[News] Last Stand of the American Republic
Anti-Imperialist News
News at freedomarchives.org
Thu Dec 29 14:39:16 EST 2005
----------
http://chris-floyd.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=369&Itemid=1
Clowntime is Over: The Last Stand of the American Republic
Chris Floyd
Wednesday, 28 December 2005
So now, at last, the crisis is upon us. Now the cards are finally on
the table, laid out so starkly that even the Big Media sycophants and
Beltway bootlickers can no longer ignore them. Now the choice for the
American Establishment is clear, and inescapable: do you hold for the
Republic, or for autocracy?
There is no third way here, no other option, no wiggle room, no
ambiguity. The much-belated exposure of George W. Bush's warrantless
spy program has forced the Bush-Cheney Regime to openly declare what
they have long implied -- and enacted -- in secret: that the
president is above the law, a military autocrat with unlimited
powers, beyond the restraint or supervision of any other institution
or branch of government. Outed as rank deceivers, perverters of the
law and rapists of the Constitution, the Bush gang has decided that
their best defense -- their only defense, really -- is a belligerent
offense. "Yeah, we broke the law," they now say; "so what? We'll
break it again whenever we want to, because law don't stick to our
Big Boss Man. What are you going to do about it, chump?"
That is the essence, the substance and pretty much the style of the
entire Bushist response to the domestic spying scandal. They are
scarcely bothering to gussy it up with the usual rhetorical
circumlocutions. The attack is being led by the fat, sneering coward,
Dick Cheney, who has crawled out of his luxurious hidey-holes to
re-animate the rotting husk of Richard Nixon and send it tottering
back onto the national stage. Through the facade of Cheney's
pig-squint and peevish snarl, we can see the long-dead Nixonian
visage, his grave-green, worm-filled jowls muttering once more the
lunatic mantra he brought to the Oval Office: "If the president does
it, it can't be illegal." This is what we've come to, this is
American leadership today: ugly, stupid men mouthing the witless
drivel of failed, dead, discredited, would-be petty tyrants.
But not even Nixon was as foul as this crew. When he was caught, he
folded; some faint spark of republican conscience restrained him from
pushing the crisis to the end. He was a vain, stupid, greedy,
grasping, dirty man with blood on his hands, but in the end, he did
not identify himself with the government as a whole. He did not say,
"l'etat, c'est moi," he had no messianic belief that the life of the
nation was somehow bound up with his personal fate, or that he and
his clique and his cronies had a God-given right to rule. They just
wanted power and loot -- as much of it as they could get -- and they
pushed and pushed until the Establishment pushed back.
It has long been evident, however, that Bush and Cheney do believe
their clique should by all rights rule the country -- and that anyone
who opposes their unrestrained dominion is automatically
"anti-American," an enemy of the state. For them, there is no "loyal
opposition," or even political opponents in any traditional
understanding of the term; there are only enemies to be destroyed,
and herd-like masses to be manipulated. They believe that their
dominion is more important than democracy, which they despise as a
brake and hindrance to the arbitrary leadership of an all-wise elite
-- i.e., them. They are the state; a police state.
Elections are just necessary evils, a way to manufacture the illusion
of consent, shake down corporations for big bucks and calibrate the
loyalty of courtiers. Democracy is simply another system to be gamed,
subverted, turned to factional advantage -- in precisely the same way
that Enron gamed the California electric grid. This accounts for the
strange, omnipresent tang of unreality that permeated the last three
national elections, in 2000, 2002, and 2004. It's because they were
unreal: the results were gamed, sometimes in secret, sometimes in
plain sight; the "issues" and rhetoric were divorced from the reality
that we all actually lived and felt -- and the outcomes were as phony
as an Enron balance sheet.
Dominion seized on such sinister and cynical terms will almost
certainly be defended -- and extended -- by any means necessary. That
is the great danger. The Bushists have already pushed on further than
Nixon ever dared; will they "bear it out even to the edge of doom"?
This is the crux of the matter; this is the crossroads where we now
stand. Will the American Establishment push back at last? Will they
say, This far we will go, but no further; this much we will swallow,
but no more?
Some of us have been writing for years about Bush's piecemeal
assumption of dictatorial powers. We have watched in rage and
amazement as the Establishment meekly accepted Bush's repeated,
brutal insults to democracy. Time and again, I've quoted the words of
the Emperor Tiberius, after the lackeys of the Senate grovelled to do
his bidding: "Men fit to be slaves." In one sense, then, the Rubicon
was crossed long ago. Yet "we live in hope and die in despair," as my
father always says. In the back of the minds of many an embittered
dissident, there has been a spark of hope that somewhere down the
line, one of the many, many Bush outrages would somehow take hold,
gain critical mass, and force the Establishment to act, to rein in
the renegade, break him, box him in if not remove him from office.
