.S. left, in
engendering the multiplicity of national liberation struggles, would
support the dismantling and reconfiguration of the U.S. national
borders should the struggle of oppressed nations culminate in forms
of independence, autonomy or new federation relations. Asian
Americans, for example, in the oppressed nation of Hawaii must choose
between siding with the Yankee oppressor nation/identity or with
being part of the oppressed Hawaiian nation: electing to identify as
"I'm kanaka maoli (Hawaiian) of Japanese descent," (or whatever new
appellation is created in which immigrants to the Hawaiian nation
explicitly identify with the Hawaiian nation and not with the Yankee
nation-state, for example). A white person must proclaim, "I am a
new Afrikan of European descent" or a "Xicano of European descent",
should they reside in what is now Mississippi or Texas, respectively.
Whites must recognize that they owe no special allegiance to white
anything, including even the privileged view that the primary role of
white leftists or white anti-racists is to concentrate in white
communities. Whites have no entitlement to monopolize anything, EVEN
THE DRAGS OF ORGANIZING WORK! The best way to "unlearn" whiteness
(and be a true race traitor!) is to for people of European descent in
the U.S.A. to give their all in exactly the same way as oppressed
nationality freedom fighters: liberate stolen and occupied lands,
return of resources and wealth, reparations, and to build a new
society that will certainly mean the destruction of the U.S.A. as it
has historically been constructed and construed, and the
coming-into-being of voluntarily-associated liberated peoples and societies.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20080602/a090c98c/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list