[News] Judging the Intifada
News at freedomarchives.org
News at freedomarchives.org
Wed Oct 6 08:59:04 EDT 2004
Judging the Intifada
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3166.shtml
Hasan Abu Nimah & Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 6 October 2004
23c029.jpg
Fruit of the Loom: A young Palestinian, who has only known a life under
military occupation, strides with rocks to confront Israeli rifles on the
edge of Bethlehem. (Photo: Nigel Parry)
The fourth anniversary of Israel's violent crackdown on the Palestinian
uprising, which coincided with its latest massacre of Palestinians in the
Gaza Strip, occasioned a number of analyses, many concluding wishfully
that the Intifada has been "counterproductive" for the Palestinians, or
even a "failure."
Ha'aretz analyst Bradley Burston wrote an article headlined, "The war that
Palestine couldn't lose - and did." US Secretary of State, Colin Powell,
asked on Al-Jazeera, "What has [the Intifada] accomplished for the
Palestinian people? Has it produced progress toward a Palestinian state?
Has it defeated Israel on the battlefield?" Concluding it had not, he
declared, "it is time to end this process. It is time to end the Intifada."
The standard that Mr. Powell set for assessing Palestinian success or
failure is disengenuous and absurd. No one expected that Palestinians could
defeat Israel's astronomically superior, US-backed armed forces. But as the
ongoing resistance, both nonviolent and armed, demonstrates every day, the
Palestinians are not close to defeat, nor are the Israelis close to
victory. Despite all of Israel's killing and cruelty for decades, the
Palestinians are unbroken; they have neither abandoned their rights, nor
resigned themselves to living permanently under Israeli dictatorship.
Palestinians have indeed paid a heartbreaking price during the past four
years in death and destruction inflicted by Israel. But that is not the
only way they measure the Intifada. Mr. Powell failed to ask how much the
Palestinians had gained from more than a decade of the American-sponsored
"peace process" and the "roadmap." He knows the answer: throughout the
period, Israel continued, with American connivance, to steal and colonize
the little left of their land at an accelerating pace, extinguishing the
prospects for a truly independent Palestinian state even as the US claimed
to be supporting it. The Intifada did not interrupt and "derail" the peace
process as revisionists argue; it came long after the peace process failed,
and as a direct result of this failure. As long as Palestinians see that no
outside powers will fairly uphold their rights, or international law, some
will always conclude that their only course is to impose as a high cost as
possible on Israel, no matter the cost to themselves. This is what fuels
support for counterattacks on Israeli civilians, and indeed the willingness
to die carrying them out. In a context where Israel has left them nothing
to lose, some Palestinians feel such attacks are the only means they have
to even the killing field.
Powell also did not ask Israel how much its unrelenting brutality and
colonization has allowed Israelis to relax and enjoy the fruits of
dispossessing the Palestinians and depriving them of their basic rights. In
addition to losing more than one thousand people, Israel is wracked with
corruption, unemployment, poverty and mass emigration as a direct result of
its war to keep the Palestinians under occupation.
It is nevertheless fashionable to point to the precipitous drop in
Palestinian living standards as further evidence of the failure of the
Intifada, as New York Times reporter Steven Erlanger did in an October 3
column. This economic collapse, as numerous UN, EU and other bodies have
reported over many years, is the direct result of Israel's collective
punishment of the population. But rather than condemning the illegal
measures of the occupier, some seek to blame the victims for bringing it on
themselves. Erlanger quoted a recent report by the International Crisis
Group (ICG) that "although the occupation and the confrontation with Israel
that is entering its fifth year provide the context, today's Palestinian
predicament is decidedly domestic." The ICG, which seems to exist solely to
lend false credibility to the most shallow, power-serving clichés, has once
again issued a report in which the hypothetical ideal is offered as the
alternative to grim reality, but without a single plausible suggestion for
how to get there, and with virtually all responsibility for action lying at
the door of the weakest party.
Such transparent apologia for Israel is nothing new. From the first days of
what began as a peaceful uprising, to which Israel responded with one
million bullets in the first month of protests, Israeli and American
analysts have been declaring that the efforts to stop all resistance would
soon succeed. A few more assassinations, a few more missiles, a few
thousand more arrests, a bit more torture, a few hundred more demolitions,
a little more hunger and darkness and the Palestinians will get the
message and realize that their best option is servitude under occupation.
