[News] Haiti, Neptune and Privert Hunger Strike
News at freedomarchives.org
News at freedomarchives.org
Wed Mar 9 08:51:38 EST 2005
AHP News - March 7, 2005 - English translation (Unofficial)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AHP Editorial:
Haiti, or when any and all means are good when it comes to drowning
opposing views
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Prime Minister Yvon Neptune and former Interior Minister Jocelerme
Privert have been on hunger strike for 16 days to protest "their illegal,
unjust, and unjustified incarceration at the National Penitentiary in
Port-au-Prince".
The living conditions for these two men who are no longer consuming
anything except water have seriously deteriorated over the past few days.
This is why alerts are being launched left and right to call for an end to
what many believe is a complete frame-up of these two men meant to strike a
blow at the government to which they belonged, the Lavalas government,
whose supporters have been sorely tested in the populist neighborhoods.
Yvon Neptune and Jocelerme Privert are accused of involvement in a presumed
massacre allegedly perpetrated by police officers and supporters of the
Lavalas government in the hamlet of La Scierie, in greater Saint-Marc.
With respect to Mr. Neptune specifically, the accusations against him are
reportedly based solely on the fact that he visited Saint-Marc two days
before the alleged events.
What was the nature of his talks with the police? What message did he give
to them? His accusers do not know. But he is nevertheless guilty of a
massacre whose very existence remains very difficult to establish thirteen
months later.
According to the primary accuser, NCHR, the alleged massacre took place on
February 11, 2004 and resulted in five deaths, a toll that was reported at
the time by a daily newspaper in Port-au-Prince and by some radio stations.
But, once Mr. Aristide left Haiti on February 29, the number of alleged
corpses put forward by the primary accuser did not seem to be enough to
arouse the desired level of emotion. The idea then was to find grounds for
making sensational finds and thus succeed in routing potential adversaries
who are viewed as too tough.
It was in this perspective that the toll needed to be adjusted upwards
until it grew to be more than 50 killed in the alleged massacre. The
director of NCHR tried to explain that the massacre continued for several
days, most likely after the sudden departure of Aristide.
But such things are not all that easy for NCHR, because although the five
corpses mentioned above, the unfortunate victims of a probable clash
between rival gangs for control of the port of Saint-Marc, were able to be
discovered, this ws not the case for the other 45 bodies.
In response to the question as to what happened to the other 45 bodies, the
primary accuser said not to worry, that the others were all devoured by
starving dogs, that is precisely the 45 bodies but presumably not the five
that were found.
A peasant from La Scierie named Ti Jean commented wryly this past February
11, the anniversary of the alleged massacre:
"We don't have dogs hungry enough to devour 50 corpses at La Scierie; maybe
there are dogs like that in Port-au-Prince".
Despite all the inconsistencies relating to the case, Yvon Neptune and
Jocelerme Privert continue to be kept in prison. Worse yet, they have never
been brought before a judge as required by the law and have been thus
imprisoned for nearly a year.
Worse still, in practically all circles, including the diplomatic
community, many people do not hesitate to to say that the accusations
against them do not hold water.
Do they feel they have gone so far that they can not reverse course.
Many ask how, if a serious investigation is to be undertaken, those
inquiries could be entrusted to people from RAMICOS, the violent
organization of the former anti-Aristide opposition in Saint-Marc, without
losing all credibility.
It is also imperative to focus on the cases of many former prisoners who
have been walking the streets since the insurrection of February 2004, as
well as on the question of the rebels who were responsible for deaths
across the country, who looted and destroyed many State facilities.
All two-tracked systems of justice that look more like a settling of
political scores must be rejected.
Along the same lines, many are asking why some human rights organizations
have not condemned the violence of February 28, and why some sectors are
upset at MINUSTAH for having prevented the police from approaching Friday's
demonstration.
It is as if one were to say to the foreign soldiers: it is not up to you to
prevent us from deciding whether our compatriots live or die as we intend.
Otherwise, how can one explain the attacks that rained down on the UN
mission, which was denounced five days earlier for having failed to prevent
peaceful demonstrators from being shot.
Many people are losing their heads over the elections. As if anything goes
given the high stakes.
But the international community and the UN have a heavy responsibility
because they promised to change the direction of things in Haiti, to
correct the very serious errors of the past by working with the government
named after the departure of Aristide.
Unfortunately, today's climate of intolerance outdoes even the period of
the coup d'état of 1991.
Yesterday at least the press, the human rights organizations and other
pressure groups relayed information about the abuses of all types... Today
there is silence in every latitude.
Indeed, how many of these groups raised their voices against the killers of
Jimmy Charles, Abdias Jean and all the others? How many raised their voices
against the bloodshed left by the violent dispersion of the February 28th
demonstration?
On the contrary, they strive to find accusations that could justify the
abuses.
When a very few institutions and individuals spoke out to break the
silence, they were insulted, threatened and accused.
And it is in this manner that one believes one can reassure the population
that is being asked to participate in elections.
The actors and their supporters who espouse the gospel of silence and
complicity try to explain their choice by the fact that people refused to
support their cause in the recent past. But they forget that the mission
they had given themselves was to promote justice, put an end to abuses and
facilitate national reconciliation.
Unfortunately, no sound system of justice can put up with extra-judicial
executions, repression of peaceful demonstrators and complicity with silence.
We must rid ourselves of the burnt out residue and find good paths forward,
paths that will actually lead to national reconciliation.
Otherwise, if we act as we are doing today, we will not go anywhere.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congresswoman Maxine Waters affirms her determination to do what she can to
help obtain the release of Yvon Neptune, whose hunger strike is in its 16th
day
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port-au-Prince, March 7, 2005 (AHP)- On a mission to Haiti lasting several
hours, U.S. Congresswoman Maxine Waters again called for the release of
former Prime Minister Yvon Neptune as well as all other political prisoners.
Maxine Waters expressed serious concern for the life of Yvon Neptune who is
in his 16th day of a hunger strike at the National penitentiary and whose
health has considerably deteriorated.
"We are going to do all we can to persuade Mr. Neptune to end his hunger
strike and also to obtain his release", said the congresswoman.
Ms. Waters indicated that the former Prime Minister categorically refused
to end his hunger strike, insisting that he is a political prisoner.
"It would be immoral for the interim government to let Yvon Neptune die in
prison while no charges have been filed against him", said Ms. Waters. The
interim government, which presents itself as a defender of democracy should
release Yvon Neptune immediately, she said.
She declared that she does not see why the interim government persists in
wanting to project a more catastrophic image of Haiti to the outside world.
One of the attorneys who accompanied the delegation, Mr. Ira Kurzban, was
forbidden to enter the capital by the interim authorities.
As a result, Mr. Kurzban had to return immediately to the United States.
AHP March 7, 2005 3:20 PM
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20050309/4a66a1d9/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list