[News] Prisoner Abuse Probe Widened
News at freedomarchives.org
News at freedomarchives.org
Mon May 3 08:44:59 EDT 2004
>
>
>Note the highlighted line below and remember that the current head of the
>prison has just been replaced by -- the head of the Guantanamo prison!!
>A month before the alleged abuses occurred, she said, a team of military
>intelligence officers from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
>came to Abu Ghraib last year. "Their main and specific mission was to get
>the interrogators -- give them new techniques to get more information from
>detainees," she said.
>
>
>
>
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/>washingtonpost.com<http://www.washingtonpost.com/>
Prisoner Abuse Probe Widened
Military Intelligence at Center of Investigation
By Sewell Chan and Michael Amon
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, May 2, 2004; Page A01
BAGHDAD, May 1 -- A top Pentagon intelligence officer is leading an
investigation into interrogation practices at an Army-run prison where
Iraqi detainees were allegedly beaten and sexually abused, officials
announced Saturday. The move came amid allegations that military guards
abused prisoners at the behest of military intelligence operatives.
A soldier accused of abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib facility wrote to
his family last December that military intelligence officers encouraged the
mistreatment, according to correspondence provided by the soldier's family.
"We have had a very high rate with our style of getting them to break," the
soldier, Staff Sgt. Ivan L. "Chip" Frederick II, wrote in a Dec. 18 e-mail
released by Frederick's uncle. "They usually end up breaking within hours."
Frederick also wrote that he questioned some of the abuses. "I questioned
this and the answer I got was: This is how military intelligence wants it
done," he wrote.
The Army Reserve commander who oversaw the prison said that military
intelligence, rather than the military police, dictated the treatment of
prisoners at Abu Ghraib. "The prison, and that particular cellblock where
the events took place, were under the control of the MI command," Brig.
Gen. Janis L. Karpinski said in a telephone interview Saturday night from
her home in Hilton Head, S.C.
Karpinski, who commanded the 800th Military Police Brigade, also described
a high-pressure atmosphere that prized successful interrogations. A month
before the alleged abuses occurred, she said, a team of military
intelligence officers from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
came to Abu Ghraib last year. "Their main and specific mission was to get
the interrogators -- give them new techniques to get more information from
detainees," she said.
The naming of Maj. Gen. George R. Fay, the former deputy commander of the
Army Intelligence and Security Command, to review the methods and
procedures used in questioning Iraqi prisoners represents a widening of the
probe into conditions at Abu Ghraib, a prison about 20 miles west of
Baghdad that was notorious for torture and executions under the government
of former president Saddam Hussein.
A spokesman for the Central Intelligence Agency said Saturday that its
inspector general is working with the Pentagon to determine whether the CIA
was involved in the abuses, which have drawn international attention. "We
are opposed to abusing prisoners in Iraq, and we have found no direct
evidence connecting CIA personnel with incidents" of abuse, the spokesman
said.
On Saturday, Arabic satellite television networks repeatedly broadcast
photographs of naked prisoners being humiliated. The images have been
broadcast around the world and drawn condemnation from President Bush and
U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan.
In March, the Army charged six military police officers, all from one Army
reserve unit, with the physical and sexual abuse of 20 prisoners at Abu
Ghraib in November and December. A criminal probe into the actions of four
other soldiers is continuing.
In an e-mail, a commissioned officer in the unit, the 372nd Military Police
Company, based in Cumberland, Md., acknowledged that the abuses had
occurred but attributed them to a far-reaching failure in leadership.
"I won't defend my soldiers," the officer wrote, on the condition of
anonymity. "They knew better."
The officer added: "I am extremely disappointed in the way the Army has
handled the entire situation and feel the leadership has been made the
scapegoat for a few individuals. I think the leadership problems go much
higher than the brigade commander."
An issue emerging in the defense of military police allegedly involved in
abuse is whether the treatment was condoned or encouraged by military
intelligence units interrogating Iraqi prisoners.
According to a source familiar with the March findings of an administrative
review conducted by the Army, the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade,
which helped oversee the questioning of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, pressed
members of the military police unit, 372nd Military Police Company, to use
rough tactics to prepare prisoners for questioning.