By any standard, in a war between a colonial occupier and an indigenous
people, the Palestinians are in a comparable state to those who have
trodden this path before them. In Southeast Asia, the United States killed
approximately fifty Vietnamese, Laotians and Cambodians for every American
who died in that war, and still the Americans suffered a total strategic
defeat. In Algeria, the French killed on a similar scale and were defeated.
In South Africa, the apartheid regime killed hundreds of black South
Africans for every white person killed, and that regime no longer exists.
Nor did massacres and atrocities in Iraq in the 1920s, or India in the
1940s, save British rule there. In colonial wars, the colonized always pay
a much higher price than their foreign rulers. The Americans and British
are learning afresh in the "New" Iraq that massive military dominance is
not the same thing as victory.
Israel, though, stubbornly refuses to learn any lessons and thus spare
Jewish and Arab lives. As its situation has deteriorated, it has used ever
more brutality against the Palestinians, with increasingly meagre results
from its perspective. Strategically, Israel remains at an absolute dead
end. Despite all the talk of "disengagement," Israel has thrust deeper into
Gaza. It can neither afford to stay there, nor can it afford to leave.
Sharon's only reason for ever speaking of a withdrawal from Gaza was to
reduce the cost of the occupation to Israel and to consolidate Israel's
conquests in the West Bank. But the tenacity of the resistance in Gaza and
the West Bank shows that as long as Israel is determined to colonize any
inch of the occupied territories, it is necessarily committed to staying in
all of them. The logic of Israeli policy demands ever deeper penetration
and ever more savage measures.
South African law professor John Dugard, the UN special rapporteur for
human rights in the Palestinian territories, wrote in a report to the
General Assembly last August that Israel has created, "an apartheid regime"
in the occupied territories "worse than the one that existed in South
Africa." Dugard is in a good position to know, since he was a member his
country's post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Contrasting with Dugard's forthrightness is the utter cowardice of those
who talk loudest about international law and human rights in the abstract.
The United States' pro-Israel position is the most extreme and biased, but
has lost the power to shock or disappoint. Yet the European Union, which
has for years posed as an even-handed force in the conflict, has long since
abandoned all serious efforts. European states now make empty statements
about adhering to the "roadmap" and calling for Palestinian "reform," not
because they believe genuinely that such things are in any remote way
related to a solution, but because they realize that exposing the real
problem Israel's intransigence will lead to embarassing calls for
sanctions against an outlaw regime that recognizes no boundaries for its
conduct.
Recently, UK prime minister Tony Blair, the champion of democracy, human
rights and freedom in Iraq, made a personal committment to do everything
possible to resolve the Palestine-Israel conflict. Before the Iraq
invasion, he made the same promise on the BBC Arabic Service, responding to
doubts about the West's past performance by saying that a skeptical Arab
public should just wait, and judge him by his actions. More than a year has
passed and Blair has done absolutely nothing except vigorously oppose
Palestinian efforts to win their rights through the peaceful forum of the
International Court of Justice at The Hague.
The result of all this is that Israel is ever emboldened, confident that it
can do as it pleases. Other than bleats of displeasure from Arab and
international officials, no one will act against it. Never has Ben-Gurion's
infamous maxim been more apt: "What matters is not what the Gentiles will
say, but what the Jews will do."
Those who wish to mark the anniversary of the Intifada with a hard look at
reality, rather than self-delusion, might make the following predictions:
there will be no Palestinian state alongside Israel, because such a thing
is impossible in the reality Israel has, with the world's acquiescence,
created. But in another four years it will become clear that Israel can no
longer exist as a "Jewish state," superimposed on a Palestinian majority
that refuses to accept the inferior status Israel has assigned it, and
which Palestinians will continue to resist with whatever resources they have.
In the meantime, we can expect ever more horrifying violence that will not
be abated by ritual condemnations. And, as Israel gets further into its
corner, the chances increase dramatically that it will seek to resolve its
existential problem not just at the expense of the Palestinians, but by
spreading the conflict to its neighbors.
Ambassador Hasan Abu Nimah is former permanent representative of Jordan at
the United Nations. Ali Abunimah is co-founder of the websites The
Electronic Intifada and Electronic Iraq.
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20041006/c14efda4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 23c029.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 103122 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20041006/c14efda4/attachment.jpg>
More information about the News
mailing list