For let's be clear about this: only the Establishment -- the
institutional powers-that-be -- can break an outlaw president.
Millions marched in the street against Nixon and the system; whole
city quadrants went up in flames in those days; but none of this was
decisive in the corridors of power. (Nor to much of the American
public, to be frank; after Kent State, after My Lai, after Cambodia,
Nixon was still re-elected in a landslide.) It was his insult to the
institutions -- the Watergate break-in of Democratic headquarters,
the subsequent cover-up and subversion of the legal system, the
defiance of Congress -- that led to his downfall. He pushed too far,
tried to grab too much -- and the Establishment pulled him short.
And it will have to be the Establishment that breaks Bush -- or he
won't be broken. All the blogs in the world won't bring him down, no
matter how much truth they tell, how much bloodsoaked Bushist dirt
they expose. Yes, perhaps if we had millions of outraged citizens
marching in the street day after day across America, a sustained mass
movement and popular uprising for liberty and democracy, this might
obviate the need for Establishment action. But we all know that such
marches are not going to happen. If there was sufficient fire for
liberty and democracy in America, there would have already been a
popular uprising -- and Bush would never have garnered enough public
support to keep the election results close enough to be fudged. No,
it will be the Establishment -- or no one.
That's why the spy scandal is so pivotal. Because it is a direct,
open and unignorable challenge to the institutional life of the
American Establishment. In it, the Bush Regime is saying to the
various powers-that-be, especially in Congress and the courts, but
also to centers of power and influence outside government: you no
longer have any power. All real power is now in our gift. Your laws,
your institutions, your traditions, the whole complex infrastructure
of checks and balances that have sustained society are now
essentially meaningless. As in ancient Rome, we will keep the old
forms, but the life of the state has now passed into the hands of the
autocrat and his court. His arbitrary will can override any law --
although of course, strong law will still be applied to his enemies,
and to the riff-raff in the lower orders.
How will the Establishment deal with this direct challenge? The past
few years give little grounds for hope: the Democrats spineless,
conflicted, co-opted and corrupt; the Republicans slavish, bellicose,
cruel and criminal; the media timorous, witless,
corporate-controlled; big business absolutely rolling in gravy from
the autocrat's larder; academia cowed, silenced, ignored, demonized;
the military acquiescent in criminal aggression, top-heavy with
time-servers currying autocratic favor. Only the courts provide some
stray sparks of hope, although they too are now loaded with political
sycophants, corporate bagmen and knuckle-dragging throwbacks produced
by the Right's decades-long devolution of American jurisprudence.
Prosecutors like Patrick Fitzgerald and Elliot Spitzer "keep hope
alive," but their efforts will mean little in a system where
lawlessness at the top has been countenanced by the rest of the
Establishment. And in any case, the outcome of their work lies
ultimately with the Supreme Court -- the same court that shredded the
Constitution in awarding power to Bush in the first place, and which
is now led by a Bushist apparatchik.
Still, you don't go through a constitutional crisis with the
Establishment you want; you go through a constitutional crisis with
the Establishment you have. And this sad, sick crew, ladies and
gentlemen, is all we have. If they swallow the spy scandal, if they
don't push back now -- and I mean really push back, not just make a
lot of harrumphing noise or hold a few toothless hearings or get a
couple of underlings offered up as ritual sacrifices to save the
Leader -- then we will have well and truly and finally lost the
Republic that Franklin, Jefferson and Madison gave us so long ago.
The next few weeks will show us if there is still some hope of
restoring the Republic through the old institutions, or if we will
have to follow the course laid out by Bob Dylan some 40 years ago:
"Strike another match, go start anew." Who knows? Maybe we can make a
better republic next time: one not born of blood, greed and fury --
those all-too-common elements of human organization -- but made from
a new compound of mercy, justice, communion and liberty. Still
imperfect, of course, still corrupt -- because that's our intractable
human nature -- but with our worst instincts restrained by
enlightened, ever-evolving law, and the predatory ambitions of the
rich and powerful reined by elaborate checks and balances.
It's just a dream, of course; probably a vain one. But we will need
some vision to guide us if, as seems likely, we must soon set forth
into the unknown territory of an openly declared American autocracy.
Since 2000, Chris Floyd has worked as a freelance journalist and as a
writer and researcher for Oxford University. In addition to the
"Global Eye," his work is also published weekly in CounterPunch and
the Bergen Record, and he is a regular contributor to The Ecologist
magazine and the Anderson Valley Advertiser. His work has also
appeared in The Nation, The Guardian, Columbia Journalism Review, The
Christian Science Monitor, the Baltimore Chronicle, and on
innumerable websites around the world, including Common Dreams,
Buzzflash, Democrats.com, BushWatch, The Smirking Chimp, Cursor, Make
Them Accountable and many others.
--
originally forwarded by
http://www.humboldt.net/~fcieciorka
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20051229/499c6b3a/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list