U.S. officials said the review, by Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba, found that
prisoners at Abu Ghraib were regularly subjected to cruel and harsh
punishments. In an article posted on its Web site, the New Yorker magazine
reported in its May 10 issue that Taguba found a pattern of "sadistic,
blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" at the prison.
According to the New Yorker article, by Seymour M. Hersh, a report last
November by Maj. Gen. Donald J. Ryder, the Army's top law enforcement
officer, concluded that military intelligence did not order military police
to put pressure on prisoners to prepare them for interrogations. Taguba,
the article states, disagreed.
"Contrary to the findings of MG Ryder's report, I find that personnel
assigned to the 372nd MP Company, 800th MP Brigade were directed to change
facility procedures to 'set the conditions' for MI interrogations," Taguba
wrote, according to the article. Army intelligence officers, CIA personnel
and private contractors "actively requested that MP guards set physical and
mental conditions for favorable interrogation of witnesses," according to
the article's account of Taguba's report.
The top U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, made
no attempt Saturday to defend conditions at Abu Ghraib, which holds a
majority of the nearly 8,000 detainees in Iraq.
"The very fact that we can't hold our detainee operations as a shining
light for how things should be done is personally and professionally
embarrassing to me," he said Saturday evening during a somber talk with
reporters.
Kimmitt added that he and other commanders in Iraq felt "absolute disgust"
at the images, which CBS first broadcast Wednesday night. However, he
disputed the idea that the abuses were a result of inadequate training or
supervision. "Those soldiers knew what the right thing to do was," he said.
The 372nd Military Police Company was attached to the 800th Military Police
Brigade, based in Uniondale, N.Y. In January, 17 soldiers from the company,
including seven officers and the six soldiers who were later charged, were
suspended from their duties.
Karpinski said she was stunned and sickened to learn of the abuses months
after they had occurred.
"If I had ever heard -- and soldiers were never afraid to talk to or
approach me about everything -- that there was even a hint or suggestion of
abuse, I would have responded immediately and vigorously, and I was never
given the chance," she said. "I became aware of these abuses -- these
crimes -- when the investigation was near complete and Sanchez was being
briefed on it," she added, referring to the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Lt.
Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez.
"I hadn't been included, I hadn't been informed, and I knew nothing," she
said. Following the administrative review, Karpinski was reassigned.
Frederick, the most senior of the six soldiers charged, wrote of inmates
being shot with non-lethal bullets, forced to sleep in 3-by-3-foot closets,
handcuffed for long periods to the doors of their cells and made to go
naked or wear women's underpants.
Frederick's uncle, Bill Lawson, provided the correspondence. He said his
nephew began keeping detailed notes of conditions at the prison after Jan.
14, when the military began its investigation. Later that month, Frederick
sent single-spaced hand-written letters to four family members in late January.
In one letter, Frederick alleged that an inmate's death in November was
covered up. "They stressed him out so bad that the man passed away,"
Frederick wrote. His body was placed in a black bag, Frederick wrote, and
packed in ice for about 24 hours in a shower stall. Frederick alleged that
the death was never documented.
Prisoners were interrogated using physical coercion, Frederick wrote. One
prisoner with a broken arm was choked, he wrote, and dogs were used as
tools of intimidation. Prisoners were made to remain for as long as three
days in damp isolation cells without a toilet or running water, he wrote.
In addition to Frederick, criminal charges were filed against Spec. Megan
M. Ambuhl, Sgt. Javal S. Davis, Cpl. Charles A. Graner Jr., Spec. Sabrina
D. Harman and Spec. Jeremy C. Sivits, according to sealed charging papers
provided to The Washington Post.
The appointment of Fay came two days after the military announced that
another two-star general, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller, has taken over U.S.
military prisons in Iraq in the new position of deputy commander for
detainee operations.
Human rights workers in Iraq said the military has allowed only one group,
the International Committee of the Red Cross, to enter Abu Ghraib to
interview prisoners and inspect conditions. "One of the key problems is
that because we have not been given access by the military, we are not in a
position to judge how systematic and widespread these abuses are," said
Hania Mufti, a Human Rights Watch representative in Iraq.
Amon reported from Washington. Staff writers Dana Priest, Thomas E. Ricks
and Christian Davenport in Washington contributed to this report.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20040503/496a61d5/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list