[News] Smoke Signals from the Battle of Bint Jbeil

Anti-Imperialist News news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jul 28 12:28:48 EDT 2006


July 28, 2006

A Warning to Israel

Smoke Signals from the Battle of Bint Jbeil


Qlaya, Southern Lebanon

Is it possible - is it conceivable - that Israel is losing its war in Lebanon?

 From this hill village in the south of the country, I am watching 
the clouds of brown and black smoke rising from its latest disaster 
in the Lebanese town of Bint Jbeil: up to 13 Israeli soldiers dead, 
and others surrounded, after a devastating ambush by Hizbollah 
guerrillas in what was supposed to be a successful Israeli military 
advance against a "terrorist centre" .

To my left smoke rises too, over the town of Khiam, where a smashed 
United Nations outpost remains the only memorial to the four UN 
soldiers - most of them decapitated by an American-made missile on 
Tuesday - killed by the Israeli air force.

Indian soldiers of the UN army in southern Lebanon, visibly moved by 
the horror of bringing their Canadian, Fijian, Chinese and Austrian 
comrades back in at least 20 pieces from the clearly marked UN post 
next to Khiam prison, left their remains at Marjayoun hospital yesterday.

In past years, I have spent hours with their comrades in this UN 
position, which is clearly marked in white and blue paint, with the 
UN's pale blue flag opposite the Israeli frontier. Their duty was to 
report on all they saw: the ruthless Hizbollah missile fire out of 
Khiam and the brutal Israeli response against the civilians of Lebanon.

Is this why they had to die, after being targeted by the Israelis for 
eight hours, their officers pleading to the Israeli Defense Forces 
that they cease fire? An American-made Israeli helicopter saw to that.

In Bint Jbeil, meanwhile, another bloodbath was taking place. 
Claiming to " control" this southern Lebanese town, the Israelis 
chose to walk into a Hizbollah trap. The moment they reached the 
deserted marketplace, they were ambushed from three sides, their 
soldiers falling to the ground under sustained rifle fire. The 
remaining Israeli troops - surrounded by the "terrorists" they were 
supposed to liquidate - desperately appealed for help, but an Israeli 
Merkava tank and other vehicles sent to help them were also attacked 
and set on fire. Up to 17 Israeli soldiers may have died so far in 
this disastrous operation.

The battle for southern Lebanon is on an epic scale but, from the 
heights above Khiam, the Israelis appear to be in deep trouble. Their 
F-16s turn in the high bright sun - small, silver fish whose whispers 
gain in volume as they dive - and their bombs burst over the old 
prison, where the Hizbollah are still holding out; beyond the 
frontier, I can see livid fires burning across the Israeli hillsides 
and the Jewish settlement of Metullah billowing smoke.

It was not meant to be like this, 15 days into Israel's assault on 
Lebanon. The Katyushas still streak in pairs out of southern Lebanon, 
clearly visible to the naked eye, white contrails that thump into 
Israeli's hillsides and border towns.

So is it frustration or revenge that keeps Israel's bombs falling on 
the innocent? In the early hours two days ago, a tremendous explosion 
woke me up, rattling the windows and shaking the trees outside, and a 
single flash suffused the western sky over Nabatiyeh.

The lives of an entire family of seven had just been extinguished.

And how come - since this now obsesses the humanitarian organizations 
working in Lebanon - that the Israelis bombed two ambulances in Qana, 
killing two of the three wounded inside. All the crews were injured - 
one with a piece of shrapnel in his neck - but what worried the 
Lebanese Red Cross was that the Israeli missiles had pierced the very 
centre of the red cross painted on the roof of each vehicle. Did the 
pious use the cross as their aiming point?

