[News] Operational Backfire: Criminalizing Dissent
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu May 25 08:44:17 EDT 2006
Original article is at: http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/05/1825126.php
Operational Backfire: Criminalizing Dissent
MICHAEL DONNELLY (counter punch) Wednesday, May. 24, 2006 at 3:34 PM
Two and a half years ago, Attorney General John Ashcroft took time
away from his busy schedule hanging drapes on statues to charge
Greenpeace with a moldy 19th Century law against "sailor mongering."
As Kurt Nimmo wrote at the time, "In 1890, an Oregon court described
the purpose of the sailor-mongering law as preventing 'the evil' of
'sailor-mongers [who] get on board vessels and by the help of
intoxicants, and the use of other means, often savoring of violence,
get the crews ashore and leave the vessel without help to manage or
care for her.'
John Passacantando, executive director of Greenpeace in the United
States responded, "This prosecution is unprecedented in American
history. Never before has our government criminally prosecuted an
entire organization for the free speech activities of its supporters.
If this prosecution succeeds, then peaceful protest -- an essential
American tradition from the Boston Tea Party through the modern civil
rights movement -- may become yet another casualty of Attorney
General Ashcroft's attack on civil liberties."
An array of progressive groups came to Greenpeace's defense in this,
the first nautical protest prosecution in the US since the Boston Tea
Party. The NAACP, American Friends Service Committee, People For the
American Way, the entire Big Green establishment and grassroots
greens all condemned the ludicrous prosecution.
In the end, Ashcroft was denied. After the government failed to
prove its case, U.S. District Judge Adalberto Jordan granted a
Greenpeace motion to dismiss the charges in a Miami courtroom on May 19, 2004.
First they came for the forest activists...
Fast forward two years and the government's target becomes the
grassroots. Under the code name Operation Backfire, the feds began
the largest roundup of eco-activists in American history. On Dec. 7,
2005, seven people were arrested and charged with participating in a
wide array of property destruction actions the feds link to the Earth
Liberation Front (ALF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ELF).
The very same day, several more folks were subpoenaed to testify
before a Grand Jury in Eugene, Oregon. A full-scale dragnet was
launched against grassroots activists. On Jan. 20, 2006, Ashcroft's
successor (literally and philosophically) Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales announced a 65-count indictment against a fictional entity
the government calls, 'The Family." Four more arrests brought the
total to eleven, with conspiracy charges now added.
Ironically, after serving ten years; also on the very same day,
Michael Fortier, who was convicted for his part in the Oklahoma City
bombing which killed 168 people, was released from jail. In contrast,
the government is threatening the environmentalists who injured no
one, with extraordinary sentences ranging from 30 years to life plus
335 years.
By March 15th, the feds issued a "superseding" indictment that
replaced all existing indictments. The new conspiracy prosecution
charged another two individuals; bringing the total to 13 indictees
facing 65 counts of arson, destruction of property and conspiracy.
March 30th brought two more arrests, rounding the total to 15. It's
now up to 17.
As I noted in an earlier article, the entire government case rests
on one informant. No real evidence links anyone to the alleged crimes.
In a separate case, on Feb 22nd, Pasqua Yaqui activist Rod Coronado
was arrested for merely speaking about how to make an incendiary
device during a talk he gave in San Diego on militant eco-activism.
Coronado faces 25 years and/or a $250,000 fine!
Guantanamo, Oregon
On May 18th, nursing student and long time grassroots environmental
activist Jeff Hogg answered his subpoena and appeared before a Grand
Jury in Eugene, Oregon. Grand Juries usually are used to gather
evidence BEFORE indictments are issued. Since the Indictments are
already handed down and Hogg was already informed that he was not a
target of the investigation, this appearance amounted to little more
than a government fishing expedition/forced preview of just how Hogg
would testify if called once theconspiracy trials begin in Eugene on
October 31st.
About 100 supporters gathered outside the Federal Courthouse in a
show of steely resolve. Hogg refused to cooperate with the
Inquisition, er, Grand Jury and was promptly found in Contempt. Hogg
was hustled from the Grand Jury Star Chamber to the courthouse itself
for his Contempt Hearing.
