[News] Venezuela: George W. Bush personally connected to terrorist organizations?

News at freedomarchives.org News at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jan 28 16:45:04 EST 2005

US President George W. Bush personally connected to terrorist organizations?


VHeadline.com commentarist Elio Cequea writes: For your information I am 
not a scholar ... I am not an expert ... not even a journalist. I am just a 
Venezuelan citizen concerned about the malicious propaganda and 
manipulation of information about my country.

There are powerful and influential people trying to pull the balance of the 
public opinion their way regardless of the truth and the facts.

They can do so thanks to privileged access to the mainstream media. I will 
not question their motivation, just the fact that truth and factual 
information is not necessarily what we read in the news ... it is much less 
so with regards to opinion columns.

In these times when the right is flat wrong and the left seems to be right, 
the least that we can do is look at the facts. Iraq did not have WMD. Even 
though, more than one thousand American soldiers, together with at least 
ten times that many Iraqi civilians have lost their lives. All of that 
because somebody in the White House "thought" they had WMD.

Meanwhile, the poor in Venezuela now have access to "privileges" such as 
preventive health care thanks to the "populist" and the "left" leaning 
measures of the government.

Let us point out the facts with regards to Venezuela.

Why give that prerogative to those who a couple of years ago "proved" to us 
that Saddam Hussein had WMD ... they are the same people now accusing the 
President of Venezuela of harboring terrorists.

Before people start dying, let's look at the facts.

Venezuela is a Democracy.

Hugo Chavez was elected President for the first time in December 1998. He 
and his movement have since then won eight elections, including two that 
have ratified him as President. Ladies and gentlemen ... he has been 
elected President three times in less than six years!
    * The only possible conclusion after nine consecutive electoral 
victories is that Hugo Chavez has the support of the majority in Venezuela.

That is also an indication that most people in Venezuela agree with his 
policies and his plans to take our country off that long and never ending 
IMF/World Bank "developing" road.

We are taking a short cut!

How can that be considered "destructive"?

One more thing in Chavez' favor is the fact that the same people who 
dominated Venezuela politically and economically for forty "down-the-hill" 
years still control the leadership of the opposition. That is their problem.

After nine consecutive defeats it should be clear that the majority of the 
Venezuelans have no desire to go back to what Venezuela was before 1998.

Isn't that what democracy is all about?

The people have chosen!

Nine times in five years!

There is a media campaign that is trying to portray the President of 
Venezuela as a sponsor of terrorism. This misleading information has to be 
clarified before somebody in the US State Department gets too exited. No 
one should die because of news reporters using their positions to push a 
friend's political agenda.

It is true that Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is considered to be a good 
ally to George W. Bush ... that is in spite of the support of the Colombian 
government to paramilitary groups that have murdered thousands of innocent 

The point is that they do so in the name of democracy and that 
automatically takes them out of the US definition of terrorism.

Read this carefully: Fighting for democracy in Latin America means nothing 
but fighting for the preservation of the colonial socio-economic status quo.

Why is that so hard to see for the experts in Washington?

It is not a surprise that the FARC fighters ... who for more than forty 
years have been fighting to eradicate the same status quo ... are the only 
ones who are considered terrorists.

So I ask you ... is the problem terrorism or the preservation of certain 
status quo?

Let's not kid ourselves!
    * Even Moammar Khadaffi has been taken off the terrorist list just for 
deciding to play ball the "right" way and ... he is still a dictator!

The media is calling for Mr. Bush to give stronger support to the Colombian 
leader "towards containing the Venezuelan tyrant" ... to some reporters 
Chavez is a tyrant because some people have mentioned the existence of 
evidence  (without showing it!) that indicates that he is harboring 
Colombian terrorists.
    * The case to prove the existence of WMD in Iraq was a little stronger 
than this one: they had pictures of the WMD!

Exaggeration and intentional reckless conclusions are being used to prove 
the case against the "tyrant" we have as President.

I read that there are "alarming reports that suggest Chavez may be bent on 
arming his revolutionary cadres all over South America."  How can a report 
cause "alarm" when it is only "suggesting" that something "may be" happening?

Nice choice of words but no thanks!

In the on going crisis between Colombia and Venezuela, there are 
significant details that are being left out intentionally.

1. Bounty hunters did not capture Rodrigo Granda. Corrupt members of the 
Venezuelan Armed Forces kidnapped him. The participation of Colombian 
citizens and CIA agents in the kidnapping is still being investigated.

2. The Colombian government first denied that Granda was kidnapped in 
Venezuela and insisted for about a month that he was captured in the city 
of Cucuta, Colombia.

3. For Interpol, Rodrigo Granda was not a wanted man at the time of his 
"capture." He became wanted about a month after that. How could have been 
possible for the Interpol to advise Venezuela a year before his capture 
that Granda was a wanted man? That came from a "reliable" source according 
to an "op-news" editor.

4. Rodrigo Granda entered Venezuela for the first time in the 90s ... after 
years of legal residency he became a naturalized citizen. He was also a 
resident of Ecuador ... but, only Venezuela is conveniently being accused 
of harboring terrorists.

If Chavez' denials that he knew about Granda are implausible and enough 
reasons to consider him a destructive influence in the Western hemisphere, 
what can be made up of Bush's declaration that he "thought" Iraq had WMD? 
Never mind.

The goal is to prove the connection of Chavez with terrorist organizations 
... to prove that connection, some have argued that Venezuelan Foreign 
Minister Ali Rodriguez Araque is on the editorial board of the hard-left 
Argentine-based magazine "America Libre." So is the FARC's Comandante 
Manuel Marulanda ... the fact is that also a member of the magazine's 
editorial board is James Petras ... an American college professor.

Does that make the USA a harbor for terrorists?

Is Bush personally connected to terrorist organizations?

Why is Petras moving freely in the US and has an American passport?

Enough of that! The facts are simple.

Most people in Venezuela belong to the lower socio-economic levels. Chavez 
has made social benefits available to them that were until recently 
considered privileges: preventive health and education.

Populist or not, he is taking care of the people.

They see it, and they keep voting for him ... nine times in a row and counting.

Viva democracy! No?

No, someone said ... it might not matter anyway ... Condoleezza Rice has 
just been confirmed as new US Secretary of State. She stated in her 
confirmation hearings: "I think it's extremely unfortunate that the Chavez 
government has not been constructive."

Like Uribe's she meant. And unlike Saddam's...

Elio Cequea
<mailto:elio at vheadline.com>elio at vheadline.com

The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20050128/096c9ef5/attachment.html>

More information about the News mailing list