The bombardment of Khiam has set off its own brush fires on the 
hillsides below Qlaya, whose Maronite Christian inhabitants now stand 
on the high road above like spectators at a 19th century battle. 
Khiam is - or was - a pretty village of cut-stone doorways and 
tracery windows, but Israel's target, apart from the obviously marked 
UN position whose inhabitants they massacred, is the notorious prison 
in which - before its retreat from Lebanon in 2000 - hundreds of 
Hizbollah members and, in some cases, their families, were held and 
tortured with electricity by Israel's proxy militia, the South Lebanon Army.

This was the same prison complex - turned into a "museum of torture" 
by the Hizbollah after the Israeli retreat - that was visited by the 
late Edward Said shortly before his death. More important, however, 
is that many of the Hizbollah men originally held prisoner here were 
captives in cells deep underground the old French mandate fort. These 
same men are now fighting the Israelis, almost certainly sheltering 
from their fire in the same underground cells in which they 
languished, perhaps even storing some of their missiles there.

In Marjayoun, next to Qlaya, once the SLA's headquarters, Lebanese 
troops are trying to prevent Hizbollah guerrillas using the streets 
of the Greek Catholic town to fire yet more missiles at Israel. 
Seven-man Lebanese army patrols are moving through the darkened roads 
of both towns at night in case the Hizbollah brings yet more Israeli 
bombs down on our heads.

In Beirut, one observes the folly of Western nations with amusement 
as well as horror, but, sitting in these hill villages and listening 
to how the US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, plans to reshape 
Lebanon is clearly a lesson in human self-delusion. According to US 
correspondents accompanying Ms Rice on her visit to the Middle East, 
she is proposing the intervention of a Nato-led force along the 
Lebanese-Israeli border for between 60 and 90 days to assure that a 
ceasefire exists, the deployment of an enlarged Nato force throughout 
Lebanon to disarm Hizbollah and then the retraining of the Lebanese 
army before its own deployment to the border.

This plan - which, like all American proposals on Lebanon, is exactly 
the same as Israel's demands - carries the same depth of conceit as 
that of the Israeli consul general in New York, who said last week 
that "most Lebanese appreciate what we are doing".

Does Ms Rice think the Hizbollah want to be disarmed? By Nato? Wasn't 
there a Nato force in Beirut which fled Lebanon after a group close 
to the Hizbollah bombed the US Marine base at Beirut airport in 1983, 
killing 241 US servicemen and dozens more French troops a few seconds 
later? Does anyone believe that Shia Muslim forces will not do the 
same again to any Nato " intervention" force? The Americans are 
talking about Egyptian and Turkish troops in southern Lebanon; Sunni 
Muslims ruling Shia territory.

The Hizbollah has been waiting and training and dreaming of this new 
war for years, however ruthless we may regard the actions. They are 
not going to surrender the territory they liberated from the Israeli 
army in an 18-year guerrilla war, least of all to Nato at Israel's bidding.

Yesterday's assault on the Israeli army in Bint Jbeil proved that. 
The problem is that the US sees this slaughterhouse as an 
"opportunity" rather than a tragedy, a chance to humble Hizbollah 
supporters in Tehran and help to shape the "new Middle East" of which 
Ms Rice spoke so blithely this week.

It is Israel which is running out of time in southern Lebanon. Its 
attacks have for the fifth time in 30 years placed it in the dock for 
war crimes in Lebanon. The toll of Lebanon's civilian casualties has 
reached 400. And still the US will not intervene to prevent the 
carnage, even to call for a 24-hour ceasefire to allow the 3,000 
civilians still trapped between Qlaya and Bint Jbeil - who include a 
number of foreign nationals - to flee.

The only civilian walking those frightening roads to Qlaya was a 
goatherd, guiding his animals around the huge bomb craters in the 
tarmac. Talking to him, it emerged that he was almost stone deaf and 
obviously could not hear the bombs. In this, it seemed, he has a lot 
in common with Condoleezza Rice.

Robert Fisk is a reporter for The Independent and author of 
the Nation. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch's collection, 
Politics of Anti-Semitism. Fisk's new book is 
Conquest of the Middle East.

The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060728/0cce9737/attachment.html>

More information about the News mailing list