Contempt hearings are supposed to be open to the public. But, in
this case, a secret tribunal was held by pro-Big Timber Judge Michael
Hogan as the government disingenuously hides the entire case behind
the mantra of "terrorism." (Sound familiar?) Hogg's supporters, the
media and attorneys were not allowed in to the contempt hearing.
Hogg was granted Immunity. He still refused to play. The Grand Jury
went home for the night and Hogg was locked up. In theory, he could
be incarcerated until the Grand Jury's term runs out. Only problem
there: because of "terrorism" concerns, the government will not tell
anyone how long the Grand Jury has been impaneled, though it appears
that Hogg will be a guest of the state (kidnapped in the eyes of his
friends) until at least September 30, 2006. His very productive life
is now on hold. Hogg is employed full time taking care of autistic
adults. He is in nursing school. He has a long-term partner and many friends.
One Man's Terrorist
Of course, what we're talking about here is property destruction
with arson being the preferred method. The US Sentencing Commission
reports that in 2003 in 82 cases where arson was the primary offense,
the median sentence was 60 months (5 years). The median Murder
sentence in the US is 15 years; sex abuse 3.4 years; and assault 1.25.
In these property destruction cases, the government has asked for a
mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years and some defendants are facing
Life-plus 335 years for alleged property damage. Already, Eugene's
"justice" system has seen Jeffrey Luers sentenced to a preposterous
22 years, 8 months for torching three SUVs (which were later restored
and sold.)
Upon issuing the Indictments, Gonzales and FBI Director Robert
Mueller both said that eco-sabotage is the government's top domestic
terrorism priority. Gonzales told the press, "The indictment tells a
story of four-and-a-half years of arson, vandalism, violence and
destruction claimed to have been executed on behalf of the Animal
Liberation Front or Earth Liberation Front, extremist movements known
to support acts of domestic terrorism."
Mueller added, "Terrorism is terrorism, no matter what the motive.
The FBI is committed to protecting Americans from crime and
terrorism, including acts of domestic terrorism in the name of animal
rights or the environment."
The FBI now ranks both ALF and ELF as the No. 1 domestic terrorism
threat according to James Jarboe, FBI domestic terrorism section chief.
"The FBI estimates that the ALF/ELF have committed more than 600
criminal acts in the United States since 1996, resulting in damages
in excess of $43 million," Jarboe told a February Congressional hearing.
"The rationalization of ecoterrorists is no different from the al
Qaeda terrorists," said House Resources Committee Chairman James V.
Hansen (R-UT) at the same hearing.
Another FBI counter-terrorism expert, John Lewis, claimed a total
of 1,200 criminal acts between 1990 and 2004 in the US.
Yet the State Department defines terrorism as "premeditated
politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatants."
Here at home, the feds in this case are using a broader definition
that defines domestic terrorism as acts of violence that are designed
to "intimidate or coerce a civilian population."
Since the inception of the Domestic Terrorism Task Force ten years
ago, the government by its own definition has firmly identified a
total of 52 acts of domestic terrorism having occurred during that
time on American soil--no telling what category they put Jarboe's or
Lewis' much larger estimates . (Of course, the FBI conveniently does
not consider attacks on abortion clinics and/or abortion providers as
meeting their definition despite the six people killed in such
attacks since 1993. Only the murderous attacks of "Christian"
terrorist Eric Rudolph make the list.
Do the math. More real violence occurs at US Post Offices every
year than that. Though it's another War on Terrorism secret, it
appears that the Task Force has consumed over a billion dollars of
tax money to collate that list.
And, of the 35 incidents on the list laid at the feet of various
environmental and animal rights groups, not one death or one injury
to anyone has occurred--nor have any occurred period even if one
accepts the 600 or 1200 figure. In the FBI-charted incidents caused
by white supremacists, six people have been killed and 135 injured since 1996.
Add in the facts that the FBI has only informants, some paid over
$75,000 per year according to court documents, and the agency has
used warrantless spying on a wide array of dissenting groups--from
Code Pink, Quaker meetings to Earth First!--and, FBI agent
provocateurs are involved in every single Operation Backfire case;
and we have a repeat of the COINTELPRO havoc the government wreaked
on dissent in an earlier era. (Interesting to note: a Backfire is a
fire started by fire fighters themselves.)
And, make no mistake; Operation Backfire is a fully orchestrated
assault on dissent. In 16 years the FBI has not found the bomber of
forest activists Judi Bari and Daryl Cherney. The FBI has also
produced nothing on the 2001 Anthrax letters which were sent to
prominent Democrats and members of the media. Both cases can easily
be defined as acts of violence that are designed to "intimidate or
coerce a civilian population." Yet, where are the task forces
defending peaceful activists, top Democrats and members of the media?
What we have here is a concerted campaign to criminalize ALL
environmental activism. How else can one explain Operation Backfire
with its reliance on Grand Juries, secret witnesses, paid informants
and brutal prison sentences? How else can one explain Rod Coronado's
arrest for mere Free Speech?
Big Green: MIA or Worse
Back at the time of the most famous US property destruction - the
Boston Tea Party--many of the radicals of the day condemned the
saboteurs. Ben Franklin even offered to pay for the destroyed tea.
Today, the silence coming out of Green Central on this assault on
grassroots activism and dissent in general has been deafening. And,
when they do speak, it's larded with self-serving inanities and guilt
by association. Echoing Poor Richard, Dominick DellaSala, the grant
farmer assigned to the World Wildlife Fund's Ashland, Oregon Biscuit
Fire grant plantation, has dismissed the activists as "This is a
fringe element--it always has been. Nobody is going to win the hearts
and minds of people by doing criminal acts." (Not quite how history
views the Tea Party.)
At least DellaSala has pride in his misplaced convictions. Most
other Big Greens are running from the question like Republicans
fleeing Duke Cunningham and Jack Abramoff. The Sierra Club and the
Wilderness Society each have long histories of condemning even
non-violent Civil Disobedience in defense of Nature, so their lack of
support for activists caught up in the Backfire dragnet is expected.
But back Greenpeace - the recipient of so much support from the
grassroots when it was under attack for non-violent dissent;
Greenpeace's Passacantando has joined the chorus condemning and
convicting (without trial) those under arrest. Yes, John, our
government IS criminally prosecuting an entire movement for the free
speech activities of its supporters. Where are the NAACP, American
Friends Service Committee, People For the American Way and the entire
Big Green establishment now?
At the Eugene witch hunt, just the Civil Liberties Defense Center,
the Northwest Constitutional Rights Center and the international
group Forest Ethics stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Hogg and his supporters.
The NW Constitutional Rights Center's executive director Alejandro
Queral put it all in perspective, reminding all that the government
has a long history of intimidating activists and criminalizing
dissent. He said, "Today, we are seeing a repeat of American history.
Americans must remain vigilant."
Part of that history is encouraging: in 1973, defendants who had
destroyed draft records were acquitted in Camden, NJ; in 1974 Sam
Lovejoy saw his charges of sabotage due to his toppling a 500 foot
tower at an under-construction nuclear plant dismissed because the
judge ruled the act one of protected civil disobedience; in 1985
three defendants were acquitted on charges related to their sabotage
of the Williams International plant in Michigan--the producers of the
cruise missile engine.
One would be hard pressed to find any movement for justice dating
back to long before the Boston Tea Party that did not feel it
necessary to violate existing law. While the efficacy of such acts
can and should be debated (I for one think sabotage
counterproductive, at minimum), there should be no debate whatsoever
about the government's use of such odious tactics to suppress dissent.
MICHAEL DONNELLY is a longtime forest activist and fierce defender
of Free Speech and all Constitutional Rights. He can be reached at
[pahtoo at aol.com] (URL: mailto:pahtoo at aol.com)
http://www.counterpunch.org/donnelly05242006.html
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060525/3fef7d90/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list